The Left Loses Ground...

[PaintMyHouse]

Yea, if only liberals could embrace the right's bigotry, hate and dehumanizing...

You "claim" extremes" from both sides are the problem, but there is nothing the right can do or say that will draw your ire. No matter how vile, you attack people who find it appalling.

You spew talking points, if not for that, your mind would be completly empty.

I don't "spew" anything. Please tell me what would be taken from you by affording gays the same rights you enjoy?

They deserve equal rights, but not at the expense of the religious consciences of a Christian.

Get that through your thick head.

So granting equal rights to gays takes away your "conscience"?

Sexual deviants have the same rights as everyone else. Stripping marriage of the natural standards that define it, as a means to find 'legitimacy', is NOT a right common to sexual deviancy or anything else.

There is no "natural" standard for marriage. It's man-made. There's a "natural" standard for heterosexual fucking, which you here and there get a baby out of. Is that what you mean?

 

[TemplarKormac]

You and those like you are going to be nasty to those who disagree with you because that's just the way you are.

Which illustrates my point. I wouldn't expect you to change and become decent & civil. This is the way it's going to be.

.

Yea, if only liberals could embrace the right's bigotry, hate and dehumanizing...

You "claim" extremes" from both sides are the problem, but there is nothing the right can do or say that will draw your ire. No matter how vile, you attack people who find it appalling.

You spew talking points, if not for that, your mind would be completly empty.

I don't "spew" anything. Please tell me what would be taken from you by affording gays the same rights you enjoy?

They deserve equal rights, but not at the expense of the religious consciences of a Christian.

Get that through your thick head.

So granting equal rights to gays takes away your "conscience"?

No. Granting them equal rights at the expense of the freedom to practice ones faith in the business is pretty much unacceptable. If you want gays to have freedom to marry, you should be willing to grant those of faith the freedom not to recognize their marriage as legitimate, and perhaps to refuse to participate in something they find sinful. But hey, being a liberal means forcefully coercing others to tolerate gay marriage.

 

[TemplarKormac]

But in the public realm, there are laws against discrimination by business open to the public.

And? There is also the First Amendment to consider. Don't you think it odd that someone must give up their first Amendment rights to run a business?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

...my question regarding the predation of the sick, elderly or very young. This is most definitely part of nature.

So what separates humanity from the lower species who are sustained through the predation of the sick and weak?

Let me help ya through this... that would be the means to reason SOUNDLY... which is to say to reason OBJECTIVELY.

An example of that is found in the observed principles wherein we find "All men are created equal by God, thus all men are equally endowed with self-evident rights to their life..."

Now... Skylar, tell the board about the equal human rights to pursue the fulfillment of their life.

Let's assume for the sake of argument that I am a woman, steeped in dedication to whatever and I find myself having willfully engaged in coitus, which for some reason has resulted in a human life growing inside me... and to tell ya the truth... I'm sorta busy right now and the LAST thing I need is a kid.

From your point of view, what are my options?

(If you're too shy to get into this, I could easily go through the record of your daily drivel and cull from that, your well established position on this... and may still do so. I just thought I'd give you a chance to show the Reader, what a complete fuckin' idiot you truly are.)

What if you find an "already born" and they are hungry. Need help. Have been abused. Are sick. Do you only worry about the unborn? Once born, are they on their own?

We call that a non sequitur. It's a function of a perversion of human reasoning and common to the lowly idiots.

Being Hungry does not entitle you to someone else's food.

Being sick does not entitle you to someone else's medical services.

It is the duty of every free sovereign to defend the defenseless... as that is the responsibility that sustains the right to not be abused.

If one is hungry, they should do what they can to feed themselves through and as a consequence of the product of one's labor. The same goes for the sick.

Where such is impossible and one needs help, one should ask for it... and where you are among a Christian people, one will find help, for which one will be held to account; meaning that they will be helped as long as they need it and as long as they do everything that they can to help themselves.

All of which having absolutely NOTHING to do with a people who claim a RIGHT to murder the most innocent and defenseless of human life.

You wouldn't happen to be one of those who calls himself a Christian by chance? I'm just curious since what you said isn't what Jesus said.

LOL!

(Reader, kick your shoes off and rest up for a minute while I run this idiot off again. It won't take long.)

Now, PMS... pray tell, what have I ever said, that you'd like to show the Reader, is different from what Jesus said?

And please, be specific. At least as specific as your intellectual limitations allow.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

There is no "natural" standard for marriage.

False... LOL! And demonstrably so.

Nature designed humanity with two distinct, but complimenting genders... each respectively designed to join with the other, two physical bodies joined as one sustainable body.

Marriage is the legal extension of that; the human physiological design... OKA: The natural standard of Marriage.

 

[TemplarKormac]

You "claim" extremes" from both sides are the problem, but there is nothing the right can do or say that will draw your ire.

Oh, there are plenty of things the right do to draw my ire. For those reasons, I left the Republican party. Neither side is willing to express tolerance of the views of the other. But one thing the right has going for it is that it isn't as vicious as the left is. But I must point out that for you, nothing the left does draws your anger either.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

There is no "natural" standard for marriage.

False... LOL! And demonstrably so.

Nature designed humanity with two distinct, but complimenting genders... each respectively designed to join with the other, two physical bodies joined as one sustainable body.

Marriage is the legal extension of that; the human physiological design... OKA: The natural standard of Marriage.

Stop confusing marriage with fucking.

BTW, human reproduction gets a free ride on human fucking. That's why most fucking doesn't make babies, they're a byproduct.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

...my question regarding the predation of the sick, elderly or very young. This is most definitely part of nature.

So what separates humanity from the lower species who are sustained through the predation of the sick and weak?

Let me help ya through this... that would be the means to reason SOUNDLY... which is to say to reason OBJECTIVELY.

An example of that is found in the observed principles wherein we find "All men are created equal by God, thus all men are equally endowed with self-evident rights to their life..."

Now... Skylar, tell the board about the equal human rights to pursue the fulfillment of their life.

Let's assume for the sake of argument that I am a woman, steeped in dedication to whatever and I find myself having willfully engaged in coitus, which for some reason has resulted in a human life growing inside me... and to tell ya the truth... I'm sorta busy right now and the LAST thing I need is a kid.

From your point of view, what are my options?

(If you're too shy to get into this, I could easily go through the record of your daily drivel and cull from that, your well established position on this... and may still do so. I just thought I'd give you a chance to show the Reader, what a complete fuckin' idiot you truly are.)

What if you find an "already born" and they are hungry. Need help. Have been abused. Are sick. Do you only worry about the unborn? Once born, are they on their own?

We call that a non sequitur. It's a function of a perversion of human reasoning and common to the lowly idiots.

Being Hungry does not entitle you to someone else's food.

Being sick does not entitle you to someone else's medical services.

It is the duty of every free sovereign to defend the defenseless... as that is the responsibility that sustains the right to not be abused.

If one is hungry, they should do what they can to feed themselves through and as a consequence of the product of one's labor. The same goes for the sick.

Where such is impossible and one needs help, one should ask for it... and where you are among a Christian people, one will find help, for which one will be held to account; meaning that they will be helped as long as they need it and as long as they do everything that they can to help themselves.

All of which having absolutely NOTHING to do with a people who claim a RIGHT to murder the most innocent and defenseless of human life.

You wouldn't happen to be one of those who calls himself a Christian by chance? I'm just curious since what you said isn't what Jesus said.

LOL!

(Reader, kick your shoes off and rest up for a minute while I run this idiot off again. It won't take long.)

Now, PMS... pray tell, what have I ever said, that you'd like to show the Reader, is different from what Jesus said?

And please, be specific. At least as specific as your intellectual limitations allow.

Just the one post above will do nicely, and do you call yourself a Christian, yes or no?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

But in the public realm, there are laws against discrimination by business open to the public.

And? There is also the First Amendment to consider. Don't you think it odd that someone must give up their first Amendment rights to run a business?

No, and neither should you.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Stop confusing marriage with fucking.

LOL! And in that, we find yet another presentation of the mental disorder that presents sexual deviancy. See how that works, reader?

Once again Paint, you've managed to demonstrate the profound limitations of your pitiful intellect.

There is no separating marriage from procreation... and that the culture allows a man and a woman who are either incapable of or uninterested in procreation to marry, in NO WAY, alters that fact.

Absent such, there is no purpose for marriage and certainly no reason to offer tax incentives or any other benefit as a consequence of marriage.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Just the one post above will do nicely, and do you call yourself a Christian, yes or no?

WOW~ That is truly SOME SERIOUS intellectual limitation you're saddled with there.

Your concession is AGAIN... Duly noted and summarily accepted.

(ROFL! Told ya it would take long Reader.)

 

[Bfgrn]

Thanks for proving my point...it is ALWAYS the left you attack, no matter how vile the right gets, you are blind to it...

The converse is also true for you. No matter how vile the left is, you are blinded by it.

You hypocrite.

Yea, all liberals have to do is embrace the right's bigotry, hate and dehumanizing...

From where I stand, I see that they already have. You in particular. You engage in bigotry against Christians, call them hateful for having a distaste for gay marriage, randomly start quoting cherrypicked bible verses that supposedly support gay marriage, and dehumanize anyone who speaks out against it.

So how are you tolerant when you are only willing to grant it to homosexuals and not Christians? Tolerance is the willingness to accept that other people hold different views from you, without compromisig your own. What liberals like you demonstrate is nothing close to tolerance.

You can "hold" any view you wish. And no one is forced to invite gays into their home. But in the public realm, there are laws against discrimination by business open to the public.

Yes... there are laws against irrationally discriminating against people who are a different color, gender or who are disadvantaged because their physical circumstances... but none of THAT is relevant where the issue is BEHAVIOR!

I am not obligated to accept your behavior, because your behavior is common to a minority.

The notion that you're entitled to force others to accept your behavior is foolish beyond measure.

What "behavior"? There are also laws against public lewdness.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The converse is also true for you. No matter how vile the left is, you are blinded by it.

You hypocrite.

Yea, all liberals have to do is embrace the right's bigotry, hate and dehumanizing...

From where I stand, I see that they already have. You in particular. You engage in bigotry against Christians, call them hateful for having a distaste for gay marriage, randomly start quoting cherrypicked bible verses that supposedly support gay marriage, and dehumanize anyone who speaks out against it.

So how are you tolerant when you are only willing to grant it to homosexuals and not Christians? Tolerance is the willingness to accept that other people hold different views from you, without compromisig your own. What liberals like you demonstrate is nothing close to tolerance.

You can "hold" any view you wish. And no one is forced to invite gays into their home. But in the public realm, there are laws against discrimination by business open to the public.

Yes... there are laws against irrationally discriminating against people who are a different color, gender or who are disadvantaged because their physical circumstances... but none of THAT is relevant where the issue is BEHAVIOR!

I am not obligated to accept your behavior, because your behavior is common to a minority.

The notion that you're entitled to force others to accept your behavior is foolish beyond measure.

What "behavior"? There are also laws against public lewdness.

Sexual Deviancy, a presentation of mental disorder... and more specifically, the behavior that seeks to normalize that mental disorder that presents with that behavior.

 

[Bfgrn]

The hardcore Left doesn't even realize how nasty and intolerant it has become.

Yea, we are intolerant of bigotry, hate and dehumanizing by the right.

Gee, maybe if liberals starting using words like "faggots" "towel-heads" and "monkeys" we would be accepted by frauds like you?

So now I'm a fraud. Amazing how many of my posts you must "not see", those with which you agree.

You're hateful, intolerant and nasty, and you prove my point constantly.

.

Yes, you are a fraud. You constantly focus your attacks on liberals. There isn't anything the right says that you criticize.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The hardcore Left doesn't even realize how nasty and intolerant it has become.

Yea, we are intolerant of bigotry, hate and dehumanizing by the right.

Gee, maybe if liberals starting using words like "faggots" "towel-heads" and "monkeys" we would be accepted by frauds like you?

So now I'm a fraud. Amazing how many of my posts you must "not see", those with which you agree.

You're hateful, intolerant and nasty, and you prove my point constantly.

.

Yes, you are a fraud. You constantly focus your attacks on liberals. There isn't anything the right says that you criticize.

What does "The Right" say that you feel should be criticized?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Yea, all liberals have to do is embrace the right's bigotry, hate and dehumanizing...

From where I stand, I see that they already have. You in particular. You engage in bigotry against Christians, call them hateful for having a distaste for gay marriage, randomly start quoting cherrypicked bible verses that supposedly support gay marriage, and dehumanize anyone who speaks out against it.

So how are you tolerant when you are only willing to grant it to homosexuals and not Christians? Tolerance is the willingness to accept that other people hold different views from you, without compromisig your own. What liberals like you demonstrate is nothing close to tolerance.

You can "hold" any view you wish. And no one is forced to invite gays into their home. But in the public realm, there are laws against discrimination by business open to the public.

Yes... there are laws against irrationally discriminating against people who are a different color, gender or who are disadvantaged because their physical circumstances... but none of THAT is relevant where the issue is BEHAVIOR!

I am not obligated to accept your behavior, because your behavior is common to a minority.

The notion that you're entitled to force others to accept your behavior is foolish beyond measure.

What "behavior"? There are also laws against public lewdness.

Sexual Deviancy, a presentation of mental disorder... and more specifically, the behavior that seeks to normalize that mental disorder that presents with that behavior.

Isn't celibacy a mental disorder, using your standards? Wouldn't the species disappear if everyone was celibate?

 

[Bfgrn]

Yea, all liberals have to do is embrace the right's bigotry, hate and dehumanizing...

From where I stand, I see that they already have. You in particular. You engage in bigotry against Christians, call them hateful for having a distaste for gay marriage, randomly start quoting cherrypicked bible verses that supposedly support gay marriage, and dehumanize anyone who speaks out against it.

So how are you tolerant when you are only willing to grant it to homosexuals and not Christians? Tolerance is the willingness to accept that other people hold different views from you, without compromisig your own. What liberals like you demonstrate is nothing close to tolerance.

You can "hold" any view you wish. And no one is forced to invite gays into their home. But in the public realm, there are laws against discrimination by business open to the public.

Yes... there are laws against irrationally discriminating against people who are a different color, gender or who are disadvantaged because their physical circumstances... but none of THAT is relevant where the issue is BEHAVIOR!

I am not obligated to accept your behavior, because your behavior is common to a minority.

The notion that you're entitled to force others to accept your behavior is foolish beyond measure.

What "behavior"? There are also laws against public lewdness.

Sexual Deviancy, a presentation of mental disorder... and more specifically, the behavior that seeks to normalize that mental disorder that presents with that behavior.

"deviancy"? You are the one who talks about the laws of nature...in nature...

1,500 animal species practice homosexuality

 

[Mac1958]

The hardcore Left doesn't even realize how nasty and intolerant it has become.

Yea, we are intolerant of bigotry, hate and dehumanizing by the right.

Gee, maybe if liberals starting using words like "faggots" "towel-heads" and "monkeys" we would be accepted by frauds like you?

So now I'm a fraud. Amazing how many of my posts you must "not see", those with which you agree.

You're hateful, intolerant and nasty, and you prove my point constantly.

.

Yes, you are a fraud. You constantly focus your attacks on liberals. There isn't anything the right says that you criticize.

Your partisanship has completely blinded you.

Not my problem.

.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Stop confusing marriage with fucking.

LOL! And in that, we find yet another presentation of the mental disorder that presents sexual deviancy. See how that works, reader?

Once again Paint, you've managed to demonstrate the profound limitations of your pitiful intellect.

There is no separating marriage from procreation... and that the culture allows a man and a woman who are either incapable of or uninterested in procreation to marry, in NO WAY, alters that fact.

Absent such, there is no purpose for marriage and certainly no reason to offer tax incentives or any other benefit as a consequence of marriage.

You're admitting that marriage and procreation are separated by pointing out that 'the culture' allows marriage without procreation.

That includes all predominantly Christian cultures, correct me if I'm wrong.

 

[Skylar]

You spew talking points, if not for that, your mind would be completly empty.

I don't "spew" anything. Please tell me what would be taken from you by affording gays the same rights you enjoy?

They deserve equal rights, but not at the expense of the religious consciences of a Christian.

Get that through your thick head.

So granting equal rights to gays takes away your "conscience"?

Sexual deviants have the same rights as everyone else. Stripping marriage of the natural standards that define it, as a means to find 'legitimacy', is NOT a right common to sexual deviancy or anything else.

There is no "natural" standard for marriage. It's man-made. There's a "natural" standard for heterosexual fucking, which you here and there get a baby out of. Is that what you mean?

Exactly. Marriage and fucking aren't the same thing. Neither requires the other. And marriage is completely our invention. it is what we say it is.

All this 'natural law of marriage' bullshit is just the same made up nonsense that Keys always does. Where he offers his subjective opinion, labels it, then insists that the new label makes his opinion 'objective truth'.

Sigh....nope.