emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
- Jan 21, 2010
- 23,669
- 4,181
When will you people stop digging?
*Sheesh!!*
![]()
Dear MarcATL as I tried to warn of this before,
when Obama's administration pushed the whole "health care as a right"
through govt, this insistence on using govt to ESTABLISH A BELIEF,
despite opposition arguments to respect "freedom of choice" in health care,
OPENED THE DOOR for "right to life" to push THOSE BELIEFS through govt.
If you open the door for one political belief or creed to be
forced through by "majority rule" at the expense and exclusion of OTHER beliefs,
then what's to stop ANOTHER group or belief from being railroaded through by majority?
Democrats did this to themselves.
To argue this establishment of biased beliefs through Govt is unconstitutional,
we should admit the same went wrong with ACA being unconstitutional as well.
I look forward to the day leaders of both parties can admit that
in both cases of abusing govt to establish beliefs at the expense of others
is unconstitutional, and neither side agrees when such legislation violates their own beliefs and creeds.
First the bill that legalized abortion up to the point of birth
(which violates prolife BELIEFS of citizens the state is supposed to represent EQUALLY and INCLUSIVELY)
then this bill and others banning abortion
(which also discriminates against citizens of opposing BELIEFS against criminalizing women for abortion).
It should be obvious that any such laws passed that discriminate against
citizens of the opposite creed are unconstitutional, and consensus based
legislation would be required in order to treat, include, and represent people equally regardless of creed.