The Right Wing had better be right about this "Deep State" stuff.

[Correll]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

They're not. A court ordered investigation is not spying.

Neither is Constitutionally mandated Congressional oversight.

Putting the national security of the United States in jeopardy by exposing operatives and methods IS treason.

Barr and Trump better tread lightly. There is no statute of limitations on treason.

Wrong on many counts.

A court ordered the spying, but it was just legal spying.

We are now waiting to see if that court order was obtained legally or not. Did Team Hillary lie to the court? It appears yes. That’s a felony.

Was obtained legally or not?

WTF?
They applied for and received a court order allowing surveillance. Not once but four times. That is the legal process.

Based on known bullshit. That is not legal. That is illegal.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

They're not. A court ordered investigation is not spying.

Neither is Constitutionally mandated Congressional oversight.

Putting the national security of the United States in jeopardy by exposing operatives and methods IS treason.

Barr and Trump better tread lightly. There is no statute of limitations on treason.

Courts don't order investigations. They approve certain means of gathering evidence. Prosecutors and law enforcement initiate investigations.

.

A warrant is a court order, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

They're not. A court ordered investigation is not spying.

Neither is Constitutionally mandated Congressional oversight.

Putting the national security of the United States in jeopardy by exposing operatives and methods IS treason.

Barr and Trump better tread lightly. There is no statute of limitations on treason.

Wrong on many counts.

A court ordered the spying, but it was just legal spying.

We are now waiting to see if that court order was obtained legally or not. Did Team Hillary lie to the court? It appears yes. That’s a felony.

Was obtained legally or not?

WTF?
They applied for and received a court order allowing surveillance. Not once but four times. That is the legal process.

Based on known bullshit. That is not legal. That is illegal.

What "known bullshit"?

 

[Correll]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

They're not. A court ordered investigation is not spying.

Neither is Constitutionally mandated Congressional oversight.

Putting the national security of the United States in jeopardy by exposing operatives and methods IS treason.

Barr and Trump better tread lightly. There is no statute of limitations on treason.

Wrong on many counts.

A court ordered the spying, but it was just legal spying.

We are now waiting to see if that court order was obtained legally or not. Did Team Hillary lie to the court? It appears yes. That’s a felony.

Was obtained legally or not?

WTF?
They applied for and received a court order allowing surveillance. Not once but four times. That is the legal process.

Based on known bullshit. That is not legal. That is illegal.

What "known bullshit"?

The Steele Dossier. Known to be bullshit.

 

[Mac1958]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

I don't think they are going to have any problem proving that this happened. Unless the Doj deleted all the evidence when they busted up the cell phone that page and her buddy were using.

From what I'm hearing from the Right, the "evidence" to which they refer is clear, provable and unassailable. If that's the case, you're right.

Meanwhile, the Left is rolling their eyes and smirking. So we'll see.
.

Better get on the correct, and legal side of this one Mac. People like YOU could actually help lead the moderate Democrats back to prominence, once all the far Leftists are laughed out of political relevance.

Wish me luck.
.

 

[Mac1958]

If it turns out that the spying and the investigation was a partisan and corrupt as "the right wing" says, do you agree that it would be right for the nation if the people responsible were held accountable?

Of course.
.

 

[Correll]

If it turns out that the spying and the investigation was a partisan and corrupt as "the right wing" says, do you agree that it would be right for the nation if the people responsible were held accountable?

Of course.
.

Good. THAT is something to build on.

 

[Uncensored2008]

{During an appearance on Fox News earlier this week, Republican Congressman Mark Meadows laid down the timeline for when declassified documents about the FBI's spying during the 2016 presidential campaign will be released for public consumption.

"I can tell you, there's information coming that will curl your hair. I can tell you that the reason why it's so visceral - the response from the Democrats is so visceral right now is because they know - they've seen documents. Adam Schiff has seen documents that he knows will actually put the finger pointing back at him and his Democrat colleagues, not the President of the United States," Meadows said. "We're talking about days, not weeks. So very soon."}

Mark Meadows: We're Going to See 'Hair Curling' Declassified Info on the FBI's Spying...Within Days

Insane poster, we've been hearing that for two years now.

No, fucking liar - what we have heard for two years is RUSSIAN COLLUSION.

But there was no "collusion," fucking liar.

{
The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.

Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section IV above.

}

Still you lie - and now that REAL LAW is turning on you, the frequency of your lies becomes more shrill.

So lie some more, fucking liar - no doubt reality will change to support your lies.

Insane poster.... yes, we've been hearing about it. Your delusions don't actually make reality go away.

Rep. Gaetz: People "Will Go To Jail" Over FISA Memo, Democrats "Afraid" To Release Info

Rep. Gaetz wouldn't necessarily know that, but President Trump and Mr. Barr certainly are in a position to have that opinion.

Trump is in charge, he has all of the papers in front of him. He knows what they are already, before they are declassified.

If Trump says people are going to jail, they likely will be.

If I were advising Comey, McCabe, Clapper, Brennan et al, I'd tell them not to be surprised by a 4 a.m. wakeup call someday soon.

Gaetz knows, he has seen the documents behind the Nunes memo, which is why the Communists are in full panic. Where Fawn was lying, because sociopath Fawn ALWAYS lies, is in the timeline. That is from late 2018, not from 2016.

The problem the Marxists have is that they didn't JUST cook up a wild and absurd conspiracy theory, they criminally acted to provide veracity to their conspiracy theory. Obama used the CIA to engage foreign spies to dig up or fabricate dirt on the opposition candidate for Fusion GPS, a DNC hit squad. Obama placed Bruce Ohr in a top position of a task force to take out Candidate Trump, Ohr worked with the most corrupt AG in history, "Airport Sally" Loretta Lynch.

While Grand Inquisitor Mewler-Torquemada could find no evidence of conspiracy or "collusion" with the Trump team,, the conspiracy between the Obama DOJ, the CIA, Fusion GPS, British Intelligence, Australian intelligence and Russian operatives is fully proven.

This is the biggest scandal in American history. This kind of shit that Obama pulled destroys a nation.

 

[Uncensored2008]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

I don't think they are going to have any problem proving that this happened. Unless the Doj deleted all the evidence when they busted up the cell phone that page and her buddy were using.

The DOJ destroyed mountains of evidence once the unthinkable happened, but it was too late to get it all. In their ARROGANCE the deep state never imagined Trump would actually win - the fix was in so that wasn't a possibility. But then it did, and they had been SLOPPY, left evidence EVERYWHERE.

 

[Uncensored2008]

"Comey signed a FISA warrant application which included the Steele dossier, saying it was verified and less than 2 weeks later told Trump it was salacious and unverified."

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

No, ya lyin' pos, Comey never said the dossier was "salacious and unverified." He said, "some personally sensitive aspects," of it were. Which we came to learn he was talking about the portion of the dossier claiming trump paid prostitutes to perform a golden shower.

So you don't pay attention AND you lie. That makes you a typical conservative.

Describing his first meeting with then-President-Elect Trump, Comey says the Intelligence Community (IC) was aware that media possessed unverified material they would imminently report – even though it was “salacious and unverified.”
<<snip>>

“The IC leadership thought it important, for a variety of reasons, to alert the incoming President to the existence of this material, even though it was salacious and unverified. Among those reasons were: (1) we knew the media was about to publicly report the material and we believed the IC should not keep knowledge of the material and its imminent release from the President-Elect; and (2) to the extent there was some effort to compromise an incoming President, we could blunt any such effort with a defensive briefing.”

Comey: ‘Even Though It Was Salacious and Unverified…We Knew Media Was About to Publicly Report’

Carry on commie. LMAO


.

You lying idiot, I just posted that first meeting. And unlike you, I quoted Comey in context. He never said the entire dossier was "salacious and unverified." The parts he said were salacious and unverified were "some personally sensitive aspects."

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

So you're saying Comey lied to congress?

.

LOLOL

No, I'm saying you're an idiot and a liar

Shit, your own link quoted Comey saying...

"At the conclusion of that briefing, I remained alone with the President-Elect to brief him on some personally sensitive aspects of the information assembled during the assessment."​

... now while rightard cultists will try to spin Comey's words into claiming he said all of the dossier was "salacious and unverified," we see he actually said only "some" of it was. And anyone with a functioning brain, which evidently leaves you out, knows "some" is not "all."

Well asshole, he told the FISA court that the dossier was verified, every page had verified stamped at the top of the page. He lied to the court. And as a typical commie you want to play semantics and take shit out of context.

.

Fawn and the other Stalinists think that if they just lie hard enough they can change reality.

 

[Tehon]

There is no doubt you're full of shit. There is no Deep State. That's a lie Putin tells Trump and you believe it.

Lol
You obviously don’t understand, high-level civilian employees make up the deep state/swamp exclusively

Trump is part of the deep state.

I don’t think so. If he were, why do they want him removed?

Now it could be Trump wants to be a member of the Deep State, but they don’t want him.

It no longer appears to me that they want him removed.

Why would they? He is trying to silence the watchdog independent media and overseeing the business. He is no different than Obama in this regard.

Trump bypasses Congress to sell bombs to Gulf states

The ONLY thing the corrupt shadow government wants is to get rid of Trump.

And where is this independent media? You mean Breitbart? The corporate DNC propaganda corps you cited are part of the deep state, a VITAL part.

Breitbart Give me a break.

If you can find anything false in the story I linked to, then point it out. Otherwise we will assume it to be factual.

 

[Tehon]

There is no doubt you're full of shit. There is no Deep State. That's a lie Putin tells Trump and you believe it.

Lol
You obviously don’t understand, high-level civilian employees make up the deep state/swamp exclusively

Trump is part of the deep state.

Dumbest post you've ever made.

We'll see.

Go ahead and rely on the corporate DNC run media to tell you the truthyness....

Truth just isn't part of their job;

{“Now ladies and gentlemen, the New York Times’ coverage of the Holocaust wasn’t inadequate; it was criminal. It was unconscionable. Apparently, for Annalisa Quinn, the Holocaust was no big deal. The Third Reich was no big deal. Anything in defense of the New York Times. Anything in defense of progressivism. Anything in defense of social activism, for fundamental transformation. It doesn’t matter. And you and I are subsidizing this woman, in part: She writes for National Public Radio. … When you all but cover up what took place in the Holocaust, and the extermination of six million Jews, that’s not ‘inadequate coverage’; that’s an abomination.”}

Levin: 'When you all but cover up' the Holocaust, 'that's not "inadequate coverage"; that's an abomination'

I do not rely on the corporate media. I read people who hold the corporate media accountable.

 

[SAYIT]

absolutely.....go far right enough, and you'll end up on the left
~S~

Or go far enough left and you'll end up on the right and as Mac noted, the R/L extremes have way more in common with each other than they with rational people.

Which may explain National Socialism. ​

 

[Weatherman2020]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

They're not. A court ordered investigation is not spying.

Neither is Constitutionally mandated Congressional oversight.

Putting the national security of the United States in jeopardy by exposing operatives and methods IS treason.

Barr and Trump better tread lightly. There is no statute of limitations on treason.

Wrong on many counts.

A court ordered the spying, but it was just legal spying.

We are now waiting to see if that court order was obtained legally or not. Did Team Hillary lie to the court? It appears yes. That’s a felony.

Was obtained legally or not?

WTF?
They applied for and received a court order allowing surveillance. Not once but four times. That is the legal process.

All indications are the court order to spy on our President was obtained illegally. The court was lied to.
That’s a felony.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Want to know an even BETTER question Correll?

Will the moderate Democrats (those that self identify on this board, and I think there may be 4) INSIST that people like Adam Shiff, Nancy Pelosi, and that dummy from California,(who's name escapes me at the moment) all MUST resign from congress after PROMISING that they had the goods to prove the HOAX was true!

Not to be picky, but both Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schitt are from California, and both are dummies.

I'm just saying. (The other one might be Kamala Harris.)

 

[Uncensored2008]

So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

They're not. A court ordered investigation is not spying.

Neither is Constitutionally mandated Congressional oversight.

Putting the national security of the United States in jeopardy by exposing operatives and methods IS treason.

Barr and Trump better tread lightly. There is no statute of limitations on treason.

Courts don't order investigations. They approve certain means of gathering evidence. Prosecutors and law enforcement initiate investigations.

.

A warrant is a court order, dope.

A falsified warrant application is "perjury," retard.

 

[SAYIT]

...We are now waiting to see if that court order was obtained legally or not. Did Team Hillary lie to the court?...

Was obtained legally or not? WTF? They applied for and received a court order allowing surveillance. Not once but four times. That is the legal process.

You seem very concerned that some bad players may be exposed, their crimes made public, and financially ruined.

I don't recall you expressing any concern or remorse for those whose lives Mueller already ruined.

 

[Mac1958]

absolutely.....go far right enough, and you'll end up on the left

...go far enough left and you'll end up on the right and as Mac noted, the R/L extremes have way more in common with each other than they with rational people.

The Horseshoe Theory Says Right And Left Wing Are More Similar Than You Think

 

[imawhosure]

Want to know an even BETTER question Correll?

Will the moderate Democrats (those that self identify on this board, and I think there may be 4) INSIST that people like Adam Shiff, Nancy Pelosi, and that dummy from California,(who's name escapes me at the moment) all MUST resign from congress after PROMISING that they had the goods to prove the HOAX was true!

Not to be picky, but both Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schitt are from California, and both are dummies.

I'm just saying. (The other one might be Kamala Harris.)

LOL, you are correct, but I was referring to that phony baloney congress critter running for President. For some reason, his name escapes me, but I know his face, and his arrogant attitude-)

 

[Uncensored2008]

Lol
You obviously don’t understand, high-level civilian employees make up the deep state/swamp exclusively

Trump is part of the deep state.

I don’t think so. If he were, why do they want him removed?

Now it could be Trump wants to be a member of the Deep State, but they don’t want him.

It no longer appears to me that they want him removed.

Why would they? He is trying to silence the watchdog independent media and overseeing the business. He is no different than Obama in this regard.

Trump bypasses Congress to sell bombs to Gulf states

The ONLY thing the corrupt shadow government wants is to get rid of Trump.

And where is this independent media? You mean Breitbart? The corporate DNC propaganda corps you cited are part of the deep state, a VITAL part.

Breitbart Give me a break.

If you can find anything false in the story I linked to, then point it out. Otherwise we will assume it to be factual.

The challenge when linking to MSNBC is finding anything TRUE in their stories.

But seriously, you think the corporate DNC controlled media is "independent?"