The Right Wing had better be right about this "Deep State" stuff.

There is no doubt the Deep State exists. It has been in place for decades. However I would question just about anything promoted by Hannity and Levin. Partisans of either party canā€™t be trusted.

There is no doubt you're full of shit. There is no Deep State. That's a lie Putin tells Trump and you believe it.
Lol
You obviously donā€™t understand, high-level civilian employees make up the deep state/swamp exclusively
Trump is part of the deep state.
I donā€™t think so. If he were, why do they want him removed?

Now it could be Trump wants to be a member of the Deep State, but they donā€™t want him.

They've already committed themselves to the "Drumpf is a russian puppet" narrative. To stop now would be too obvious, even to the dumb American public.
That is part of the kabuki theater. It gives the impression of a resistance. It is all style and no substance.

It's like the public rift between Obama and Netanyahu. Behind the scenes Obama was funneling record amounts of money to Israel.
 
So where did that nasty crap come from?
Don't know.
Of course. You probably do know, and you don't care. That's why you're the problem in our politics.
Oh? You know where it came from??
Yep.
Oh? Who said it?


DERP

{
Rtskhiladzeā€™s description of the tapesā€™ content tracks with the unverified information included in the Steele dossier, which claimed that Trump watched Russian prostitutes urinate in a Moscow hotel room in 2013. ā€œRtskhiladze said ā€˜tapesā€™ referred to compromising tapes of Trump rumored to be held by persons associated with the Russian real estate conglomerate Crocus Group, which had helped host the 2013 Miss Universe Pageant in Russia.ā€

The Crocus Groupā€™s president is Aras Agalarov. It was Agalarovā€™s son, the Russian pop star Emin Agalarov, who brokered the June 9th, 2016 Trump Tower meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a Kremlin-linked lawyer, who promised to deliver ā€œofficial documents and information that would incriminate Hillary.ā€}

Hereā€™s What the Mueller Report Says About the Pee Tape ā€“ Rolling Stone

You full on insane; pathological fucking liar.
 
There is no doubt the Deep State exists. It has been in place for decades. However I would question just about anything promoted by Hannity and Levin. Partisans of either party canā€™t be trusted.

There is no doubt you're full of shit. There is no Deep State. That's a lie Putin tells Trump and you believe it.
Lol
You obviously donā€™t understand, high-level civilian employees make up the deep state/swamp exclusively
Trump is part of the deep state.
:lmao:

Dumbest post you've ever made.
We'll see.
 

{During an appearance on Fox News earlier this week, Republican Congressman Mark Meadows laid down the timeline for when declassified documents about the FBI's spying during the 2016 presidential campaign will be released for public consumption.

"I can tell you, there's information coming that will curl your hair. I can tell you that the reason why it's so visceral - the response from the Democrats is so visceral right now is because they know - they've seen documents. Adam Schiff has seen documents that he knows will actually put the finger pointing back at him and his Democrat colleagues, not the President of the United States," Meadows said. "We're talking about days, not weeks. So very soon."}

Mark Meadows: We're Going to See 'Hair Curling' Declassified Info on the FBI's Spying...Within Days
Insane poster, we've been hearing that for two years now.

No, fucking liar - what we have heard for two years is RUSSIAN COLLUSION.

But there was no "collusion," fucking liar.

{
The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.

Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section IV above.

}

Still you lie - and now that REAL LAW is turning on you, the frequency of your lies becomes more shrill.

So lie some more, fucking liar - no doubt reality will change to support your lies.

russian-collusion-iz-2-reel.jpg
Faun is typical of the leftist lying trash that hates America.
How fortunate am I you're nothing but a slobbering imbecile?

DERP

Pathological lying fuck.

{
The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.

Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section IV above.

}
 
If that is an example of the best lies you Stalinists can come up with - you fuckers are toast. :thup:
:lmao:

{During an appearance on Fox News earlier this week, Republican Congressman Mark Meadows laid down the timeline for when declassified documents about the FBI's spying during the 2016 presidential campaign will be released for public consumption.

"I can tell you, there's information coming that will curl your hair. I can tell you that the reason why it's so visceral - the response from the Democrats is so visceral right now is because they know - they've seen documents. Adam Schiff has seen documents that he knows will actually put the finger pointing back at him and his Democrat colleagues, not the President of the United States," Meadows said. "We're talking about days, not weeks. So very soon."}

Mark Meadows: We're Going to See 'Hair Curling' Declassified Info on the FBI's Spying...Within Days
Insane poster, we've been hearing that for two years now.

No, fucking liar - what we have heard for two years is RUSSIAN COLLUSION.

But there was no "collusion," fucking liar.

{
The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.

Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section IV above.

}

Still you lie - and now that REAL LAW is turning on you, the frequency of your lies becomes more shrill.

So lie some more, fucking liar - no doubt reality will change to support your lies.

russian-collusion-iz-2-reel.jpg
Insane poster.... yes, we've been hearing about it. Your delusions don't actually make reality go away.

Rep. Gaetz: People "Will Go To Jail" Over FISA Memo, Democrats "Afraid" To Release Info



Rep. Gaetz wouldn't necessarily know that, but President Trump and Mr. Barr certainly are in a position to have that opinion.

Trump is in charge, he has all of the papers in front of him. He knows what they are already, before they are declassified.

If Trump says people are going to jail, they likely will be.

If I were advising Comey, McCabe, Clapper, Brennan et al, I'd tell them not to be surprised by a 4 a.m. wakeup call someday soon.
 
So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.
I don't think they are going to have any problem proving that this happened. Unless the Doj deleted all the evidence when they busted up the cell phone that page and her buddy were using.
 

{During an appearance on Fox News earlier this week, Republican Congressman Mark Meadows laid down the timeline for when declassified documents about the FBI's spying during the 2016 presidential campaign will be released for public consumption.

"I can tell you, there's information coming that will curl your hair. I can tell you that the reason why it's so visceral - the response from the Democrats is so visceral right now is because they know - they've seen documents. Adam Schiff has seen documents that he knows will actually put the finger pointing back at him and his Democrat colleagues, not the President of the United States," Meadows said. "We're talking about days, not weeks. So very soon."}

Mark Meadows: We're Going to See 'Hair Curling' Declassified Info on the FBI's Spying...Within Days
Insane poster, we've been hearing that for two years now.

No, fucking liar - what we have heard for two years is RUSSIAN COLLUSION.

But there was no "collusion," fucking liar.

{
The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.

Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section IV above.

}

Still you lie - and now that REAL LAW is turning on you, the frequency of your lies becomes more shrill.

So lie some more, fucking liar - no doubt reality will change to support your lies.

russian-collusion-iz-2-reel.jpg
Faun is typical of the leftist lying trash that hates America.
How fortunate am I you're nothing but a slobbering imbecile?
Poor pitiful creature. You're in a lot of pain, huh.
 
Considering everything is based on sworn congressional testimony and peoples actions, it would be hard to prove it a fantasy. The only question is was it due to nefarious intent or was it justified. Comey signed a FISA warrant application which included the Steele dossier, saying it was verified and less than 2 weeks later told Trump it was salacious and unverified. McCabe told congress, without the dossier there would have been no FISA warrant. Steele told a British court that the dossier was raw intelligence and was unverified. This isn't rocket science.

.
"Comey signed a FISA warrant application which included the Steele dossier, saying it was verified and less than 2 weeks later told Trump it was salacious and unverified."

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

No, ya lyin' pos, Comey never said the dossier was "salacious and unverified." He said, "some personally sensitive aspects," of it were. Which we came to learn he was talking about the portion of the dossier claiming trump paid prostitutes to perform a golden shower.

So you don't pay attention AND you lie. That makes you a typical conservative.


Describing his first meeting with then-President-Elect Trump, Comey says the Intelligence Community (IC) was aware that media possessed unverified material they would imminently report ā€“ even though it was ā€œsalacious and unverified.ā€
<<snip>>

ā€œThe IC leadership thought it important, for a variety of reasons, to alert the incoming President to the existence of this material, even though it was salacious and unverified. Among those reasons were: (1) we knew the media was about to publicly report the material and we believed the IC should not keep knowledge of the material and its imminent release from the President-Elect; and (2) to the extent there was some effort to compromise an incoming President, we could blunt any such effort with a defensive briefing.ā€

Comey: ā€˜Even Though It Was Salacious and Unverifiedā€¦We Knew Media Was About to Publicly Reportā€™

Carry on commie. LMAO


.
You lying idiot, I just posted that first meeting. And unlike you, I quoted Comey in context. He never said the entire dossier was "salacious and unverified." The parts he said were salacious and unverified were "some personally sensitive aspects."

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.


So you're saying Comey lied to congress?

.
LOLOL

No, I'm saying you're an idiot and a liar

Shit, your own link quoted Comey saying...

"At the conclusion of that briefing, I remained alone with the President-Elect to brief him on some personally sensitive aspects of the information assembled during the assessment."

... now while rightard cultists will try to spin Comey's words into claiming he said all of the dossier was "salacious and unverified," we see he actually said only "some" of it was. And anyone with a functioning brain, which evidently leaves you out, knows "some" is not "all."



Well asshole, he told the FISA court that the dossier was verified, every page had verified stamped at the top of the page. He lied to the court. And as a typical commie you want to play semantics and take shit out of context.

.
 
Last edited:
So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.
I don't think they are going to have any problem proving that this happened. Unless the Doj deleted all the evidence when they busted up the cell phone that page and her buddy were using.
From what I'm hearing from the Right, the "evidence" to which they refer is clear, provable and unassailable. If that's the case, you're right.

Meanwhile, the Left is rolling their eyes and smirking. So we'll see.
.
 
What concerns me as much as anything on this, is that if (bolded, underlined) this is found to be largely fantasy, it won't matter. The response from the Right will be that the Deep State was able to cover it up, or something like that.


That sounds a lot like what the Tards have done with Russia and Trump......

We all know what the Tards did and now it's time to pay for their evil deeds...
 
What concerns me as much as anything on this, is that if (bolded, underlined) this is found to be largely fantasy, it won't matter. The response from the Right will be that the Deep State was able to cover it up, or something like that.
That sounds a lot like what the Tards have done with Russia and Trump......
We all know what the Tards did and now it's time to pay for their evil deeds...
Yes, the two ends can be incredibly and comically similar in their behaviors.
.
 
If that is an example of the best lies you Stalinists can come up with - you fuckers are toast. :thup:
:lmao:

{During an appearance on Fox News earlier this week, Republican Congressman Mark Meadows laid down the timeline for when declassified documents about the FBI's spying during the 2016 presidential campaign will be released for public consumption.

"I can tell you, there's information coming that will curl your hair. I can tell you that the reason why it's so visceral - the response from the Democrats is so visceral right now is because they know - they've seen documents. Adam Schiff has seen documents that he knows will actually put the finger pointing back at him and his Democrat colleagues, not the President of the United States," Meadows said. "We're talking about days, not weeks. So very soon."}

Mark Meadows: We're Going to See 'Hair Curling' Declassified Info on the FBI's Spying...Within Days
Insane poster, we've been hearing that for two years now.

No, fucking liar - what we have heard for two years is RUSSIAN COLLUSION.

But there was no "collusion," fucking liar.

{
The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.

Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section IV above.

}

Still you lie - and now that REAL LAW is turning on you, the frequency of your lies becomes more shrill.

So lie some more, fucking liar - no doubt reality will change to support your lies.

russian-collusion-iz-2-reel.jpg
Insane poster.... yes, we've been hearing about it. Your delusions don't actually make reality go away.

Rep. Gaetz: People "Will Go To Jail" Over FISA Memo, Democrats "Afraid" To Release Info

Yes shit head liar, that is from 9 months ago, when your crimes had started to unravel.

As long as Sessions was AG, the corrupt dims were safe, Sessions was one of yours, an insider. Barr is clearly an outsider willing to put the crooks in prison, which is why you're panicking, and you're right to panic.
 
There is no doubt the Deep State exists. It has been in place for decades. However I would question just about anything promoted by Hannity and Levin. Partisans of either party canā€™t be trusted.

There is no doubt you're full of shit. There is no Deep State. That's a lie Putin tells Trump and you believe it.
Lol
You obviously donā€™t understand, high-level civilian employees make up the deep state/swamp exclusively
Trump is part of the deep state.
I donā€™t think so. If he were, why do they want him removed?

Now it could be Trump wants to be a member of the Deep State, but they donā€™t want him.
It no longer appears to me that they want him removed.

Why would they? He is trying to silence the watchdog independent media and overseeing the business. He is no different than Obama in this regard.

Trump bypasses Congress to sell bombs to Gulf states

The ONLY thing the corrupt shadow government wants is to get rid of Trump.

And where is this independent media? You mean Breitbart? The corporate DNC propaganda corps you cited are part of the deep state, a VITAL part.
 
There is no doubt the Deep State exists. It has been in place for decades. However I would question just about anything promoted by Hannity and Levin. Partisans of either party canā€™t be trusted.

There is no doubt you're full of shit. There is no Deep State. That's a lie Putin tells Trump and you believe it.
Lol
You obviously donā€™t understand, high-level civilian employees make up the deep state/swamp exclusively
Trump is part of the deep state.
:lmao:

Dumbest post you've ever made.
We'll see.

Go ahead and rely on the corporate DNC run media to tell you the truthyness....

Truth just isn't part of their job;

{ā€œNow ladies and gentlemen, the New York Timesā€™ coverage of the Holocaust wasnā€™t inadequate; it was criminal. It was unconscionable. Apparently, for Annalisa Quinn, the Holocaust was no big deal. The Third Reich was no big deal. Anything in defense of the New York Times. Anything in defense of progressivism. Anything in defense of social activism, for fundamental transformation. It doesnā€™t matter. And you and I are subsidizing this woman, in part: She writes for National Public Radio. ā€¦ When you all but cover up what took place in the Holocaust, and the extermination of six million Jews, thatā€™s not ā€˜inadequate coverageā€™; thatā€™s an abomination.ā€}

Levin: 'When you all but cover up' the Holocaust, 'that's not "inadequate coverage"; that's an abomination'
 
So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.
I don't think they are going to have any problem proving that this happened. Unless the Doj deleted all the evidence when they busted up the cell phone that page and her buddy were using.
From what I'm hearing from the Right, the "evidence" to which they refer is clear, provable and unassailable. If that's the case, you're right.

Meanwhile, the Left is rolling their eyes and smirking. So we'll see.
.

Better get on the correct, and legal side of this one Mac. People like YOU could actually help lead the moderate Democrats back to prominence, once all the far Leftists are laughed out of political relevance.
 
What concerns me as much as anything on this, is that if (bolded, underlined) this is found to be largely fantasy, it won't matter. The response from the Right will be that the Deep State was able to cover it up, or something like that.
That sounds a lot like what the Tards have done with Russia and Trump......
We all know what the Tards did and now it's time to pay for their evil deeds...
Yes, the two ends can be incredibly and comically similar in their behaviors.
.


If it turns out that the spying and the investigation was a partisan and corrupt as "the right wing" says, do you agree that it would be right for the nation if the people responsible were held accountable?
 
So here we go, I guess.

This is no longer going to be some fevered conspiracy story born of one of Mark Levin's fevered hyper-partisan conspiracy books. It's no longer going to be the foundation of President Hannity's hyper-partisan radio and teevee shows, buttressed by the manic "reporting" of his small band of like-minded "investigative reporters" (Out-of-Control Sean Hannity Thumbs His Nose at Fox News Bosses).

It's no longer going to be this alternate-universe "blockbuster" narrative that a relatively small group of people know like the back of their hand, as if they're convinced that "Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" are documentaries.

You're accusing the American government, all the way to the top, of conspiring to spy on and bring down a presidential candidate and an American President. Key players in this accusation include a Special Counsel, a former Director of National Intelligence, a former FBI Director, former Secretary of State and a former President. Not to mention any number of lower-level government conspirators. The Deep State.

Bottom line: If you folks are right about this whole thing, it's a huge, historic story and must be addressed with historic attention, seriousness and care. If it's just a product of your fevered alternate universe, you deserve whatever you get.

Hopefully we'll soon know, once and for all, what actually happened. If anything.
.

They're not. A court ordered investigation is not spying.

Neither is Constitutionally mandated Congressional oversight.

Putting the national security of the United States in jeopardy by exposing operatives and methods IS treason.

Barr and Trump better tread lightly. There is no statute of limitations on treason.
Wrong on many counts.

A court ordered the spying, but it was just legal spying.

We are now waiting to see if that court order was obtained legally or not. Did Team Hillary lie to the court? It appears yes. Thatā€™s a felony.

Was obtained legally or not?

WTF?
They applied for and received a court order allowing surveillance. Not once but four times. That is the legal process.
 
What concerns me as much as anything on this, is that if (bolded, underlined) this is found to be largely fantasy, it won't matter. The response from the Right will be that the Deep State was able to cover it up, or something like that.
That sounds a lot like what the Tards have done with Russia and Trump......
We all know what the Tards did and now it's time to pay for their evil deeds...
Yes, the two ends can be incredibly and comically similar in their behaviors.
.


If it turns out that the spying and the investigation was a partisan and corrupt as "the right wing" says, do you agree that it would be right for the nation if the people responsible were held accountable?

Want to know an even BETTER question Correll?

Will the moderate Democrats (those that self identify on this board, and I think there may be 4) INSIST that people like Adam Shiff, Nancy Pelosi, and that dummy from California,(who's name escapes me at the moment) all MUST resign from congress after PROMISING that they had the goods to prove the HOAX was true!

And if not, why not?

Let me tell ALL of you straight up------------> The GOP...ā€¦ā€¦...MANY of their members in congress...ā€¦ā€¦...have told America that they have the goods to basically PROVE that this whole thing was put in motion by the alphabet agencies. If they lied to us like the Leftists did, I have no problem calling for their resignations.

NOW ARE YOU LEFTIES GOING TO FOLLOW SUIT, or are you gonna sit there and be herded AGAIN!

All I hear is, work together, work together. Well, that is something we can WORK TOGETHER ON! LIARS from both party's on this issue, should be REMOVED from office by "we, the people," and that includes Trump if he is blowing smoke!

So you willing to go all in Leftists, or are you backtracking a little, and if so, WHY?!?!?!?!
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top