Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 97,449
- 73,671
- 3,645
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure you aren't. You just think about it and talk about it with strangers on the internet. Just 'cause, ya know.im not taking half nude selfies and posting them on HS facebook sites you sick POS.
Sure you aren't. You just think about it and talk about it with strangers on the internet. Just 'cause, ya know.
Sure.
Sure you are.You’re another lowIQ board clogger like kitchen Aid. Im out//
You don’t know much about the case. In many cases, Trump had obtained expert third party value of his property and then inflated those value by 400%.Trump's statement was compiled by experts he hired. In that statement Trump told the bank to get their own estimates. He was not defrauding anyone and was being upfront to the bank. You don't seem to know much about the law, Real Estate or the lending industry. Perhaps you should just stay in your own lane, huh? As I have told other lunk head TDSers here, if YOU go to get a loan and tell the bank what you think your property is worth and they lend you money on your word you will not be charged with fraud, you bleeding idiot. The BANK will take the fall for not adhering to lending practice and Fannie Mae (who underwrites most home loans) if you default. No default, nobody cares. Such stupidity and hatred......
Trump had an opportunity to explain how those values could be so wildly divergent and he could not do so.And you don't know what was included in that "300%" all the TDS people spout here because that's what you heard or read.
Weisselberg pled guilty. But in his plea he pled guilty to defrauding the Trump organisation as well.He should have paid HIS taxes.
Again you seem to believe that banks are mud fucking stupid.You don’t know much about the case. In many cases, Trump had obtained expert third party value of his property and then inflated those value by 400%.
Perhaps if you knew the facts, your appeal to authority would be taken more seriously.
Weisselberg was for effect the Trump organization. He pled guilty to defrauding the Trump organisation and forced them to be called defendants.Agreed, if he had and the Trump Organization hadn't attempted tax fraud there would have been no conviction.
Remember there were two parts to the tax fraud case where the conviction occurred. Those actions by the Trump Organization and the personal actions of Alan Wesselberg (Trump Organization CFO).
WW
Maybe they are, maybe they aren't. How is that relevant to the law?Again you seem to believe that banks are mud fucking stupid.
You have to be a slick lawyer to defend Trump. Like, the kind of slimy lawyer we all hate. Johnny Cochran types. Master Liars. Can argue anything.Here is the difference in you and me on this matter.
I know what fraud is. And you do not.
I owned a mortgage firm so know the laws that apply to this case.
You have no idea how mortgages work nor what hoops borrowers have to leap through to get loans.
I also appraised real estate as a Federal appraiser. I know the law and methods of creating loans.
And you do not. Think hard about how this sham judge is operating!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
For a problem like this, imagine this judge was after you for an imaginary crime.
Anyway, it is so low level all it amounts to is a suit over money.
Well idiot. Don't ask me for the evidence. Read the indictment. And, save it for the judge. Ever hear that saying?Fairy Tales like them and the Steele Dossier are boring,
Why don't you tell us. Explain how bankers never use appraisers, how they never examine applicants statements and shit like that. I spent many years in that business and am well aware of the checks made by banks.Maybe they are, maybe they aren't. How is that relevant to the law?
You're flailing, bobo clown.Well idiot. Don't ask me for the evidence. Read the indictment. And, save it for the judge. Ever hear that saying?
cliché Your claims of innocence won't stop me from arresting you or bringing you to justice, so you might as well savethem for your trial.A: "Wait, you can't arrest me! I'm innocent! I don't know how that money got there, I swear!" B: "Yeah, yeah, save it forthe judge."A: "I found Terry's blood on your clothes, Jim. I'm calling the cops." B: "I've been framed, I tell you, framed!" B: "Save itfor the judge!"
You would not hate your lawyer if you did as Trump did.You have to be a slick lawyer to defend Trump. Like, the kind of slimy lawyer we all hate. Johnny Cochran types. Master Liars. Can argue anything.
No very true. I did something wrong once and had to get a lawyer. I had to deny one thing I did. Aside from that one thing I did, I was in the right. But if the judge knew I did that one thing, I would have been found GUILTY as fuck. Of course my lawyer knew I did that one thing but we denied it, they couldn't prove it and I got off.You would not hate your lawyer if you did as Trump did.
When Biden faces being put on trial, they will all swear on the devil's bible Biden is being falsely accused and tried for crimes. Bank on it.You're flailing, bobo clown.