BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 43,797
- 26,966
- 2,615
You really aren't equipped to participate in this discussion.Half brothers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You really aren't equipped to participate in this discussion.Half brothers.
My day to day life is guided by the Holy Spirit which is how I can see the nuances within scripture that you can’t. I don’t reject scripture. I reject your interpretation of scripture.Scripture was inspired by the Holy Spirit. You're partly correct.
That’s a textbook example of the dunning effect and demonstrates how prideful you are.You really aren't equipped to participate in this discussion.
Actually he had a younger brother named James who was the son of Mary and Joseph.Jesus had brothers (step brothers)
Mary being a Virgin her entire life was something completely made up by the Catholic Church.Actually he had a younger brother named James who was the son of Mary and Joseph.
Of course, you're a catholic.My day to day life is guided by the Holy Spirit which is how I can see the nuances within scripture that you can’t. I don’t reject scripture. I reject your interpretation of scripture.
You're the one who puts your tradition above Scripture. Good luck.That’s a textbook example of the dunning effect and demonstrates how prideful you are.
Then show me the truth.Fake news.
“This question arises because the gospels refer to the “brothers” and “sisters” of our Lord. In the New American Bible’s English translation of the Gospel of St. Mark, we do indeed read about the crowd asking, “Isn’t this the carpenter, the son of Mary, a brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon? Aren’t his sisters our neighbors here?” (Mark 6:3). A similar reference occurs earlier in Mark 3:31 — “His mother and brothers arrived….”Actually he had a younger brother named James who was the son of Mary and Joseph.
You know I said that, right?Actually he had a younger brother named James who was the son of Mary and Joseph.
“…Actually the confusion originates in Hebrew and Aramaic, the languages of most of the original Old Testament texts and of Christ. In these languages, no special word existed for cousin, nephew or aunt, half-brother or half-sister, or step-brother or step-sister; so they used the word brother or a circumlocution, such as in the case of a cousin, “the son of the brother of my father.” When the Old Testament was translated into Greek and the New Testament written in Greek, the word adelphos was used to capture all of these meanings for male relatives. So in each instance, we must examine the context in which the title is used. In all, the confusion arises in English because of the lack of distinct terms for relatives in the Hebrew and Aramaic, and the usage of the Greek adelphos to signify all of these relations….”Actually he had a younger brother named James who was the son of Mary and Joseph.
“…Nevertheless, other gospel passages clarify these relationships. James and Joses were the sons of Mary of Cleophas (Mark 15:40). Mary of Cleophas is described in the Gospel of John as our Blessed Mother’s “sister” (John 20:25); obviously, she must have been a cousin, and James and Joses thereby cousins of our Lord. Judas was the son of James (not either of the apostles) (Luke 6:16). James the lesser was the son of Alphaeus (Luke 6:15). James the greater and John were the sons of Zebedee with a mother other than our Blessed Mother Mary (Matthew 20:20ff)…”Actually he had a younger brother named James who was the son of Mary and Joseph.
“…The gospels are also very clear that Mary was a virgin at the time she conceived Jesus through the power of the Holy Spirit (cf. Matthew 1:18-25, Luke 1:26-38). Remember when the Archangel Gabriel announced to Mary God’s plan, she responded, “How can this be since I do not know man?” After the birth of our Lord, although the gospels do not give us many details of His childhood, no mention is made of Mary and Joseph ever having other children. Never does it refer to the “sons of Mary” or “a son of Mary,” but only the son of Mary…”Mary being a Virgin her entire life was something completely made up by the Catholic Church.
“…This point is again corroborated at the crucifixion scene: Before He dies, our Lord says to Mary, “Woman, there is your son,” and then to St. John, who is definitely not a blood brother, “There is your mother.” According to Jewish law, the oldest son had the responsibility of caring for the widowed mother, and that responsibility would pass to the next oldest if anything happened to the first born son. By this time, St. Joseph had died. Since Jesus, the first born, had no “blood brother,” He entrusted Mary to the care of St. John, the Beloved Disciple…”Mary being a Virgin her entire life was something completely made up by the Catholic Church.
See posts #269, 271, 272, 273 and 274.Then show me the truth.
Would you like for me to misstate your beliefs now?You're the one who puts your tradition above Scripture. Good luck.
Matthew 16:18Of course, you're a catholic.
Another explanation is that Cleophas was the brother of Joseph (Mary's husband) and Cleophas wife was also named Mary, meaning they were sisters-in-law, not biological sisters. Mary's biological sister was thought to be Salome, who was Zebedee's wife, the mother of James and John. This would make James and John the cousins of Jesus--and Peter, as a fisherman, knew and worked with James and John. Andrew, of course, was Peter's brother.“…Nevertheless, other gospel passages clarify these relationships. James and Joses were the sons of Mary of Cleophas (Mark 15:40). Mary of Cleophas is described in the Gospel of John as our Blessed Mother’s “sister” (John 20:25); obviously, she must have been a cousin, and James and Joses thereby cousins of our Lord.
The confusion originates with liars.“…Actually the confusion originates in Hebrew and Aramaic, the languages of most of the original Old Testament texts and of Christ. In these languages, no special word existed for cousin, nephew or aunt, half-brother or half-sister, or step-brother or step-sister; so they used the word brother or a circumlocution, such as in the case of a cousin, “the son of the brother of my father.” When the Old Testament was translated into Greek and the New Testament written in Greek, the word adelphos was used to capture all of these meanings for male relatives. So in each instance, we must examine the context in which the title is used. In all, the confusion arises in English because of the lack of distinct terms for relatives in the Hebrew and Aramaic, and the usage of the Greek adelphos to signify all of these relations….”
Did Jesus have "blood" brothers and sisters? - Catholic Straight Answers
This question arises because the gospels refer to the “brothers” and “sisters” of our Lord. In the New American Bible’s English translation of the Gospel of St. Mark, we do indeed read about the crowd asking, “Isn’t this the carpenter, … Continuedcatholicstraightanswers.com
You're wasting time here.See posts #269, 271, 272, 273 and 274.![]()