a mandate says you do it or else
So does a tax incentive.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
a mandate says you do it or else
The only real reason to support Trump is that he is Not hiLIARy.
Just sayin'.
dont kid yourself
a vote for anyone other then Trump
is a vote for Hillary
a mandate says you do it or else
So does a tax incentive.
The only real reason to support Trump is that he is Not hiLIARy.
Just sayin'.
dont kid yourself
a vote for anyone other then Trump
is a vote for Hillary
The only real reason to support Trump is that he is Not hiLIARy.
Just sayin'.
dont kid yourself
a vote for anyone other then Trump
is a vote for Hillary
yeah, yeah, yeah. And a vote for anyone other than Hillary is a vote for Trump. That would make a vote for a Libertarian a vote for both? Methinks your logic blows.
a mandate says you do it or else
So does a tax incentive.
stop being silly
a tax incentive is to encourage particular economic activity
a mandate forces it
Petraeus knowingly and willingly gave classified information to a person without the clearance to have it. Hillary did no such thing. The FBI has not been able to find any fault.3) Hillary Clinton...an avaricious liar & crook, and incompetent, and in poor health...who all not willingly blind know should be indicted just on the public record if General Petraeus got indicted.
In your dreams. She has not committed any crime. You just spew what your conservative peers keep repeating, without proof.Her crime is 100 times worse...but of the same nature.
a mandate says you do it or else
So does a tax incentive.
stop being silly
a tax incentive is to encourage particular economic activity
a mandate forces it
It forces it in the same way a tax incentive "encourages" it - through economic penalties. Do the the math. It's the same thing.
a mandate says you do it or else
So does a tax incentive.
stop being silly
a tax incentive is to encourage particular economic activity
a mandate forces it
It forces it in the same way a tax incentive "encourages" it - through economic penalties. Do the the math. It's the same thing.
no it dont
but continue in your ignorance in the matter
Except there is no evidence of such a thing. Post it or STFU.OK so that's a fail on your part.Employers would rather have slave labor. That isnt the point.Why arent our citizens picking crops in fields and building roads and doing landscaping work?
Because employers don't want to pay American style wages. They'd rather pay the kind of wages they pay in Mexico, and illegal immigration makes that possible.
Can you show employers in America pay lower wages to illegals, when those illegal present fraudulent credentials?
That isn't the test of whether immigrant labor drives down wages.
There is no evidence employers pay less than legal wages.
And no evidence illegals drive down wages either.
Spare us your economic idiocy. The laws of supply and demand say that if the supply of labor increases, then price will go down.
You fail.
Walls work better in non populated areas? What are you smoking?Except you're missing the other differences. Like Israel's wall is close to population centers and ours wont be. But in similarities, Israel's wall simply prompted Palestinians to tunnel underneath. So will illegals.Show this empirical evidence.
But you can't. Because you are pulling shit out of your ass again.
Israel’s Security Fence Saves Lives, Builder Says
Israel is the size of a postage stamp . That wall is just a few miles . Not 1000 ! And our relationship wh Mexico is waaaay different that Israel / Palistine.
Israel's wall is 400 miles long. If a country the size of Israel can build a wall that long, then a country 50 times bigger can easily build a 2000 mile lone wall. Our relationship with Mexico is far better that Israel's relationship with the the PLO, so that's hardly an argument.
Walls work better in non populated areas, so that's no argument against it. Hama and the PLO consumed vast amounts of resources to tunnel under the wall. Nevertheless, whenever they attempted to use them, the Israelis quickly located them and destroyed them. Furthermore, didn't you read the article I posted a link to about new tunnel detection technology?
The bottom line is that the wall has drastically reduced the incidence of suicide bombers in Israel.
The wall works.
Im sorry but if you can't keep up Im not helping you.We didnt. That's his point.Please then compare and contrast what their lifestyles were in the fucking shithole tar paper shacks they lived in the the shithole sand dune they lived in in Mexico?Huh?
You obviously think illegals come here just to colelct welfare benefits and live in public housing.
That makes you an idiot.
You mean before or after we wiped out their agriculture and manufacturing?
You have no clue about Mexico. None at all.
How did we wipe out their agriculture and manufacturing?
Whether we did or we didn't, how does his claim support his argument?
Walls work better in non populated areas? What are you smoking?Except you're missing the other differences. Like Israel's wall is close to population centers and ours wont be. But in similarities, Israel's wall simply prompted Palestinians to tunnel underneath. So will illegals.
Israel is the size of a postage stamp . That wall is just a few miles . Not 1000 ! And our relationship wh Mexico is waaaay different that Israel / Palistine.
Israel's wall is 400 miles long. If a country the size of Israel can build a wall that long, then a country 50 times bigger can easily build a 2000 mile lone wall. Our relationship with Mexico is far better that Israel's relationship with the the PLO, so that's hardly an argument.
Walls work better in non populated areas, so that's no argument against it. Hama and the PLO consumed vast amounts of resources to tunnel under the wall. Nevertheless, whenever they attempted to use them, the Israelis quickly located them and destroyed them. Furthermore, didn't you read the article I posted a link to about new tunnel detection technology?
The bottom line is that the wall has drastically reduced the incidence of suicide bombers in Israel.
The wall works.
Israel still experiences terrorist attacks and the Palis have used the tunnels for commerce at least as much as terror.
We can add Israel to things you know nothing about.
Im sorry but if you can't keep up Im not helping you.We didnt. That's his point.Please then compare and contrast what their lifestyles were in the fucking shithole tar paper shacks they lived in the the shithole sand dune they lived in in Mexico?
You mean before or after we wiped out their agriculture and manufacturing?
You have no clue about Mexico. None at all.
How did we wipe out their agriculture and manufacturing?
Whether we did or we didn't, how does his claim support his argument?
Except there is no evidence of such a thing. Post it or STFU.OK so that's a fail on your part.Employers would rather have slave labor. That isnt the point.Because employers don't want to pay American style wages. They'd rather pay the kind of wages they pay in Mexico, and illegal immigration makes that possible.
Can you show employers in America pay lower wages to illegals, when those illegal present fraudulent credentials?
That isn't the test of whether immigrant labor drives down wages.
There is no evidence employers pay less than legal wages.
And no evidence illegals drive down wages either.
Spare us your economic idiocy. The laws of supply and demand say that if the supply of labor increases, then price will go down.
You fail.
Oh wait. You never post anyting to back up what you say. You're like the JakeStarkey of USMB.
a mandate says you do it or else
So does a tax incentive.
stop being silly
a tax incentive is to encourage particular economic activity
a mandate forces it
It forces it in the same way a tax incentive "encourages" it - through economic penalties. Do the the math. It's the same thing.
no it dont
but continue in your ignorance in the matter
compelling argument!
Or they stab people. Or ram people with cars. Or.....Walls work better in non populated areas? What are you smoking?Except you're missing the other differences. Like Israel's wall is close to population centers and ours wont be. But in similarities, Israel's wall simply prompted Palestinians to tunnel underneath. So will illegals.Israel is the size of a postage stamp . That wall is just a few miles . Not 1000 ! And our relationship wh Mexico is waaaay different that Israel / Palistine.
Israel's wall is 400 miles long. If a country the size of Israel can build a wall that long, then a country 50 times bigger can easily build a 2000 mile lone wall. Our relationship with Mexico is far better that Israel's relationship with the the PLO, so that's hardly an argument.
Walls work better in non populated areas, so that's no argument against it. Hama and the PLO consumed vast amounts of resources to tunnel under the wall. Nevertheless, whenever they attempted to use them, the Israelis quickly located them and destroyed them. Furthermore, didn't you read the article I posted a link to about new tunnel detection technology?
The bottom line is that the wall has drastically reduced the incidence of suicide bombers in Israel.
The wall works.
Israel still experiences terrorist attacks and the Palis have used the tunnels for commerce at least as much as terror.
We can add Israel to things you know nothing about.
Yes, the work better in non populated areas. For one thing, that makes it harder to build tunnels since you can't hide the opening inside a building.
The claim that "Israel still experiences terrorist attacks" is meaningless. What kind of attacks, with Katyusha rockets? One kind it no longer experiences is from suicide bombers who simply walk across the border.
Walls work.
Suck on it.
Fail.Except there is no evidence of such a thing. Post it or STFU.OK so that's a fail on your part.Employers would rather have slave labor. That isnt the point.
Can you show employers in America pay lower wages to illegals, when those illegal present fraudulent credentials?
That isn't the test of whether immigrant labor drives down wages.
There is no evidence employers pay less than legal wages.
And no evidence illegals drive down wages either.
Spare us your economic idiocy. The laws of supply and demand say that if the supply of labor increases, then price will go down.
You fail.
Oh wait. You never post anyting to back up what you say. You're like the JakeStarkey of USMB.
There's no evidence for the laws of supply and demand? Really?
Or they stab people. Or ram people with cars. Or.....Walls work better in non populated areas? What are you smoking?Except you're missing the other differences. Like Israel's wall is close to population centers and ours wont be. But in similarities, Israel's wall simply prompted Palestinians to tunnel underneath. So will illegals.Israel's wall is 400 miles long. If a country the size of Israel can build a wall that long, then a country 50 times bigger can easily build a 2000 mile lone wall. Our relationship with Mexico is far better that Israel's relationship with the the PLO, so that's hardly an argument.
Walls work better in non populated areas, so that's no argument against it. Hama and the PLO consumed vast amounts of resources to tunnel under the wall. Nevertheless, whenever they attempted to use them, the Israelis quickly located them and destroyed them. Furthermore, didn't you read the article I posted a link to about new tunnel detection technology?
The bottom line is that the wall has drastically reduced the incidence of suicide bombers in Israel.
The wall works.
Israel still experiences terrorist attacks and the Palis have used the tunnels for commerce at least as much as terror.
We can add Israel to things you know nothing about.
Yes, the work better in non populated areas. For one thing, that makes it harder to build tunnels since you can't hide the opening inside a building.
The claim that "Israel still experiences terrorist attacks" is meaningless. What kind of attacks, with Katyusha rockets? One kind it no longer experiences is from suicide bombers who simply walk across the border.
Walls work.
Suck on it.
The wall did nothing to make Israel safer.
We can add Israel (again) to things you know nothng about.Or they stab people. Or ram people with cars. Or.....Walls work better in non populated areas? What are you smoking?Except you're missing the other differences. Like Israel's wall is close to population centers and ours wont be. But in similarities, Israel's wall simply prompted Palestinians to tunnel underneath. So will illegals.
Walls work better in non populated areas, so that's no argument against it. Hama and the PLO consumed vast amounts of resources to tunnel under the wall. Nevertheless, whenever they attempted to use them, the Israelis quickly located them and destroyed them. Furthermore, didn't you read the article I posted a link to about new tunnel detection technology?
The bottom line is that the wall has drastically reduced the incidence of suicide bombers in Israel.
The wall works.
Israel still experiences terrorist attacks and the Palis have used the tunnels for commerce at least as much as terror.
We can add Israel to things you know nothing about.
Yes, the work better in non populated areas. For one thing, that makes it harder to build tunnels since you can't hide the opening inside a building.
The claim that "Israel still experiences terrorist attacks" is meaningless. What kind of attacks, with Katyusha rockets? One kind it no longer experiences is from suicide bombers who simply walk across the border.
Walls work.
Suck on it.
The wall did nothing to make Israel safer.
The only people they can stab or ram with their cars are other Palestinians on their side of the wall.