Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And since you don't know anyone who did it, it cannot possibly have happened. Of course. We get that. lol
And how many of the 3 were suicides?
2 were suicides, one was a murder. I mean, you hang on every other word I say, I thought you'd get that by now.
And Kellerman ignored evidence and excluded information from his studies. He didn't do research to find answers. He did research to prove what he wanted to be true.
I have a good memory.
The 2 suicides are tragic, but not the fault of the guns. (especially the suicide of the terminally ill person)
No way to know for sure the murder wouldn't have happened without a gun. So......
You only know 3 households with a gun in them, and you claim to be such an expert? lmao
No good reason to drink alcohol.I have a good memory.
The 2 suicides are tragic, but not the fault of the guns. (especially the suicide of the terminally ill person)
No way to know for sure the murder wouldn't have happened without a gun. So......
You only know 3 households with a gun in them, and you claim to be such an expert? lmao
No, i know of three households that had a tragedy.
Because of guns.
No good reason for a civilian to own a gun.
And Kellerman ignored evidence and excluded information from his studies. He didn't do research to find answers. He did research to prove what he wanted to be true.
Kleck just made shit up.
Actually, Kellerman was pretty fucking straightfoward.
He counted up all the gun deaths.
How many were bad guys getting shot
How many suicides
How many homicides
How many accidents.
43 times more accidents, homicides and suicides than bad guys getting shot.
Now, your boys in the NRA didn't do what you do when you think a study if flawed, and demand another study.
Your boys in the NRA did what you do when you know a study disproves your philosophy. They made sure that Congress NEVER LOOKED AT THIS SUBJECT, EVER AGAIN!!!!
So here's a simple solution. Let's do the same study, on a national level.
Let's stack up all the gun deaths, and find out how many were deaths of household members vs. deaths of criminals. I think you'll probably get the same results.
I have a good memory.
The 2 suicides are tragic, but not the fault of the guns. (especially the suicide of the terminally ill person)
No way to know for sure the murder wouldn't have happened without a gun. So......
You only know 3 households with a gun in them, and you claim to be such an expert? lmao
No, i know of three households that had a tragedy.
Because of guns.
No good reason for a civilian to own a gun.
No good reason to drink alcohol.
Probably not, but the Alcoholic doesn't hurt anyone but himself.
The gun whacks don't show that much restraint.
And add in the number of times a crime was thwarted without anyone dying and you have an accurate assessment of the situation. Your refusal to look at the incidents in which a criminal was apprehended or run off makes your study bogus.
Two of them were suicides, with one being a terminally ill person. You deny him the right to end his life and avoid the horrible last stages of cancer? How compassionate of you.
And add in the number of times a crime was thwarted without anyone dying and you have an accurate assessment of the situation. Your refusal to look at the incidents in which a criminal was apprehended or run off makes your study bogus.
Well, first, an incident where a criminal "runs off" isn't a crime prevented. He just goes off and robs someone else.
So I would grant you that you could ALMOST count incidents where the gunowner held the bad guy at gunpoint until the cops arrived as win, but you guys never provide stats on those.
Instead, you have Kleck counting every case of Penis Compensation as a "Defensive Gun Use" and call it a day.
LMAO!! Only if you ignore the number of people killed by drunk drivers. But then, you have a knack for ignoring facts that don't support your nonsense.
Absolute bullshit. The gun owner does, in fact, prevent a crime. The fact that someone else relies solely on the police to stop crime is not the gun owners fault. But once again, you can't fix stupid.
Two of them were suicides, with one being a terminally ill person. You deny him the right to end his life and avoid the horrible last stages of cancer? How compassionate of you.
Again, on the "Dry Run", he shot a bullet into the parking lot of our condo complex. He could have hit someone, maybe one of the dozens of children who live here.
LMAO!! Only if you ignore the number of people killed by drunk drivers. But then, you have a knack for ignoring facts that don't support your nonsense.
The DUI thing is another racket. We could end the DUI thing in five minutes.
Every car has to have a blow-meter. Wouldn't add much to the cost of the car.
But the State makes too much money off the DUI industry.
Absolute bullshit. The gun owner does, in fact, prevent a crime. The fact that someone else relies solely on the police to stop crime is not the gun owners fault. But once again, you can't fix stupid.
again, "I felt better about my tiny pecker" is not crime prevention.
Well, you're the one who is "compensating".
Well, you're the one who is "compensating".
So you know how big my penis is? Hmmm, I think you must be lying again.
Given I usually calculate the amount of whiny gun posts to shortness, yours must be concave...
