Yes, the wrong people.
Mmm. Who do you want to put into prison that is not being arrested and put into prison? And who do you want to let out?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, the wrong people.
There is no "prefer". People have sex with their OPPOSITE sex. Anything else is lunacy.Do you prefer the male sex or the female sex when it comes to sexual activity?
Having paid a debt to society, doesn't mean that they one is trustworthy enough to possess and carry guns.
Like anyone else in society, possessors of guns should only be doing that having passed a criminal and mental background check. So some teachers might be qualified to carry guns. Others may not.
I consider queers to be mentally deranged, but not really in any violent way. I guess I still would not trust them to carry a gun. They're just too unhinged. And they shouldn't be in schools, at all, in the first place.
1. There is no such thing as "sexual preferences". There are 2 sexes -male & female. Talking about "sexual preferences" is "really creepy."
I sense that you don't know how unhinged you are.
2. And when you say "only through due process" I dont know which of my 2 questions that is supposed to be answering.
Well, I don't approve of throwing people off tall buildings because they are deranged, but I also don't approve of assessing sanity to people who are insane, either. Get it ?
Mmm. Who do you want to put into prison that is not being arrested and put into prison? And who do you want to let out?
LURGTBQZXDDo you prefer the male sex or the female sex when it comes to sexual activity?
Hilarious!
NOBODY TALK ABOUT THE SEXUAL PERVERTS AND CRAPPY EDUCATORS IN SCHOOLS ON USMB!
Talk about crappy teachers….
What are you suggesting?
Dufus says murderers and rapists should be allowed guns upon release.How about violent people that are too much a danger to allow them to have a basic right protected by the Constitution. Those folks should be put into prison.
Those found with a bag of weed should be let out.
Funny how you support sexual perversions upon children. Says a lot about you.So now you suddenly trust those sexual perverts and crappy educators....WITH GUNS!?!?
Make it make sense.....
How about violent people that are too much a danger to allow them to have a basic right protected by the Constitution. Those folks should be put into prison.
Those found with a bag of weed should be let out.
Funny how you support sexual perversions upon children. Says a lot about you.
2. People are not put into prison for a bag of weed.
I am not suggesting anything. I am saying that once people have served their sentence they should not continue to be punished. I am saying if they are too much a danger to be allowed a basic right protected by the Constitution they should not be allowed to walk around freely.
1. "Violent" is a potential. Everyone has the potential to be violent, in the right circumstances. If someone breaks into my house, I may very well kill them. That is not a sin by American traditional morals. Your standard seems vague and likely subjective. What specific example were you thinking of?
And sayhing that they should not be "allowed to walk around freely" is suggesting something.
What are you suggesting?
Oh irony, thy sting is sweet.Stop obsessing about ME and explain why you suddenly trust perverts with GUNS
Got nothing right? Thought so
I am thinking of the people you all wish to keep punishing once they have served their sentence. If they are in prison and they serve their time, then their punishment's should end at that point. If they are still a danger then their time in prison should not end.