Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

Once again agents have no reference to back up what they say.

Here is a zoom of the 3rd floor core plan. We see airshaft, steam shaft, elevator and janitor closet.

A-A-24_1.3rdfloor.coreplan.jpg


Here is the 3rd and 2nd floor of WTC 1 north core wall at ground zero. We see a massive concrete wall with a 3x7 utility access hallway running the length of it.

wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg
 
Once again agents have no reference to back up what they say.

Here is a zoom of the 3rd floor core plan. We see airshaft, steam shaft, elevator and janitor closet.



Here is the 3rd and 2nd floor of WTC 1 north core wall at ground zero. We see a massive concrete wall with a 3x7 utility access hallway running the length of it.
and you are fucking delusional
there is NO CONCRETE IN THAT PHOTO
there wasnt the first time you posted it, and there wont be the next time you post it


this is why you are seen as a fucking lunatic
 
The concrete stains are easily seen on the interior box columns on the left.

who says they are concrete stains?

find someone that ISNT a delusional fuckiing moron, an admitted liar and a deadbeat dad that has actually looked at that picture and seen concrete.
 
Are you pretending there are planks in front of the interior box columns seen on the left?

wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg


No, there is a stain that connects the sloping line of the concrete above and to the right of the interior box column leading to the top of the concrete core base wall. The stain travels on another slope angle towards the outside, left of the interior box column.
 
Are you pretending there are planks in front of the interior box columns seen on the left?
there is no such thing as "interior box columns". you only pretend there is. the truth is there was the steel core and perimeter columns. thats it. what you claim "surrounded the core" actually IS the fucking core you moron!! :cuckoo:
 
In 8 years no one has ever shown the supposed steel core in the core area on 9-11. The only thing that can prove this core existed is a photo of it on 9-11.

femacore.gif


Until then, the core is proven to be concrete because ALL of the independet authorities identify concrete.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the

wtc1.core.wall.base.annot4.jpg


WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick with the interior box columns to the left of it, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
 
OMG, the agents did a text again. Of course they have no image of the supposed steel core columns on 9-11, because they didn't exist . . . and the opposite of what agents say is most often true.

It is easy to post images of concrete surrounding the core on 9-11.

core_animation_75.gif


Because the Twins had a concrete core, just like the engineer of record of record said.
 
OMG, the agents did a text again. Of course they have no image of the supposed steel core columns on 9-11, because they didn't exist . . . and the opposite of what agents say is most often true.


Because the Twins had a concrete core, just like the engineer of record of record said.
moron, there are NO AGENTS HERE

and you have been shown photos of the steel core columns MULTIPLE TIMES
grow a brain, dipshit
 
Gee, another text assertion of steel core columns. No image from 9-11 showing what is needed to show in order to support FEMA.

No one has ever shown an image of this core on 9-11.



That core did not exist. A concrete core did. A hollow, rectangular tube full of elevators and stairs.



Just like Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 identifies.
it is a waste of time to post photos or links for a fucking lying moron like you
 
I find posting proof of the concrete core defeating agents of treason like you very rewarding.

core_animation_75.gif


The concrete core is very well verified.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
 
I find posting proof of the concrete core defeating agents of treason like you very rewarding.


<delusional bullshit deleted>.
except you have yet to post any evidence if a concrete core
while tons of evidence of the STEEL core has been posted, even by you, you fucking delusional moron
 

Forum List

Back
Top