Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's the end result of the war on poverty in the black community...
75% of children are born out of wedlock and 50% literacy rates.
The claim was more women date felons than college students.
Your statistics are unrelated to such a claim.
[email protected]
Twitter [MENTION=46050]ShawnChris13[/MENTION]
What Republicans need to do to win:
1. Cut taxes
2. Bash gays
3. Bash immigrants
4. Ban abortion
5. Cut taxes
6. Bash labor
7. Blame the poor
8. Cut taxes
9. Kill Obamacare
10. Block gun control
Or they can go the Obama route and knowingly and willingly pander to every group and lie thru their teeth to win elections. You get the government you deserve and right now, many Obama/Democrat supporters are finding that there is a price to pay to their blind faith and not paying attention to the details.
obama is going to offer to subsidize the people who lost their Insurance or the Insurance Companies themselves will be protected from loss by the US Treasury. I suspect the former.
Republicans will fight it and obama will present us as heartless even though it was dimocrap scum who created the problem in the first place.
If he pulls this off, we'll have Single Payer a lot sooner than expected. And it will be a lot worse than expected.
Don't 1/2 of all hetero marriages end in divorce? Hard to believe homosexuals could destroy the sanctity of marriage any more than Newt Gingrich has. Or John Edwards for that matter.
or Bill Clinton, or Al Gore, or Weiner.
How many gay marriages end in divorce. Do you think the turkey baster kids of a gay marriage will be normal when that marriage breaks up?
go away fluke, its time to pick up your nightly supply of condoms for your trip to lafayette circle.
You sure seem to know alot about a place called Lafayette Circle.. Is that where you caught your VD?
QUOTE]
I have seen you hustling tricks there with the other drug and UTI infected whores. Are you still charging $3 per BJ? Still trading a screw for a nickel bag?
Here's the end result of the war on poverty in the black community...
75% of children are born out of wedlock and 50% literacy rates.
The claim was more women date felons than college students.
Your statistics are unrelated to such a claim.
[email protected]
Twitter [MENTION=46050]ShawnChris13[/MENTION]
Uhhhh, which is more prevalent in the black ghettos of our big cities, college grads or felons?
They don't care about gay marriage. They care about destroying the family unit and replacing it with the State.
word
How does gay marriage destroy a family unit?
Don't 1/2 of all hetero marriages end in divorce? Hard to believe homosexuals could destroy the sanctity of marriage any more than Newt Gingrich has. Or John Edwards for that matter.
The claim was more women date felons than college students.
Your statistics are unrelated to such a claim.
[email protected]
Twitter [MENTION=46050]ShawnChris13[/MENTION]
Uhhhh, which is more prevalent in the black ghettos of our big cities, college grads or felons?
The topic keeps changing here. I'm not arguing against certain areas having different statistics. The original claim was never about ghettos.
Poor communities are going to have high crime rates. There's nothing we can do about that if we are still arguing about who to blame for it.
[email protected]
Twitter [MENTION=46050]ShawnChris13[/MENTION]
Here's the end result of the war on poverty in the black community...
75% of children are born out of wedlock and 50% literacy rates.
The claim was more women date felons than college students.
Your statistics are unrelated to such a claim.
[email protected]
Twitter [MENTION=46050]ShawnChris13[/MENTION]
I was talking to you... I didn't quote anyone. Do try and keep up.
Here's the end result of the war on poverty in the black community...
75% of children are born out of wedlock and 50% literacy rates.
The claim was more women date felons than college students.
Your statistics are unrelated to such a claim.
[email protected]
Twitter [MENTION=46050]ShawnChris13[/MENTION]
Uhhhh, which is more prevalent in the black ghettos of our big cities, college grads or felons?
Uhhhh, which is more prevalent in the black ghettos of our big cities, college grads or felons?
The topic keeps changing here. I'm not arguing against certain areas having different statistics. The original claim was never about ghettos.
Poor communities are going to have high crime rates. There's nothing we can do about that if we are still arguing about who to blame for it.
[email protected]
Twitter [MENTION=46050]ShawnChris13[/MENTION]
soggy gave you stats for black unwed pregnancy rates. YOU changed the subject.
The claim was more women date felons than college students.
Your statistics are unrelated to such a claim.
[email protected]
Twitter [MENTION=46050]ShawnChris13[/MENTION]
Uhhhh, which is more prevalent in the black ghettos of our big cities, college grads or felons?
my clients, for my dick-lips.
I am in complete agreement with the assumptions I have made on your position regarding health care. Car insurance gives us the privilege to drive and is required by law. Health insurance should not be turned into a privilege to health, or life.
You agree with yourself. How narcissistic. I wonder what car insurance has to do with healthcare insurance. You're saying people should be forced into a government approved insurance plan that will cost them 41 percent more than their old plan. Really? And you lecture people about choice?
I seem to be explaining myself incorrectly. I am against the ACA. I use car insurance as an example of how we use the law to enforce responsible driving and public safety.
However, on the other end of the spectrum would be health insurance. A public mandate to buy or pay a fine is abhorrent to what I believe. I shouldn't have to buy anything if I don't want to.
My exception to that statement would be car insurance as it affects the public safety. Clear?
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX - do not post personal information please
And the Oscar goes to... KEVIN... for most dramatic rendition of playing the high ground.And you know the page in your Sal Alinsky, Rules for Radicals manual by heart, where if you disagree with someone, ridicule them and insult them.My post was a reaction to 007's extremely childish response of asking if "you a homo" because you might theoretically support gay marriage.
His (or her) level of reasoning is on par with that of a 12 year old child, who would call their friend "gay" for wearing a certain shirt, etc. It was a logical comparison of 007 and an underdeveloped youth who hasn't quite broken through into maturity or not.
Obviously people oppose gay marriage; that's fine, I respect a person's right to opinion. But 007 was acting like a child.
So STFU moron. You're no more superior to anyone else here than the used rubber your butt buddy threw in the toilet after he got done fucking you up the ass last night.
Hey man, I've debated with many adults who share their opposition to gay marriage logically and respectfully (ie not calling somebody a "homo" because they support). Can't say I agree with them, but at the end of the day I respect their right to disagree.
You acted like a kid and I called you out on it; deal with it.
The claim was more women date felons than college students.
Your statistics are unrelated to such a claim.
[email protected]
twitter [MENTION=46050]ShawnChris13[/MENTION]
I wasn't talking to you... I didn't quote anyone. Do try and keep up.
You jumped into the middle of a discussion without understanding the subject matter and I'm supposed to keep up?
It's not my job to change the subject alongside a whim.
[email protected]
Twitter [MENTION=46050]ShawnChris13[/MENTION]
You agree with yourself. How narcissistic. I wonder what car insurance has to do with healthcare insurance. You're saying people should be forced into a government approved insurance plan that will cost them 41 percent more than their old plan. Really? And you lecture people about choice?
I seem to be explaining myself incorrectly. I am against the ACA. I use car insurance as an example of how we use the law to enforce responsible driving and public safety.
However, on the other end of the spectrum would be health insurance. A public mandate to buy or pay a fine is abhorrent to what I believe. I shouldn't have to buy anything if I don't want to.
My exception to that statement would be car insurance as it affects the public safety. Clear?
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX - do not post personal information please
Your appeal to objectivity has failed. Your explanation has failed. By touting first the so-called benefits of the ACA, you indicated support for such. I don't like being lied to.
I wasn't talking to you... I didn't quote anyone. Do try and keep up.
You jumped into the middle of a discussion without understanding the subject matter and I'm supposed to keep up?
It's not my job to change the subject alongside a whim.
[email protected]
Twitter [MENTION=46050]ShawnChris13[/MENTION]
Uhm, in case you missed it, this topic jumped around a lot. But basically, absurd claims have been made about conservatives hating children and welfare and otherwise other stupid shit. I was just pointing out that liberal policies have not only not helped the black community, but have gravely damaged the black community.
But, I suspect you knew this and are purposely just being a cementhead.
I seem to be explaining myself incorrectly. I am against the ACA. I use car insurance as an example of how we use the law to enforce responsible driving and public safety.
However, on the other end of the spectrum would be health insurance. A public mandate to buy or pay a fine is abhorrent to what I believe. I shouldn't have to buy anything if I don't want to.
My exception to that statement would be car insurance as it affects the public safety. Clear?
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX - do not post personal information please
Your appeal to objectivity has failed. Your explanation has failed. By touting first the so-called benefits of the ACA, you indicated support for such. I don't like being lied to.
Did you read what I posted? I'm lost as how I supported the ACA. My objectivity lies within straying from emotional name calling. I have personal beliefs that I try to explain without childish recursion.
You jumped into the middle of a discussion without understanding the subject matter and I'm supposed to keep up?
It's not my job to change the subject alongside a whim.
[email protected]
Twitter [MENTION=46050]ShawnChris13[/MENTION]
Uhm, in case you missed it, this topic jumped around a lot. But basically, absurd claims have been made about conservatives hating children and welfare and otherwise other stupid shit. I was just pointing out that liberal policies have not only not helped the black community, but have gravely damaged the black community.
But, I suspect you knew this and are purposely just being a cementhead.
I agree with your statement. I am disappointed by both parties' attempts at reform and if I misread you I apologize and withdraw any cement headed comments I may have unintentionally made.
Your appeal to objectivity has failed. Your explanation has failed. By touting first the so-called benefits of the ACA, you indicated support for such. I don't like being lied to.
Did you read what I posted? I'm lost as how I supported the ACA. My objectivity lies within straying from emotional name calling. I have personal beliefs that I try to explain without childish recursion.
You explained how if car insurance was mandatory, so too should healthcare insurance, namely the ACA. You are disingenuous.
Uhm, in case you missed it, this topic jumped around a lot. But basically, absurd claims have been made about conservatives hating children and welfare and otherwise other stupid shit. I was just pointing out that liberal policies have not only not helped the black community, but have gravely damaged the black community.
But, I suspect you knew this and are purposely just being a cementhead.
I agree with your statement. I am disappointed by both parties' attempts at reform and if I misread you I apologize and withdraw any cement headed comments I may have unintentionally made.
a word of caution. read the message board for a few days to see how it works before jumping in. It can get brutal if you are not prepared. Don't let em see you sweat.
I don't have a party, I am registered as independent and although I can not see myself voting dimocrap in the near 15 years at least, I can't say that the establishment republicans are warming my heart too much as well.
I choose them as a lesser evil.
And I never base my vote on absolutely unimportant issues like gay marriage - in this economy it is a clear diversion.
If people are stupid to get those unimportant issues decide their vote - they are going to pay for it. And they are already.
And no, I do not see it as a political problem. I see the inability to respond in a manner which will leave the issue out of the discussion as a problem
Okay.
Candidate ___________, What is the difference between your view of gay marriage and that of your Democratic opponent?
How would you answer in a way that may get you a vote from a same sex couple?
thats what you don't get. Maybe taking a stand against gay marriage will lose the gay marriage vote, BFD. That is a tiny segment of the population.
The GOP does not have to get the radical 'gay marriage is a right' vote. let all 50,000 of them vote dem, who cares?
