Trump acts like a child while everyone else stands for the anthem

[colfax_m]

Yeah. I’m saying your opinion is wrong because it ignores reality. He says he’s worth $10 billion. He says he was only given a small loan from his father to start his business. He says he made billions off his casino and airline. Hell, pretends his buildings are 10 stories higher than they actually are.

He claims Bolton wasn’t asked to testify. He claimed that Zelensky brought up Yovanovich. He claimed Yovanovich refused to put up his presidential portrait. He claimed the whistleblower got his phone call almost completely wrong. He claims that Biden bragged about stopping a prosecution in Ukraine.

Should I go on?

Colfax fabricates out loud: "Hell, pretends his buildings are 10 stories higher than they actually are."
​

You shouldn’t accuse me of fabricating anything.
Donald Trump’s Math Takes His Towers to Greater Heights

1979? Come on. LOL

I was not even born yet. Nitpicking

Be honest, how much of the article did you read?

It asked me to subscribe after the first paragraph so that was as far as I got and you lied again. I said list his lies without scouring the web. You could not do that either.

So you only read the first paragraph. I see. Then you missed where it stated in 1979 and went to the present.

What lie are you accusing me of telling now? I didn’t scour the web for a list of lies.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

His lie about having sex with Stormy Daniels is the only one I can recall off the top of my head. Which one can you recall without Googling it? The rest is hyperbolic bravado. Now you’re saying my opinion is wrong? Interesting.

Yeah. I’m saying your opinion is wrong because it ignores reality. He says he’s worth $10 billion. He says he was only given a small loan from his father to start his business. He says he made billions off his casino and airline. Hell, pretends his buildings are 10 stories higher than they actually are.

He claims Bolton wasn’t asked to testify. He claimed that Zelensky brought up Yovanovich. He claimed Yovanovich refused to put up his presidential portrait. He claimed the whistleblower got his phone call almost completely wrong. He claims that Biden bragged about stopping a prosecution in Ukraine.

Should I go on?

Colfax fabricates out loud: "Hell, pretends his buildings are 10 stories higher than they actually are."
​

You shouldn’t accuse me of fabricating anything.
Donald Trump’s Math Takes His Towers to Greater Heights

The New York Times? You didn't know they are a catch-all for predators who feed on lies about Trump. Time and again, they've carried lying stories about how Trump should be impeached because of this or that, and y'know, the American people have paid $One Hundred Million Dollars to find out what the New York Times claims he did, and they're lying, always lying, lying every day in the morning, noon, and all night long.

So don't you lecture me about fabrication if your prime source is the world-class liar that the New York Times prides itself on being. Their only readers are fawning Democrats who never went out into the business world to try to earn a living for thousands of employees. Trump did just that and he did it successfully by telling the truth, making things right when he made a mistake with cash on the barrel head.

You don't have the credentials to criticize this honorable businessman if the damn New York Times lies over and over and over again. It's always conservatives bad, Democrats good with those creepsisters. They're the worst of the worst who have thoroughly devastated Journalism to be a feel good profession, not one that seeks and presents the truth to the nation. Those days are gone with the winds of the communism the Democrats want to sell very uninformed people, and it ain't happening. They call it socialism, but their methodology is a carbon copy of the failed communist countries across this planet. And in fact, every time the New York Times backs the Democrat foible-of-the-month lie, they sink lower and lower into the swamp.

Is that all ya got. What a waste of time. Don’t ever ask me for a link again.

Therein lies the problem. We do not trust our journalists any longer. Just as earlier you trashed my numerous links.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Colfax fabricates out loud: "Hell, pretends his buildings are 10 stories higher than they actually are."
​

You shouldn’t accuse me of fabricating anything.
Donald Trump’s Math Takes His Towers to Greater Heights

1979? Come on. LOL

I was not even born yet. Nitpicking

Be honest, how much of the article did you read?

It asked me to subscribe after the first paragraph so that was as far as I got and you lied again. I said list his lies without scouring the web. You could not do that either.

So you only read the first paragraph. I see. Then you missed where it stated in 1979 and went to the present.

What lie are you accusing me of telling now? I didn’t scour the web for a list of lies.

You knew all those off the top of your head? Seriously? I find that very hard to believe.

 

[colfax_m]

You can say they’re irrelevant to you. I don’t care. They’re still lies. If saying you’re 6’10” when you’re 6’3” is a lie, so is saying you’re worth $10 billion when you’re worth $4

Saying you like what he’s done isn’t logic. It’s completely unrelated. He could be the greatest president ever or the worst. It has nothing to do with the truth of his statements. Truth is truth. Whether you like the effects of his policy or not, it doesn’t change it.

You see, this is why I hate debating facts. It’s like they don’t exist anymore.

Agree to disagree. His hyperbole is what makes him unique. His policies is what helps me and my family. His “lies” have zero impact on me. His policies have a significant impact on me.

You’re not even making an argument anymore. I’m arguing he’s a liar and you’re arguing he’s made you rich. You decided to switch topics mid-debate.

You’re lying now. I said he was honest about a stronger economy, stronger military and pro Israel policies. Did you not see that post or are you lying?

I saw that post. It was irrelevant. If a person tells two truths and a thousand lies, can we no longer call them a liar?

So now you’re picking which truths and which lies are important to you. Subjective. His truths are much more critical than his so called lies. You did not acknowledge that post until I called you out. Very dishonest of you.

I said he’s a liar. A liar is a person who tells lies. I didn’t acknowledge your post because it’s irrelevant. Saying he told the truth in one place or another does not affect whether someone is a liar. It’s not a me of what is or isn’t important. It’s a matter of whether he’s has been truthful.

It was not dishonest. You’re getting personal.

 

[colfax_m]

You shouldn’t accuse me of fabricating anything.
Donald Trump’s Math Takes His Towers to Greater Heights

1979? Come on. LOL

I was not even born yet. Nitpicking

Be honest, how much of the article did you read?

It asked me to subscribe after the first paragraph so that was as far as I got and you lied again. I said list his lies without scouring the web. You could not do that either.

So you only read the first paragraph. I see. Then you missed where it stated in 1979 and went to the present.

What lie are you accusing me of telling now? I didn’t scour the web for a list of lies.

You knew all those off the top of your head? Seriously? I find that very hard to believe.

I don’t care what you believe. I have a good memory.

 

[colfax_m]

Yeah. I’m saying your opinion is wrong because it ignores reality. He says he’s worth $10 billion. He says he was only given a small loan from his father to start his business. He says he made billions off his casino and airline. Hell, pretends his buildings are 10 stories higher than they actually are.

He claims Bolton wasn’t asked to testify. He claimed that Zelensky brought up Yovanovich. He claimed Yovanovich refused to put up his presidential portrait. He claimed the whistleblower got his phone call almost completely wrong. He claims that Biden bragged about stopping a prosecution in Ukraine.

Should I go on?

Colfax fabricates out loud: "Hell, pretends his buildings are 10 stories higher than they actually are."
​

You shouldn’t accuse me of fabricating anything.
Donald Trump’s Math Takes His Towers to Greater Heights

The New York Times? You didn't know they are a catch-all for predators who feed on lies about Trump. Time and again, they've carried lying stories about how Trump should be impeached because of this or that, and y'know, the American people have paid $One Hundred Million Dollars to find out what the New York Times claims he did, and they're lying, always lying, lying every day in the morning, noon, and all night long.

So don't you lecture me about fabrication if your prime source is the world-class liar that the New York Times prides itself on being. Their only readers are fawning Democrats who never went out into the business world to try to earn a living for thousands of employees. Trump did just that and he did it successfully by telling the truth, making things right when he made a mistake with cash on the barrel head.

You don't have the credentials to criticize this honorable businessman if the damn New York Times lies over and over and over again. It's always conservatives bad, Democrats good with those creepsisters. They're the worst of the worst who have thoroughly devastated Journalism to be a feel good profession, not one that seeks and presents the truth to the nation. Those days are gone with the winds of the communism the Democrats want to sell very uninformed people, and it ain't happening. They call it socialism, but their methodology is a carbon copy of the failed communist countries across this planet. And in fact, every time the New York Times backs the Democrat foible-of-the-month lie, they sink lower and lower into the swamp.

Is that all ya got. What a waste of time. Don’t ever ask me for a link again.

Therein lies the problem. We do not trust our journalists any longer. Just as earlier you trashed my numerous links.

Not my problem you don’t trust journalists. Your links were to opinion pieces and I trashed them because I was able to identify methodological flaws in the reporting.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Agree to disagree. His hyperbole is what makes him unique. His policies is what helps me and my family. His “lies” have zero impact on me. His policies have a significant impact on me.

You’re not even making an argument anymore. I’m arguing he’s a liar and you’re arguing he’s made you rich. You decided to switch topics mid-debate.

You’re lying now. I said he was honest about a stronger economy, stronger military and pro Israel policies. Did you not see that post or are you lying?

I saw that post. It was irrelevant. If a person tells two truths and a thousand lies, can we no longer call them a liar?

So now you’re picking which truths and which lies are important to you. Subjective. His truths are much more critical than his so called lies. You did not acknowledge that post until I called you out. Very dishonest of you.

I said he’s a liar. A liar is a person who tells lies. I didn’t acknowledge your post because it’s irrelevant. Saying he told the truth in one place or another does not affect whether someone is a liar. It’s not a me of what is or isn’t important. It’s a matter of whether he’s has been truthful.

It was not dishonest. You’re getting personal.

You’re being irrational and overly sensitive. Good talk. He has been great for me and my family that matters most to me.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

1979? Come on. LOL

I was not even born yet. Nitpicking

Be honest, how much of the article did you read?

It asked me to subscribe after the first paragraph so that was as far as I got and you lied again. I said list his lies without scouring the web. You could not do that either.

So you only read the first paragraph. I see. Then you missed where it stated in 1979 and went to the present.

What lie are you accusing me of telling now? I didn’t scour the web for a list of lies.

You knew all those off the top of your head? Seriously? I find that very hard to believe.

I don’t care what you believe. I have a good memory.

Who won the 1986 World Series? Top of your head.

 

[colfax_m]

You’re not even making an argument anymore. I’m arguing he’s a liar and you’re arguing he’s made you rich. You decided to switch topics mid-debate.

You’re lying now. I said he was honest about a stronger economy, stronger military and pro Israel policies. Did you not see that post or are you lying?

I saw that post. It was irrelevant. If a person tells two truths and a thousand lies, can we no longer call them a liar?

So now you’re picking which truths and which lies are important to you. Subjective. His truths are much more critical than his so called lies. You did not acknowledge that post until I called you out. Very dishonest of you.

I said he’s a liar. A liar is a person who tells lies. I didn’t acknowledge your post because it’s irrelevant. Saying he told the truth in one place or another does not affect whether someone is a liar. It’s not a me of what is or isn’t important. It’s a matter of whether he’s has been truthful.

It was not dishonest. You’re getting personal.

You’re being irrational and overly sensitive. Good talk. He has been great for me and my family that matters most to me.

You’re not having an honest debate. When you start losing, you switch topics. Coward.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Colfax fabricates out loud: "Hell, pretends his buildings are 10 stories higher than they actually are."
​

You shouldn’t accuse me of fabricating anything.
Donald Trump’s Math Takes His Towers to Greater Heights

The New York Times? You didn't know they are a catch-all for predators who feed on lies about Trump. Time and again, they've carried lying stories about how Trump should be impeached because of this or that, and y'know, the American people have paid $One Hundred Million Dollars to find out what the New York Times claims he did, and they're lying, always lying, lying every day in the morning, noon, and all night long.

So don't you lecture me about fabrication if your prime source is the world-class liar that the New York Times prides itself on being. Their only readers are fawning Democrats who never went out into the business world to try to earn a living for thousands of employees. Trump did just that and he did it successfully by telling the truth, making things right when he made a mistake with cash on the barrel head.

You don't have the credentials to criticize this honorable businessman if the damn New York Times lies over and over and over again. It's always conservatives bad, Democrats good with those creepsisters. They're the worst of the worst who have thoroughly devastated Journalism to be a feel good profession, not one that seeks and presents the truth to the nation. Those days are gone with the winds of the communism the Democrats want to sell very uninformed people, and it ain't happening. They call it socialism, but their methodology is a carbon copy of the failed communist countries across this planet. And in fact, every time the New York Times backs the Democrat foible-of-the-month lie, they sink lower and lower into the swamp.

Is that all ya got. What a waste of time. Don’t ever ask me for a link again.

Therein lies the problem. We do not trust our journalists any longer. Just as earlier you trashed my numerous links.

Not my problem you don’t trust journalists. Your links were to opinion pieces and I trashed them because I was able to identify methodological flaws in the reporting.

The Harvard study was not an opinion piece. You’re lying again. You’ve told more lies than Trump in this thread alone.

 

[colfax_m]

Be honest, how much of the article did you read?

It asked me to subscribe after the first paragraph so that was as far as I got and you lied again. I said list his lies without scouring the web. You could not do that either.

So you only read the first paragraph. I see. Then you missed where it stated in 1979 and went to the present.

What lie are you accusing me of telling now? I didn’t scour the web for a list of lies.

You knew all those off the top of your head? Seriously? I find that very hard to believe.

I don’t care what you believe. I have a good memory.

Who won the 1986 World Series? Top of your head.

No idea. I don’t follow baseball. I follow politics.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You’re lying now. I said he was honest about a stronger economy, stronger military and pro Israel policies. Did you not see that post or are you lying?

I saw that post. It was irrelevant. If a person tells two truths and a thousand lies, can we no longer call them a liar?

So now you’re picking which truths and which lies are important to you. Subjective. His truths are much more critical than his so called lies. You did not acknowledge that post until I called you out. Very dishonest of you.

I said he’s a liar. A liar is a person who tells lies. I didn’t acknowledge your post because it’s irrelevant. Saying he told the truth in one place or another does not affect whether someone is a liar. It’s not a me of what is or isn’t important. It’s a matter of whether he’s has been truthful.

It was not dishonest. You’re getting personal.

You’re being irrational and overly sensitive. Good talk. He has been great for me and my family that matters most to me.

You’re not having an honest debate. When you start losing, you switch topics. Coward.

Not remotely. I told you he told the truth about the economy, military, trade deals and Israel. You just went to ad Hominems. You re losing it.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

It asked me to subscribe after the first paragraph so that was as far as I got and you lied again. I said list his lies without scouring the web. You could not do that either.

So you only read the first paragraph. I see. Then you missed where it stated in 1979 and went to the present.

What lie are you accusing me of telling now? I didn’t scour the web for a list of lies.

You knew all those off the top of your head? Seriously? I find that very hard to believe.

I don’t care what you believe. I have a good memory.

Who won the 1986 World Series? Top of your head.

No idea. I don’t follow baseball. I follow politics.

You must be the life of the party. LOL

Good talk. Good night. It was the Mets.

 

[colfax_m]

You shouldn’t accuse me of fabricating anything.
Donald Trump’s Math Takes His Towers to Greater Heights

The New York Times? You didn't know they are a catch-all for predators who feed on lies about Trump. Time and again, they've carried lying stories about how Trump should be impeached because of this or that, and y'know, the American people have paid $One Hundred Million Dollars to find out what the New York Times claims he did, and they're lying, always lying, lying every day in the morning, noon, and all night long.

So don't you lecture me about fabrication if your prime source is the world-class liar that the New York Times prides itself on being. Their only readers are fawning Democrats who never went out into the business world to try to earn a living for thousands of employees. Trump did just that and he did it successfully by telling the truth, making things right when he made a mistake with cash on the barrel head.

You don't have the credentials to criticize this honorable businessman if the damn New York Times lies over and over and over again. It's always conservatives bad, Democrats good with those creepsisters. They're the worst of the worst who have thoroughly devastated Journalism to be a feel good profession, not one that seeks and presents the truth to the nation. Those days are gone with the winds of the communism the Democrats want to sell very uninformed people, and it ain't happening. They call it socialism, but their methodology is a carbon copy of the failed communist countries across this planet. And in fact, every time the New York Times backs the Democrat foible-of-the-month lie, they sink lower and lower into the swamp.

Is that all ya got. What a waste of time. Don’t ever ask me for a link again.

Therein lies the problem. We do not trust our journalists any longer. Just as earlier you trashed my numerous links.

Not my problem you don’t trust journalists. Your links were to opinion pieces and I trashed them because I was able to identify methodological flaws in the reporting.

The Harvard study was not an opinion piece. You’re lying again. You’ve told more lies than Trump in this thread alone.

You and your op-Ed pieces misrepresented the Harvard study. I pointed out exactly how.

You can’t seem to figure out what is a lie and what isn’t.

 

[colfax_m]

So you only read the first paragraph. I see. Then you missed where it stated in 1979 and went to the present.

What lie are you accusing me of telling now? I didn’t scour the web for a list of lies.

You knew all those off the top of your head? Seriously? I find that very hard to believe.

I don’t care what you believe. I have a good memory.

Who won the 1986 World Series? Top of your head.

No idea. I don’t follow baseball. I follow politics.

You must be the life of the party. LOL

Good talk. Good night. It was the Mets.

Adios.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The New York Times? You didn't know they are a catch-all for predators who feed on lies about Trump. Time and again, they've carried lying stories about how Trump should be impeached because of this or that, and y'know, the American people have paid $One Hundred Million Dollars to find out what the New York Times claims he did, and they're lying, always lying, lying every day in the morning, noon, and all night long.

So don't you lecture me about fabrication if your prime source is the world-class liar that the New York Times prides itself on being. Their only readers are fawning Democrats who never went out into the business world to try to earn a living for thousands of employees. Trump did just that and he did it successfully by telling the truth, making things right when he made a mistake with cash on the barrel head.

You don't have the credentials to criticize this honorable businessman if the damn New York Times lies over and over and over again. It's always conservatives bad, Democrats good with those creepsisters. They're the worst of the worst who have thoroughly devastated Journalism to be a feel good profession, not one that seeks and presents the truth to the nation. Those days are gone with the winds of the communism the Democrats want to sell very uninformed people, and it ain't happening. They call it socialism, but their methodology is a carbon copy of the failed communist countries across this planet. And in fact, every time the New York Times backs the Democrat foible-of-the-month lie, they sink lower and lower into the swamp.

Is that all ya got. What a waste of time. Don’t ever ask me for a link again.

Therein lies the problem. We do not trust our journalists any longer. Just as earlier you trashed my numerous links.

Not my problem you don’t trust journalists. Your links were to opinion pieces and I trashed them because I was able to identify methodological flaws in the reporting.

The Harvard study was not an opinion piece. You’re lying again. You’ve told more lies than Trump in this thread alone.

You and your op-Ed pieces misrepresented the Harvard study. I pointed out exactly how.

You can’t seem to figure out what is a lie and what isn’t.

I disagree.

 

[colfax_m]

I saw that post. It was irrelevant. If a person tells two truths and a thousand lies, can we no longer call them a liar?

So now you’re picking which truths and which lies are important to you. Subjective. His truths are much more critical than his so called lies. You did not acknowledge that post until I called you out. Very dishonest of you.

I said he’s a liar. A liar is a person who tells lies. I didn’t acknowledge your post because it’s irrelevant. Saying he told the truth in one place or another does not affect whether someone is a liar. It’s not a me of what is or isn’t important. It’s a matter of whether he’s has been truthful.

It was not dishonest. You’re getting personal.

You’re being irrational and overly sensitive. Good talk. He has been great for me and my family that matters most to me.

You’re not having an honest debate. When you start losing, you switch topics. Coward.

Not remotely. I told you he told the truth about the economy, military, trade deals and Israel. You just went to ad Hominems. You re losing it.

Which is irrelevant. Telling two truths doesn’t make 1000 lies go away. You can’t respond to that. You suck at this.

 

[colfax_m]

Is that all ya got. What a waste of time. Don’t ever ask me for a link again.

Therein lies the problem. We do not trust our journalists any longer. Just as earlier you trashed my numerous links.

Not my problem you don’t trust journalists. Your links were to opinion pieces and I trashed them because I was able to identify methodological flaws in the reporting.

The Harvard study was not an opinion piece. You’re lying again. You’ve told more lies than Trump in this thread alone.

You and your op-Ed pieces misrepresented the Harvard study. I pointed out exactly how.

You can’t seem to figure out what is a lie and what isn’t.

I disagree.

Who cares?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So now you’re picking which truths and which lies are important to you. Subjective. His truths are much more critical than his so called lies. You did not acknowledge that post until I called you out. Very dishonest of you.

I said he’s a liar. A liar is a person who tells lies. I didn’t acknowledge your post because it’s irrelevant. Saying he told the truth in one place or another does not affect whether someone is a liar. It’s not a me of what is or isn’t important. It’s a matter of whether he’s has been truthful.

It was not dishonest. You’re getting personal.

You’re being irrational and overly sensitive. Good talk. He has been great for me and my family that matters most to me.

You’re not having an honest debate. When you start losing, you switch topics. Coward.

Not remotely. I told you he told the truth about the economy, military, trade deals and Israel. You just went to ad Hominems. You re losing it.

Which is irrelevant. Telling two truths doesn’t make 1000 lies go away. You can’t respond to that. You suck at this.

List his 1000 lies. Were you being hyperbolic? Your last sentence is subjective. You seem angry. You OK? Need to put me on ignore again? It’s OK.

 

[colfax_m]

I said he’s a liar. A liar is a person who tells lies. I didn’t acknowledge your post because it’s irrelevant. Saying he told the truth in one place or another does not affect whether someone is a liar. It’s not a me of what is or isn’t important. It’s a matter of whether he’s has been truthful.

It was not dishonest. You’re getting personal.

You’re being irrational and overly sensitive. Good talk. He has been great for me and my family that matters most to me.

You’re not having an honest debate. When you start losing, you switch topics. Coward.

Not remotely. I told you he told the truth about the economy, military, trade deals and Israel. You just went to ad Hominems. You re losing it.

Which is irrelevant. Telling two truths doesn’t make 1000 lies go away. You can’t respond to that. You suck at this.

List his 1000 lies. Were you being hyperbolic? Your last sentence is subjective. You seem angry. You OK? Need to put me on ignore again? It’s OK.

I graciously accept your surrender.