Trump Asks Supreme Court To Intervene In Mar A Lago Documents Scandal

[bodecea]

After the midterms, some of them will be getting called onto the carpet.

By whom?

 

[The Duke]

By whom?

Congressional committees, Bodey-Odey-Os

And guess what? The "1/6 Commission" goes away, too.

Surely you realized that, no?

 

[Stann]

Congressional committees, Bodey-Odey-Os

And guess what? The "1/6 Commission" goes away, too.

Surely you realized that, no?

The bipartisan committee that reviewed the events of January 6th did an excellent and thorough job. It is not in their scope to prosecute, that's up to the department of Justice.

 

[The Duke]

The bipartisan committee that reviewed the events of January 6th did an excellent and thorough job. It is not in their scope to prosecute, that's up to the department of Justice.

There's going to be a Congressional "Department of Justice Review Committee" Coming soon to a town near you.

 

[skews13]

After the midterms, some of them will be getting called onto the carpet.

Actually they won't. Not even Congress has the authority to interfere in an ongoing criminal investigation, and no court will make anyone in the dept. testify to facts involving the case.

And Merrick Garland will still be Attorney General, will still have the authority to act as such, and now has the blessing of the 11th Circuit decision, and the SCOTUS ruling today, denying Trumps petition.

The Republicans on any of those committees, will be nothing but helpless, howling hyenas, that can only watch the investigation, and any ensuing indictments take place, with no power whatsoever to do anything about it.

 

[The Duke]

Actually they won't. Not even Congress has the authority to interfere in an ongoing criminal investigation, and no court will make anyone in the dept. testify to facts involving the case.

And Merrick Garland will still be Attorney General, will still have the authority to act as such, and now has the blessing of the 11th Circuit decision, and the SCOTUS ruling today, denying Trumps petition.

The Republicans on any of those committees, will be nothing but helpless, howling hyenas, that can only watch the investigation, and any ensuing indictments take place, with no power whatsoever to do anything about it.

Do expect Garland to go away.

 

[Stann]

There's going to be a Congressional "Department of Justice Review Committee" Coming soon to a town near you.

There have to be grounds in order for a committee to be formed. Even if the Republicans do have a majority they won't have the grounds to open an investigation of an investigation that was thoroughly vetted.

 

[BackAgain]

Moving boxes within MAL does not violate anything.

That will disappoint our AG. He didn’t know that fact.

 

[BackAgain]

Good news the supreme Court just rejected his current claim.

No. They chose not to accept it.

 

[Stann]

No. They chose not to accept it.

Correct, they don't put up with bullshit. They turned him down.

 

[airplanemechanic]

High court rejects Trump plea to step into Mar-a-Lago case

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected former President Donald Trump’s plea to step into the legal fight over the FBI search of his Florida estate .

apnews.com

 

[excalibur]

Dog Bites Man . . . and Supremes Rebuff Premature Trump Mar-a-Lago Appeal | National Review

The justices have not slammed the door on Trump. They have simply told him, ‘Now is not the time.’

www.nationalreview.com

 

[Stann]

Dog Bites Man . . . and Supremes Rebuff Premature Trump Mar-a-Lago Appeal | National Review

The justices have not slammed the door on Trump. They have simply told him, ‘Now is not the time.’

www.nationalreview.com

National review, a leading conservative magazine and website. Not a very convincing argument.

 

[bravoactual]

As I wrote earlier, who did NOT see this coming? I also wrote that SCOTUS has ruled against the Traitor before. There are no surprises here.

Cons wanted a Conservative SCOTUS and now they have to live with it. No way will SCOTUS ever insinuate itself into the ongoing shit storm that is the Traitor.

 

[BackAgain]

Correct, they don't put up with bullshit. They turned him down.

Don’t substitute your thinking for theirs. But the result was to your liking.

 

[Stann]

Don’t substitute your thinking for theirs. But the result was to your liking.

The one site you listed had a different opinion on the subject. All the other major news sources simply reported that they rejected his claim, they didn't give their opinions on it as your article did.

 

[playtime]

 

[bravoactual]

National review, a leading conservative magazine and website. Not a very convincing argument.

William F. Buckley would be rolling in his grave with the current crop of Q-Publicans.

 

[BackAgain]

The one site you listed had a different opinion on the subject.

Wtf are in talking about?

All the other major news sources simply reported that they rejected his claim, they didn't give their opinions on it as your article did.

Again. Are you high?

 

[Stann]

Wtf are in talking about?

Again. Are you high?

I do not do drugs. You must be talking about yourself again.