Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And called it the lie of the year. Either way IRRELEVANT, and btw it was a poor prediction, not a lie, and ACA didn't make it the way things were going...Wrong again, Fox dupe.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiHmYnxl4fSAhWp5YMKHTUjBnkQFggcMAA&url=http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/mar/17/donald-trump/no-donald-trump-we-are-not-giving-iran-150-billion/&usg=AFQjCNGD4zBMWs73yWQfzxB0iAl6sx5CVw&sig2=hZdJ-FV_NyXOD_-821fcGQ
Under the deal, Iran agreed to lose 97 percent of its stockpile of enriched uranium and give up 14,000 of its 20,000 centrifuges, which are needed to enrich uranium. It also agreed to curb production of plutonium (the other element that can be used to build a bomb) and dismantle its one plutonium reactor.
Yes, the same politifact that said if you like your healthcare plan you can keep your healthcare plan. Pants On Fire: PolitiFact Tries To Hide That It Rated 'True' in 2008 Obamacare's 'Keep Your Health Plan' Promise
BTW, you're totally wrong about the Iran deal DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
You are correct. A poor prediction of so,thing that had then yet to come. They seem to get in trouble when they fact check predictions. ... .. .. like predictions on the Iran deal.
Indeed they did call it the lie of the year. Even they fell for it. But they were calling it true until they so obviously could not.
Once again contradiction is not argument.
Insurer and hospital networks were already making keeping your doctor difficult. Could you possibly face the fact that Fox/Trump dupes like you don't know Iran gave up a heluva lot. DUH. Change the channel.
They gave up making a nuke now for making a nuke when they finally achieved the technology to attach it to a missile est. (10 years.) In short, they gave up nothing. Nevertheless this conversation is refreshing. It seems like only yesterday that liberals were saying that Iran didn't have a nuclear weapons program. How far we've come.
Only in dupe world, dupe.That we know of, but the areas that can be inspected are so limited, the fact that no violations have been discovered does not mean there have been no violations.To date there have been no violationsI think you forget that full implementation involves inspections and actions if violations are found.
But I think you did pretty well for an ESL student!
Absolutely clueless. You stick with your alternate Fox /Trump facts, superdupe.Jesus you're dumb, dupes.Democrat Fake News Alert. Movin on...
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal : The Two ...
www.npr.org/sections/.../6-things-you-should-know-about-the-iran-nuclear-deal
Jul 14, 2015 - Under the deal, Iran also agrees to give up its most advanced ... Another big part of the deal is that Iran has agreed to reduce its stockpile of uranium by 98 ... Iran were to someday walk away from it, the breakout time would be ...
Iran deal: A treaty or not? - CNNPolitics.com - CNN.com
www.cnn.com/2015/03/12/politics/iran-nuclear-deal-treaty-obama-administration/
Mar 12, 2015 - When it comes to the Iran nuclear deal, not necessarily. ... object to a pact they warn could eventually give Tehran a nuclear bomb. ... tied the administration's bid to keep the deal away from Congress to ... the United States to commitments under international law; i.e., a treaty, or a less stringent arrangement.
Indeed, they state what the aim, i.e. the object, that is to say, what the end GOAL is without making an assessment as to wheather it will pan out that way. No one at CNN or NPR will because they can read the tea leaves and they don't want to lose any further credibility. Indeed NPR is the master at bias via omission. I listen to them every morning. But nevertheless they will not make an assessment of what the plan will do. They will only write about what the agreement intends to do. Indeed you and I don't know all of the plan because as are in all international agreements there are secret agreements within them.
And called it the lie of the year. Either way IRRELEVANT, and btw it was a poor prediction, not a lie, and ACA didn't make it the way things were going...Yes, the same politifact that said if you like your healthcare plan you can keep your healthcare plan. Pants On Fire: PolitiFact Tries To Hide That It Rated 'True' in 2008 Obamacare's 'Keep Your Health Plan' Promise
BTW, you're totally wrong about the Iran deal DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
You are correct. A poor prediction of so,thing that had then yet to come. They seem to get in trouble when they fact check predictions. ... .. .. like predictions on the Iran deal.
Indeed they did call it the lie of the year. Even they fell for it. But they were calling it true until they so obviously could not.
Once again contradiction is not argument.
Insurer and hospital networks were already making keeping your doctor difficult. Could you possibly face the fact that Fox/Trump dupes like you don't know Iran gave up a heluva lot. DUH. Change the channel.
They gave up making a nuke now for making a nuke when they finally achieved the technology to attach it to a missile est. (10 years.) In short, they gave up nothing. Nevertheless this conversation is refreshing. It seems like only yesterday that liberals were saying that Iran didn't have a nuclear weapons program. How far we've come.
They don't NOW, because of the treaty, superdupe. It will take years for them to make a nuke when the treaty ends in 10 years. Only the Alternate universe New BS GOPers in THE WHOLE WORLD don't get the news. See also GW, our crap GOP tax rates, etc etc.
And called it the lie of the year. Either way IRRELEVANT, and btw it was a poor prediction, not a lie, and ACA didn't make it the way things were going...
BTW, you're totally wrong about the Iran deal DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
You are correct. A poor prediction of so,thing that had then yet to come. They seem to get in trouble when they fact check predictions. ... .. .. like predictions on the Iran deal.
Indeed they did call it the lie of the year. Even they fell for it. But they were calling it true until they so obviously could not.
Once again contradiction is not argument.
Insurer and hospital networks were already making keeping your doctor difficult. Could you possibly face the fact that Fox/Trump dupes like you don't know Iran gave up a heluva lot. DUH. Change the channel.
They gave up making a nuke now for making a nuke when they finally achieved the technology to attach it to a missile est. (10 years.) In short, they gave up nothing. Nevertheless this conversation is refreshing. It seems like only yesterday that liberals were saying that Iran didn't have a nuclear weapons program. How far we've come.
They don't NOW, because of the treaty, superdupe. It will take years for them to make a nuke when the treaty ends in 10 years. Only the Alternate universe New BS GOPers in THE WHOLE WORLD don't get the news. See also GW, our crap GOP tax rates, etc etc.
Years? Oooo link link! What national security expert who is currently working in intelligence made that claim? Not a political hack who owes his career to president Obama, but a current national security expert that currently works within intelligence and has first hand knowledge of what Iran WILL do. Good luck finding a dupe to hitch his credibility to that wagon.
You are correct. A poor prediction of so,thing that had then yet to come. They seem to get in trouble when they fact check predictions. ... .. .. like predictions on the Iran deal.
Indeed they did call it the lie of the year. Even they fell for it. But they were calling it true until they so obviously could not.
Once again contradiction is not argument.
Insurer and hospital networks were already making keeping your doctor difficult. Could you possibly face the fact that Fox/Trump dupes like you don't know Iran gave up a heluva lot. DUH. Change the channel.
They gave up making a nuke now for making a nuke when they finally achieved the technology to attach it to a missile est. (10 years.) In short, they gave up nothing. Nevertheless this conversation is refreshing. It seems like only yesterday that liberals were saying that Iran didn't have a nuclear weapons program. How far we've come.
They don't NOW, because of the treaty, superdupe. It will take years for them to make a nuke when the treaty ends in 10 years. Only the Alternate universe New BS GOPers in THE WHOLE WORLD don't get the news. See also GW, our crap GOP tax rates, etc etc.
Years? Oooo link link! What national security expert who is currently working in intelligence made that claim? Not a political hack who owes his career to president Obama, but a current national security expert that currently works within intelligence and has first hand knowledge of what Iran WILL do. Good luck finding a dupe to hitch his credibility to that wagon.
Everyone outside your dumbass dupe bubble. And now Trump and his advisors. CHANGE THE CHANNEL.
The Iran nuclear deal is a success – and the whole world is safer for it ...
News, sport and opinion from the Guardian's US edition | The Guardian › Opinion › Iran's nuclear programme
Jan 17, 2017 - One year on, brave leadership and hard work have paid off. Iran is adhering to its obligations, to the huge benefit of the region and beyond.
Top Scientists Urge Trump to Abide by Iran Nuclear Deal - The New ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/02/.../top-scientists-letter-trump-iran-nuclear-deal.htm...
Jan 2, 2017 - In March, Donald J. Trump criticized the nuclear deal with Iran in a speech before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Credit Doug ...
And called it the lie of the year. Either way IRRELEVANT, and btw it was a poor prediction, not a lie, and ACA didn't make it the way things were going...
BTW, you're totally wrong about the Iran deal DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
You are correct. A poor prediction of so,thing that had then yet to come. They seem to get in trouble when they fact check predictions. ... .. .. like predictions on the Iran deal.
Indeed they did call it the lie of the year. Even they fell for it. But they were calling it true until they so obviously could not.
Once again contradiction is not argument.
Insurer and hospital networks were already making keeping your doctor difficult. Could you possibly face the fact that Fox/Trump dupes like you don't know Iran gave up a heluva lot. DUH. Change the channel.
They gave up making a nuke now for making a nuke when they finally achieved the technology to attach it to a missile est. (10 years.) In short, they gave up nothing. Nevertheless this conversation is refreshing. It seems like only yesterday that liberals were saying that Iran didn't have a nuclear weapons program. How far we've come.
They don't NOW, because of the treaty, superdupe. It will take years for them to make a nuke when the treaty ends in 10 years. Only the Alternate universe New BS GOPers in THE WHOLE WORLD don't get the news. See also GW, our crap GOP tax rates, etc etc.
Years? Oooo link link! What national security expert who is currently working in intelligence made that claim? Not a political hack who owes his career to president Obama, but a current national security expert that currently works within intelligence and has first hand knowledge of what Iran WILL do. Good luck finding a dupe to hitch his credibility to that wagon.
Everyone outside your dumbass dupe bubble. And now Trump and his advisors. CHANGE THE CHANNEL.They don't NOW, because of the treaty, superdupe. It will take years for them to make a nuke when the treaty ends in 10 years. Only the Alternate universe New BS GOPers in THE WHOLE WORLD don't get the news. See also GW, our crap GOP tax rates, etc etc.Insurer and hospital networks were already making keeping your doctor difficult. Could you possibly face the fact that Fox/Trump dupes like you don't know Iran gave up a heluva lot. DUH. Change the channel.
They gave up making a nuke now for making a nuke when they finally achieved the technology to attach it to a missile est. (10 years.) In short, they gave up nothing. Nevertheless this conversation is refreshing. It seems like only yesterday that liberals were saying that Iran didn't have a nuclear weapons program. How far we've come.
Years? Oooo link link! What national security expert who is currently working in intelligence made that claim? Not a political hack who owes his career to president Obama, but a current national security expert that currently works within intelligence and has first hand knowledge of what Iran WILL do. Good luck finding a dupe to hitch his credibility to that wagon.
The Iran nuclear deal is a success – and the whole world is safer for it ...
News, sport and opinion from the Guardian's US edition | The Guardian › Opinion › Iran's nuclear programme
Jan 17, 2017 - One year on, brave leadership and hard work have paid off. Iran is adhering to its obligations, to the huge benefit of the region and beyond.
Top Scientists Urge Trump to Abide by Iran Nuclear Deal - The New ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/02/.../top-scientists-letter-trump-iran-nuclear-deal.htm...
Jan 2, 2017 - In March, Donald J. Trump criticized the nuclear deal with Iran in a speech before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Credit Doug ...
Basic math
You are correct. A poor prediction of so,thing that had then yet to come. They seem to get in trouble when they fact check predictions. ... .. .. like predictions on the Iran deal.
Indeed they did call it the lie of the year. Even they fell for it. But they were calling it true until they so obviously could not.
Once again contradiction is not argument.
Insurer and hospital networks were already making keeping your doctor difficult. Could you possibly face the fact that Fox/Trump dupes like you don't know Iran gave up a heluva lot. DUH. Change the channel.
They gave up making a nuke now for making a nuke when they finally achieved the technology to attach it to a missile est. (10 years.) In short, they gave up nothing. Nevertheless this conversation is refreshing. It seems like only yesterday that liberals were saying that Iran didn't have a nuclear weapons program. How far we've come.
They don't NOW, because of the treaty, superdupe. It will take years for them to make a nuke when the treaty ends in 10 years. Only the Alternate universe New BS GOPers in THE WHOLE WORLD don't get the news. See also GW, our crap GOP tax rates, etc etc.
Years? Oooo link link! What national security expert who is currently working in intelligence made that claim? Not a political hack who owes his career to president Obama, but a current national security expert that currently works within intelligence and has first hand knowledge of what Iran WILL do. Good luck finding a dupe to hitch his credibility to that wagon.
Iran Nuclear Deal: Debunking the Myths - The Center for Arms Control ...
armscontrolcenter.org/the-real-facts-on-the-iran-nuclear-negotiations/
Aug 31, 2015 - The deal is not based on trust; it's based on verification. The IAEA will have 24/7 access to Iran's known nuclear facilities and will be closely ...
We Can Verify This Deal | The National Interest
nationalinterest.org/feature/we-can-verify-deal-13751
Sep 1, 2015 - Both proponents and opponents of the nuclear deal with Iran acknowledge that its verification provisions are the key to judging the deals ...
Vigorous Verification in Iran - Carnegie Endowment for International ...
carnegieendowment.org/2016/06/28/vigorous-verification-in-iran-pub-63946
Jun 28, 2016 - Summary: Five months into the Iran deal's implementation, the IAEA reports that Tehran is in compliance with its obligations. But there are some ...
Everyone outside your dumbass dupe bubble. And now Trump and his advisors. CHANGE THE CHANNEL.They don't NOW, because of the treaty, superdupe. It will take years for them to make a nuke when the treaty ends in 10 years. Only the Alternate universe New BS GOPers in THE WHOLE WORLD don't get the news. See also GW, our crap GOP tax rates, etc etc.They gave up making a nuke now for making a nuke when they finally achieved the technology to attach it to a missile est. (10 years.) In short, they gave up nothing. Nevertheless this conversation is refreshing. It seems like only yesterday that liberals were saying that Iran didn't have a nuclear weapons program. How far we've come.
Years? Oooo link link! What national security expert who is currently working in intelligence made that claim? Not a political hack who owes his career to president Obama, but a current national security expert that currently works within intelligence and has first hand knowledge of what Iran WILL do. Good luck finding a dupe to hitch his credibility to that wagon.
The Iran nuclear deal is a success – and the whole world is safer for it ...
News, sport and opinion from the Guardian's US edition | The Guardian › Opinion › Iran's nuclear programme
Jan 17, 2017 - One year on, brave leadership and hard work have paid off. Iran is adhering to its obligations, to the huge benefit of the region and beyond.
Top Scientists Urge Trump to Abide by Iran Nuclear Deal - The New ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/02/.../top-scientists-letter-trump-iran-nuclear-deal.htm...
Jan 2, 2017 - In March, Donald J. Trump criticized the nuclear deal with Iran in a speech before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Credit Doug ...
Basic math
Not part of the agreement. If you macho GOP shytteheads would stop fegging with them, their moderate majority could take over. Looks like Trumps isn't a Foxbot...we hope...
Everyone outside your dumbass dupe bubble. And now Trump and his advisors. CHANGE THE CHANNEL.They don't NOW, because of the treaty, superdupe. It will take years for them to make a nuke when the treaty ends in 10 years. Only the Alternate universe New BS GOPers in THE WHOLE WORLD don't get the news. See also GW, our crap GOP tax rates, etc etc.
Years? Oooo link link! What national security expert who is currently working in intelligence made that claim? Not a political hack who owes his career to president Obama, but a current national security expert that currently works within intelligence and has first hand knowledge of what Iran WILL do. Good luck finding a dupe to hitch his credibility to that wagon.
The Iran nuclear deal is a success – and the whole world is safer for it ...
News, sport and opinion from the Guardian's US edition | The Guardian › Opinion › Iran's nuclear programme
Jan 17, 2017 - One year on, brave leadership and hard work have paid off. Iran is adhering to its obligations, to the huge benefit of the region and beyond.
Top Scientists Urge Trump to Abide by Iran Nuclear Deal - The New ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/02/.../top-scientists-letter-trump-iran-nuclear-deal.htm...
Jan 2, 2017 - In March, Donald J. Trump criticized the nuclear deal with Iran in a speech before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Credit Doug ...
Basic math
Not part of the agreement. If you macho GOP shytteheads would stop fegging with them, their moderate majority could take over. Looks like Trumps isn't a Foxbot...we hope...
Oh how the libs hate alpha males.
I'll play it again.
Bad days ahead for Iran.....Guess it's not such a "bad deal" after all.
The European Union's foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, said on Friday she was reassured during meetings with President Donald Trump's administration that it was committed to full implementation of the Iran nuclear deal.
Mogherini, who met this week with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, Trump's advisor and son-in-law Jared Kushner and members of Congress, said her main intention in Washington was to discuss the nuclear accord, which granted Iran sanctions relief in return for curbs on its nuclear program.
"I was reassured by what I heard in the meetings on the intention to stick to the full implementation of the agreement," Mogherini told reporters.
EU's Mogherini: U.S. says will fully implement Iran nuclear deal
Only in dupe world...Bad days ahead for Iran.....Guess it's not such a "bad deal" after all.
The European Union's foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, said on Friday she was reassured during meetings with President Donald Trump's administration that it was committed to full implementation of the Iran nuclear deal.
Mogherini, who met this week with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, Trump's advisor and son-in-law Jared Kushner and members of Congress, said her main intention in Washington was to discuss the nuclear accord, which granted Iran sanctions relief in return for curbs on its nuclear program.
"I was reassured by what I heard in the meetings on the intention to stick to the full implementation of the agreement," Mogherini told reporters.
EU's Mogherini: U.S. says will fully implement Iran nuclear deal
Yes, your plantation.....Only in dupe world...Bad days ahead for Iran.....Guess it's not such a "bad deal" after all.
The European Union's foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, said on Friday she was reassured during meetings with President Donald Trump's administration that it was committed to full implementation of the Iran nuclear deal.
Mogherini, who met this week with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, Trump's advisor and son-in-law Jared Kushner and members of Congress, said her main intention in Washington was to discuss the nuclear accord, which granted Iran sanctions relief in return for curbs on its nuclear program.
"I was reassured by what I heard in the meetings on the intention to stick to the full implementation of the agreement," Mogherini told reporters.
EU's Mogherini: U.S. says will fully implement Iran nuclear deal
I don't trust any government estimates. Foolish to do so. When was the last ballistic test? I think it was about a week ago.Guess it's not such a "bad deal" after all.
The European Union's foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, said on Friday she was reassured during meetings with President Donald Trump's administration that it was committed to full implementation of the Iran nuclear deal.
Mogherini, who met this week with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, Trump's advisor and son-in-law Jared Kushner and members of Congress, said her main intention in Washington was to discuss the nuclear accord, which granted Iran sanctions relief in return for curbs on its nuclear program.
"I was reassured by what I heard in the meetings on the intention to stick to the full implementation of the agreement," Mogherini told reporters.
EU's Mogherini: U.S. says will fully implement Iran nuclear deal
The government estimates that Iran can develop an nuke in anywhere between a few months to a year. Conversely they estimate that it will take roughly 10 years to develop the missile technology to transport it. The nuke deal is for 10 years. Now answer me this, how does this deal slow down the Iranian nuclear program? You can't exactly cave to a deal that gives Iran nuclear weapons on the same timetable as they had before.
Obviously, you are unfamiliar with the fact the inspectors can only inspect sites declared to be nuclear sites by the Iranian government and must go through a process of requesting access to other sites from the Iranian government that can take months to complete, and even then Iran can refuse access without penalty.Only in dupe world, dupe.That we know of, but the areas that can be inspected are so limited, the fact that no violations have been discovered does not mean there have been no violations.To date there have been no violationsI think you forget that full implementation involves inspections and actions if violations are found.
But I think you did pretty well for an ESL student!
And called it the lie of the year. Either way IRRELEVANT, and btw it was a poor prediction, not a lie, and ACA didn't make it the way things were going...That was before they had to throw out so much of their program, dupe.The government estimates that Iran can develop an nuke in anywhere between a few months to a year. Conversely they estimate that it will take roughly 10 years to develop the missile technology to transport it. The nuke deal is for 10 years. Now answer me this, how does this deal slow down the Iranian nuclear program? You can't exactly cave to a deal that gives Iran nuclear weapons on the same timetable as they had before.
Ceasing uranium enrichment is different than getting rid of your already enriched uranium.Wrong again, Fox dupe.That was before they had to throw out so much of their program, dupe.The government estimates that Iran can develop an nuke in anywhere between a few months to a year. Conversely they estimate that it will take roughly 10 years to develop the missile technology to transport it. The nuke deal is for 10 years. Now answer me this, how does this deal slow down the Iranian nuclear program? You can't exactly cave to a deal that gives Iran nuclear weapons on the same timetable as they had before.
Ceasing uranium enrichment is different than getting rid of your already enriched uranium.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiHmYnxl4fSAhWp5YMKHTUjBnkQFggcMAA&url=http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/mar/17/donald-trump/no-donald-trump-we-are-not-giving-iran-150-billion/&usg=AFQjCNGD4zBMWs73yWQfzxB0iAl6sx5CVw&sig2=hZdJ-FV_NyXOD_-821fcGQ
Under the deal, Iran agreed to lose 97 percent of its stockpile of enriched uranium and give up 14,000 of its 20,000 centrifuges, which are needed to enrich uranium. It also agreed to curb production of plutonium (the other element that can be used to build a bomb) and dismantle its one plutonium reactor.
Yes, the same politifact that said if you like your healthcare plan you can keep your healthcare plan. Pants On Fire: PolitiFact Tries To Hide That It Rated 'True' in 2008 Obamacare's 'Keep Your Health Plan' Promise
BTW, you're totally wrong about the Iran deal DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Jesus you're dumb, dupes.Democrat Fake News Alert. Movin on...
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal : The Two ...
www.npr.org/sections/.../6-things-you-should-know-about-the-iran-nuclear-deal
Jul 14, 2015 - Under the deal, Iran also agrees to give up its most advanced ... Another big part of the deal is that Iran has agreed to reduce its stockpile of uranium by 98 ... Iran were to someday walk away from it, the breakout time would be ...
Iran deal: A treaty or not? - CNNPolitics.com - CNN.com
www.cnn.com/2015/03/12/politics/iran-nuclear-deal-treaty-obama-administration/
Mar 12, 2015 - When it comes to the Iran nuclear deal, not necessarily. ... object to a pact they warn could eventually give Tehran a nuclear bomb. ... tied the administration's bid to keep the deal away from Congress to ... the United States to commitments under international law; i.e., a treaty, or a less stringent arrangement.
Indeed, they state what the aim, i.e. the object, that is to say, what the end GOAL is without making an assessment as to wheather it will pan out that way. No one at CNN or NPR will because they can read the tea leaves and they don't want to lose any further credibility. Indeed NPR is the master at bias via omission. I listen to them every morning. But nevertheless they will not make an assessment of what the plan will do. They will only write about what the agreement intends to do. Indeed you and I don't know all of the plan because as are in all international agreements there are secret agreements within them.
It's real news, it's called journalism. You brainwashed dupes wouldn't understand....Real news TRIES to ignore your crap bs propaganda, of course. Fact checkers are the new industry to keep up with your crap.Jesus you're dumb, dupes.Democrat Fake News Alert. Movin on...
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal : The Two ...
www.npr.org/sections/.../6-things-you-should-know-about-the-iran-nuclear-deal
Jul 14, 2015 - Under the deal, Iran also agrees to give up its most advanced ... Another big part of the deal is that Iran has agreed to reduce its stockpile of uranium by 98 ... Iran were to someday walk away from it, the breakout time would be ...
Iran deal: A treaty or not? - CNNPolitics.com - CNN.com
www.cnn.com/2015/03/12/politics/iran-nuclear-deal-treaty-obama-administration/
Mar 12, 2015 - When it comes to the Iran nuclear deal, not necessarily. ... object to a pact they warn could eventually give Tehran a nuclear bomb. ... tied the administration's bid to keep the deal away from Congress to ... the United States to commitments under international law; i.e., a treaty, or a less stringent arrangement.
Indeed, they state what the aim, i.e. the object, that is to say, what the end GOAL is without making an assessment as to wheather it will pan out that way. No one at CNN or NPR will because they can read the tea leaves and they don't want to lose any further credibility. Indeed NPR is the master at bias via omission. I listen to them every morning. But nevertheless they will not make an assessment of what the plan will do. They will only write about what the agreement intends to do. Indeed you and I don't know all of the plan because as are in all international agreements there are secret agreements within them.
The thread-title indicates another Trump-Hater fantasy. It has nothing to do with News or facts. It's Democrat Fake News. I usually skip these farces. In fact, i don't know why i'm still here. I'm out. Take care.
It's real news, it's called journalism. You brainwashed dupes wouldn't understand....Real news TRIES to ignore the your crap bs propaganda, of course. Fact checkers are the new industry to keep up with your crap.Jesus you're dumb, dupes.Democrat Fake News Alert. Movin on...
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal : The Two ...
www.npr.org/sections/.../6-things-you-should-know-about-the-iran-nuclear-deal
Jul 14, 2015 - Under the deal, Iran also agrees to give up its most advanced ... Another big part of the deal is that Iran has agreed to reduce its stockpile of uranium by 98 ... Iran were to someday walk away from it, the breakout time would be ...
Iran deal: A treaty or not? - CNNPolitics.com - CNN.com
www.cnn.com/2015/03/12/politics/iran-nuclear-deal-treaty-obama-administration/
Mar 12, 2015 - When it comes to the Iran nuclear deal, not necessarily. ... object to a pact they warn could eventually give Tehran a nuclear bomb. ... tied the administration's bid to keep the deal away from Congress to ... the United States to commitments under international law; i.e., a treaty, or a less stringent arrangement.
Indeed, they state what the aim, i.e. the object, that is to say, what the end GOAL is without making an assessment as to wheather it will pan out that way. No one at CNN or NPR will because they can read the tea leaves and they don't want to lose any further credibility. Indeed NPR is the master at bias via omission. I listen to them every morning. But nevertheless they will not make an assessment of what the plan will do. They will only write about what the agreement intends to do. Indeed you and I don't know all of the plan because as are in all international agreements there are secret agreements within them.
The thread-title indicates another Trump-Hater fantasy. It has nothing to do with News or facts. It's Democrat Fake News. I usually skip these farces. In fact, i don't know why i'm still here. I'm out. Take care.
