Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude, I repeat, when asked what "republicans" you were talking about, you started whining that I was nitpicking words and that you were talking about Trump. Obviously you were not talking about Trump.It was an argument made broadly by Republicans, from Trump to Congress members to media personalities.
You aren’t shredding anything by claiming to not know what was said.
Your inability to understand the case against Trump does not make it nonsensical.Of course.
Exhibit A is the nonsensical indictment brought by persecutor Bragg.
Ya know, bug, your ongoing denial of facts and reality doesn’t make them go away.
Obviously I was talking about Trump and other republicans.Dude, I repeat, when asked what "republicans" you were talking about, you started whining that I was nitpicking words and that you were talking about Trump. Obviously you were not talking about Trump.
And that reason is that it's the only coping mechanism left to them.There is a reason you folks don't like to refer to the indictments as having come from multiple grand juries. There's a reason you like using deceptive language like the Dem's persecution.
Zzz. There is a reason you guys like to pretend that the persecutions weren’t all orchestrated.There is a reason you folks don't like to refer to the indictments as having come from multiple grand juries.
There’s a reason you choose to deny the truth.There's a reason you like using deceptive language like the Dem's persecution.
Nonsense. Keep two words in mind: “ham sandwich.”The charges would have gone nowhere if the grand juries didn't find the evidence compelling enough to indict.
No. They are just more of your vapid empty silly stupid baseless clams.I know you hate being reminded of that but them's the facts.
I do understand the fake case. That’s the issue you just don’t like to see how much of a fraud it is. Or you don’t like to admit it.Your inability to understand the case against Trump does not make it nonsensical.
Bingo.And that reason is that it's the only coping mechanism left to them.
Admitting the Orange God did anything wrong simply is not an option.
So they have to invent stories like a jilted lover would, when his lover leaves and goes incommunicado.
"I bet she just took a little vacation. Probably went to visit her mom."
Denial is a powerful thing.
It's fascinating to watch this abnormal psychology unfurl in real time.
Have you noticed how reflexively you fall back on these talking points while being unable to present any credible evidence what so ever. I have noticed.There is a reason you guys like to pretend that the persecutions weren’t all orchestrated.
I see that I'm upsetting you. I'll stop.Obviously I was talking about Trump and other republicans.
I’m not whining. I’m just observing your inability to substantively reply to the point being made because your argument is fundamentally weak.
Because you say so.I do understand the fake case. That’s the issue you just don’t like to see how much of a fraud it is. Or you don’t like to admit it.
Either way, you’re just a useless hack.
You are almost as insightful as I expected.I see that I'm upsetting you. I'll stop.
Have a blessed day.
If Trump gets on, he needs to sack every Lefty out of government this time. And needs to stop any finance going to New York and remove that agenda judge. Also, bus millions of immigrants to New York.‘I Would Have Every Right To Go After Them’
Surveying the news of the past 24 hours, we’re presented with a particularly sobering reflection of our current state of affairs. I will lay it out brick by brick in the items below, but first I want to circle back to Donald Trump’s appearance two nights ago on Sean Hannity’s Fox News program.
Hannity asked a leading question, clearly trying to throw Trump a softball that will let him deny his intention to use the office of the presidency to exact retribution against his political foes – even though Trump has spent many months now promising to do precisely that.
At first, Trump took the easy swing and suggested that he won’t perpetuate what he implies is a cycle of retribution he’s already been victimized by. But then he launched into an extended justification of doing exactly what he had just disclaimed and asserting that he has “every right to go after them”:
Trump Claims He Has Every Right To Prosecute His Enemies
This could be one of the better cons he's invented in a while. Setting up a win-win scenario by which should he be re-elected he can claim righteousness and excite the base for going after his proclaimed enemies, or get credit with the minions if he does not. Because if he goes after those who have held him accountable for his many crimes he'll say he's justified. If he doesn't he'll say he is showing great restraint. The Following will love him either way. This guy is a genius in a manipulative, malevolent kind of way.
Same thing with the hush money trial. Win or lose he set up a construct by which he was being unfairly treated by the system. Acquittal.......the charges were made up. Conviction.......the charges were made up. Amazingly, the rubes fell for it AGAIN.
You’re pretending the case against Trump is “nonsensical”. It’s not easy to understand but that doesn’t make it nonsenseNo. It’s because you’re a useless hack.
You’re pretending the case against Trump is “nonsensical”. It’s not easy to understand but that doesn’t make it nonsense
No he didn’t alter even one business record.He altered business records to hide his NDA which violated campaign laws.
I have no idea. But I sure as fuck wouldn’t take her word on it. Especially after she herself denied it.I bet you believe Trump never had any affair with her.
I don’t know. I also don’t care. That’s of no concern.I bet you believe Trump had no idea Cohen made the NDA.
The jury was entirely deep blue and that hurt in a political Soviet style show trial.The jury didn’t.
Mutually exclusive. It can’t be easy to understand and also nonsense. Nonsense can’t be understood. That’s what makes it nonsense.Nope. It’s easy to understand. It’s just nonsense. Sorry you’re too dimwitted to follow along.
He didn’t do it himself, but he caused them to be altered by his directions as the owner of the business.No he didn’t alter even one business record.
And nothing about the NDA was illegal nor did it violate any campaign law.
Head in the sand.I have no idea. But I sure as fuck wouldn’t take her word on it. Especially after she herself denied it.
Also head in the sand. These matter greatly.I don’t know. I also don’t care. That’s of no concern.
Nonsense. The trial operated under the usual rules of our court system. It wasn’t anything all that unusual. You’re just talking shit because you don’t have a compelling defense. Trump’s highly paid lawyers didn’t have one either , so don’t feel bad.The jury was entirely deep blue and that hurt in a political Soviet style show trial.
If you are talking about McConnell, he's been a never Trumper from day 1.How would you explain the Repub senator's rationale for not voting to convict on charges there was a mountain of evidence for? After all, Don used his position to extort Zelensky in to helping him with his campaign against Biden. One could say his political enemy.
Another Trumper who thinks a President is a King... lots of that going around in Trumplandia, these days...If Trump gets on, he needs to sack every Lefty out of government this time. And needs to stop any finance going to New York and remove that agenda judge. Also, bus millions of immigrants to New York.
Mutually exclusive. It can’t be easy to understand and also nonsense.
Of course it can. You just need to be smart enough to see it for what it is.Nonsense can’t be understood.
Nope. You remain wrong.That’s what makes it nonsense.
They weren’t altered at all.He didn’t do it himself, but he caused them to be altered by his directions as the owner of the business.
Not according to the FEC. You really like being wrong.The NDA was a campaign expense and failing to file it as such was a violation of campaign law.
Your usual position?Head in the sand.
ZzzAlso head in the sand. These matter greatly.
Zzz. You are free to believe that.Nonsense. The trial operated under the usual rules of our court system.
Yea. It was. Most cases with bullshit indictments never make it to trial.It wasn’t anything all that unusual.
No. I’m responding to the shit talker. Hint: that’s you. I don’t need any defense.You’re just talking shit because you don’t have a compelling defense.
I don’t feel bad. The kangaroo court verdict had nothing to do with law or justice. Here, the law and justice can only be reclaimed via the appellate process.Trump’s highly paid lawyers didn’t have one either , so don’t feel bad.
