Trump classified documents case dismissed. Jack Smith loses again.

[CrusaderFrank]

Based on what I am reading it is based on a Clarence Thomas dissent in the immunity case. It will be overturned if appealed. My guess is Cannon is eying a Trump win and a promotion to the Federal Court of Appeals or US Supreme Court. It is win for Trump for the time being.

Wait. Are you saying if God willing, Trump wins, he can appoint anyone as Special Counsel to go after democrats?

 

[Faun]

Geez dembot, that's how they are paid, not if they are a principal or inferior employee for Constitutional purposes.

Nothing in here...

https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/5/7511

...defines them as a principal officer.

 

[JLW]

Wait. Are you saying if God willing, Trump wins, he can appoint anyone as Special Counsel to go after democrats?

If they break the law like he has.

 

[Robert W]

Based on what I am reading it is based on a Clarence Thomas dissent in the immunity case. It will be overturned if appealed. My guess is Cannon is eying a Trump win and a promotion to the Federal Court of Appeals or US Supreme Court. It is win for Trump for the time being.

It is all over. Democrats will point to this as the day they lost.

 

[struth]

Nothing in here...

https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/5/7511

...defines them as a principal officer.

Cool, but has nothing to do with constitutional review of the appointment clause

 

[Faun]

Cool, but has nothing to do with constitutional review of the appointment clause

The appointment clause does not pertain to private attorneys.

 

[struth]

The appointment clause does not pertain to private attorneys.

It does if they are appointed to govt positions

Like when Jack Smith took a job with the DOJ

 

[Faun]

It does if they are appointed to govt positions

Like when Jack Smith took a job with the DOJ

Post your source...

 

[struth]

Post your source...

Um the US Constitution

 

[SeaMajor7]

The copium of the demented LEFT is industrial strength in this thread.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

If they break the law like he has.

Biden illegally retained over 7,000 pages of classified documents to Trump's 135

 

[Faun]

Um the US Constitution

Nothing in there says what you're claiming. Cite the article, section & paragraph, or amendment, you're referring to...

 

[Faun]

Biden illegally retained over 7,000 pages of classified documents to Trump's 135

So? He should be charged for that.

 

[struth]

Nothing in there says what you're claiming. Cite the article, section & paragraph, or amendment, you're referring to...

Appointments Clause

Smith was not a private attorney, working for the DOJ. He was a private attorney that took a job with the DOJ.

A job that required him to be confirme by the senate, which never happened

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nah, they'll just drop it.

You're delusional. Not how the DOJ works.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Wait. Are you saying if God willing, Trump wins, he can appoint anyone as Special Counsel to go after democrats?

You sure can. It has always been that way.

How do you think Ken Starr ended up in court over a blowjob?

 

[struth]

So? He should be charged for that.

Hur, who was confirmed by the senate, did an investigation and determined he was too senile to prosecute. We don’t prosecute senile people in the United States

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Biden illegally retained over 7,000 pages of classified documents to Trump's 135

 

[struth]

You sure can. It has always been that way.

No it hasn’t

 

[bigrebnc1775]

LOLOLOL

PussyBitch, you're a fucking imbecile. We're talking about a private attorney hired as an individual Special Counsel, not the federal U.S. Office of Special Counsel

Move along dumbass