Yeah the nutbag claiming Obama hired a law firm to keep them private doesn't in any way imply a legal requirement to provide them.I haven't seen anyone say he is legally required to provide them. The narrow and irrelevant point you keep arguing.
I'll let you go tell Redfish he's not making any sense.
Here you go, Sparky
"So that's where we started our research. We did our own tally of payments made to Perkins Coie, all of which were reported, as required by law, in quarterly disbursement reports filed to the FEC by his campaign organization, Obama for America. We found that in the last quarter of 2008 -- which is roughly the period after Obama was elected in early November -- and the first three quarters of 2009, which is when WND wrote its story, Obama for America did, in fact, pay Perkins Coie $1.7 million. If you add in the payments made in subsequent months, the fees paid to Perkins Coie between October 2008 and December 2010 rises to $2.6 million."
Donald Trump claims Obama has spent 2 million in legal fees defending lawsuits about his birth certificate PolitiFact
Here you go Sparky- what you left out:
From your article
![rulings%2Ftom-false.gif](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politifact.com.s3.amazonaws.com%2Frulings%252Ftom-false.gif&hash=b1f729eca0724567ad72270e2bd7abfa)
But what does that $2.6 million number mean? Not what Trump and others have assumed.
Specifically, the payments by Obama for America to Perkins Coie covered all sorts of legal expenses -- not just expenses related to birth certificate issues.