Trump guilty of battery and defamation of E Jean Carroll

1. I don't see anything about rape in there.
2. Where's the evidence?
- 2 people claiming under oath that Carroll told them about the incident at the time.
- 1 other person claiming the same happened to her.
- 1 psychiatrist stating Carroll shows signs of trauma from sexual abuse.
- 1 videotape in which Trump can be heard saying he does exactly what he's accused of.
- 1 videotape of a deposition where you can hear Trump stating that sexual assault being wrong is morally ambiguous when you're a "star"
 
Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, and Now Donald Trump

juries say...

trump sexual predator 2.jpg
 
You prefer the term sexual assaulter? So, now you can sexually assault somebody, whether they want it of not, but that isn't sexual abuse? She sounded like she felt abused. The jury agreed to the tune of $5,000,000.00 Dollars.
Maybe the jury accepted the judge’s instruction that they could find Trump liable based on a simple undesired kiss by him on her cheek. So, we don’t actually know what the jury determined specifically.

Very poor legal instruction.

And let’s say the jury did think he committed an act of brief sexual intercourse on her without consent. Does that mean he did it? Or does it just mean that they bought her story?

You know, even with the higher standard of proof in a criminal case, sometimes juries do make factual findings that are wrong. Even easier to do with the lower standards in n a civil trial.

In any event, Trump has never been convicted of any crime. Maybe that’s something you and guys like Taz should try to remember.
 
What biased rulings? Trump put on no defense, because he did not have one. Last week, from Europe, Trump bragged to reporters how he was going to charge back to America and confront the charges head on. Then when the judge went out of his way to accommodate Trump, the sorry coward refused to show up. Bigly!!!
If you didn’t follow the trial, you wouldn’t know. So why ask now?
 
Maybe the jury accepted the judges instruction that they could find Trump liable based on a simple undesired kiss by him on her cheek. So, we don’t actually know what the jury determined specifically.

Very poor legal instruction.

And let’s say the jury did think he committed an act of brief sexual intercourse on her without consent. Does that mean he did it? Or does it just mean that they bought her story?

You know, even with the higher standard of proof in a criminal case, sometimes juries do make factual findings that are wrong. Even easier to do with the lower standards in n a civil trial.

In any event, Trump has never been convicted of any crime. Maybe that’s something you and guys like Taz should try to remember.
Neither was OJ Simpson.

Now go ahead and claim OJ did not murder his wife and Ron Goldman.
 
The first of many to come. This should embolden the many other women Trump has "grabbed by the pu..y and "kiss just kiss; it's automatic."
I hope hundreds of women come forward now. They could sue him for Billions.
 
Some things need repeating. This happens to be one of them:

Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, and Now Donald Trump

juries say...


trump sexual predator 2.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top