Trump guilty of battery and defamation of E Jean Carroll

Trump"
"A Manhattan jury has found that Trump sexually abused and defamed E. Jean Carroll, and awarded $5 million in damages."

He lied about the rape.
We don’t even know that this is what the jury determined, given the stupid legal instructions from the judge.

So, once again, dainty offers nothing of value to the discussion.
 
Trump isn't a sex offender though.
You prefer the term sexual assaulter? So, now you can sexually assault somebody, whether they want it of not, but that isn't sexual abuse? She sounded like she felt abused. The jury agreed to the tune of $5,000,000.00 Dollars.
 
"Overwhelmingly proved it?" Not according to a jury who found reasonable doubt. Because you are right criminal court has a higher standard. Yet in OJ Simpsons case you feel confident to go by the lower standard of civil court. Make up your mind.
Everyone knows OJ is guilty because of the evidence at the scene of the crime.

Race politics got him off because he was black.
 
Trump was accused of rape.

He denied it.

Victim took him to court saying his denial (sicko shit out of Trump's mouth), defamed her.'

Unanimous verdict by jury says he did indeed defame her when he lied about the rape.

trump sexual predator 2.jpg


Trump also confused a photo of the victim with his wife.

after saying the victim was not his type
 
I'm aware, that hardly anyone reads the details of what is going on, so, they don't know this is a lie. You have no credibility here. Do you read your own links?

:dunno:

". . . Because this was a civil case, Trump faces no criminal consequences and, as such, there was never a threat of prison.

Trump's legal team opted not to present a defense, gambling that jurors would find that Carroll had failed to make a persuasive case.

Trump had said Carroll, a former Elle magazine columnist and a registered Democrat, made up the allegations to try to increase sales of her 2019 memoir and to hurt him politically.

Because the case was in civil court, Carroll was required to establish her rape claim by "a preponderance of the evidence" - meaning more likely than not - rather than the higher standard used in criminal cases of "proof beyond a reasonable doubt." Carroll had to show "clear and convincing evidence" to prove her defamation claim.

The trial featured testimony from two women who said Trump sexually assaulted them decades ago.

Former People magazine reporter Natasha Stoynoff told jurors that Trump cornered her at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida in 2005 and forcibly kissed her for a “few minutes” until a butler interrupted the alleged assault. Another woman, Jessica Leeds, testified that Trump kissed her, groped her and put his hand up her skirt on a flight in 1979.

Jurors also heard excerpts from a 2005 "Access Hollywood" video in which Trump says women let him "grab 'em by the pussy."

"Historically, that's true, with stars ... if you look over the last million years," Trump said in an October 2022 video deposition played in court. He has repeatedly denied allegations of sexual misconduct.. . . ."
View attachment 783873


Most non-partisan, critial thinkers, can see, from that exchange, he never moves on them, unless, "they let you do it."

But if they are married, too young, or other wise uninterested? "I couldn't get there, she was married."

Everything you need to know about his character, and about whether he forces himself upon unwilling women? Is right there in that Access Hollywood Tape, if you are non-partisan, and really honest with yourself. Yes, he is a dirtbag, and not loyal to his wife, but. . . OTH, he is no sex offender or rapist.

I know that this does not comport to your agenda, but this leaked tape shows us this truth.


It is a civil case, there is no conviction. His lawyers knew the whole thing was political.

We don't even know if alcohol is involved with these women.

So? Get lost.

The only thing we know for sure, but we have always known, is that Trump has no moral compass.
Blah Blah Blah

Voters will see him as a sexual assaulter.
 
She was a magazine writer. Hang out with the boys and you’re liable to get bounced around a bit. Wouldn’t have happened if she was at home raising kids… where she belonged.

That doesn’t make it appropriate, but it does mean I have zero sympathy for her.
You are a Neanderthal
 

Not exactly a surprise verdict. Unlikely to stand after the judge’s several biased rulings.
What biased rulings? Trump put on no defense, because he did not have one. Last week, from Europe, Trump bragged to reporters how he was going to charge back to America and confront the charges head on. Then when the judge went out of his way to accommodate Trump, the sorry coward refused to show up. Bigly!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top