Trump Is Looking at a Landslide Victory !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[jc456]

Gateway Pundit: Social Media Patterns Show Trump Is Looking at a Landslide Victory


Current polls show the race for President is much tighter than it really is. Ann Coulter warned us years ago in her best seller Slanderthat Democrats and the liberal media always use polls to manipulate and discourage conservatives from voting. Thanks to social media there is more and more evidence that the polls are way off and if things stay as they are, Trump will win in a landslide!


.

I almost feel sorry for you

Well, don't feel sorry for me, feel sorry for the US if Trump loses.


..Like I have stated before , Is Trump the ideal candidate? No.

But, what are our viable options?


.

Gary Johnson is the best candidate in the race by leaps and bounds

that's why you never hear about him from mainstream media. Right? And people are protesting his rallies and things, oh wait, that's Trump. too funny. yep sure loser there taz, go with him. good for you, backing a sure loser. I'll just laugh at all you third party farts.

 

[jc456]

Gateway Pundit: Social Media Patterns Show Trump Is Looking at a Landslide Victory


Current polls show the race for President is much tighter than it really is. Ann Coulter warned us years ago in her best seller Slanderthat Democrats and the liberal media always use polls to manipulate and discourage conservatives from voting. Thanks to social media there is more and more evidence that the polls are way off and if things stay as they are, Trump will win in a landslide!


.

No wonder the US is bankrupt


A socialist community organized who likes to distribute someone elses's wealth is electable


A Billionaire is not

go fig

.

That would be a good point if it wasn't for the fact that Donald Trump is just as progressive as hillary Clinton.

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

except he isn't

 

[jc456]

No wonder the US is bankrupt


A socialist community organized who likes to distribute someone elses's wealth is electable


A Billionaire is not

go fig

.

That would be a good point if it wasn't for the fact that Donald Trump is just as progressive as hillary Clinton.

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

For the umpteenth time, I fully understand that Trump is not the ideal candidate

but he will not start WWIII

nor will he disarm us


.

Not a ideal candidate? The man is a complete fucking disaster! Not only is he a progressive authoritarian douche he doesn't seem to even want to win! Instead of staying on target and exposing Clinton over and over for the stupid crooked shit she does he attacks gold star families and people who are no longer in the race and thier supporters. This man has done huge damage to the party and is smearing conservatism with his stupidity.
We have no good choice. None. One is just as fucking bad as the other .

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk

Points to ponder

Trump beat all the establishment candidates

He is not a professional politician

If he "loses" he is still a billionaire

The powers-that be- refused to indict crooked hillary

The winner will appoint, at least two SCOTUS "justices" - would you rather let Hillary appoint them?


Is the right to bear arms important to you?

Forget all the other unimportant issues until there is no so much at stake.


.

The question that makes your questions meaningless...

"Do you want a 70 year old who has the temperament of a nine year old, to hold the nuclear code?"

Most Americans say "NO! KEEP TRUMP OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE!"

I agree, keep her out of the whitehouse.

 

[jc456]

Gateway Pundit: Social Media Patterns Show Trump Is Looking at a Landslide Victory


Current polls show the race for President is much tighter than it really is. Ann Coulter warned us years ago in her best seller Slanderthat Democrats and the liberal media always use polls to manipulate and discourage conservatives from voting. Thanks to social media there is more and more evidence that the polls are way off and if things stay as they are, Trump will win in a landslide!


.

Trump is looking at a Clinton landslide victory.

he is?

 

[jc456]

If polls can't be trusted then on what basis is anybody ahead in gaining public's favor? Social media patterns have shown to prove what?

Can US election polls be trusted?

Not a day goes by without pundits and the media scrutinizing a new US election poll tracking candidates' performances. But a look at past election surveys suggests it is better to take polls with a grain of salt.

.

Yes, and you silly asses can be trusted to make excuses for your insanity in making him the canidate for President. You are going to lose big this time, barring the intervention of some sort of Deity.

you making that statement puts me at ease. You wouldn't know a fact if it hit you in the nose.

 

[Foxfyre]

Gateway Pundit: Social Media Patterns Show Trump Is Looking at a Landslide Victory


Current polls show the race for President is much tighter than it really is. Ann Coulter warned us years ago in her best seller Slanderthat Democrats and the liberal media always use polls to manipulate and discourage conservatives from voting. Thanks to social media there is more and more evidence that the polls are way off and if things stay as they are, Trump will win in a landslide!


.

No wonder the US is economically fucked up - bankrupt - 19 trillion deficit - a socialist neighborhood organizer who loves to distribute soomebody elses's money is considered electable - a billionaire is no good.= go fig.

.


.

Do you realize that Trump's policies have been independently analyzed and will add 11 TRILLION to that debt you complain about - taking our national debt from 75% of GDP to a economy crushing 127% of GDP?
Promises and Price Tags: A Fiscal Guide to the 2016 Election

Has this group EVER endorsed conservative economic principles? I believe they have not. The reason is that progressives think that just taxing the rich more will solve the problems. They never seem to take into account that a change in economic policy promotes change in the public sector. That is why Obama's strategy to tax more and spend more has failed to promote vigorous economic growth but has instead produced just the opposite. If you consider the opportunities for the private sector to prosper under Trump policies, the economic forecast looks much different. I don't see much opportunity for the economy to prosper under a Hillary Clinton presidency. At least we would have a chance with Trump.

 

[jc456]

We really don't know. The media has discovered that if they are united, there is no way the people can refute what they say. Investigative journalism is dead.

Oh, I think you people are going to find that it is alive and well, much to your chagrin. As this election progresses, I think you are going to see some investigations that will demonstrate that Trump is not at all what he claims in many departments. Why do you think that he is hiding his tax returns.

says who? you? hahahahaahhahaaha you couldn't predict your next meal.

 

[g5000]

Social media patterns, LOL.

A Trump app in which you can vote several times is way more accurate than any scientific poll by Gallup, dontcha know.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Gateway Pundit: Social Media Patterns Show Trump Is Looking at a Landslide Victory


Current polls show the race for President is much tighter than it really is. Ann Coulter warned us years ago in her best seller Slanderthat Democrats and the liberal media always use polls to manipulate and discourage conservatives from voting. Thanks to social media there is more and more evidence that the polls are way off and if things stay as they are, Trump will win in a landslide!


.

Too bad Coulter never proved her 'theory' correct.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Well then, Trump can be President of all the crazy cat ladies on Facebook.

 

[Skylar]

Gateway Pundit: Social Media Patterns Show Trump Is Looking at a Landslide Victory


Current polls show the race for President is much tighter than it really is. Ann Coulter warned us years ago in her best seller Slanderthat Democrats and the liberal media always use polls to manipulate and discourage conservatives from voting. Thanks to social media there is more and more evidence that the polls are way off and if things stay as they are, Trump will win in a landslide!


.

Too bad Coulter never proved her 'theory' correct.

If anything, the opposite is true. In the 2012 presidential election, 19 of 23 polling agencies skewed results to the right, inaccurately favoring republicans by up to 7 points.

 

[peabody]

You only have to look back in recent history to see where polls were wildly off the mark. It's all there to see. With respect to media bias, The FBI and the US Attorney General in New York opened up a joint investigation into the Clinton Foundation on Thursday. This big event went unreported by the MSM. Literally unreported. My question to you is Why would the press ignore this?

More accurately the The Daily Caller claims that such an investigation is underway. It didn't get much play beyond right wing pundit websites.....as there's nothing to back the claims up.

No source, no evidence, no quotes from anyone at the FBI or US Attorney generals office in NY. Nothing.

So why are you accepting it as fact despite the lack of supporting evidence? Simple: Because you want it to be true. Your entire argument is an expression of your desires. Not the evidence.

Maybe you're right, I guess. But you could be wrong. Who knows?

 

[Skylar]

You only have to look back in recent history to see where polls were wildly off the mark. It's all there to see. With respect to media bias, The FBI and the US Attorney General in New York opened up a joint investigation into the Clinton Foundation on Thursday. This big event went unreported by the MSM. Literally unreported. My question to you is Why would the press ignore this?

More accurately the The Daily Caller claims that such an investigation is underway. It didn't get much play beyond right wing pundit websites.....as there's nothing to back the claims up.

No source, no evidence, no quotes from anyone at the FBI or US Attorney generals office in NY. Nothing.

So why are you accepting it as fact despite the lack of supporting evidence? Simple: Because you want it to be true. Your entire argument is an expression of your desires. Not the evidence.

Maybe you're right, I guess. But you could be wrong. Who knows?

November will tell us one way or the other. But polling has a pretty solid track record. You may not want to discount it quite yet.

 

[g5000]

With respect to media bias, The FBI and the US Attorney General in New York opened up a joint investigation into the Clinton Foundation on Thursday. This big event went unreported by the MSM. Literally unreported. My question to you is Why would the press ignore this?

The press has ignored it because the FBI director has said there is no such investigation. You drank the piss of your propaganda outlets.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

that's why you never hear about him from mainstream media. Right? And people are protesting his rallies and things, oh wait, that's Trump. too funny. yep sure loser there taz, go with him. good for you, backing a sure loser. I'll just laugh at all you third party farts.

That's an amusing comment coming from someone who, himself, is backing a sure loser.

 

[peabody]

With respect to media bias, The FBI and the US Attorney General in New York opened up a joint investigation into the Clinton Foundation on Thursday. This big event went unreported by the MSM. Literally unreported. My question to you is Why would the press ignore this?

The press has ignored it because the FBI director has said there is no such investigation. You drank the piss of your propaganda outlets.

I don't drink piss, dude. That would be totally gross, drinking piss. I don't even think I could get a sip down. Not even one sip of piss. No way.

 

[jc456]

that's why you never hear about him from mainstream media. Right? And people are protesting his rallies and things, oh wait, that's Trump. too funny. yep sure loser there taz, go with him. good for you, backing a sure loser. I'll just laugh at all you third party farts.

That's an amusing comment coming from someone who, himself, is backing a sure loser.

I'm backing the next president. you, sure loser.

 

[Skylar]

that's why you never hear about him from mainstream media. Right? And people are protesting his rallies and things, oh wait, that's Trump. too funny. yep sure loser there taz, go with him. good for you, backing a sure loser. I'll just laugh at all you third party farts.

That's an amusing comment coming from someone who, himself, is backing a sure loser.

I'm backing the next president. you, sure loser.

Trump is losing badly. What excuse will you tell yourself when Hillary is elected in November?

 

[jc456]

that's why you never hear about him from mainstream media. Right? And people are protesting his rallies and things, oh wait, that's Trump. too funny. yep sure loser there taz, go with him. good for you, backing a sure loser. I'll just laugh at all you third party farts.

That's an amusing comment coming from someone who, himself, is backing a sure loser.

I'm backing the next president. you, sure loser.

Trump is losing badly. What excuse will you tell yourself when Hillary is elected in November?

I didn't know there was a vote yet! how is it he's losing? Explain.

 

[jc456]

so curious, why so many trump threads if you believe what you believe? 5 to 10 threads a day in here it seems, and yet you're so so convinced he'll lose. i find that absolutely hilarious my friend, hilarious