Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,035
- 56,850
Works for me, and everyone else smart enough to click on it.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Trump Says He Will Be Filing a “Major Motion” Soon in Response to FBI Raid on Mar-a-Lago
- Thread starter skye
- Start date
Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 29,290
- 13,622
That’s totally false.The CFO plead guilty to not claiming all his benefits as income on his personal taxes. Nothing to do with trump or the company
Care4all
Warrior Princess
- Mar 24, 2007
- 73,855
- 28,784
Here's a map,
If trump org had reported it, then Weisselberg would have been caught with his tax evasion scheme.
Trump didn't report he paid him these things, as benefits....as also required under the law. This allowed Weisselberg to cheat the past 15 years....with Trump orgs help.The CFO plead guilty to not claiming all his benefits as income on his personal taxes. Nothing to do with trump or the company
If trump org had reported it, then Weisselberg would have been caught with his tax evasion scheme.
Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 29,290
- 13,622
You’re not smart enough to understand what they’re talking about.Works for me, and everyone else smart enough to click on it.
Sixties Fan
Diamond Member
- Mar 6, 2017
- 58,480
- 11,084
The only court ruling you posted a link to is Bill Clinton's which was about his PERSONAL items, which he could keep because they were like watches, etc?Works for me, and everyone else smart enough to click on it.
Classified, Top Secret Documents are personal possessions of a President or Former President?
There is not court ruling supporting that.
well that’s what the link discusses. Did you not read your own link?That’s totally false.
they did. It’s not their job to report his income and pay his taxesHere's a map,
Trump didn't report he paid him these things, as benefits....as also required under the law. This allowed Weisselberg to cheat the past 15 years....with Trump orgs help.
If trump org had reported it, then Weisselberg would have been caught with his tax evasion scheme.
This sort of thing is rarely prosecuted
it was only prosecuted because the dems have weaponized the executive to threaten trump and those around him
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,035
- 56,850
No distinction was made in the ruling, Simp.The only court ruling you posted a link to is Bill Clinton's which was about his PERSONAL items, which he could keep because they were like watches, etc?
Classified, Top Secret Documents are personal possessions of a President or Former President?
There is not court ruling supporting that.
Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 29,290
- 13,622
well that’s what the link discusses. Did you not read your own link?
Plea Deal Requires Weisselberg to Testify at Trump Organization Trial (Published 2022)
The chief financial officer of the former president’s business is expected to admit to 15 felonies on Thursday and to take the stand at the company’s trial.
Plea Deal Requires Weisselberg to Testify at Trump Organization Trial
The chief financial officer of the former president’s business is expected to admit to 15 felonies on Thursday and to take the stand at the company’s trial.haha yea took a plea about his personal income taxesPlea Deal Requires Weisselberg to Testify at Trump Organization Trial (Published 2022)
The chief financial officer of the former president’s business is expected to admit to 15 felonies on Thursday and to take the stand at the company’s trial.www.nytimes.com
Plea Deal Requires Weisselberg to Testify at Trump Organization Trial
The chief financial officer of the former president’s business is expected to admit to 15 felonies on Thursday and to take the stand at the company’s trial.
Sixties Fan
Diamond Member
- Mar 6, 2017
- 58,480
- 11,084
You give a thread you started as proof on a ruling?????No distinction was made in the ruling, Simp.
Bill Clinton court ruling spells trouble for DOJ in Mar a Lago invasion.
Courts have already decided it is the sole discretion of the President to decide what is his personal records. https://fb.watch/f1nM_0lHgr/
www.usmessageboard.com
Here, this is the real thing:
"All of these items were considered gifts to us," Hillary Clinton, now a senator from New York, told reporters in Rochester, N.Y., yesterday. "That's what the permanent record of the White House showed. . . . But if there is a different intent, we will certainly honor the intention of the donor."
Clinton's transition office added in a statement that the White House usher's office and the White House curator's office reviewed each of the items the Clintons took with them against the official list of White House property.
"In short, gifts did not leave the White House without the approval of the White House Usher's and Curator's Offices," the statement said.
Clintons Plan to Return Some Gifts Not Meant for Their Personal Use
The Clintons promised to return gifts not meant for them as a fresh controversy attached itself to the former first family's departure from Washington.
www.wsj.com
Trump's Classified and Top Secret documents did not go through any process when they left the White House for Mar O Lago. That is the issue. They were not personal items, they belong to the US government.
Kondor3
Cafeteria Centrist
- Jul 29, 2009
- 33,970
- 9,931
Hor$e$hit, Orange a$$-licker...He means he is right between Mao and Stalin.
Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 29,290
- 13,622
In exchange for his testimony against the Trump Organization which is under indictment.haha yea took a plea about his personal income taxes
yeah it certainly gone down hill since trump stopped running itIn exchange for his testimony against the Trump Organization which is under indictment.
Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 29,290
- 13,622
When did he stop running it?yeah it certainly gone down hill since trump stopped running it
2016When did he stop running it?
Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 29,290
- 13,622
Oh gotcha.2016
The criminal activity started in 2005.
DocumentCloud
www.documentcloud.org
2005 is before 2016.
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 61,908
- 55,521
It does not prove it is constitutional. It proves it was signed by a judge. Judges do unconstitutional things.The warrant signed by a judge proves it asshole
Kondor3
Cafeteria Centrist
- Jul 29, 2009
- 33,970
- 9,931
DoJ had probable cause.It does not prove it is constitutional. It proves it was signed by a judge. Judges do unconstitutional things.
DoJ had sworn affadavits.
DoJ presented their case for a warrant.
DoJ was granted a broad-based warrant.
There was absolutely nothing unconstitutional about what happened att Mar-a-Lago.
Sux to be one of you Rumpian Personality Cult minions, I'm sure.
The noose tightens.
Last edited:
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 61,908
- 55,521
The DoJ is weaponized. Period. They are doing the administration's bidding with 0 regard for the rule of law. Fact.DoJ had probable cause.
DoJ had sworn affadavits.
DoJ presented their case for a warrant.
DoJ was granted a broad-based warrant.
There was absolutely nothing unconstitutional about what happened att Mar-a-Lago.
Sux to be one of your Rumpian Personality Cult minions, I'm sure.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 138
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 43
- Views
- 564
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 173
- Replies
- 192
- Views
- 2K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 4K
- Views
- 46K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8514
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 484
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-