Trump Says "Insurance for Everyone."

[BluesLegend]

Laughing. Seriously though.....how many families have you talked to concerning their insurance needs?

But a piano is more important than health!

A liberal mocking generosity, not surprising. From the father, "Well, so much for the element of surprise. I had a crew of giddy girls waiting for me to arrive home. Can't keep a secret around here. You have made me a hero today. I cannot thank your enough for your kindness and generosity and I will be sure to impress it upon all who enjoy this piano and pass it on myself"

Oh you can make up a quote too? Which is more important? A piano or someone getting the health care they need?

^^^ see I told you it pissed the left off.

How did that piss me off? Please show me where I said I was pissed off or gave an eyer of being pissed off. I truly believe in the arts, it is an essential part of being a civilization... however listening to you complain about helping people get health insurance, and then in the next breath say how great a person you are for giving someone a piano amazes me. Your priorities are fucked.

I clearly said I have no problem helping those who are truly in need, and that a nation as wealthy as ours should be doing that. While I'm not perfect, I'm not a saint, I try to practice what I preach hence I give back.

Now understand this. The United States is the best hope not only our own poor but other poor nations on this planet have. But we can't help them if we are freaking broke. $20 trillion in debt and heading for $30 trillion with no end in sight.

If we go down then the world will know real pain and suffering I promise you. This has already happened in human history. So lazy ass moochers who won't get off their ass and pitch in, they are part of that problem they have been throughout history, hence I have little sympathy for them.

 

[BluesLegend]

What's odd, is when liberals learn of my generosity it pisses them off.

Learn of generosity? I have no reason to believe anything you've said. I tried to give someone I know my extra car... he is on disability and has three kids with no vehicle. He turned it down... because he can't afford to tag the car, register it, and pay the insurance for it. Do you believe me? And I'm a full time college student who could use the money from selling the car, not giving it away. Am I telling you this to make myself look better? Nope, to prove a point. Anyone can say something on an Internet forum.

I have made people cry tears of joy with a simple act of generosity, they almost can't believe it which is sad really. I have been fortunate, I'm not a millionaire but earn enough to spread the wealth around a bit. I reward myself absolutely I'm not some saint but as I get older I honestly enjoy giving more.

Yes, you are a "saint" just ask you.

You still here, you may go now I'm finished with you.

Look , I'm sorry but you are a selfish idiot.

Your meltdown is noted, tissue?

 

[Lewdog]

But a piano is more important than health!

A liberal mocking generosity, not surprising. From the father, "Well, so much for the element of surprise. I had a crew of giddy girls waiting for me to arrive home. Can't keep a secret around here. You have made me a hero today. I cannot thank your enough for your kindness and generosity and I will be sure to impress it upon all who enjoy this piano and pass it on myself"

Oh you can make up a quote too? Which is more important? A piano or someone getting the health care they need?

^^^ see I told you it pissed the left off.

How did that piss me off? Please show me where I said I was pissed off or gave an eyer of being pissed off. I truly believe in the arts, it is an essential part of being a civilization... however listening to you complain about helping people get health insurance, and then in the next breath say how great a person you are for giving someone a piano amazes me. Your priorities are fucked.

I clearly said I have no problem helping those who are truly in need, and that a nation as wealthy as ours should be doing that. While I'm not perfect, I'm not a saint, I try to practice what I preach hence I give back.

Now understand this. The United States is the best hope not only our own poor but other poor nations on this planet have. But we can't help them if we are freaking broke. $20 trillion in debt and heading for $30 trillion with no end in sight.

If we go down then the world will know real pain and suffering I promise you. This has already happened in human history. So lazy ass moochers who won't get off their ass and pitch in, they are part of that problem they have been throughout history, hence I have little sympathy for them.

We spend millions upon millions upon millions of dollars in waste every year on things in defense... there is a yard I believe in Indiana full of millions of dollars worth of tanks the Army didn't want... but here on this forum people are complaining about money spent on health care and food stamps. Do you not see the problem with that?

 

[Doc1]

Learn of generosity? I have no reason to believe anything you've said. I tried to give someone I know my extra car... he is on disability and has three kids with no vehicle. He turned it down... because he can't afford to tag the car, register it, and pay the insurance for it. Do you believe me? And I'm a full time college student who could use the money from selling the car, not giving it away. Am I telling you this to make myself look better? Nope, to prove a point. Anyone can say something on an Internet forum.

I have made people cry tears of joy with a simple act of generosity, they almost can't believe it which is sad really. I have been fortunate, I'm not a millionaire but earn enough to spread the wealth around a bit. I reward myself absolutely I'm not some saint but as I get older I honestly enjoy giving more.

Yes, you are a "saint" just ask you.

You still here, you may go now I'm finished with you.

Look , I'm sorry but you are a selfish idiot.

Your meltdown is noted, tissue?

(wink) I never melt down, I've been doing this too long.
You know what Jesus says about those who do anything to be seen
You've already received your reward.

 

[frigidweirdo]

A liberal mocking generosity, not surprising. From the father, "Well, so much for the element of surprise. I had a crew of giddy girls waiting for me to arrive home. Can't keep a secret around here. You have made me a hero today. I cannot thank your enough for your kindness and generosity and I will be sure to impress it upon all who enjoy this piano and pass it on myself"

Oh you can make up a quote too? Which is more important? A piano or someone getting the health care they need?

^^^ see I told you it pissed the left off.

How did that piss me off? Please show me where I said I was pissed off or gave an eyer of being pissed off. I truly believe in the arts, it is an essential part of being a civilization... however listening to you complain about helping people get health insurance, and then in the next breath say how great a person you are for giving someone a piano amazes me. Your priorities are fucked.

I clearly said I have no problem helping those who are truly in need, and that a nation as wealthy as ours should be doing that. While I'm not perfect, I'm not a saint, I try to practice what I preach hence I give back.

Now understand this. The United States is the best hope not only our own poor but other poor nations on this planet have. But we can't help them if we are freaking broke. $20 trillion in debt and heading for $30 trillion with no end in sight.

If we go down then the world will know real pain and suffering I promise you. This has already happened in human history. So lazy ass moochers who won't get off their ass and pitch in, they are part of that problem they have been throughout history, hence I have little sympathy for them.

We spend millions upon millions upon millions of dollars in waste every year on things in defense... there is a yard I believe in Indiana full of millions of dollars worth of tanks the Army didn't want... but here on this forum people are complaining about money spent on health care and food stamps. Do you not see the problem with that?

Or how people are complaining about money spent on healthcare, but support the most expensive healthcare system in the world, but get pissy when the price increases slightly because a black man did it.

 

[usmbguest5318]

What exactly does he mean by that?

I don't think it even matters that we understand what he means by saying "insurance for everyone." The man says all sorts of things that are without real meaning and that don't later mean what they did when he said them the first time round. Why should this be any different?

 

[BluesLegend]

A liberal mocking generosity, not surprising. From the father, "Well, so much for the element of surprise. I had a crew of giddy girls waiting for me to arrive home. Can't keep a secret around here. You have made me a hero today. I cannot thank your enough for your kindness and generosity and I will be sure to impress it upon all who enjoy this piano and pass it on myself"

Oh you can make up a quote too? Which is more important? A piano or someone getting the health care they need?

^^^ see I told you it pissed the left off.

How did that piss me off? Please show me where I said I was pissed off or gave an eyer of being pissed off. I truly believe in the arts, it is an essential part of being a civilization... however listening to you complain about helping people get health insurance, and then in the next breath say how great a person you are for giving someone a piano amazes me. Your priorities are fucked.

I clearly said I have no problem helping those who are truly in need, and that a nation as wealthy as ours should be doing that. While I'm not perfect, I'm not a saint, I try to practice what I preach hence I give back.

Now understand this. The United States is the best hope not only our own poor but other poor nations on this planet have. But we can't help them if we are freaking broke. $20 trillion in debt and heading for $30 trillion with no end in sight.

If we go down then the world will know real pain and suffering I promise you. This has already happened in human history. So lazy ass moochers who won't get off their ass and pitch in, they are part of that problem they have been throughout history, hence I have little sympathy for them.

We spend millions upon millions upon millions of dollars in waste every year on things in defense... there is a yard I believe in Indiana full of millions of dollars worth of tanks the Army didn't want... but here on this forum people are complaining about money spent on health care and food stamps. Do you not see the problem with that?

You are preaching to the choir, I'm not trying to insult you but you sound like a fiscal conservative, you keep thinking like that next thing you know you will be listening to Rush Limbaugh.

 

[BluesLegend]

I have made people cry tears of joy with a simple act of generosity, they almost can't believe it which is sad really. I have been fortunate, I'm not a millionaire but earn enough to spread the wealth around a bit. I reward myself absolutely I'm not some saint but as I get older I honestly enjoy giving more.

Yes, you are a "saint" just ask you.

You still here, you may go now I'm finished with you.

Look , I'm sorry but you are a selfish idiot.

Your meltdown is noted, tissue?

(wink) I never melt down, I've been doing this too long.
You know what Jesus says about those who do anything to be seen
You've already received your reward.

Oh I think you are heading for the eternal toaster go concern yourself with that.

 

[Lewdog]

Oh you can make up a quote too? Which is more important? A piano or someone getting the health care they need?

^^^ see I told you it pissed the left off.

How did that piss me off? Please show me where I said I was pissed off or gave an eyer of being pissed off. I truly believe in the arts, it is an essential part of being a civilization... however listening to you complain about helping people get health insurance, and then in the next breath say how great a person you are for giving someone a piano amazes me. Your priorities are fucked.

I clearly said I have no problem helping those who are truly in need, and that a nation as wealthy as ours should be doing that. While I'm not perfect, I'm not a saint, I try to practice what I preach hence I give back.

Now understand this. The United States is the best hope not only our own poor but other poor nations on this planet have. But we can't help them if we are freaking broke. $20 trillion in debt and heading for $30 trillion with no end in sight.

If we go down then the world will know real pain and suffering I promise you. This has already happened in human history. So lazy ass moochers who won't get off their ass and pitch in, they are part of that problem they have been throughout history, hence I have little sympathy for them.

We spend millions upon millions upon millions of dollars in waste every year on things in defense... there is a yard I believe in Indiana full of millions of dollars worth of tanks the Army didn't want... but here on this forum people are complaining about money spent on health care and food stamps. Do you not see the problem with that?

You are preaching to the choir, I'm not trying to insult you but you sound like a fiscal conservative, you keep thinking like that next thing you know you will be listening to Rush Limbaugh.

I just believe in being financially responsible... period. That's why I'm an Independent. I base my decisions on what I feel is right and wrong and not along party lines. I truly believe in having a strong military. I think that military personnel should be paid well. I think we should never send anyone into battle unless they have all the best gear... BUT I don't believe in the idea you have a budget and you spend to the max of that budget just so that when the next budget comes up they don't cut it because they see you can spend money responsibly. You know that right? When these guys do a budget... they make sure to spend all the money regardless if they need to or not, so that their budget doesn't get cut in the future.

 

[Contumacious]

Tell me Mr Weirdo

How much did Obama spend destroying Libya? Let me remind you each tomahawk missile costs $1.41 million.

How much did he pay AlBaghdaddy

How much did he spend sending troop to Poland? How much did he pay Albaghdaddy to pretend that he was with the "Syrian Resistance?

What was all that for?

.

.

You're assuming a lot by calling me "Mr Weirdo" aren't you?

Obama shouldn't have gone into Libya.

But you're again making more assumptions that Trump won't do anything in his time in office that will cost money..... or something like that. What's your point? Trump hasn't spent any money as president yet, he must be great????

Tell me Frigid

Would Killary have saved us a lot of money by starting WWIII in order to teach the Russkies a lesson?


..

.

Would Hillary have started WW3 with the Russians? No. So..... what kind of a question is that?

It's the sort of question that introduces a fallacy in there.

"Tell me, when you cheat on your wife, do you eat peanuts?"

"I don't cheat on my wife"

"I asked you a question, answer it"

"But, I don't cheat on my wife"

"Fucking moron liberal"

So much bullshit, so litttle time

here from the liberal rag Huffpost



Hillary Clinton’s Enthusiasm for Regime Change Wars


Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton champions wars to effectuate regime change. Their immorality, illegality, and stupidity do not diminish Ms. Clinton’s enthusiasm for treating independent nations as serfs of the United States

Do you understand now why I need to Insult you?

You need to insult me because you felt that High School was the best time of your life and that Bullying was what made it so?

You do realize that this is a place to DEBATE, to TALK POLITICS and yet you feel the need to insult. Come off it dude, stop trying to justify the unjustifiable.

The problem is that you people believe that fascism and socialism are fashion statements.


Instead of analyzing the effects of having the government control the economy and our lives.

It would be different if you folks bought land in Idaho and created a nice commune where the ONLY ones affected by your crazy policies are yourselves.

.

.

 

[usmbguest5318]

I'm an Independent.

I truly believe in having a strong military.

Doesn't everyone believe that? After all, a weak military is only good for one thing: attacking one's own people.

I don't believe in the idea you have a budget and you spend to the max of that budget just so that when the next budget comes up they don't cut it because they see you can spend money responsibly. You know that right? When these guys do a budget... they make sure to spend all the money regardless if they need to or not, so that their budget doesn't get cut in the future.

Sort of, yes, but not exactly either. Part of that "spend it all" mentality derives from not wanting to have something left over that can be directed to places either party doesn't want to see it go. There's also the psycho-optics aspect: if they don't spend it all, it looks as though they asked for money they didn't really need.

More interesting to me is why they don't balance the budget. It's not so much that I think the federal government has to have a balanced budget -- in fact for U.S. exports, that wouldn't be a good thing because it'd make the dollar stronger, thus making exported goods cost relatively more than the foreign made products with which they compete (yet another reason "bring back manufacturing" doesn't bode well for exporting manufacturers) -- but rather that for all the rhetoric about it, you'd think they'd just friggin' do it and move on to solve other/new issues. I'm just tired of hearing the same crap over and over when the fact is they what they want to do is doable and the only thing standing in the way of doing it is Congress' will to make it happen.

 

[Lewdog]

I'm an Independent.

I truly believe in having a strong military.

Doesn't everyone believe that? After all, a weak military is only good for one thing: attacking one's own people.

I don't believe in the idea you have a budget and you spend to the max of that budget just so that when the next budget comes up they don't cut it because they see you can spend money responsibly. You know that right? When these guys do a budget... they make sure to spend all the money regardless if they need to or not, so that their budget doesn't get cut in the future.

Sort of, yes, but not exactly either. Part of that "spend it all" mentality derives from not wanting to have something left over that can be directed to places either party doesn't want to see it go. There's also the psycho-optics aspect: if they don't spend it all, it looks as though they asked for money they didn't really need.

More interesting to me is why they don't balance the budget. It's not so much that I think the federal government has to have a balanced budget -- in fact for U.S. exports, that wouldn't be a good thing because it'd make the dollar stronger, thus making exported goods cost relatively more than the foreign made products with which they compete (yet another reason "bring back manufacturing" doesn't bode well for exporting manufacturers) -- but rather that for all the rhetoric about it, you'd think they'd just friggin' do it and move on to solve other/new issues. I'm just tired of hearing the same crap over and over when the fact is they what they want to do is doable and the only thing standing in the way of doing it is Congress' will to make it happen.

There are lots of people that think we should cut the military... we spend more on the military than the next 5 countries combined.

 

[usmbguest5318]

I'm an Independent.

I truly believe in having a strong military.

Doesn't everyone believe that? After all, a weak military is only good for one thing: attacking one's own people.

I don't believe in the idea you have a budget and you spend to the max of that budget just so that when the next budget comes up they don't cut it because they see you can spend money responsibly. You know that right? When these guys do a budget... they make sure to spend all the money regardless if they need to or not, so that their budget doesn't get cut in the future.

Sort of, yes, but not exactly either. Part of that "spend it all" mentality derives from not wanting to have something left over that can be directed to places either party doesn't want to see it go. There's also the psycho-optics aspect: if they don't spend it all, it looks as though they asked for money they didn't really need.

More interesting to me is why they don't balance the budget. It's not so much that I think the federal government has to have a balanced budget -- in fact for U.S. exports, that wouldn't be a good thing because it'd make the dollar stronger, thus making exported goods cost relatively more than the foreign made products with which they compete (yet another reason "bring back manufacturing" doesn't bode well for exporting manufacturers) -- but rather that for all the rhetoric about it, you'd think they'd just friggin' do it and move on to solve other/new issues. I'm just tired of hearing the same crap over and over when the fact is they what they want to do is doable and the only thing standing in the way of doing it is Congress' will to make it happen.

There are lots of people that think we should cut the military... we spend more on the military than the next 5 countries combined.

Okay...I don't measure military strength by how much is spent on the military. Does anyone? I measure it by capability.

If someone were to say "we should have the most expensive military," or even that we should have an expensive military," I wouldn't out of hand agree with them.

 

[frigidweirdo]

You're assuming a lot by calling me "Mr Weirdo" aren't you?

Obama shouldn't have gone into Libya.

But you're again making more assumptions that Trump won't do anything in his time in office that will cost money..... or something like that. What's your point? Trump hasn't spent any money as president yet, he must be great????

Tell me Frigid

Would Killary have saved us a lot of money by starting WWIII in order to teach the Russkies a lesson?


..

.

Would Hillary have started WW3 with the Russians? No. So..... what kind of a question is that?

It's the sort of question that introduces a fallacy in there.

"Tell me, when you cheat on your wife, do you eat peanuts?"

"I don't cheat on my wife"

"I asked you a question, answer it"

"But, I don't cheat on my wife"

"Fucking moron liberal"

So much bullshit, so litttle time

here from the liberal rag Huffpost



Hillary Clinton’s Enthusiasm for Regime Change Wars


Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton champions wars to effectuate regime change. Their immorality, illegality, and stupidity do not diminish Ms. Clinton’s enthusiasm for treating independent nations as serfs of the United States

Do you understand now why I need to Insult you?

You need to insult me because you felt that High School was the best time of your life and that Bullying was what made it so?

You do realize that this is a place to DEBATE, to TALK POLITICS and yet you feel the need to insult. Come off it dude, stop trying to justify the unjustifiable.

The problem is that you people believe that fascism and socialism are fashion statements.


Instead of analyzing the effects of having the government control the economy and our lives.

It would be different if you folks bought land in Idaho and created a nice commune where the ONLY ones affected by your crazy policies are yourselves.

.

.

No, the problem is that YOU make assumptions about people when you have no fucking clue about me.

You don't know, you're replying to what you think is the typical "libtard" or some other childish term that commonly gets used on boards like this.

Maybe if you took the time to actually debate me, instead of making silly assumptions and insulting, you might learn something different about people.

 

[Dragonlady]

What exactly does he mean by that? Single payer?

When asked how he would pay for it, his response was "the government."

lol, this is the guy is who you Repubs voted for?

Again, we wait for the facts, not rumors from the press or soundbites..

We're smart you are not.


PS you can't cause us to panic and turn....he pisses off you guys way too much, we have given him him a long.leash just because he breaks all the norms.

Yeah, and he's going to strangle you with it.

I can't wait to watch your head explode when he proposes Canadian health care for you dips.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I'm an Independent.

I truly believe in having a strong military.

Doesn't everyone believe that? After all, a weak military is only good for one thing: attacking one's own people.

I don't believe in the idea you have a budget and you spend to the max of that budget just so that when the next budget comes up they don't cut it because they see you can spend money responsibly. You know that right? When these guys do a budget... they make sure to spend all the money regardless if they need to or not, so that their budget doesn't get cut in the future.

Sort of, yes, but not exactly either. Part of that "spend it all" mentality derives from not wanting to have something left over that can be directed to places either party doesn't want to see it go. There's also the psycho-optics aspect: if they don't spend it all, it looks as though they asked for money they didn't really need.

More interesting to me is why they don't balance the budget. It's not so much that I think the federal government has to have a balanced budget -- in fact for U.S. exports, that wouldn't be a good thing because it'd make the dollar stronger, thus making exported goods cost relatively more than the foreign made products with which they compete (yet another reason "bring back manufacturing" doesn't bode well for exporting manufacturers) -- but rather that for all the rhetoric about it, you'd think they'd just friggin' do it and move on to solve other/new issues. I'm just tired of hearing the same crap over and over when the fact is they what they want to do is doable and the only thing standing in the way of doing it is Congress' will to make it happen.

There are lots of people that think we should cut the military... we spend more on the military than the next 5 countries combined.

Okay...I don't measure military strength by how much is spent on the military. Does anyone? I measure it by capability.

If someone were to say "we should have the most expensive military," or even that we should have an expensive military," I wouldn't out of hand agree with them.

Well, the US is trying to produce the next generation of technology, so it's expensive. Does that lead to capability? Sure it does. However you only need such capability when you're going around invading and bombing other countries.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Maybe Trump will call all his voters who have Obamaphones and ask them if he should repeal the Lifeline Assistance program...

"I put all these billionaires in my Cabinet because I promised to look out for the little guy."

As opposed to those political hacks who make money only in govt, no thanks

 

[Dragonlady]

I'm an Independent.

I truly believe in having a strong military.

Doesn't everyone believe that? After all, a weak military is only good for one thing: attacking one's own people.

I don't believe in the idea you have a budget and you spend to the max of that budget just so that when the next budget comes up they don't cut it because they see you can spend money responsibly. You know that right? When these guys do a budget... they make sure to spend all the money regardless if they need to or not, so that their budget doesn't get cut in the future.

Sort of, yes, but not exactly either. Part of that "spend it all" mentality derives from not wanting to have something left over that can be directed to places either party doesn't want to see it go. There's also the psycho-optics aspect: if they don't spend it all, it looks as though they asked for money they didn't really need.

More interesting to me is why they don't balance the budget. It's not so much that I think the federal government has to have a balanced budget -- in fact for U.S. exports, that wouldn't be a good thing because it'd make the dollar stronger, thus making exported goods cost relatively more than the foreign made products with which they compete (yet another reason "bring back manufacturing" doesn't bode well for exporting manufacturers) -- but rather that for all the rhetoric about it, you'd think they'd just friggin' do it and move on to solve other/new issues. I'm just tired of hearing the same crap over and over when the fact is they what they want to do is doable and the only thing standing in the way of doing it is Congress' will to make it happen.

There are lots of people that think we should cut the military... we spend more on the military than the next 5 countries combined.

9 - the next 9 countries combined, 8 of which are your allies.

 

[theHawk]

We've never been against healthcare or insurance. That's always been a progressive lie in order to demonize the right. What we cannot do is have income redistribution through subsidies like the ACA does, it just fucks over the middle class. Forcing the lower class to pay for most of their own health care is the way to go.

Huh? WTF is wrong with you? The lower class can barely afford to pay their fucking rent, how can they pay for health care in this country? Has living in Germany given you a lobotomy?

Most of the middle class can barely afford to pay their mortgage.
They'll just have to save more money instead of spending it on unnecessary things. Instead of tax dollars going to welfare checks, it can help subsidize their healthcare. Don't worry, there will be plenty of jobs when Trump takes over and kicks out all those illegals. Most of the lower class will be able to get two jobs.

Jesus dude. You really are out of your fucking mind. You're just not living on the same planet as the rest of us. What sort of jobs do you think illegals have anyway? Do you think they're performing open heart surgery? Do you think they're constructing elaborate plans for commercial buildings? Do you think they're arguing cases in court rooms? lol, dude...they're cleaning fucking houses, mowing lawns and picking strawberries.

Yup, they do low skill work. You know, the stuff people on welfare should be doing themselves. The stuff they would be doing if it weren't for welfare paying them to sit on their asses all day. You act as if those jobs are beneath people doing.

You mean like all the people on welfare in red states?

People on welfare in any state. Why do you retards like to bring up "red state" welfare as if its going to change how we feel about welfare?

 

[theHawk]

We've never been against healthcare or insurance. That's always been a progressive lie in order to demonize the right. What we cannot do is have income redistribution through subsidies like the ACA does, it just fucks over the middle class. Forcing the lower class to pay for most of their own health care is the way to go.

Huh? WTF is wrong with you? The lower class can barely afford to pay their fucking rent, how can they pay for health care in this country? Has living in Germany given you a lobotomy?

Most of the middle class can barely afford to pay their mortgage.
They'll just have to save more money instead of spending it on unnecessary things. Instead of tax dollars going to welfare checks, it can help subsidize their healthcare. Don't worry, there will be plenty of jobs when Trump takes over and kicks out all those illegals. Most of the lower class will be able to get two jobs.

Jesus dude. You really are out of your fucking mind. You're just not living on the same planet as the rest of us. What sort of jobs do you think illegals have anyway? Do you think they're performing open heart surgery? Do you think they're constructing elaborate plans for commercial buildings? Do you think they're arguing cases in court rooms? lol, dude...they're cleaning fucking houses, mowing lawns and picking strawberries.

Yup, they do low skill work. You know, the stuff people on welfare should be doing themselves. The stuff they would be doing if it weren't for welfare paying them to sit on their asses all day. You act as if those jobs are beneath people doing.

What made you do think that these people on welfare will give that up just to do a dirty work? Just imagine if they have kids ....... they have to pay babysitter just to make less than $10.
You are in the different planet dude.

Maybe they'll stop having kids if they can't afford it. We have to stop rewarding bad behavior if you want to see progress.