Trump's Muslim ban is NOT unconstitutional!!

[EverCurious]

Thank you lying media ( and all you useful idiots who blindly follow them )

What??!! Are you saying that the Washington Post is making this up, that its fake news?? The same story have been reported by numerous other sources. Is everything that you don't like, that hurts your eyes and ears fake new? Pull you head out mister.

ISIS Praises Trump Travel Ban for Showing US as Anti-Islamic
ISIS radicals see Trump's executive order as 'blessed ban' | Donald Trump | Dallas News
ISIS Reacts To Trump Muslim Travel Ban: Islamic State Group Calls Immigration Order A Gift For Terrorists, Compares To Iraq War Invasion

There is plenty more where that came from Bubba

It's not a Muslim ban dipstick. Unless Obama is a Muslim hater?

Obama made the list, Trump just used it because that is who/where US agencies (UNDER OBAMA) had reported as countries which were not up to snuff on vetting.

Horseshit!! The order give preference to "religious minorities" from the named countries. Read: "Christians" A preference to one religion over others in violation of the first amendment! Is it possible that you are not bright enough to understand that?

That's your bias talking son. Who says some Muslim minority wouldn't be prioritized? Only bias.

This kind of "priority" statement is typical of immigration policies from all over the world. Though even if it does apply to Christian's being persecuted in the M.E. is that a problem? I don't have a problem with prioritizing a religious group that is very realistically facing a complete genocide at the hands of ISIS, why do you?

Muslim minorities?? THEY ARE ALL MUSLIM MAJORITY COUNTRIES!!

Different sects you dip shit, unless you would like to forward the idea that Radical Islam is the /only/ religion found there - in which case you just shot yourself in the foot.

 

[Old Rocks]

The orange clown exempted nations in which he has a financial interest. A clear conflict of interest. Especially considering those nations are the very ones whose citizens have murdered people right here in the US. This is nothing but a political move to rev up the deplorables, and actually makes the nation less secure.

 

[MaryL]

Obama did the same thing, Ignored by the liberal propaganda commissars. Call it anti Muslim. Let's defend Islam. Like 9/11, beheads people in HD. Forbids abortion or gay rights. Bans free speech. Let's defend that ideology. We really need to defend MUSLIMS?

 

[Conservative65]

None of the states he has banned has killed any US citizen, on US soil. Also Syria and Iraq never invited Americans with guns to come in and do a coup. Did they? Also what we did to N. Korea was beyond disgrace. We think we are so high and mighty, if it was not for our coups , these people would not want to come here.

is a "war on terror" even Constitutional. Our War on Iraq ended already.

It's as Constitutional as the war on poverty.

Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution; providing for the general warfare is not. It really is that simple.

Providing for the social welfare is not in our Constitution; providing for the entities that wage war and declaring war are in the our Constitution. It's that simple.

Yes, it is. The social welfare is a part of the general welfare. That is why, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law, or economics.

Not because you say so, pussy.

 

[EverCurious]

The orange clown exempted nations in which he has a financial interest. A clear conflict of interest. Especially considering those nations are the very ones whose citizens have murdered people right here in the US. This is nothing but a political move to rev up the deplorables, and actually makes the nation less secure.

Are you saying that Obama and his administration were aware of Trump Inc business dealings when they made the list two years ago?

Source please?

 

[Old Rocks]

Yes, much of Islam is centuries behind where the other major religions are. But religions can change in the face of reality, after all, anyone that knows the history of Christianity in Europe knows that. In fact, the secular nature of our government, built into our Constitution, is based on the atrocities that the Christians did to each other and others in Europe.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Trump's Muslim ban excludes countries linked to his businesses

So Trump isn't doing business with Islamic state sponsors of terrorism?

That's good to know! Thanks! Good job president Trump!

 

[EverCurious]

^ LOL Good catch airplanemechanic

 

[danielpalos]

Feel free to show me a single Wikileaks document that was not true. I'm all eyes.

where was the critique of Mr. Trump? just a one sided, "revelation"? why not Mr. Trump's, "dealings"?

Probably because Mr. Trump apparently doesn't use email - aka nothing for Wikileak's to find and publish.

I do notice you dodged the question. Please do share with us any document that Wikileaks has released in the past decade that is not 'real.' I'll wait.

any excuse will do for the national socialist right wing? MSM had some stuff on Mr. Trump. Wikileaks, nothing. Was it merely, paid advertisement.

 

[MaryL]

Trump didn't ban ALL Muslims. Just restricted immigration from certain countries. For a few weeks. Like Obama did, and liberals weren't pissing themselves then,why now?

 

[danielpalos]

Oh and for the record Assange wasn't exactly keen on Trump, in fact he stated very plainly that Trump could not win the election.

This recorded meeting was from like September I believe, I'll try to find the original Nope, I was wrong. November 4th appears to be the date of this meeting based on related statements made at said meeting and date of release on the first four pages of postings of it.)

he was stating ideal social morals for free, under our form of Capitalism where morals have a market friendly price.

 

[danielpalos]

They don't; the executive branch has to faithfully execute the law.
We also have a federal Doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will; and should be applied to unemployment compensation. It can also, happen by executive order. But, that wasn't on the "pander todo" list, of our new President.

Exactly. Thus making Trump's actions unconstitutional because the president does not have the authority to unilaterally ban anybody.

There is long standing precedent for Presidents to be able to suspend travel to and from specified nations, dude.

same thing about executive orders. Mr. Trump only has, national socialist, executive orders.

 

[Old Rocks]

Trump didn't ban ALL Muslims. Just restricted immigration from certain countries. For a few weeks. Like Obama did, and liberals weren't pissing themselves then,why now?

He did that in a way that has created chaos among the general population, and even the people in charge of enforcing that EO. Possibly the least thought out EO in history.

Yes, we have to be cautious about who comes to this nation. However, most of the recent attacks in the US have been by our own people, lone wolf attacks. And the worst attacks from the outside came from the very nations that the orange clown excluded from the EO. In fact, the very nations that the orange clown has economic interests in. He has obviously put his economic interests above those of the nation.

 

[danielpalos]

is a "war on terror" even Constitutional. Our War on Iraq ended already.

It's as Constitutional as the war on poverty.

Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution; providing for the general warfare is not. It really is that simple.

Providing for the social welfare is not in our Constitution; providing for the entities that wage war and declaring war are in the our Constitution. It's that simple.

Yes, it is. The social welfare is a part of the general welfare. That is why, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law, or economics.

Not because you say so, pussy.

You don't have a better argument for rebuttal, so You are simply wrong, like usual.

 

[MaryL]

They don't; the executive branch has to faithfully execute the law.
We also have a federal Doctrine and State laws regarding the concept of employment at will; and should be applied to unemployment compensation. It can also, happen by executive order. But, that wasn't on the "pander todo" list, of our new President.

Exactly. Thus making Trump's actions unconstitutional because the president does not have the authority to unilaterally ban anybody.

There is long standing precedent for Presidents to be able to suspend travel to and from specified nations, dude.

same thing about executive orders. Mr. Trump only has, national socialist, executive orders.

Obama did the same thing, did you you object then?

 

[Conservative65]

It's as Constitutional as the war on poverty.

Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution; providing for the general warfare is not. It really is that simple.

Providing for the social welfare is not in our Constitution; providing for the entities that wage war and declaring war are in the our Constitution. It's that simple.

Yes, it is. The social welfare is a part of the general welfare. That is why, nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law, or economics.

Not because you say so, pussy.

You don't have a better argument for rebuttal, so You are simply wrong, like usual.

I stated all the argument I need to rebut something you said that isn't true.

Why are you opposed to supporting yourself? Why do you insist on being inferior to people like me?

 

[HenryBHough]

Democrats bearing lighted candles parade outside US Supreme Court exposing their love for terrorists for all the world to see.

De-fucking-lightful!

 

[EverCurious]

Oh and for the record Assange wasn't exactly keen on Trump, in fact he stated very plainly that Trump could not win the election.

This recorded meeting was from like September I believe, I'll try to find the original Nope, I was wrong. November 4th appears to be the date of this meeting based on related statements made at said meeting and date of release on the first four pages of postings of it.)

he was stating ideal social morals for free, under our form of Capitalism where morals have a market friendly price.

I'm not entirely sure this is English, nor exactly how you came up with this as a response. Though it is true that most folks have a price - it's why corruption is rampant across the world after all, but that does not change the reality that I have /never/ heard of a single document released by Wikileaks being false. I'm all eyes if you have one, go for it.

 

[Conservative65]

Trump didn't ban ALL Muslims. Just restricted immigration from certain countries. For a few weeks. Like Obama did, and liberals weren't pissing themselves then,why now?

He did that in a way that has created chaos among the general population, and even the people in charge of enforcing that EO. Possibly the least thought out EO in history.

Yes, we have to be cautious about who comes to this nation. However, most of the recent attacks in the US have been by our own people, lone wolf attacks. And the worst attacks from the outside came from the very nations that the orange clown excluded from the EO. In fact, the very nations that the orange clown has economic interests in. He has obviously put his economic interests above those of the nation.

So an Army officer yelling Allahu Akbar is a lone wolf attack? Bullshit. He killed 13 of his fellow service men/women while yelling a phrase uttered by terrorists and it's called workplace violence.

 

[EverCurious]

Ya know what people? The right wing screamed and yelled about Obama's OE's - they warned you a thousand, maybe even a million times over, that it was a slippery slope. But you folks didn't listen. This is your baby, perhaps now you'll realize that playing partisan politics against the checks and balances laid out by the founders of this nation was a seriously bad idea.


Frankly, I hope Trump ditches all of Obama's nuke option crap when he's done doing shit that /needs/ to be done. Though if he does my attempts at being unbiased are completely fucked...