Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
do you have trouble spelling "huffington"?
what i find, whether it is by the blogger or relayed by huffington, is that most of the descriptions of TSA action have an agenda and slant that makes them inherantly unreliable. what i can say is that if they have rules against "replica weapons", and i have no doubt that they do, the officers on the line don't have the discretion. And no one is losing their job by not abiding by protocol for one passenger. I also assume, like anything else, that the more annoying the person is, and the more attention they draw to themselves, the more they will be inconvenienced.
All that thinking you're doing will get you into a lot of trouble one day.
Why are we accepting the TSA while we have an open border policy?
Why are we accepting the TSA while we have an open border policy?
do you have trouble spelling "huffington"?
.
Why are we accepting the TSA while we have an open border policy?
Senate passes $662B Defense bill after deal on detainee language - The Hill's DEFCON Hill
“Senator McCain, Senator Graham and I have argued on this floor that there's nothing in our bill, nothing, which changes the rights of United States citizens,” Levin said. “There was no intent to do it.”
Before the agreement was reached, however, there was heated debate over what powers the military should have inside of U.S. soil and whether U.S. citizens could be detained indefinitely in military custody.
Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) tried to strip all of the detainee language out of the bill, but his amendment failed Tuesday in a 38-60 vote. Feinstein had two more amendments that would have specifically stated U.S. citizens could not be held indefinitely by the military, but they were both defeated 45-55, leading to the final deal.
Civil liberties groups warned that the compromise did not stop military from detaining U.S. citizens and could “turn out to be meaningless.”
“The bill is an historic threat to American citizens and others because it expands and makes permanent the authority of the president to order the military to imprison without charge or trial American citizens,” Christopher Anders, ACLU senior legislative counsel, said in a statement.
well, if a blogger says it, it must be true!