Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How is that against the constitution you fuckwit? The constitution doesn't ever stipulate how many members of the Supreme Court there should be. They leave that determination up to Congress.The ones who want to pack the USSC with Dem/ Socialist DIE hires who will follow the Dem / Socialist model of governance.
You only find little bitches crying about democracy on the far right.Nope you're still wrong try again
You cannot find support anywhere but in leftists dogma
Your link correctly states, …”the United States is more accurately defined as a constitutional federal republic”, not a democracy.And a representive democracy is where you elect people to represent you in government. That also sounds a lot like us, don't it?
And you find bitches whining when corrected about America being called a democrascyYou only find little bitches crying about democracy on the far right.
DeesmocrayYour link correctly states, …”the United States is more accurately defined as a constitutional federal republic”, not a democracy.
It's not my link and more accurately does not have the same meaning as inaccurately. In fact the words more accurately imply that it is still accurate just not as accurate as the other.Your link correctly states, …”the United States is more accurately defined as a constitutional federal republic”, not a democracy.
You didn't correct anything. You, like a dumb Bingo revealed you don't understand what the words, more accurately imply.And you find bitches whining when corrected about America being called a democrascy
How is that against the constitution you fuckwit? The constitution doesn't ever stipulate how many members of the Supreme Court there should be. They leave that determination up to Congress.
Let's not pretend Republicans don't wish the same with their racist, xenophobic agenda. That's kind of what separates the political parties you dumb bitch. We want different things.Let’s not pretend the Dems / Socialists have not been whining about not getting the decisions that are favorable to their sociopath-political ideology.
And those threats aren't unconstitutional you dumb bitch. Congress has the constitutional authority to decide how many members sit on the Supreme Court bench.Threats by the Dems / Socialists to pack the USSC are made clear. The threats are to put in place Dems / Socialists who will further that socio- political agenda.
It was not your link and my error for attributing that to you.It's not my link and more accurately does not have the same meaning as inaccurately. In fact the words more accurately imply that it is still accurate just not as accurate as the other.
Republicans love gerrymandering and use it extensively, especially in state houses.
A republic isn’t very democratic when the elected officials can distort the system to maintain power without the consent of the public.
This is the same Thomas Jefferson who famously owned slaves? How was the early Slave Republic of the United States not in an open or secret war with the rights of mankind? Their violation of those rights famously resulted in the Civil War....It was not your link and my error for attributing that to you.
However, the Founders knew the difference between a democracy and a constitutional republic. The latter is what they formed.
“Thomas Jefferson is our second Founder to see profound issues with democracy. Jefferson said, “The republican is the only form of government which is not eternally at open or secret war with the rights of mankind.”
Let's not pretend Republicans don't wish the same with their racist, xenophobic agenda. That's kind of what separates the political parties you dumb bitch. We want different things.
And those threats aren't unconstitutional you dumb bitch. Congress has the constitutional authority to decide how many members sit on the Supreme Court bench.
This is the same Thomas Jefferson who famously owned slaves? How was the early Slave Republic of the United States not in an open or secret war with the rights of mankind? Their violation of those rights famously resulted in the Civil War....
I'm not going to play this kind of game with you. Liberals want more majority rule and less limits on state power. If you just want to deny that, you can. But I'm not going to chase you around while you do.Which liberal democrats have said we should do away with constitutional protections?
LOL -- mkay.You lash out in your puerile rage because I correctly note that our democratic republic is guided by the will of the People.
Disgruntled losers are upset by that.
I responded in kind to your silly quip about socialism and Marxism. Don't name call people and then cry like a bitch when they do the same to you.Your retreat to the silly racist™ slogan is time wasting. Similarly, your juvenile attempts at insult doesn’t conceal the obvious intention of the Dem / Socialist court packing wish.
Or you know what, be a bitch. I don't care. And? Guess what. We get to propose legislation, even if a little bitch like you disagrees with it. That's part of being in federal republic.As to your tirade about Congress having the authority to decide the number of justices, it was exclusively Dems / Socialists who put forth legislation toward expanding the court.
I'm not going to play this kind of game with you.
What does this mean specifically other than wanting to get rid of the electoral college and why shouldn't we?Liberals want more majority rule and less limits on state power.
I want to debate it because I think you're argument is full of shit. Conservatives want more state power in some areas and less in others vice versa for liberals. There is no black and white dichotomy where one party wants less State power and the other wants more. It really depends on the issue.If you just want to deny it, you can do that. But I'm not going to chase you around while you do.
So you admit that the Republic was still at war with individual rights?Yes. Jefferson owned slaves.
It was the same Constitutional Republic that fought a war to end slavery… you know…. slavery that one party from one part of the country chose to secede from in order to continue slavery.
The party that wanted to continue slavery was the Democrat party, the Party of Slavery.
I responded in kind to your silly quip about socialism and Marxism. Don't name call people and then cry like a bitch when they do the same to you.
And? Guess what. We get to propose legislation, even if a little bitch like to disagrees with it. That's part of being in federal republic.
