Understanding The Left

[Jets]

Just to be clear, I do not support the progressive left anymore than the reactionary right. I do not march in lockstep with them on immigration. The majority of those items you mentioned will never come to fruition. They are campaign folderol to pander for votes.
Good, prove the part that’s wrong.

Oh wait. You can’t.

1. Everything I posted is factual.
See if you can find otherwise.


2. "... the reactionary right. "

There is no 'reactionary right,' 'Far Right' or extremist Right.'

Those are terms of art produced by the Far Left, the evil Left, etc. to try to pretend equivalence.

The is no Far Right in this nation....but there certainly is a Far Left.

The thesis is based on the definitions involved:


To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."


"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)


It's what the radical Obama was getting at when he said “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” — Barack Obama, October 30, 2008. “

Transforming from the positions that America was built on.




So far, I've given these examples of traditionally American positions...the 'center' against which to compare the positions.


Radical positions as opposed to traditional ones identify "Far" Left




1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical?

2. Another of those positions under regular discussion is 'prayer' in the public arena....Congress opens each year with prayer. Opposing prayer is radical....religiosity is traditional in America.


3. Is 'free speech' embraced by one side, and opposed by the other? You betcha! Obama's Supreme Court nominee says it would be be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.


Starting to see a pattern?


4. While we were founded on the biblical idea that all men are created equal,


LBJ advanced a two-class nation based on skin color.
....this radical view was advanced: affirmative action. Hence, Democrats....the Far Left.

5. Here's one more radical position by the Left....fighting to elect a sexual pervert and admitted liar and disbarred lawyer to the White House: Bill Clinton
Relative to American traditions, values, and history ...championing a man of such low character is a radical position.
Hence, Far Left..


6. Franklin Roosevelt threw the United States Constitution under the bus, and used the public fisc for all sorts of endeavors not authorized in Article 1, section 8.


A radical and Progressive position.


He was the ultimate "Far Leftist."


7. Under Franklin Roosevlet the federal government was transformed from one of limited & enumerated powers only to the Frankensteinian monster it is today. ....the regulatory welfare state where the federal government regulates business and commerce, natural resources, human resources, ...
Under the Progressives, the federal government was no longer limited by the enumerated powers delegated in the Constitution; ...


Radical to the utmost....hence Far Left.


8. Under Roosevelt's NRA, most manufacturing industries were suddenly forced into government-mandated cartels. Codes that regulated prices and terms of sale briefly transformed much of the American economy into a fascist-style arrangement,

"... into a fascist-style arrangement,..."
"A New Jersey tailor named Jacob Maged was arrested and sent to jail for the “crime” of pressing a suit of clothes for 35 cents rather than the NRA-inspired “Tailor’s Code” of 40 cents."
No surprise here: FDR's New Deal was a copy of Mussolini's economic program.


Could anything short of setting up concentration camps for our citizens, be more radical???


Oh...wait....he did build concentration camps for innocent civilians....his own citizens.


9. How about The Far Left's Gender-Agenda., versus the Right's stand for tradition and reality: "Republicans Battle to Roll Back Washington's New Transgender Bathroom Rules"


Really....could there be a more pertinent example of the radical, insane Far Left's corruption of tradition and history???


Could there?



10. The corruption of the press by the Far Left: the JournoList Scandal: hundreds of Leftist journalists plotted to minimize negative publicity surrounding Obama’s radical ties. They plotted to smear the other side with lies. Peter Zenger....spinnning in his grave.

A clear affront to the honor bestowed on the press by the first amendment.




And several times, I've presented this challenge: If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or reactionary Right, or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.




Still waiting.

Asked and answered in an earlier post. You glossed over them and dismissed them. That’s on you.

Let's review.

1. You couldn't refute any of the reasons I listed for voting for Trump

2. You couldn't refute any of the promises for America that Democrats promised if elected.

3. You couldn't find a single 'reactionary'- your word- or Far or extreme position of the GOP.

4. You clearly don't understand the origins of Democrat/Progressive/Leftist doctrines....that would be Rousseau, Hegel, and Marx.

5. I claimed you must be a government school grad.....bet I'm correct on that as well.

What more is there to say?


Thank's for dropping by

Just to be clear, I do not support the progressive left anymore than the reactionary right. I do not march in lockstep with them on immigration. The majority of those items you mentioned will never come to fruition. They are campaign folderol to pander for votes.
Good, prove the part that’s wrong.

Oh wait. You can’t.

1. Everything I posted is factual.
See if you can find otherwise.


2. "... the reactionary right. "

There is no 'reactionary right,' 'Far Right' or extremist Right.'

Those are terms of art produced by the Far Left, the evil Left, etc. to try to pretend equivalence.

The is no Far Right in this nation....but there certainly is a Far Left.

The thesis is based on the definitions involved:


To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."


"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)


It's what the radical Obama was getting at when he said “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” — Barack Obama, October 30, 2008. “

Transforming from the positions that America was built on.




So far, I've given these examples of traditionally American positions...the 'center' against which to compare the positions.


Radical positions as opposed to traditional ones identify "Far" Left




1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical?

2. Another of those positions under regular discussion is 'prayer' in the public arena....Congress opens each year with prayer. Opposing prayer is radical....religiosity is traditional in America.


3. Is 'free speech' embraced by one side, and opposed by the other? You betcha! Obama's Supreme Court nominee says it would be be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.


Starting to see a pattern?


4. While we were founded on the biblical idea that all men are created equal,


LBJ advanced a two-class nation based on skin color.
....this radical view was advanced: affirmative action. Hence, Democrats....the Far Left.

5. Here's one more radical position by the Left....fighting to elect a sexual pervert and admitted liar and disbarred lawyer to the White House: Bill Clinton
Relative to American traditions, values, and history ...championing a man of such low character is a radical position.
Hence, Far Left..


6. Franklin Roosevelt threw the United States Constitution under the bus, and used the public fisc for all sorts of endeavors not authorized in Article 1, section 8.


A radical and Progressive position.


He was the ultimate "Far Leftist."


7. Under Franklin Roosevlet the federal government was transformed from one of limited & enumerated powers only to the Frankensteinian monster it is today. ....the regulatory welfare state where the federal government regulates business and commerce, natural resources, human resources, ...
Under the Progressives, the federal government was no longer limited by the enumerated powers delegated in the Constitution; ...


Radical to the utmost....hence Far Left.


8. Under Roosevelt's NRA, most manufacturing industries were suddenly forced into government-mandated cartels. Codes that regulated prices and terms of sale briefly transformed much of the American economy into a fascist-style arrangement,

"... into a fascist-style arrangement,..."
"A New Jersey tailor named Jacob Maged was arrested and sent to jail for the “crime” of pressing a suit of clothes for 35 cents rather than the NRA-inspired “Tailor’s Code” of 40 cents."
No surprise here: FDR's New Deal was a copy of Mussolini's economic program.


Could anything short of setting up concentration camps for our citizens, be more radical???


Oh...wait....he did build concentration camps for innocent civilians....his own citizens.


9. How about The Far Left's Gender-Agenda., versus the Right's stand for tradition and reality: "Republicans Battle to Roll Back Washington's New Transgender Bathroom Rules"


Really....could there be a more pertinent example of the radical, insane Far Left's corruption of tradition and history???


Could there?



10. The corruption of the press by the Far Left: the JournoList Scandal: hundreds of Leftist journalists plotted to minimize negative publicity surrounding Obama’s radical ties. They plotted to smear the other side with lies. Peter Zenger....spinnning in his grave.

A clear affront to the honor bestowed on the press by the first amendment.




And several times, I've presented this challenge: If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or reactionary Right, or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.




Still waiting.

Asked and answered in an earlier post. You glossed over them and dismissed them. That’s on you.

Let's review.

1. You couldn't refute any of the reasons I listed for voting for Trump

2. You couldn't refute any of the promises for America that Democrats promised if elected.

3. You couldn't find a single 'reactionary'- your word- or Far or extreme position of the GOP.

4. You clearly don't understand the origins of Democrat/Progressive/Leftist doctrines....that would be Rousseau, Hegel, and Marx.

5. I claimed you must be a government school grad.....bet I'm correct on that as well.

What more is there to say?


Thank's for dropping by.

1. Hyperbole dismissed

2. Those promises are campaign rhetoric designed to influence the vote. They will never become law.

3. Abortion without any exceptions has been proposed by the some members of the GOP. That’s extreme.

4. More hyperbole, again dismissed

5. Incorrect


Thanks for playing

"Dismissed' is but another way to admit that I am correct, and you can't deny or refute.

Correct.

One does not deny or refute hyperbole. It dismisses itself.

 

[bodecea]

The left cares about the environment, healthcare, education, civil rights

Conservatives care about the wealthy

Environment? Lol you loons have equated AGW with natural variability. You hacks cant be honest enough to "care about the environment"
Healthcare? You mean take mine away? Replace it with something controlled by the very entity that screwed it up in the first place?
Education? you mean indoctrination centers?
Civil rights? You mean your racist special rights you want to give people you look down upon?

It's too late to do anything about AGW.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The left cares about the environment, healthcare, education, civil rights

Conservatives care about the wealthy

Would you hate yourself if you were rich?

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Everything I posted is factual.
See if you can find otherwise.


2. "... the reactionary right. "

There is no 'reactionary right,' 'Far Right' or extremist Right.'

Those are terms of art produced by the Far Left, the evil Left, etc. to try to pretend equivalence.

The is no Far Right in this nation....but there certainly is a Far Left.

The thesis is based on the definitions involved:


To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."


"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)


It's what the radical Obama was getting at when he said “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” — Barack Obama, October 30, 2008. “

Transforming from the positions that America was built on.




So far, I've given these examples of traditionally American positions...the 'center' against which to compare the positions.


Radical positions as opposed to traditional ones identify "Far" Left




1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical?

2. Another of those positions under regular discussion is 'prayer' in the public arena....Congress opens each year with prayer. Opposing prayer is radical....religiosity is traditional in America.


3. Is 'free speech' embraced by one side, and opposed by the other? You betcha! Obama's Supreme Court nominee says it would be be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.


Starting to see a pattern?


4. While we were founded on the biblical idea that all men are created equal,


LBJ advanced a two-class nation based on skin color.
....this radical view was advanced: affirmative action. Hence, Democrats....the Far Left.

5. Here's one more radical position by the Left....fighting to elect a sexual pervert and admitted liar and disbarred lawyer to the White House: Bill Clinton
Relative to American traditions, values, and history ...championing a man of such low character is a radical position.
Hence, Far Left..


6. Franklin Roosevelt threw the United States Constitution under the bus, and used the public fisc for all sorts of endeavors not authorized in Article 1, section 8.


A radical and Progressive position.


He was the ultimate "Far Leftist."


7. Under Franklin Roosevlet the federal government was transformed from one of limited & enumerated powers only to the Frankensteinian monster it is today. ....the regulatory welfare state where the federal government regulates business and commerce, natural resources, human resources, ...
Under the Progressives, the federal government was no longer limited by the enumerated powers delegated in the Constitution; ...


Radical to the utmost....hence Far Left.


8. Under Roosevelt's NRA, most manufacturing industries were suddenly forced into government-mandated cartels. Codes that regulated prices and terms of sale briefly transformed much of the American economy into a fascist-style arrangement,

"... into a fascist-style arrangement,..."
"A New Jersey tailor named Jacob Maged was arrested and sent to jail for the “crime” of pressing a suit of clothes for 35 cents rather than the NRA-inspired “Tailor’s Code” of 40 cents."
No surprise here: FDR's New Deal was a copy of Mussolini's economic program.


Could anything short of setting up concentration camps for our citizens, be more radical???


Oh...wait....he did build concentration camps for innocent civilians....his own citizens.


9. How about The Far Left's Gender-Agenda., versus the Right's stand for tradition and reality: "Republicans Battle to Roll Back Washington's New Transgender Bathroom Rules"


Really....could there be a more pertinent example of the radical, insane Far Left's corruption of tradition and history???


Could there?



10. The corruption of the press by the Far Left: the JournoList Scandal: hundreds of Leftist journalists plotted to minimize negative publicity surrounding Obama’s radical ties. They plotted to smear the other side with lies. Peter Zenger....spinnning in his grave.

A clear affront to the honor bestowed on the press by the first amendment.




And several times, I've presented this challenge: If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or reactionary Right, or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.




Still waiting.

Asked and answered in an earlier post. You glossed over them and dismissed them. That’s on you.

Let's review.

1. You couldn't refute any of the reasons I listed for voting for Trump

2. You couldn't refute any of the promises for America that Democrats promised if elected.

3. You couldn't find a single 'reactionary'- your word- or Far or extreme position of the GOP.

4. You clearly don't understand the origins of Democrat/Progressive/Leftist doctrines....that would be Rousseau, Hegel, and Marx.

5. I claimed you must be a government school grad.....bet I'm correct on that as well.

What more is there to say?


Thank's for dropping by

1. Everything I posted is factual.
See if you can find otherwise.


2. "... the reactionary right. "

There is no 'reactionary right,' 'Far Right' or extremist Right.'

Those are terms of art produced by the Far Left, the evil Left, etc. to try to pretend equivalence.

The is no Far Right in this nation....but there certainly is a Far Left.

The thesis is based on the definitions involved:


To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."


"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)


It's what the radical Obama was getting at when he said “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” — Barack Obama, October 30, 2008. “

Transforming from the positions that America was built on.




So far, I've given these examples of traditionally American positions...the 'center' against which to compare the positions.


Radical positions as opposed to traditional ones identify "Far" Left




1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical?

2. Another of those positions under regular discussion is 'prayer' in the public arena....Congress opens each year with prayer. Opposing prayer is radical....religiosity is traditional in America.


3. Is 'free speech' embraced by one side, and opposed by the other? You betcha! Obama's Supreme Court nominee says it would be be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.


Starting to see a pattern?


4. While we were founded on the biblical idea that all men are created equal,


LBJ advanced a two-class nation based on skin color.
....this radical view was advanced: affirmative action. Hence, Democrats....the Far Left.

5. Here's one more radical position by the Left....fighting to elect a sexual pervert and admitted liar and disbarred lawyer to the White House: Bill Clinton
Relative to American traditions, values, and history ...championing a man of such low character is a radical position.
Hence, Far Left..


6. Franklin Roosevelt threw the United States Constitution under the bus, and used the public fisc for all sorts of endeavors not authorized in Article 1, section 8.


A radical and Progressive position.


He was the ultimate "Far Leftist."


7. Under Franklin Roosevlet the federal government was transformed from one of limited & enumerated powers only to the Frankensteinian monster it is today. ....the regulatory welfare state where the federal government regulates business and commerce, natural resources, human resources, ...
Under the Progressives, the federal government was no longer limited by the enumerated powers delegated in the Constitution; ...


Radical to the utmost....hence Far Left.


8. Under Roosevelt's NRA, most manufacturing industries were suddenly forced into government-mandated cartels. Codes that regulated prices and terms of sale briefly transformed much of the American economy into a fascist-style arrangement,

"... into a fascist-style arrangement,..."
"A New Jersey tailor named Jacob Maged was arrested and sent to jail for the “crime” of pressing a suit of clothes for 35 cents rather than the NRA-inspired “Tailor’s Code” of 40 cents."
No surprise here: FDR's New Deal was a copy of Mussolini's economic program.


Could anything short of setting up concentration camps for our citizens, be more radical???


Oh...wait....he did build concentration camps for innocent civilians....his own citizens.


9. How about The Far Left's Gender-Agenda., versus the Right's stand for tradition and reality: "Republicans Battle to Roll Back Washington's New Transgender Bathroom Rules"


Really....could there be a more pertinent example of the radical, insane Far Left's corruption of tradition and history???


Could there?



10. The corruption of the press by the Far Left: the JournoList Scandal: hundreds of Leftist journalists plotted to minimize negative publicity surrounding Obama’s radical ties. They plotted to smear the other side with lies. Peter Zenger....spinnning in his grave.

A clear affront to the honor bestowed on the press by the first amendment.




And several times, I've presented this challenge: If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or reactionary Right, or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.




Still waiting.

Asked and answered in an earlier post. You glossed over them and dismissed them. That’s on you.

Let's review.

1. You couldn't refute any of the reasons I listed for voting for Trump

2. You couldn't refute any of the promises for America that Democrats promised if elected.

3. You couldn't find a single 'reactionary'- your word- or Far or extreme position of the GOP.

4. You clearly don't understand the origins of Democrat/Progressive/Leftist doctrines....that would be Rousseau, Hegel, and Marx.

5. I claimed you must be a government school grad.....bet I'm correct on that as well.

What more is there to say?


Thank's for dropping by.

1. Hyperbole dismissed

2. Those promises are campaign rhetoric designed to influence the vote. They will never become law.

3. Abortion without any exceptions has been proposed by the some members of the GOP. That’s extreme.

4. More hyperbole, again dismissed

5. Incorrect


Thanks for playing

"Dismissed' is but another way to admit that I am correct, and you can't deny or refute.

Correct.

One does not deny or refute hyperbole. It dismisses itself.

You've been put in your place.....


....why are you back????


Really must have stung, huh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"New York Times Reveals Source On Kavanaugh Allegations Was Reputable Nigerian Prince
September 16th, 2019

NEW YORK, NY—Many people criticized the New York Times' recent piece bringing to light new and recycled Brett Kavanaugh allegations, especially after the website issued a disclaimer admitting basically nobody remembered the alleged incident.

But the Times is standing by its story, going so far as to reveal its source: a reputable Nigerian prince who emailed the investigative reporters offering information in exchange for funds to be wired via MoneyGram.

"The Nigerian prince contacted us and said he had dirt on Kavanaugh, and who were we to question his story?" said Kate Kelly, one of the reporters who worked on the piece and new book on Kavanaugh. "Who do we look like, Dick Tracy? If Nigerian royalty contacts you asking for a million dollars and promises you information on Kavanaugh, you have to act on that kind of lead."

The Times reproduced the email the Nigerian prince sent them:

SUBJECT: I AM CONTACT YOU IN RESPECT OF FAMILY GOLD TREASURE FOR KAVANAH INFO

FROM: LEGITIMATENIGERIANPRINCEMAN

Dear sirs and/or madams,

My name is Bob Smith.I have very much need of reliable persons and it is my reason for contacting you today.I have a very big family treasure in the sum of $1,000,000 U.S. pounds and need this money extradited out of the country immediately.I hear you are in need of many information on Bret Kavanah the evil white devil judge.If you help me I am very willing to help you in return with money of a sizable nature.But first I require funds to come via wire and when wired money has come I will be able to leave my country and come to you with even more riches than your most wild imaginations can contain.Thank you for listening today but we will here from you soon.

HIS MAJESTY BOB SMITH

HIGHEST PRINCE OF NIGERIA AND COOL GUY

"As you can see," Kelly continued, "this was pretty well-researched and the source was pretty darn reputable."
New York Times Reveals Source On Kavanaugh Allegations Was Reputable Nigerian Prince

 

[Jets]

Asked and answered in an earlier post. You glossed over them and dismissed them. That’s on you.

Let's review.

1. You couldn't refute any of the reasons I listed for voting for Trump

2. You couldn't refute any of the promises for America that Democrats promised if elected.

3. You couldn't find a single 'reactionary'- your word- or Far or extreme position of the GOP.

4. You clearly don't understand the origins of Democrat/Progressive/Leftist doctrines....that would be Rousseau, Hegel, and Marx.

5. I claimed you must be a government school grad.....bet I'm correct on that as well.

What more is there to say?


Thank's for dropping by

Asked and answered in an earlier post. You glossed over them and dismissed them. That’s on you.

Let's review.

1. You couldn't refute any of the reasons I listed for voting for Trump

2. You couldn't refute any of the promises for America that Democrats promised if elected.

3. You couldn't find a single 'reactionary'- your word- or Far or extreme position of the GOP.

4. You clearly don't understand the origins of Democrat/Progressive/Leftist doctrines....that would be Rousseau, Hegel, and Marx.

5. I claimed you must be a government school grad.....bet I'm correct on that as well.

What more is there to say?


Thank's for dropping by.

1. Hyperbole dismissed

2. Those promises are campaign rhetoric designed to influence the vote. They will never become law.

3. Abortion without any exceptions has been proposed by the some members of the GOP. That’s extreme.

4. More hyperbole, again dismissed

5. Incorrect


Thanks for playing

"Dismissed' is but another way to admit that I am correct, and you can't deny or refute.

Correct.

One does not deny or refute hyperbole. It dismisses itself.

You've been put in your place.....


....why are you back????


Really must have stung, huh?

Not at all. Only partisans get burned when challenged.

You have a nice day

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's review.

1. You couldn't refute any of the reasons I listed for voting for Trump

2. You couldn't refute any of the promises for America that Democrats promised if elected.

3. You couldn't find a single 'reactionary'- your word- or Far or extreme position of the GOP.

4. You clearly don't understand the origins of Democrat/Progressive/Leftist doctrines....that would be Rousseau, Hegel, and Marx.

5. I claimed you must be a government school grad.....bet I'm correct on that as well.

What more is there to say?


Thank's for dropping by

Let's review.

1. You couldn't refute any of the reasons I listed for voting for Trump

2. You couldn't refute any of the promises for America that Democrats promised if elected.

3. You couldn't find a single 'reactionary'- your word- or Far or extreme position of the GOP.

4. You clearly don't understand the origins of Democrat/Progressive/Leftist doctrines....that would be Rousseau, Hegel, and Marx.

5. I claimed you must be a government school grad.....bet I'm correct on that as well.

What more is there to say?


Thank's for dropping by.

1. Hyperbole dismissed

2. Those promises are campaign rhetoric designed to influence the vote. They will never become law.

3. Abortion without any exceptions has been proposed by the some members of the GOP. That’s extreme.

4. More hyperbole, again dismissed

5. Incorrect


Thanks for playing

"Dismissed' is but another way to admit that I am correct, and you can't deny or refute.

Correct.

One does not deny or refute hyperbole. It dismisses itself.

You've been put in your place.....


....why are you back????


Really must have stung, huh?

Not at all. Only partisans get burned when challenged.

You have a nice day

I hope that means 'good-bye.'

 

[rightwinger]

The left cares about the environment, healthcare, education and civil rights.....they have the legislative record to support it

The right cares about supporting the wealthy......they have the legislative record to support it

then list it. instead all you do is make these extreme statements of stereotypes and say ITS TRUE but never NEVER EVER back it up.

list the legislation and voting history and why those who voted against your "ideals" did so. without doing that you're just a muppet dancing around hoping big bird finally notices you.

They are neither extreme nor stereotypes

If not, show me a piece of Republican legislation protecting the environment. Show me a single Trump executive action that made environmental rules tougher

Show me ANY Republican legislation that helps the poor and working class more than it helps the wealthy

now you're moving the goal posts around, son. like you love to do.

you said the RIGHT cares about supporting the wealthy and has the legislative record to back that up. you said the left cares about all the welfare and social issues, and has the record to back it up.

i asked you to prove this - NOT hide behind TRUMP SUCKS; of which you did, as usual. so yes, you are lobbing out stereotypes and pretending they are an accurate representation when its' just you, blithering.

Sorry....but yet another FAIL on your part

All I asked for was one single piece of legislation from Republicans that helped the poor and working class and you couldn’t do it

/----/ ... allow me to address that whole “conservatives don’t like poor people” idea directly. Exhibit A: Charitable giving. I love my liberal friends, and know many who are generous with their money and time – but as Reagan said, facts are stubborn things, and the numbers don’t lie. Conservatives give substantially more to charity than liberals every year. Republicans are often attacked as not being compassionate for opposing government welfare programs, but that is a function of our belief in the proper role of government, not hostility to people in lower income brackets. More than that, a quick look at income levels throughout the US shows that the twenty or so lowest income states are red states, while most of the states above the median income level are reliably blue. Combined, these facts tend to rebut the idea that conservatives as people are anti-poor. Republicans and the Poor - A Conservative's Perspective

Another myth

Conservatives give to their church
They vote against programs that help the working class and the poor

 

[Seawytch]

The left cares about the environment, healthcare, education, civil rights

Conservatives care about the wealthy

you are so full of trivial stereotypical asinine bullshit.

we ALL care about such things, just see different ways of getting there. but your 3rd grade mind trapped in a 1st grade mentality fucks things up for you.

So rolling back efforts to have clean air and water is a way of getting clean air and water? That's one hell of a way of "getting there"....

You hate details, don't you? Give it a pretty name that must be what it's about.

Link me up to these policies pre Obama, Obama and why trump rolled them back.

Or keep trolling and never actually discussing topics, just headlines.

What details did you provide? Tell me how drilling in the arctic or cutting down Alaska’s largest forest helps the environment. How does less efficient light bulbs clean our air? Republicans used to care about the environment until the money got too good not to care.

 

[Seawytch]

The left cares about the environment, healthcare, education, civil rights

Conservatives care about the wealthy

Environment? Lol you loons have equated AGW with natural variability. You hacks cant be honest enough to "care about the environment"
Healthcare? You mean take mine away? Replace it with something controlled by the very entity that screwed it up in the first place?
Education? you mean indoctrination centers?
Civil rights? You mean your racist special rights you want to give people you look down upon?

Science. It is science.
Stupidity has become the most common trait among those on the right.

You have allowed Trump, Limbaugh, Mindwars & Fox to make you a pack of blithering idiots.

No one took your healthcare asshole. If you lost your doctor, it was because you were too stupid to pick a plan that included him.

Education, obvious something ou lack.

Civil rights? You assfiucks are pissed because you can't discriminate.

Its pseudo bullshit. Not science.
Medicare for all would have to eliminate private insurance. Millions of people lost their healthcare under ACA and you call them stupid. You are a bigoted asshole.
Special rights are special rights. Period.

Medicare for all doesn’t have to do away with private insurance. Supplemental policies...

 

[Cellblock2429]

then list it. instead all you do is make these extreme statements of stereotypes and say ITS TRUE but never NEVER EVER back it up.

list the legislation and voting history and why those who voted against your "ideals" did so. without doing that you're just a muppet dancing around hoping big bird finally notices you.

They are neither extreme nor stereotypes

If not, show me a piece of Republican legislation protecting the environment. Show me a single Trump executive action that made environmental rules tougher

Show me ANY Republican legislation that helps the poor and working class more than it helps the wealthy

now you're moving the goal posts around, son. like you love to do.

you said the RIGHT cares about supporting the wealthy and has the legislative record to back that up. you said the left cares about all the welfare and social issues, and has the record to back it up.

i asked you to prove this - NOT hide behind TRUMP SUCKS; of which you did, as usual. so yes, you are lobbing out stereotypes and pretending they are an accurate representation when its' just you, blithering.

Sorry....but yet another FAIL on your part

All I asked for was one single piece of legislation from Republicans that helped the poor and working class and you couldn’t do it

/----/ ... allow me to address that whole “conservatives don’t like poor people” idea directly. Exhibit A: Charitable giving. I love my liberal friends, and know many who are generous with their money and time – but as Reagan said, facts are stubborn things, and the numbers don’t lie. Conservatives give substantially more to charity than liberals every year. Republicans are often attacked as not being compassionate for opposing government welfare programs, but that is a function of our belief in the proper role of government, not hostility to people in lower income brackets. More than that, a quick look at income levels throughout the US shows that the twenty or so lowest income states are red states, while most of the states above the median income level are reliably blue. Combined, these facts tend to rebut the idea that conservatives as people are anti-poor. Republicans and the Poor - A Conservative's Perspective

Another myth

Conservatives give to their church
They vote against programs that help the working class and the poor

/——/ No myth. Arthur Brooks, the author of a book on donors to charity, “Who Really Cares,” cites data that households headed by conservatives give 30 percent more to charity than households headed by liberals. A study by Google found an even greater disproportion: average annual contributions reported by conservatives were almost double those of liberals.
Opinion | Bleeding Heart Tightwads

 

[deanrd]

To begin with the conclusion, everything the Left controls, suffers for it.



1.Remember when the NYTimes was ‘the paper of record’? Now, it is simply a vengeful, lying rag. The latest slander is a claim that Justice Kavanaugh thrust his genitals into the hand of a fellow college student….then this rag had to admit that the ‘victims’ has no knowledge of such an event.

In every way possible, the Left resists and finds a way to champion the obverse of tradition and social evolution. And it always begins with shredding the truth.



2. Society has moved from slavery and feudalism using capitalism as the vehicle to raise standards of living for everyone….so the Left champions proven failed economic theories, socialism and communism.
A leading Democrat candidate for President is a communist, the political doctrine that slaughtered over 100 million men, women and children to get its way…..and then ended with a whimper.


3. While the Bible imposes authority and a system of hierarchy, the ‘commandment to honour father and mother,' …

hi·er·ar·chy

/ˈhī(ə)ˌrärkē/

a system or organization in which people or groups are ranked one above the other according to status or authority.

synonyms:

pecking order, ranking, grading, ladder, social order, social stratum, social scale, class system

…. the Left demands a revolt against parents, police, every authority it can think of.



4. The advancement of society has been marked by increases in individualism and liberty, instead, as the Left gains power, it demands collectivism, and Leftist governance either bans or mandates.

“Florist Hopes Supreme Court Will Affirm Her Right to Turn Down Order for Gay Wedding” Florist Asks High Court to Uphold Right to Decline Order for Gay Wedding




5. While the origins of America clearly state the nation’s mission centers on life….“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.
…the Left has been responsible for the slaughter of over 60 million of the most innocent.



Color me ‘pessimist,’ but I'm convinced that the Left will succeed in destroying our nation, and Western Civilization, and will take the rest of with it into the abyss.

Republicans call people on the left “Libtards”.

 

[Cellblock2429]

To begin with the conclusion, everything the Left controls, suffers for it.



1.Remember when the NYTimes was ‘the paper of record’? Now, it is simply a vengeful, lying rag. The latest slander is a claim that Justice Kavanaugh thrust his genitals into the hand of a fellow college student….then this rag had to admit that the ‘victims’ has no knowledge of such an event.

In every way possible, the Left resists and finds a way to champion the obverse of tradition and social evolution. And it always begins with shredding the truth.



2. Society has moved from slavery and feudalism using capitalism as the vehicle to raise standards of living for everyone….so the Left champions proven failed economic theories, socialism and communism.
A leading Democrat candidate for President is a communist, the political doctrine that slaughtered over 100 million men, women and children to get its way…..and then ended with a whimper.


3. While the Bible imposes authority and a system of hierarchy, the ‘commandment to honour father and mother,' …

hi·er·ar·chy

/ˈhī(ə)ˌrärkē/

a system or organization in which people or groups are ranked one above the other according to status or authority.

synonyms:

pecking order, ranking, grading, ladder, social order, social stratum, social scale, class system

…. the Left demands a revolt against parents, police, every authority it can think of.



4. The advancement of society has been marked by increases in individualism and liberty, instead, as the Left gains power, it demands collectivism, and Leftist governance either bans or mandates.

“Florist Hopes Supreme Court Will Affirm Her Right to Turn Down Order for Gay Wedding” Florist Asks High Court to Uphold Right to Decline Order for Gay Wedding




5. While the origins of America clearly state the nation’s mission centers on life….“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.
…the Left has been responsible for the slaughter of over 60 million of the most innocent.



Color me ‘pessimist,’ but I'm convinced that the Left will succeed in destroying our nation, and Western Civilization, and will take the rest of with it into the abyss.

Republicans call people on the left “Libtards”.

/——/ Your meme is stupid. Liberal + retard = Libtard. Deal with it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The left cares about the environment, healthcare, education, civil rights

Conservatives care about the wealthy

you are so full of trivial stereotypical asinine bullshit.

we ALL care about such things, just see different ways of getting there. but your 3rd grade mind trapped in a 1st grade mentality fucks things up for you.

So rolling back efforts to have clean air and water is a way of getting clean air and water? That's one hell of a way of "getting there"....

You hate details, don't you? Give it a pretty name that must be what it's about.

Link me up to these policies pre Obama, Obama and why trump rolled them back.

Or keep trolling and never actually discussing topics, just headlines.

What details did you provide? Tell me how drilling in the arctic or cutting down Alaska’s largest forest helps the environment. How does less efficient light bulbs clean our air? Republicans used to care about the environment until the money got too good not to care.

Tell me how drilling in the arctic or cutting down Alaska’s largest forest helps the environment.

Tell me how building windmills helps the environment.

How does less efficient light bulbs clean our air?

How does less reliable energy clean our air?

 

[PoliticalChic]

To begin with the conclusion, everything the Left controls, suffers for it.



1.Remember when the NYTimes was ‘the paper of record’? Now, it is simply a vengeful, lying rag. The latest slander is a claim that Justice Kavanaugh thrust his genitals into the hand of a fellow college student….then this rag had to admit that the ‘victims’ has no knowledge of such an event.

In every way possible, the Left resists and finds a way to champion the obverse of tradition and social evolution. And it always begins with shredding the truth.



2. Society has moved from slavery and feudalism using capitalism as the vehicle to raise standards of living for everyone….so the Left champions proven failed economic theories, socialism and communism.
A leading Democrat candidate for President is a communist, the political doctrine that slaughtered over 100 million men, women and children to get its way…..and then ended with a whimper.


3. While the Bible imposes authority and a system of hierarchy, the ‘commandment to honour father and mother,' …

hi·er·ar·chy

/ˈhī(ə)ˌrärkē/

a system or organization in which people or groups are ranked one above the other according to status or authority.

synonyms:

pecking order, ranking, grading, ladder, social order, social stratum, social scale, class system

…. the Left demands a revolt against parents, police, every authority it can think of.



4. The advancement of society has been marked by increases in individualism and liberty, instead, as the Left gains power, it demands collectivism, and Leftist governance either bans or mandates.

“Florist Hopes Supreme Court Will Affirm Her Right to Turn Down Order for Gay Wedding” Florist Asks High Court to Uphold Right to Decline Order for Gay Wedding




5. While the origins of America clearly state the nation’s mission centers on life….“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.
…the Left has been responsible for the slaughter of over 60 million of the most innocent.



Color me ‘pessimist,’ but I'm convinced that the Left will succeed in destroying our nation, and Western Civilization, and will take the rest of with it into the abyss.

Republicans call people on the left “Libtards”.

See if you can find any post of mine where I've applied that term.
I'm far more articulate....and find many new and amusing ways to label your sort.
Soooo.....why even bring it up?

On the other hand, you are a dunce.


Strange.....this is what brought you here....yet you seem not able to confront, or address it...



1.Remember when the NYTimes was ‘the paper of record’? Now, it is simply a vengeful, lying rag. The latest slander is a claim that Justice Kavanaugh thrust his genitals into the hand of a fellow college student….then this rag had to admit that the ‘victims’ has no knowledge of such an event.

In every way possible, the Left resists and finds a way to champion the obverse of tradition and social evolution. And it always begins with shredding the truth.



2. Society has moved from slavery and feudalism using capitalism as the vehicle to raise standards of living for everyone….so the Left champions proven failed economic theories, socialism and communism.
A leading Democrat candidate for President is a communist, the political doctrine that slaughtered over 100 million men, women and children to get its way…..and then ended with a whimper.


3. While the Bible imposes authority and a system of hierarchy, the ‘commandment to honour father and mother,' …

hi·er·ar·chy

/ˈhī(ə)ˌrärkē/

a system or organization in which people or groups are ranked one above the other according to status or authority.

synonyms:

pecking order, ranking, grading, ladder, social order, social stratum, social scale, class system

…. the Left demands a revolt against parents, police, every authority it can think of.



4. The advancement of society has been marked by increases in individualism and liberty, instead, as the Left gains power, it demands collectivism, and Leftist governance either bans or mandates.

“Florist Hopes Supreme Court Will Affirm Her Right to Turn Down Order for Gay Wedding” Florist Asks High Court to Uphold Right to Decline Order for Gay Wedding




5. While the origins of America clearly state the nation’s mission centers on life….“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Thomas Jefferson.
…the Left has been responsible for the slaughter of over 60 million of the most innocent.



Color me ‘pessimist,’ but I'm convinced that the Left will succeed in destroying our nation, and Western Civilization, and will take the rest of with it into the abyss

 

[TNHarley]

The left cares about the environment, healthcare, education, civil rights

Conservatives care about the wealthy

Environment? Lol you loons have equated AGW with natural variability. You hacks cant be honest enough to "care about the environment"
Healthcare? You mean take mine away? Replace it with something controlled by the very entity that screwed it up in the first place?
Education? you mean indoctrination centers?
Civil rights? You mean your racist special rights you want to give people you look down upon?

Science. It is science.
Stupidity has become the most common trait among those on the right.

You have allowed Trump, Limbaugh, Mindwars & Fox to make you a pack of blithering idiots.

No one took your healthcare asshole. If you lost your doctor, it was because you were too stupid to pick a plan that included him.

Education, obvious something ou lack.

Civil rights? You assfiucks are pissed because you can't discriminate.

Its pseudo bullshit. Not science.
Medicare for all would have to eliminate private insurance. Millions of people lost their healthcare under ACA and you call them stupid. You are a bigoted asshole.
Special rights are special rights. Period.

Medicare for all doesn’t have to do away with private insurance. Supplemental policies...

Ahhhhhh ok. Just raise the taxes really high on the people that already have insurance.
Mmmkay

 

[rightwinger]

They are neither extreme nor stereotypes

If not, show me a piece of Republican legislation protecting the environment. Show me a single Trump executive action that made environmental rules tougher

Show me ANY Republican legislation that helps the poor and working class more than it helps the wealthy

now you're moving the goal posts around, son. like you love to do.

you said the RIGHT cares about supporting the wealthy and has the legislative record to back that up. you said the left cares about all the welfare and social issues, and has the record to back it up.

i asked you to prove this - NOT hide behind TRUMP SUCKS; of which you did, as usual. so yes, you are lobbing out stereotypes and pretending they are an accurate representation when its' just you, blithering.

Sorry....but yet another FAIL on your part

All I asked for was one single piece of legislation from Republicans that helped the poor and working class and you couldn’t do it

/----/ ... allow me to address that whole “conservatives don’t like poor people” idea directly. Exhibit A: Charitable giving. I love my liberal friends, and know many who are generous with their money and time – but as Reagan said, facts are stubborn things, and the numbers don’t lie. Conservatives give substantially more to charity than liberals every year. Republicans are often attacked as not being compassionate for opposing government welfare programs, but that is a function of our belief in the proper role of government, not hostility to people in lower income brackets. More than that, a quick look at income levels throughout the US shows that the twenty or so lowest income states are red states, while most of the states above the median income level are reliably blue. Combined, these facts tend to rebut the idea that conservatives as people are anti-poor. Republicans and the Poor - A Conservative's Perspective

Another myth

Conservatives give to their church
They vote against programs that help the working class and the poor

/——/ No myth. Arthur Brooks, the author of a book on donors to charity, “Who Really Cares,” cites data that households headed by conservatives give 30 percent more to charity than households headed by liberals. A study by Google found an even greater disproportion: average annual contributions reported by conservatives were almost double those of liberals.
Opinion | Bleeding Heart Tightwads

Conservatives are Bible Thumpers. They donate heavily to their church and it pays for churches, pastors and their families, heat and AC

Does nothing for the environment, education, healthcare

 

[Mac1958]

Not at all. Only partisans get burned when challenged.
You have a nice day

What did I tell ya?

 

[Jets]

Not at all. Only partisans get burned when challenged.
You have a nice day

What did I tell ya?

That’s ok. Every now and then I’m a sucker for a “good conversation”

 

[jc456]

The left cares about the environment, healthcare, education, civil rights

Conservatives care about the wealthy

you are so full of trivial stereotypical asinine bullshit.

we ALL care about such things, just see different ways of getting there. but your 3rd grade mind trapped in a 1st grade mentality fucks things up for you.

So rolling back efforts to have clean air and water is a way of getting clean air and water? That's one hell of a way of "getting there"....

what is it they're rolling back? do you even know? I'm asking you because you don't know what it is.