Update: The Illegal Alien Vote

[jc456]

PoliticalChic, post: 22413331

Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.

The flaw in your hate based lie is that Gina is not speaking for illegal aliens because “I” is first person singular meaning she is speaking for herself and herself alone.

She wouid have used ‘they’ if she intended to convey an undestsnding that she wanted to get the president of the United States to tell on the record that non-citizens should and must vote because it will never be investigated.

Do you realize how absurd your lie is at face value.

When you lie it ought to make some sense to all parties involved.

And Obama says in the same interview that non-citizens cannot vote.

You are a very stupid liar.

never heard of role play eh? shame, you missed out on a lot. no wonder you can't think for yourself.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.

The flaw in your hate based lie is that Gina is not speaking for illegal aliens because “I” is first person singular meaning she is speaking for herself and herself alone.

She wouid have used ‘they’ if she intended to convey an undestsnding that she wanted to get the president of the United States to tell on the record that non-citizens should and must vote because it will never be investigated.

Do you realize how absurd your lie is at face value.

When you lie it ought to make some sense to all parties involved.

And Obama says in the same interview that non-citizens cannot vote.

You are a very stupid liar.

I love this.

OK....another custard pie in your ugly kisser:

"...undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting.

[And that is who she is speaking for!]




Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.









Transcript:



RODRIGUEZ: Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting.

[And that is who she is speaking for!]

So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?
[Who would come for legal citizens voting?????????]
OBAMA: Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself.

[Just like you.....a bald-faced liar!]

And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera.

[Meaning: 'Go ahead and vote....no one will be the wiser!']


The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote.

[Meaning, I guess....if you are living with lots of other illegals...well, heck, at least some of you should go vote! After all....Trump is trying to get rid of you illegals!]







And, Obama did say those exact words, in the exact order I’ve provided them.







If she is a citizen, why would she say she was fearful of voting, you moron???????






NEXT!!!

 

[jc456]

Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.

The flaw in your hate based lie is that Gina is not speaking for illegal aliens because “I” is first person singular meaning she is speaking for herself and herself alone.

She wouid have used ‘they’ if she intended to convey an undestsnding that she wanted to get the president of the United States to tell on the record that non-citizens should and must vote because it will never be investigated.

Do you realize how absurd your lie is at face value.

When you lie it ought to make some sense to all parties involved.

And Obama says in the same interview that non-citizens cannot vote.

You are a very stupid liar.

I love this.

OK....another custard pie in your ugly kisser:

"...undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting.

[And that is who she is speaking for!]




Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.









Transcript:



RODRIGUEZ: Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting.

[And that is who she is speaking for!]

So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?
[Who would come for legal citizens voting?????????]
OBAMA: Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself.

[Just like you.....a bald-faced liar!]

And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera.

[Meaning: 'Go ahead and vote....no one will be the wiser!']


The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote.

[Meaning, I guess....if you are living with lots of other illegals...well, heck, at least some of you should go vote! After all....Trump is trying to get rid of you illegals!]







And, Obama did say those exact words, in the exact order I’ve provided them.







If she is a citizen, why would she say she was fearful of voting, you moron???????






NEXT!!!

the dude is a rejection deflection.

 

[Faun]

jc456, post: 22412709

So if I (an illegal) vote...

Gina Ridruguez is not an illegal. The parenthesis is yours and you are a liar for adding it.

She calls them citizens but no one tells them to vote. Obama says they cannot vote.

again, you didn't listen to what she said in the video, it was the purpose of her question and correctly ascribed. did she start her question recognizing the dreamers or not? It's how we follow a conversation based on the sentence structure. you should go to school and learn it. It's obvious you didn't.

You're still lying and everybody here reading this knows it. What she asked is if she, a U.S. citizen, has to worry about immigration coming after her family members and friends who are not here legally, if she votes.

Hilarious that the biggest and most consistently rabid liar on USMB would ever call another poster a liar. LMFAO.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

jc456, post: 22413883

did she or did she not caveat her question?

No.

She clearly used first person singular “l” not “they”.

What you think is a caveat is a clarification and expression of her opinion about calling all contributors to society ‘citizens’. It is only that. Nothing more. It does not legally define legal citizenship or bind Obama to abiding by her opinion through the end of the interview.

She is clearly not pretending that she is an illegal and wants Obama to respond as if she is.

That is your lie and you cannot contort this interview into something it isn’t.

Being too damned ignorant about common simple English is no excuse for lying.

Caveat? What a joke. You are pathetic.

 

[Faun]

1. Which is an elected representative of the Right?
Neither one.

2. What positions of the Right are racial?
None that you can name.


3. You have been an excellent witness to prove that there is no Far Right in this country.

You're dismissed.

of course alex jones is a representative of the far right. Trump bitched and moaned when social media kicked him off. Rush Limbaugh aint far behind.

I had already given you proof that far right exists, and is growing:
The Rise of Far-Right Extremism in the United States

There is no Far Right in this country....but if you'd like to try again....OK.

The official positions of the GOP, the Right, conservatives, are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

The Democrats, Liberals, Progressives ascribe to radical anti-American positions, hence, Far Left.


Let's check.

Let's go right for the head of the Far Left....Obama

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."



Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Any want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?



So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

PC, perhaps center is now far right?

Actually, like the Muslim President.....the Democrats/Liberals demand the right to lie.

There are six rules that one need know to recognize the Leftists.

Rule #1
Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

Rule #2, they never have fact on their side.

LOL

That's why it's the trump administration who had to invent the term, "alternative facts."

 

[NotfooledbyW]

PoliticalChic, post: 22413925

If she is a citizen, why would she say she was fearful of voting, you moron???????

She did not say she was fearful of voting.

And there is no “if” she is a citizen. She is a citizen.

I know what has been said by all parties involved. Keeping it all straight. You don’t. That confirms you are the only moron here. Not counting JC.

 

[PoliticalChic]

PoliticalChic, post: 22413925

If she is a citizen, why would she say she was fearful of voting, you moron???????

She did not say she was fearful of voting.

And there is no “if” she is a citizen. She is a citizen.

I know what has been said by all parties involved. Keeping it all straight. You don’t. That confirms you are the only moron here. Not counting JC.

Next beating.....coming right up:



Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.









Transcript:



RODRIGUEZ: Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting.

[And that is who she is speaking for!]

So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?
[Who would come for legal citizens voting?????????]
OBAMA: Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself.

[Just like you.....a bald-faced liar!]

And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera.

[Meaning: 'Go ahead and vote....no one will be the wiser!']


The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote.

[Meaning, I guess....if you are living with lots of other illegals...well, heck, at least some of you should go vote! After all....Trump is trying to get rid of you illegals!]







And, Obama did say those exact words, in the exact order I’ve provided them.



Keep 'em comin,' you dunce!!!!!!

 

[WillPower]

WOW! Two years old today...right on the money.....and 51 "winner" reps.....Let's make it 52.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

jc456, post: 22413876

post my lie.

I did before. Here it is again.

jc456, post: 22411592

29 second mark of the video. Gina says dreamers vote. dreamers are illegals.

Gina never said, Dreamers Vote.

You lied. No way around it, liar.

 

[Faun]

Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.

The flaw in your hate based lie is that Gina is not speaking for illegal aliens because “I” is first person singular meaning she is speaking for herself and herself alone.

She wouid have used ‘they’ if she intended to convey an undestsnding that she wanted to get the president of the United States to tell on the record that non-citizens should and must vote because it will never be investigated.

Do you realize how absurd your lie is at face value.

When you lie it ought to make some sense to all parties involved.

And Obama says in the same interview that non-citizens cannot vote.

You are a very stupid liar.

I love this.

OK....another custard pie in your ugly kisser:

"...undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting.

[And that is who she is speaking for!]




Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.









Transcript:



RODRIGUEZ: Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting.

[And that is who she is speaking for!]

So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?
[Who would come for legal citizens voting?????????]
OBAMA: Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself.

[Just like you.....a bald-faced liar!]

And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera.

[Meaning: 'Go ahead and vote....no one will be the wiser!']


The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote.

[Meaning, I guess....if you are living with lots of other illegals...well, heck, at least some of you should go vote! After all....Trump is trying to get rid of you illegals!]







And, Obama did say those exact words, in the exact order I’ve provided them.







If she is a citizen, why would she say she was fearful of voting, you moron???????






NEXT!!!

LOL

To demonstrate just how rightarded you really are .... you claim the president of the United States told illegal aliens to vote and that would make the U.S. citizens ....

.... and not a single one did.

Even worse for you... you've claimed in the past that there are as many as 80 to 100 million illegal aliens in the U.S......

100 million illegal aliens (according to you) are told by the U.S. president (according to you) that all they have to do to become a U.S. citizen is to go out and vote illegally ....

.... and not one among 100,000,000 did.

Don't you ever feel stupid for the nonsense you post?

Ever???

 

[dudmuck]

The far right is one the rise.
see, quite the contrary.
not only does it exist, its also getting bigger and more violent.

There is no Far Right in this country....only a Far Left.


Watch me FORCE you to prove it.


As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)


To be 'far,' it must be at a distance to the center: American traditions, values, and history represent that center.

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.




If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



I sure put a cork in your pie-hole, didn't I.

what are the positions of the radical right?
Look no futher than Alex Jones or Milo Yiannopoulos. Any well know views of either can be considered far right radicalism. Why do think Alex Jones and other far right nuts have been banned from all social media? Because they're right wing nuts fomenting violence, but Trump sympathizes with them.

1. Which is an elected representative of the Right?
Neither one.

2. What positions of the Right are racial?
None that you can name.


3. You have been an excellent witness to prove that there is no Far Right in this country.

You're dismissed.

of course alex jones is a representative of the far right. Trump bitched and moaned when social media kicked him off. Rush Limbaugh aint far behind.

I had already given you proof that far right exists, and is growing:
The Rise of Far-Right Extremism in the United States

There is no Far Right in this country....but if you'd like to try again....OK.

The official positions of the GOP, the Right, conservatives, are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

The Democrats, Liberals, Progressives ascribe to radical anti-American positions, hence, Far Left.


Let's check.

Let's go right for the head of the Far Left....Obama

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."



Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Any want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?



So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

hardly on the left: On Speech, Kagan Leaned Toward Conservatives.

Obama Warns Democrats Over Leftist Tilt
Obama is the worst leftist ever.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

PoliticalChic, post: 22414099

Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.

Liar. It is never made clear that when Gina says ‘when I vote’ she actually meant to say ‘when every illegal in the county votes’ .

 

[NotfooledbyW]

PoliticalChic, post: 22414099

Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.

Do you ever wonder why you and only one other dimwitted liar on this board agree that “I” actually means “they” in order to spread a whack job conclusion that the President of the United States was clear and with unconstitutional intent told every Latino non-citizen living in the US to vote and then they wouid be citizens and that no investigation wouid be forthcoming and no one in their family wouid be deported. So run out there five days before the election and register to vote. Check the box that says you are a US citizen brcause when you vote you are a US citizen because I President Obama say you are.

You have no clue how ignorant your conclusion is do you?

You are too stupid to be embarrassed and ashamed.

I’m willing to bet that the most illiterate illegal living in the US wouid not fall for your line of bullshit.

College educated dreamers certainly wouldn’t.

That puts you lower intellectually than the most uneducated migrant worker in the country.

A spot you certainly have earned and deserve.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There is no Far Right in this country....only a Far Left.


Watch me FORCE you to prove it.


As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)


To be 'far,' it must be at a distance to the center: American traditions, values, and history represent that center.

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.




If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



I sure put a cork in your pie-hole, didn't I.

what are the positions of the radical right?
Look no futher than Alex Jones or Milo Yiannopoulos. Any well know views of either can be considered far right radicalism. Why do think Alex Jones and other far right nuts have been banned from all social media? Because they're right wing nuts fomenting violence, but Trump sympathizes with them.

1. Which is an elected representative of the Right?
Neither one.

2. What positions of the Right are racial?
None that you can name.


3. You have been an excellent witness to prove that there is no Far Right in this country.

You're dismissed.

of course alex jones is a representative of the far right. Trump bitched and moaned when social media kicked him off. Rush Limbaugh aint far behind.

I had already given you proof that far right exists, and is growing:
The Rise of Far-Right Extremism in the United States

There is no Far Right in this country....but if you'd like to try again....OK.

The official positions of the GOP, the Right, conservatives, are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

The Democrats, Liberals, Progressives ascribe to radical anti-American positions, hence, Far Left.


Let's check.

Let's go right for the head of the Far Left....Obama

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."



Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Any want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?



So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

hardly on the left: On Speech, Kagan Leaned Toward Conservatives.

Obama Warns Democrats Over Leftist Tilt
Obama is the worst leftist ever.

So your claim is that conservative endorsed Kagan, and limitations on free speech????????


Gads, you're a moron.

 

[PoliticalChic]

PoliticalChic, post: 22414099

Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.

Liar. It is never made clear that when Gina says ‘when I vote’ she actually meant to say ‘when every illegal in the county votes’ .

Your entertainment value has run out.


Don't bother wiping the egg off your face....just go away.

 

[Faun]

PoliticalChic, post: 22414099

Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.

Liar. It is never made clear that when Gina says ‘when I vote’ she actually meant to say ‘when every illegal in the county votes’ .

Your entertainment value has run out.


Don't bother wiping the egg off your face....just go away.

LOLOL

Let me know when you find the first illegal alien who, according to you, took the president's advice and voted to become a U.S. citizen.

 

[dudmuck]

what are the positions of the radical right?
Look no futher than Alex Jones or Milo Yiannopoulos. Any well know views of either can be considered far right radicalism. Why do think Alex Jones and other far right nuts have been banned from all social media? Because they're right wing nuts fomenting violence, but Trump sympathizes with them.

1. Which is an elected representative of the Right?
Neither one.

2. What positions of the Right are racial?
None that you can name.


3. You have been an excellent witness to prove that there is no Far Right in this country.

You're dismissed.

of course alex jones is a representative of the far right. Trump bitched and moaned when social media kicked him off. Rush Limbaugh aint far behind.

I had already given you proof that far right exists, and is growing:
The Rise of Far-Right Extremism in the United States

There is no Far Right in this country....but if you'd like to try again....OK.

The official positions of the GOP, the Right, conservatives, are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

The Democrats, Liberals, Progressives ascribe to radical anti-American positions, hence, Far Left.


Let's check.

Let's go right for the head of the Far Left....Obama

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."



Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Any want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?



So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

hardly on the left: On Speech, Kagan Leaned Toward Conservatives.

Obama Warns Democrats Over Leftist Tilt
Obama is the worst leftist ever.

So your claim is that conservative endorsed Kagan, and limitations on free speech????????


Gads, you're a moron.

The article explains how Kagan agrees with conservative justices on free speech issues, since you cant be bothered to read it.
Its not my claim, its the article's claim.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Which is an elected representative of the Right?
Neither one.

2. What positions of the Right are racial?
None that you can name.


3. You have been an excellent witness to prove that there is no Far Right in this country.

You're dismissed.

of course alex jones is a representative of the far right. Trump bitched and moaned when social media kicked him off. Rush Limbaugh aint far behind.

I had already given you proof that far right exists, and is growing:
The Rise of Far-Right Extremism in the United States

There is no Far Right in this country....but if you'd like to try again....OK.

The official positions of the GOP, the Right, conservatives, are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

The Democrats, Liberals, Progressives ascribe to radical anti-American positions, hence, Far Left.


Let's check.

Let's go right for the head of the Far Left....Obama

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."



Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Any want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?



So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

hardly on the left: On Speech, Kagan Leaned Toward Conservatives.

Obama Warns Democrats Over Leftist Tilt
Obama is the worst leftist ever.

So your claim is that conservative endorsed Kagan, and limitations on free speech????????


Gads, you're a moron.

The article explains how Kagan agrees with conservative justices on free speech issues, since you cant be bothered to read it.
Its not my claim, its the article's claim.

I just proved the very opposite.

The lying low-life, Kagan, installed in the Supreme Court by the lying low-life, Obama, is opposed to the first amendment.


See if you can stop being a lying low-life.

Try.

 

[jc456]

jc456, post: 22413883

did she or did she not caveat her question?

No.

She clearly used first person singular “l” not “they”.

What you think is a caveat is a clarification and expression of her opinion about calling all contributors to society ‘citizens’. It is only that. Nothing more. It does not legally define legal citizenship or bind Obama to abiding by her opinion through the end of the interview.

She is clearly not pretending that she is an illegal and wants Obama to respond as if she is.

That is your lie and you cannot contort this interview into something it isn’t.

Being too damned ignorant about common simple English is no excuse for lying.

Caveat? What a joke. You are pathetic.

give a new girl work.

you just made our point. haahahahahaahaha