Update: The Illegal Alien Vote

[hadit]

Millions of illegal aliens.....enticed into the nation by Democrats and urged to vote by Barack Obama.....voted for Bill's wife.

Except there's no evidence they did... and certainly not in the numbers of the millions.

Look, you guys stole an election, conspired with the Russians, and put a madman in the White House. Own it.

Actually, we just had a lengthy, expensive investigation conclude that didn't happen.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There is no Far Right in this country.

The far right is one the rise.
see, quite the contrary.
not only does it exist, its also getting bigger and more violent.

There is no Far Right in this country....only a Far Left.


Watch me FORCE you to prove it.


As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)


To be 'far,' it must be at a distance to the center: American traditions, values, and history represent that center.

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.




If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



I sure put a cork in your pie-hole, didn't I.

what are the positions of the radical right?
Look no futher than Alex Jones or Milo Yiannopoulos. Any well know views of either can be considered far right radicalism. Why do think Alex Jones and other far right nuts have been banned from all social media? Because they're right wing nuts fomenting violence, but Trump sympathizes with them.

1. Which is an elected representative of the Right?
Neither one.

2. What positions of the Right are racial?
None that you can name.


3. You have been an excellent witness to prove that there is no Far Right in this country.

You're dismissed.

of course alex jones is a representative of the far right. Trump bitched and moaned when social media kicked him off. Rush Limbaugh aint far behind.

I had already given you proof that far right exists, and is growing:
The Rise of Far-Right Extremism in the United States

There is no Far Right in this country....but if you'd like to try again....OK.

The official positions of the GOP, the Right, conservatives, are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

The Democrats, Liberals, Progressives ascribe to radical anti-American positions, hence, Far Left.


Let's check.

Let's go right for the head of the Far Left....Obama

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."



Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Any want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?



So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

 

[jc456]

There is no Far Right in this country.

The far right is one the rise.
see, quite the contrary.
not only does it exist, its also getting bigger and more violent.

There is no Far Right in this country....only a Far Left.


Watch me FORCE you to prove it.


As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)


To be 'far,' it must be at a distance to the center: American traditions, values, and history represent that center.

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.




If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



I sure put a cork in your pie-hole, didn't I.

what are the positions of the radical right?
Look no futher than Alex Jones or Milo Yiannopoulos. Any well know views of either can be considered far right radicalism. Why do think Alex Jones and other far right nuts have been banned from all social media? Because they're right wing nuts fomenting violence, but Trump sympathizes with them.

1. Which is an elected representative of the Right?
Neither one.

2. What positions of the Right are racial?
None that you can name.


3. You have been an excellent witness to prove that there is no Far Right in this country.

You're dismissed.

of course alex jones is a representative of the far right. Trump bitched and moaned when social media kicked him off. Rush Limbaugh aint far behind.

I had already given you proof that far right exists, and is growing:
The Rise of Far-Right Extremism in the United States

what is your far right definition? PC laid out quite a nice explanation, nothing in it shows anything far right of center. So perhaps you could tell us what constitute far right, a definition, not a person's name.

 

[jc456]

The far right is one the rise.
see, quite the contrary.
not only does it exist, its also getting bigger and more violent.

There is no Far Right in this country....only a Far Left.


Watch me FORCE you to prove it.


As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)


To be 'far,' it must be at a distance to the center: American traditions, values, and history represent that center.

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.




If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



I sure put a cork in your pie-hole, didn't I.

what are the positions of the radical right?
Look no futher than Alex Jones or Milo Yiannopoulos. Any well know views of either can be considered far right radicalism. Why do think Alex Jones and other far right nuts have been banned from all social media? Because they're right wing nuts fomenting violence, but Trump sympathizes with them.

1. Which is an elected representative of the Right?
Neither one.

2. What positions of the Right are racial?
None that you can name.


3. You have been an excellent witness to prove that there is no Far Right in this country.

You're dismissed.

of course alex jones is a representative of the far right. Trump bitched and moaned when social media kicked him off. Rush Limbaugh aint far behind.

I had already given you proof that far right exists, and is growing:
The Rise of Far-Right Extremism in the United States

There is no Far Right in this country....but if you'd like to try again....OK.

The official positions of the GOP, the Right, conservatives, are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

The Democrats, Liberals, Progressives ascribe to radical anti-American positions, hence, Far Left.


Let's check.

Let's go right for the head of the Far Left....Obama

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."



Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Any want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?



So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

PC, perhaps center is now far right?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

jc456, post: 22413086

she was discussing with obammy if she were an illegal

She never said “If I were an illegal” and she never hinted, suggested, proposed or intimated that the discussion involved herself role playing as an illegal or her wanting an answer from Obama based on “If” she were an illegal.

There is no language that goes there. You are a liar.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There is no Far Right in this country....only a Far Left.


Watch me FORCE you to prove it.


As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)


To be 'far,' it must be at a distance to the center: American traditions, values, and history represent that center.

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.




If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



I sure put a cork in your pie-hole, didn't I.

what are the positions of the radical right?
Look no futher than Alex Jones or Milo Yiannopoulos. Any well know views of either can be considered far right radicalism. Why do think Alex Jones and other far right nuts have been banned from all social media? Because they're right wing nuts fomenting violence, but Trump sympathizes with them.

1. Which is an elected representative of the Right?
Neither one.

2. What positions of the Right are racial?
None that you can name.


3. You have been an excellent witness to prove that there is no Far Right in this country.

You're dismissed.

of course alex jones is a representative of the far right. Trump bitched and moaned when social media kicked him off. Rush Limbaugh aint far behind.

I had already given you proof that far right exists, and is growing:
The Rise of Far-Right Extremism in the United States

There is no Far Right in this country....but if you'd like to try again....OK.

The official positions of the GOP, the Right, conservatives, are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

The Democrats, Liberals, Progressives ascribe to radical anti-American positions, hence, Far Left.


Let's check.

Let's go right for the head of the Far Left....Obama

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."



Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Any want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?



So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

PC, perhaps center is now far right?

Actually, like the Muslim President.....the Democrats/Liberals demand the right to lie.

There are six rules that one need know to recognize the Leftists.

Rule #1
Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

 

[jc456]

jc456, post: 22413086

she was discussing with obammy if she were an illegal

She never said “If I were an illegal” and she never hinted, suggested, proposed or intimated that the discussion involved herself role playing as an illegal or her wanting an answer from Obama based on “If” she were an illegal.

There is no language that goes there. You are a liar.

sure she did, again, listening isn't a skillset you possess. I can't help you if you don't listen. I explained she role played the question. she was asking as if she were a dreamer, one she believed was a citizen, stated in her question.

 

[jc456]

what are the positions of the radical right?
Look no futher than Alex Jones or Milo Yiannopoulos. Any well know views of either can be considered far right radicalism. Why do think Alex Jones and other far right nuts have been banned from all social media? Because they're right wing nuts fomenting violence, but Trump sympathizes with them.

1. Which is an elected representative of the Right?
Neither one.

2. What positions of the Right are racial?
None that you can name.


3. You have been an excellent witness to prove that there is no Far Right in this country.

You're dismissed.

of course alex jones is a representative of the far right. Trump bitched and moaned when social media kicked him off. Rush Limbaugh aint far behind.

I had already given you proof that far right exists, and is growing:
The Rise of Far-Right Extremism in the United States

There is no Far Right in this country....but if you'd like to try again....OK.

The official positions of the GOP, the Right, conservatives, are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

The Democrats, Liberals, Progressives ascribe to radical anti-American positions, hence, Far Left.


Let's check.

Let's go right for the head of the Far Left....Obama

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."



Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Any want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?



So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

PC, perhaps center is now far right?

Actually, like the Muslim President.....the Democrats/Liberals demand the right to lie.

There are six rules that one need know to recognize the Leftists.

Rule #1
Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

Rule #2, they never have fact on their side.

 

[PoliticalChic]

jc456, post: 22413086

she was discussing with obammy if she were an illegal

She never said “If I were an illegal” and she never hinted, suggested, proposed or intimated that the discussion involved herself role playing as an illegal or her wanting an answer from Obama based on “If” she were an illegal.

There is no language that goes there. You are a liar.

You took quite a beating earlier, but if you need more.....no problem.



Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.









Transcript:



RODRIGUEZ: Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting.

[And that is who she is speaking for!]

So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?
[Who would come for legal citizens voting?????????]
OBAMA: Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself.

[Just like you.....a bald-faced liar!]

And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera.

[Meaning: 'Go ahead and vote....no one will be the wiser!']


The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote.

[Meaning, I guess....if you are living with lots of other illegals...well, heck, at least some of you should go vote! After all....Trump is trying to get rid of you illegals!]







And, Obama did say those exact words, in the exact order I’ve provided them.




She begins with the word "So..." which means she is basing the idea on that which just came before: speaking for illegals.


Let me know when you need another lesson.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Which is an elected representative of the Right?
Neither one.

2. What positions of the Right are racial?
None that you can name.


3. You have been an excellent witness to prove that there is no Far Right in this country.

You're dismissed.

of course alex jones is a representative of the far right. Trump bitched and moaned when social media kicked him off. Rush Limbaugh aint far behind.

I had already given you proof that far right exists, and is growing:
The Rise of Far-Right Extremism in the United States

There is no Far Right in this country....but if you'd like to try again....OK.

The official positions of the GOP, the Right, conservatives, are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

The Democrats, Liberals, Progressives ascribe to radical anti-American positions, hence, Far Left.


Let's check.

Let's go right for the head of the Far Left....Obama

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."



Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Any want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?



So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

PC, perhaps center is now far right?

Actually, like the Muslim President.....the Democrats/Liberals demand the right to lie.

There are six rules that one need know to recognize the Leftists.

Rule #1
Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

Rule #2, they never have fact on their side.

My actual rule #2 is a bit different....that's rule #4.

Here are all six.


Rule #1
Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.

Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.


Rule #3

The only limit on liberal insanity in this country is how many issues liberals can get before a court…A lot is at stake for liberals with the court. If they lose a liberal vote, they will be forced t fight political battles through a messy little system know as ‘democracy.’


Rule #4

For Liberals, feeling passes for knowing. Hence, facts, experience, history, reality…..none have any moment.


Rule #5

Liberal government has two purposes: either ban, or mandate. Liberty, individuality, nor difference of opinion have any place in their firmament. That’s the reason for concentration camps.


Rule #6 Only Liberals have rights. Man walks into women's showers, accuses concerned naked woman of harassment for questioning his gender. · Caldron Pool

6a. Laws are only applied against the Right/Republicans

 

[jc456]

jc456, post: 22413086

she was discussing with obammy if she were an illegal

She never said “If I were an illegal” and she never hinted, suggested, proposed or intimated that the discussion involved herself role playing as an illegal or her wanting an answer from Obama based on “If” she were an illegal.

There is no language that goes there. You are a liar.

You took quite a beating earlier, but if you need more.....no problem.



Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.









Transcript:



RODRIGUEZ: Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting.

[And that is who she is speaking for!]

So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?
[Who would come for legal citizens voting?????????]
OBAMA: Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself.

[Just like you.....a bald-faced liar!]

And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera.

[Meaning: 'Go ahead and vote....no one will be the wiser!']


The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote.

[Meaning, I guess....if you are living with lots of other illegals...well, heck, at least some of you should go vote! After all....Trump is trying to get rid of you illegals!]







And, Obama did say those exact words, in the exact order I’ve provided them.




She begins with the word "So..." which means she is basing the idea on that which just came before: speaking for illegals.


Let me know when you need another lesson.

let's take the statements in a little different direction for the dude, did she say they were fearful of voting? yes

did obammy say, they shouldn't vote then? no. Why?
she then states...
So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?
and why would she ask about immigration in this question if she is a citizen?

obammy then replies instead with

OBAMA: Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself.
And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

jc456, post: 22413086

she was discussing with obammy if she were an illegal

She never said “If I were an illegal” and she never hinted, suggested, proposed or intimated that the discussion involved herself role playing as an illegal or her wanting an answer from Obama based on “If” she were an illegal.

There is no language that goes there. You are a liar.

You must be an ESL drop out

 

[jc456]

jc456, post: 22413086

she was discussing with obammy if she were an illegal

She never said “If I were an illegal” and she never hinted, suggested, proposed or intimated that the discussion involved herself role playing as an illegal or her wanting an answer from Obama based on “If” she were an illegal.

There is no language that goes there. You are a liar.

You must be an ESL drop out

I don't know why Rodriguez would have lead with ...RODRIGUEZ: Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting.
If her intent wasn't about them, then there is no logic in predicating the question.

 

[PoliticalChic]

jc456, post: 22413086

she was discussing with obammy if she were an illegal

She never said “If I were an illegal” and she never hinted, suggested, proposed or intimated that the discussion involved herself role playing as an illegal or her wanting an answer from Obama based on “If” she were an illegal.

There is no language that goes there. You are a liar.

You took quite a beating earlier, but if you need more.....no problem.



Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.









Transcript:



RODRIGUEZ: Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting.

[And that is who she is speaking for!]

So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?
[Who would come for legal citizens voting?????????]
OBAMA: Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself.

[Just like you.....a bald-faced liar!]

And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera.

[Meaning: 'Go ahead and vote....no one will be the wiser!']


The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote.

[Meaning, I guess....if you are living with lots of other illegals...well, heck, at least some of you should go vote! After all....Trump is trying to get rid of you illegals!]







And, Obama did say those exact words, in the exact order I’ve provided them.




She begins with the word "So..." which means she is basing the idea on that which just came before: speaking for illegals.


Let me know when you need another lesson.

let's take the statements in a little different direction for the dude, did she say they were fearful of voting? yes

did obammy say, they shouldn't vote then? no. Why?
she then states...
So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?
and why would she ask about immigration in this question if she is a citizen?

obammy then replies instead with

OBAMA: Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself.
And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera.

Shouldn't we get the dolt to state whether or not he has the right to lie????

 

[jc456]

jc456, post: 22413086

she was discussing with obammy if she were an illegal

She never said “If I were an illegal” and she never hinted, suggested, proposed or intimated that the discussion involved herself role playing as an illegal or her wanting an answer from Obama based on “If” she were an illegal.

There is no language that goes there. You are a liar.

You took quite a beating earlier, but if you need more.....no problem.



Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.









Transcript:



RODRIGUEZ: Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting.

[And that is who she is speaking for!]

So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?
[Who would come for legal citizens voting?????????]
OBAMA: Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself.

[Just like you.....a bald-faced liar!]

And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera.

[Meaning: 'Go ahead and vote....no one will be the wiser!']


The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote.

[Meaning, I guess....if you are living with lots of other illegals...well, heck, at least some of you should go vote! After all....Trump is trying to get rid of you illegals!]







And, Obama did say those exact words, in the exact order I’ve provided them.




She begins with the word "So..." which means she is basing the idea on that which just came before: speaking for illegals.


Let me know when you need another lesson.

let's take the statements in a little different direction for the dude, did she say they were fearful of voting? yes

did obammy say, they shouldn't vote then? no. Why?
she then states...
So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?
and why would she ask about immigration in this question if she is a citizen?

obammy then replies instead with

OBAMA: Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself.
And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera.

Shouldn't we get the dolt to state whether or not he has the right to lie????

sure

 

[NotfooledbyW]

jc456, post: 22413363

did she say they were fearful of voting? yes

So you lied when you accused Gina of saying that illegals vote. Yes?

Why did you lie before?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

jc456, post: 22413363

did she say they were fearful of voting? yes

did obammy say, they shouldn't vote then? no. Why?

You ask why because you are an idiot.

Remember that you lied before when you claimed Gina said that illegals vote.

And now we know that you know the truth that what she actually said at this point in the interview was that illegals were fearful of voting.

And now we know you know that Gina continued saying “if I vote”...

You posted this. Didn’t you?

jc456, post: 22413363

So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?

Gina did not say ‘so if they vote’ she said ‘So if I vote’ - it’s very clear and we know you know that Gina is a legitimate voter.

It is also clear that ‘fearful of voting’ was a reference to non-citizens (illegals) who have citizens in their family and households who can vote legally.

So what the transcript shows is that Gina was asking about a common fear among mixed (legal and illegal) families and households who incorrectly fear that when a legal voter in the household votes there may be investigations that could lead to deportation in the family.

All Obama did was dismiss that fear - telling legal voters they shouid vote without fear that legal voting itself could lead to deportation of family members.

Racist haters turned a simple clear dialogue between Obama and Gina into a racist hater rant and political lie.

And you lapped it up didn’t you.

 

[jc456]

jc456, post: 22413363

did she say they were fearful of voting? yes

So you lied when you accused Gina of saying that illegals vote. Yes?

Why did you lie before?

post my lie. nice ricochet tinker. role play, it's what actors do. caveat. look it up.

ca·ve·at
/ˈkavēˌat,ˈkävēˌät/
noun

1. a warning or proviso of specific stipulations, conditions, or limitations.

 

[jc456]

jc456, post: 22413363

did she say they were fearful of voting? yes

did obammy say, they shouldn't vote then? no. Why?

You ask why because you are an idiot.

Remember that you lied before when you claimed Gina said that illegals vote.

And now we know that you know the truth that what she actually said at this point in the interview was that illegals were fearful of voting.

And now we know you know that Gina continued saying “if I vote”...

You posted this. Didn’t you?

jc456, post: 22413363

So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?

Gina did not say ‘so if they vote’ she said ‘So if I vote’ - it’s very clear and we know you know that Gina is a legitimate voter.

It is also clear that ‘fearful of voting’ was a reference to non-citizens (illegals) who have citizens in their family and households who can vote legally.

So what the transcript shows is that Gina was asking about a common fear among mixed (legal and illegal) families and households who incorrectly fear that when a legal voter in the household votes there may be investigations that could lead to deportation in the family.

All Obama did was dismiss that fear - telling legal voters they shouid vote without fear that legal voting itself could lead to deportation of family members.

Racist haters turned a simple clear dialogue between Obama and Gina into a racist hater rant and political lie.

And you lapped it up didn’t you.

I don't lie, I use facts. you're distorted cause you can't believe what actually happened in the video. I'll give you a chance to come clean, did she or did she not caveat her question? can you be honest tinker bell?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

PoliticalChic, post: 22413331

Watch as she says 'I' after making clear that she is speaking for illegal aliens.

The flaw in your hate based lie is that Gina is not speaking for illegal aliens because “I” is first person singular meaning she is speaking for herself and herself alone.

She wouid have used ‘they’ if she intended to convey an undestsnding that she wanted to get the president of the United States to tell on the record that non-citizens should and must vote because it will never be investigated.

Do you realize how absurd your lie is at face value.

When you lie it ought to make some sense to all parties involved.

And Obama says in the same interview that non-citizens cannot vote.

You are a very stupid liar.