We do not want a transcript of the call, we want the Whistleblower's

report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.

how does it feel to 'want'?



Like when you want in one hand.....
 
How could insisting on the truth about Biden's possibly illegal actions in Ukraine be construed as malfeasance? The Democrats seem to be saying that since Biden may be the Dem candidate he should have immunity for past crimes, just as they argued with Hillary.

To me it is all dependent on what, if anything, Trump offered up in exchange for information.
It's like there would be nothing wrong for CNN or Fox News asking Ukraine's leader about that conversation. However, if we later found out that the cable network gave the guy a chunk of cash, I'd be very suspect about his story.


Here is the declassified transcript of the conversation. There is no evidence of threats or bribes, just a request that Ukeraine cooperate with the US Justice Department in its investigation into whether Biden used threats to withhold US aid in order to protect his son from being indicted.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

Yep, that's why I thought the Democrats put the cart before the horse with talk of impeachment. Think the trouble they'll see will be Trump bringing his private lawyer Giuliani into the conversation to work on the matter.
 
How could insisting on the truth about Biden's possibly illegal actions in Ukraine be construed as malfeasance? The Democrats seem to be saying that since Biden may be the Dem candidate he should have immunity for past crimes, just as they argued with Hillary.

To me it is all dependent on what, if anything, Trump offered up in exchange for information.
It's like there would be nothing wrong for CNN or Fox News asking Ukraine's leader about that conversation. However, if we later found out that the cable network gave the guy a chunk of cash, I'd be very suspect about his story.


Here is the declassified transcript of the conversation. There is no evidence of threats or bribes, just a request that Ukeraine cooperate with the US Justice Department in its investigation into whether Biden used threats to withhold US aid in order to protect his son from being indicted.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

Yep, that's why I thought the Democrats put the cart before the horse with talk of impeachment. Think the trouble they'll see will be Trump bringing his private lawyer Giuliani into the conversation to work on the matter.
Nothing wrong with that, many presidents have had unpaid advisors and consultants. They used to be called the "kitchen cabinet".
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
Nothing to report ALL HEARSAY JUST LIKE THE DOSSIER...you scum are so easy to show just how truly stupid you are...AMERICA is watching you!
It's not like some guy Putin, founded a Company Rosatom who paid bribes to people like McCain, Clinton, and Holder to get a Uranium one Deal done. Lots of evidence there if they wanted to throw someone in jail. And it's not like Clinton who paid $13 Million to Putin to help her smear him during the campaign and afterwards. Evidence to look in to that too.

Nope, just fantasies is all The Left Tards have.

Tramp and his cronies, colluded with Russia , he got hired due to Russia's help. Now he twice colluded with a foreign country. Lord knows what else he has done.

We do not trust the tramp admin, we know better.

Senior Ukrainian official says he's opened probe into US election interference
John Solomon (LOL)
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
Nothing to report ALL HEARSAY JUST LIKE THE DOSSIER...you scum are so easy to show just how truly stupid you are...AMERICA is watching you!
It's not like some guy Putin, founded a Company Rosatom who paid bribes to people like McCain, Clinton, and Holder to get a Uranium one Deal done. Lots of evidence there if they wanted to throw someone in jail. And it's not like Clinton who paid $13 Million to Putin to help her smear him during the campaign and afterwards. Evidence to look in to that too.

Nope, just fantasies is all The Left Tards have.

Tramp and his cronies, colluded with Russia , he got hired due to Russia's help. Now he twice colluded with a foreign country. Lord knows what else he has done.

We do not trust the tramp admin, we know better.

Senior Ukrainian official says he's opened probe into US election interference
John Solomon (LOL)
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
Nothing to report ALL HEARSAY JUST LIKE THE DOSSIER...you scum are so easy to show just how truly stupid you are...AMERICA is watching you!
It's not like some guy Putin, founded a Company Rosatom who paid bribes to people like McCain, Clinton, and Holder to get a Uranium one Deal done. Lots of evidence there if they wanted to throw someone in jail. And it's not like Clinton who paid $13 Million to Putin to help her smear him during the campaign and afterwards. Evidence to look in to that too.

Nope, just fantasies is all The Left Tards have.

Tramp and his cronies, colluded with Russia , he got hired due to Russia's help. Now he twice colluded with a foreign country. Lord knows what else he has done.

We do not trust the tramp admin, we know better.

Senior Ukrainian official says he's opened probe into US election interference
John Solomon (LOL)

I can tell it hurts you when you have no rebuttal. Too bad.
 
Here is the declassified transcript of the conversation.
...which comes with a disclaimer that it is "not verbatim"

So this is not the transcript. Of course. You didn't really think they would release it, right?
What happened to the whistleblowers quote that Trump brought up Jojo 8 (EIGHT) times?.....You subversives are truly pathetic and the voting public knows it!
 
“The final key to the way I promote is bravado, Trump said, explaining truthful hyperbole. "I play to people’s fantasies. People may not always think big themselves, but they can still get very excited by those who do. That’s why a little hyperbole never hurts. People want to believe that something is the biggest and the greatest and the most spectacular. I call it truthful hyperbole. It’s an innocent form of exaggeration—and a very effective form of promotion.”

In the hopes that he would appear transparent, Trump threw himself on the mercy of the court, so to speak, and released both a transcript of the July 25th phone call to President Zelensky of Ukraine and the whistleblower complaint, although the latter is still classified and cannot be released to the public. However, the transcript alone is proof the President violated the Constitution and federal law by asking a foreign power to intervene in our election on his behalf.

Keep in mind, Trump stopped a military aid package to Ukraine five days before this phone call, and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff told reporters, "There is no quid pro quo necessary to betray your country or your oath of office. Even though many read this as a quid pro quo. I'm not concerned whether it is a quid pro quo or not. Ukraine understood what this President wanted."

That said, while Trump didn't come out and say, "I'm bribing you," clearly there was quid pro quo.

Zelensky mentioned that Ukraine is ready to buy more Javelin missiles from the US. Trump responded by saying, "I would like you to do us a favor."

"The United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn't say that it's reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very, very good to Ukraine," Trump said.

Of course, Zelensky agreed, and told Trump the US is a "much bigger partner" to Ukraine than other European countries. Zelensky has agreed to everything Trump has said during this episode. The very last thing the Ukrainian president wants to do is anger Trump. Trump holds the key to the defense of his country from the ongoing Russian aggression.

Trump had no qualms about using that leverage.

Trump then proceeded to pressure Zelensky for cooperation with his political agenda, urging him to start corruption investigations while stressing the United States’ role in military assistance for Kiev.

Trump rambled on about the 2016 elections, something about a server called Crowdstrike, Robert Mueller, and the former ambassador from the United States, "the woman," Trump said. Finally, he got down to hard cases. "The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me," Trump said.

In addition, Trump urged Zelensky to work with Attorney General William P. Barr on potential corruption investigations connected to former Vice President Biden, his son, Hunter, and an unsubstantiated theory about stolen Democratic emails in 2016.

"Trump’s suggestion that American law enforcement be directly involved and in contact with Ukraine’s government marks the first evidence that the president personally sought to harness the power of the United States government to further a politically motivated investigation," the New York Times.
 
Biden admitted on video to taking a bribe.

Biden admitted on video to taking a bribe.

Give a link for your accusation , as its not true.
You replied to a thread that has a link to the video, dumbass.
And nowhere in it does he say anything about a bribery. I even posted the transcript along with the video.
ROFL! It takes a real genius to believe that you can't be bribing someone if you don't use the word "bribe."

You are so fucking stupid it must hurt.
LOL

Slobbers the USMB fucking moron who still can't explain the bribe he thinks took place.

Holy fuck but you're stupid fawn. Yes, you're a fucking liar, all Stalinists are, but to think you can get away with such lies, Klafte.
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.

Hamaskunt, your American counterparts just about had a stroke when Trump questioned intelligence sources, remember? Now you're saying the SAME INTELLIGENCE SOURCES "made up" the transcript? :eek:
 
Give a link for your accusation , as its not true.
You replied to a thread that has a link to the video, dumbass.
And nowhere in it does he say anything about a bribery. I even posted the transcript along with the video.
ROFL! It takes a real genius to believe that you can't be bribing someone if you don't use the word "bribe."

You are so fucking stupid it must hurt.
LOL

Slobbers the USMB fucking moron who still can't explain the bribe he thinks took place.

Holy fuck but you're stupid fawn. Yes, you're a fucking liar, all Stalinists are, but to think you can get away with such lies, Klafte.
Faux calls me stupid for saying that you don't need to use the word "bribe," to be guilty of bribery, but he says Trump is guilty of bribery even though he never used the word "bribe."

Is it possible for a living person to be as dumb as Faux?
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.

Hamaskunt, your American counterparts just about had a stroke when Trump questioned intelligence sources, remember? Now you're saying the SAME INTELLIGENCE SOURCES "made up" the transcript? :eek:
Yep, I'm told that the people doing the transcribing work for the CIA. The libs always attack anyone who questions the credibility of anyone who works for our intelligence agencies.

The hypocrisy of leftwingers is impossible to believe.
 
Give a link for your accusation , as its not true.
You replied to a thread that has a link to the video, dumbass.
And nowhere in it does he say anything about a bribery. I even posted the transcript along with the video.
ROFL! It takes a real genius to believe that you can't be bribing someone if you don't use the word "bribe."

You are so fucking stupid it must hurt.
LOL

Slobbers the USMB fucking moron who still can't explain the bribe he thinks took place.

Holy fuck but you're stupid fawn. Yes, you're a fucking liar, all Stalinists are, but to think you can get away with such lies, Klafte.
LOLOL

Insane poster -- that doesn't explain a bribe. :cuckoo:
 
You replied to a thread that has a link to the video, dumbass.
And nowhere in it does he say anything about a bribery. I even posted the transcript along with the video.
ROFL! It takes a real genius to believe that you can't be bribing someone if you don't use the word "bribe."

You are so fucking stupid it must hurt.
LOL

Slobbers the USMB fucking moron who still can't explain the bribe he thinks took place.

Holy fuck but you're stupid fawn. Yes, you're a fucking liar, all Stalinists are, but to think you can get away with such lies, Klafte.
Faux calls me stupid for saying that you don't need to use the word "bribe," to be guilty of bribery, but he says Trump is guilty of bribery even though he never used the word "bribe."

Is it possible for a living person to be as dumb as Faux?
LOLOL

Actually, I didn't say Trump is guilty of bribery. What I actually said is there's not enough evidence yet to say that.

I'll chalk this fuckup of your to be attributed to the fact you're a fucking moron.

:dance:
 
You replied to a thread that has a link to the video, dumbass.
And nowhere in it does he say anything about a bribery. I even posted the transcript along with the video.
ROFL! It takes a real genius to believe that you can't be bribing someone if you don't use the word "bribe."

You are so fucking stupid it must hurt.
LOL

Slobbers the USMB fucking moron who still can't explain the bribe he thinks took place.

Holy fuck but you're stupid fawn. Yes, you're a fucking liar, all Stalinists are, but to think you can get away with such lies, Klafte.
Faux calls me stupid for saying that you don't need to use the word "bribe," to be guilty of bribery, but he says Trump is guilty of bribery even though he never used the word "bribe."

Is it possible for a living person to be as dumb as Faux?

What would you call it?
 
And nowhere in it does he say anything about a bribery. I even posted the transcript along with the video.
ROFL! It takes a real genius to believe that you can't be bribing someone if you don't use the word "bribe."

You are so fucking stupid it must hurt.
LOL

Slobbers the USMB fucking moron who still can't explain the bribe he thinks took place.

Holy fuck but you're stupid fawn. Yes, you're a fucking liar, all Stalinists are, but to think you can get away with such lies, Klafte.
Faux calls me stupid for saying that you don't need to use the word "bribe," to be guilty of bribery, but he says Trump is guilty of bribery even though he never used the word "bribe."

Is it possible for a living person to be as dumb as Faux?
LOLOL

Actually, I didn't say Trump is guilty of bribery. What I actually said is there's not enough evidence yet to say that.

I'll chalk this fuckup of your to be attributed to the fact you're a fucking moron.

:dance:
You're the one denying that Biden took a bribe because he never used the word "bribe." That's how stupefyingly dumb you are.
 
And nowhere in it does he say anything about a bribery. I even posted the transcript along with the video.
ROFL! It takes a real genius to believe that you can't be bribing someone if you don't use the word "bribe."

You are so fucking stupid it must hurt.
LOL

Slobbers the USMB fucking moron who still can't explain the bribe he thinks took place.

Holy fuck but you're stupid fawn. Yes, you're a fucking liar, all Stalinists are, but to think you can get away with such lies, Klafte.
Faux calls me stupid for saying that you don't need to use the word "bribe," to be guilty of bribery, but he says Trump is guilty of bribery even though he never used the word "bribe."

Is it possible for a living person to be as dumb as Faux?

What would you call it?
I call what Biden did "taking a bribe." Faux is the one who disagrees.

You're almost as stupid as Faux.
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.


Okay, dipshit.....now we know...the "Whistle Blower," did not hear the conversation he didn't have first hand knowledge of the call, all he had was "hear say," so he heard rumors and not even direct access to any of the information...

You twit....

You know that kid's game...where one kid whispers something to one kid and they do this down a whole line of kids....and by the end of the line, at the last kid, the thing that was whispered isn't even close to being what was actually whispered? You didn't learn that lesson in school...did you?

He didn't even have any first hand contact with the information...you moron....

Breaking: Whistleblower complaint released

And as reported earlier, all of the complaint comes from second-hand knowledge of the call and the events that transpired afterward:
----

Had the complainant actually read the transcript or been in the room, he might have noticed that Zelensky brought up Giuliani and the Biden investigation first, although Trump was certainly happy to discuss it. The Crowdstrike reference is accurate, though, as is its likely value to Trump. However, Trump never mentions his own election bid in the transcript nor does he pressure Zelensky in any obvious way.
 
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.

Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
SO...

Your saying you do not want the real time facts, recorded by those present. But you will take the made up crap from the third or fourth hand info as fact?

You are why this nation is in the condition it is.. This kind of stupid is hysterical...
 

Forum List

Back
Top