Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep. Crazy. You nailed it.
What’s the issue that is most important to you?
Sorry, don't have just one.
If you truly MUST sum my political concerns up into one bumper sticker slogan - which, since you're a leftist, is all you can grasp - it would be, "Leave us alone, government!"
Hmmm. I’m trying to have a discussion here.
Your primary concern is government intruding into your personal business? Is that it?
My primary concern is government MASSIVELY overstepping its appropriate bounds and involving itself in things that are none of its business, and/or which it does badly.
That is nice. Would you care to provide an example?
How about the fact that you actually have to ask that question?
Let's start with the fact that the federal government has a very clearly-defined structure under the Constitution. The vast majority of what the federal government does APPEARS NOWHERE IN THAT STRUCTURE. Businesses spend billions of dollars every year to comply with - for example - EPA regulations which have the force of law, BUT WERE NOT WRITTEN OR PASSED BY DULY-ELECTED LAWMAKERS. They're written and enforced by nameless, unelected bureaucrats.
How about Obamacare? Can you explain to me why the relationship between me and my doctor, for the purpose of preserving my personal, individual life and health, should in any way involve the federal freaking government? Why do I need to inform the government that I have chosen to take the financial responsibility for my health onto myself, rather than purchasing health insurance, and get my hand slapped like a naughty child because someone else has determined that that's a bad choice and I shouldn't make it?
Why does my church have a civil rights lawyer on retainer because of the possibility that some homosexual couple on an SJW mission might decide to try to rent the sanctuary for the purpose of triggering a "hate-crime" lawsuit? Why is anyone, anywhere in this country being forced to discuss and justify their religious beliefs to ANY employee of any government?
And don't think I don't know that you're asking for examples only so that you can try to deflect the conversation off onto a specific item and whether or not XYZ choice or behavior is good or bad, so that you'll never have to discuss the larger question of IT'S NONE OF THE GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS EITHER WAY.
I do much more than vote, loser. I motivate others to vote. I’m an activist. I’ll talk to a few hundred voters this upcoming weekend. I’ll register about 30 new voters. I’ll convince another 50 to sign up to vote by mail.
There are lots of us out here. Watch the turnout numbers. Your shit is played.
We appreciate you getting more voters to vote Republican, because for the life of me, I can't see anybody hearing how they will lose their tax break, have open borders for more aliens to take our jobs, more MS-13 in our neighborhoods, and less guns to protect ourselves would get anybody to vote Democrat.
If you had the capacity for empathy, you’d know how boring and tedious it is to have you involved in a conversation.
If you weren't a self-absorbed princess, you'd know that not everyone agrees with you. Many of us find Ray quite amusing and refreshing.
Yeah. I’m sure you do. He’s a breath of fresh air. Just like you. Always on point and never guilty of posting dopey cliche’s.
If you leftist dipshits ever learned and matured, we wouldn't have to state the same blindingly obvious truths over and over until they become cliches.
Sorry, don't have just one.
If you truly MUST sum my political concerns up into one bumper sticker slogan - which, since you're a leftist, is all you can grasp - it would be, "Leave us alone, government!"
Hmmm. I’m trying to have a discussion here.
Your primary concern is government intruding into your personal business? Is that it?
My primary concern is government MASSIVELY overstepping its appropriate bounds and involving itself in things that are none of its business, and/or which it does badly.
That is nice. Would you care to provide an example?
How about the fact that you actually have to ask that question?
Let's start with the fact that the federal government has a very clearly-defined structure under the Constitution. The vast majority of what the federal government does APPEARS NOWHERE IN THAT STRUCTURE. Businesses spend billions of dollars every year to comply with - for example - EPA regulations which have the force of law, BUT WERE NOT WRITTEN OR PASSED BY DULY-ELECTED LAWMAKERS. They're written and enforced by nameless, unelected bureaucrats.
How about Obamacare? Can you explain to me why the relationship between me and my doctor, for the purpose of preserving my personal, individual life and health, should in any way involve the federal freaking government? Why do I need to inform the government that I have chosen to take the financial responsibility for my health onto myself, rather than purchasing health insurance, and get my hand slapped like a naughty child because someone else has determined that that's a bad choice and I shouldn't make it?
Why does my church have a civil rights lawyer on retainer because of the possibility that some homosexual couple on an SJW mission might decide to try to rent the sanctuary for the purpose of triggering a "hate-crime" lawsuit? Why is anyone, anywhere in this country being forced to discuss and justify their religious beliefs to ANY employee of any government?
And don't think I don't know that you're asking for examples only so that you can try to deflect the conversation off onto a specific item and whether or not XYZ choice or behavior is good or bad, so that you'll never have to discuss the larger question of IT'S NONE OF THE GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS EITHER WAY.
Ahhhh. You think I want to deflect. So you don’t give a specific example.
I think you know that you are fine with the government butting into certain people’s business and you love it when the government forces religion on people.
You are not for freedom from government for all. Just for some.
Admit it.
That's not true for me. Look at my post history. I want liberty for all.I think you know that you are fine with the government butting into certain people’s business and you love it when the government forces religion on people.
That's not true for me. Look at my post history. I want liberty for all.I think you know that you are fine with the government butting into certain people’s business and you love it when the government forces religion on people.
Hmmm. I’m trying to have a discussion here.
Your primary concern is government intruding into your personal business? Is that it?
My primary concern is government MASSIVELY overstepping its appropriate bounds and involving itself in things that are none of its business, and/or which it does badly.
That is nice. Would you care to provide an example?
How about the fact that you actually have to ask that question?
Let's start with the fact that the federal government has a very clearly-defined structure under the Constitution. The vast majority of what the federal government does APPEARS NOWHERE IN THAT STRUCTURE. Businesses spend billions of dollars every year to comply with - for example - EPA regulations which have the force of law, BUT WERE NOT WRITTEN OR PASSED BY DULY-ELECTED LAWMAKERS. They're written and enforced by nameless, unelected bureaucrats.
How about Obamacare? Can you explain to me why the relationship between me and my doctor, for the purpose of preserving my personal, individual life and health, should in any way involve the federal freaking government? Why do I need to inform the government that I have chosen to take the financial responsibility for my health onto myself, rather than purchasing health insurance, and get my hand slapped like a naughty child because someone else has determined that that's a bad choice and I shouldn't make it?
Why does my church have a civil rights lawyer on retainer because of the possibility that some homosexual couple on an SJW mission might decide to try to rent the sanctuary for the purpose of triggering a "hate-crime" lawsuit? Why is anyone, anywhere in this country being forced to discuss and justify their religious beliefs to ANY employee of any government?
And don't think I don't know that you're asking for examples only so that you can try to deflect the conversation off onto a specific item and whether or not XYZ choice or behavior is good or bad, so that you'll never have to discuss the larger question of IT'S NONE OF THE GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS EITHER WAY.
Ahhhh. You think I want to deflect. So you don’t give a specific example.
I think you know that you are fine with the government butting into certain people’s business and you love it when the government forces religion on people.
You are not for freedom from government for all. Just for some.
Admit it.
Ahhh, you want to deflect, so you change the goalposts and then try to blame people for not reading your mind (as if I can manage with such small print).
You can "think I know" whatever the fuck you want to pretend or project until your face turns purple. Doesn't make me in the slightest bit responsible or answerable for it.
Whenever you're ready to debate my ACTUAL WORDS with the ACTUAL PERSON SAYING THEM, instead of your imaginings of what I think with the imaginary Cecilie in your head, you let me know. Until then, your surrender is noted, and you may run along and attempt to fuck up and derail some other conversation.
We appreciate you getting more voters to vote Republican, because for the life of me, I can't see anybody hearing how they will lose their tax break, have open borders for more aliens to take our jobs, more MS-13 in our neighborhoods, and less guns to protect ourselves would get anybody to vote Democrat.
If you had the capacity for empathy, you’d know how boring and tedious it is to have you involved in a conversation.
If you weren't a self-absorbed princess, you'd know that not everyone agrees with you. Many of us find Ray quite amusing and refreshing.
Yeah. I’m sure you do. He’s a breath of fresh air. Just like you. Always on point and never guilty of posting dopey cliche’s.
If you leftist dipshits ever learned and matured, we wouldn't have to state the same blindingly obvious truths over and over until they become cliches.
Ahh. You repeat lies and memes because you have to. I get it now.
If you had the capacity for empathy, you’d know how boring and tedious it is to have you involved in a conversation.
If you weren't a self-absorbed princess, you'd know that not everyone agrees with you. Many of us find Ray quite amusing and refreshing.
Yeah. I’m sure you do. He’s a breath of fresh air. Just like you. Always on point and never guilty of posting dopey cliche’s.
If you leftist dipshits ever learned and matured, we wouldn't have to state the same blindingly obvious truths over and over until they become cliches.
Ahh. You repeat lies and memes because you have to. I get it now.
See above, re: not taking responsibility for your ASSumptions and projections. Whatever script you had in your head of this conversation, I am not answerable for following it, nor does it prove anything when I don't except that you're too chickenshit to have a conversation with a REAL person, rather than your straw man construct of her.
Shoo, poseur.
If you weren't a self-absorbed princess, you'd know that not everyone agrees with you. Many of us find Ray quite amusing and refreshing.
Yeah. I’m sure you do. He’s a breath of fresh air. Just like you. Always on point and never guilty of posting dopey cliche’s.
If you leftist dipshits ever learned and matured, we wouldn't have to state the same blindingly obvious truths over and over until they become cliches.
Ahh. You repeat lies and memes because you have to. I get it now.
See above, re: not taking responsibility for your ASSumptions and projections. Whatever script you had in your head of this conversation, I am not answerable for following it, nor does it prove anything when I don't except that you're too chickenshit to have a conversation with a REAL person, rather than your straw man construct of her.
Shoo, poseur.
Wait! Am I mistaken? Are you in favor of the EPA shutting down toxic waste dumpers? You favor public accomodation laws? You OK with people going naked when they want?
Come on. Let's talk these things over.
Vote Dem for higher taxes and more illegals raping and killing Americans.
Yeah. I’m sure you do. He’s a breath of fresh air. Just like you. Always on point and never guilty of posting dopey cliche’s.
If you leftist dipshits ever learned and matured, we wouldn't have to state the same blindingly obvious truths over and over until they become cliches.
Ahh. You repeat lies and memes because you have to. I get it now.
See above, re: not taking responsibility for your ASSumptions and projections. Whatever script you had in your head of this conversation, I am not answerable for following it, nor does it prove anything when I don't except that you're too chickenshit to have a conversation with a REAL person, rather than your straw man construct of her.
Shoo, poseur.
Wait! Am I mistaken? Are you in favor of the EPA shutting down toxic waste dumpers? You favor public accomodation laws? You OK with people going naked when they want?
Come on. Let's talk these things over.
Like I said, you want to deflect off onto "Isn't this a good thing?!" to avoid talking about whether or not it's being done correctly. And apparently you ALSO want to play "all or nothing", as leftists always do, and try to make ME answer for YOUR asinine, simplistic belief that one must love ALL government, or want anarchy.
I will not be "talking over" the words you try to put in my mouth. If you actually want a conversation, you will start the fuck over with my ACTUAL views, and understand that you are not setting the parameters. If you state some more dumb shit presumptions about what I think and demand that I defend them, I will tell you again: Shoo, poseur.
If you leftist dipshits ever learned and matured, we wouldn't have to state the same blindingly obvious truths over and over until they become cliches.
Ahh. You repeat lies and memes because you have to. I get it now.
See above, re: not taking responsibility for your ASSumptions and projections. Whatever script you had in your head of this conversation, I am not answerable for following it, nor does it prove anything when I don't except that you're too chickenshit to have a conversation with a REAL person, rather than your straw man construct of her.
Shoo, poseur.
Wait! Am I mistaken? Are you in favor of the EPA shutting down toxic waste dumpers? You favor public accomodation laws? You OK with people going naked when they want?
Come on. Let's talk these things over.
Like I said, you want to deflect off onto "Isn't this a good thing?!" to avoid talking about whether or not it's being done correctly. And apparently you ALSO want to play "all or nothing", as leftists always do, and try to make ME answer for YOUR asinine, simplistic belief that one must love ALL government, or want anarchy.
I will not be "talking over" the words you try to put in my mouth. If you actually want a conversation, you will start the fuck over with my ACTUAL views, and understand that you are not setting the parameters. If you state some more dumb shit presumptions about what I think and demand that I defend them, I will tell you again: Shoo, poseur.
You've spent so much time protesting that you forgot to even respond to the post. Weird.
I don't love all government. In fact, much of it is shit. But, much of it is good. Necessary. Vital.
Like the EPA. Necessary. Life saving.
Don't you feel that we need the EPA?
If you leftist dipshits ever learned and matured, we wouldn't have to state the same blindingly obvious truths over and over until they become cliches.
Ahh. You repeat lies and memes because you have to. I get it now.
See above, re: not taking responsibility for your ASSumptions and projections. Whatever script you had in your head of this conversation, I am not answerable for following it, nor does it prove anything when I don't except that you're too chickenshit to have a conversation with a REAL person, rather than your straw man construct of her.
Shoo, poseur.
Wait! Am I mistaken? Are you in favor of the EPA shutting down toxic waste dumpers? You favor public accomodation laws? You OK with people going naked when they want?
Come on. Let's talk these things over.
Like I said, you want to deflect off onto "Isn't this a good thing?!" to avoid talking about whether or not it's being done correctly. And apparently you ALSO want to play "all or nothing", as leftists always do, and try to make ME answer for YOUR asinine, simplistic belief that one must love ALL government, or want anarchy.
I will not be "talking over" the words you try to put in my mouth. If you actually want a conversation, you will start the fuck over with my ACTUAL views, and understand that you are not setting the parameters. If you state some more dumb shit presumptions about what I think and demand that I defend them, I will tell you again: Shoo, poseur.
You've spent so much time protesting that you forgot to even respond to the post. Weird.
I don't love all government. In fact, much of it is shit. But, much of it is good. Necessary. Vital.
Like the EPA. Necessary. Life saving.
Don't you feel that we need the EPA?
Ahh. You repeat lies and memes because you have to. I get it now.
See above, re: not taking responsibility for your ASSumptions and projections. Whatever script you had in your head of this conversation, I am not answerable for following it, nor does it prove anything when I don't except that you're too chickenshit to have a conversation with a REAL person, rather than your straw man construct of her.
Shoo, poseur.
Wait! Am I mistaken? Are you in favor of the EPA shutting down toxic waste dumpers? You favor public accomodation laws? You OK with people going naked when they want?
Come on. Let's talk these things over.
Like I said, you want to deflect off onto "Isn't this a good thing?!" to avoid talking about whether or not it's being done correctly. And apparently you ALSO want to play "all or nothing", as leftists always do, and try to make ME answer for YOUR asinine, simplistic belief that one must love ALL government, or want anarchy.
I will not be "talking over" the words you try to put in my mouth. If you actually want a conversation, you will start the fuck over with my ACTUAL views, and understand that you are not setting the parameters. If you state some more dumb shit presumptions about what I think and demand that I defend them, I will tell you again: Shoo, poseur.
You've spent so much time protesting that you forgot to even respond to the post. Weird.
I don't love all government. In fact, much of it is shit. But, much of it is good. Necessary. Vital.
Like the EPA. Necessary. Life saving.
Don't you feel that we need the EPA?
Need the EPA for what? All bureaucracies should be dismantled immediately. Any laws we need under any category should be passed by Congress the way our founders meant it to be. Bureaucracies have no constitutional authority to pass laws, create fines or taxes against the people.
See above, re: not taking responsibility for your ASSumptions and projections. Whatever script you had in your head of this conversation, I am not answerable for following it, nor does it prove anything when I don't except that you're too chickenshit to have a conversation with a REAL person, rather than your straw man construct of her.
Shoo, poseur.
Wait! Am I mistaken? Are you in favor of the EPA shutting down toxic waste dumpers? You favor public accomodation laws? You OK with people going naked when they want?
Come on. Let's talk these things over.
Like I said, you want to deflect off onto "Isn't this a good thing?!" to avoid talking about whether or not it's being done correctly. And apparently you ALSO want to play "all or nothing", as leftists always do, and try to make ME answer for YOUR asinine, simplistic belief that one must love ALL government, or want anarchy.
I will not be "talking over" the words you try to put in my mouth. If you actually want a conversation, you will start the fuck over with my ACTUAL views, and understand that you are not setting the parameters. If you state some more dumb shit presumptions about what I think and demand that I defend them, I will tell you again: Shoo, poseur.
You've spent so much time protesting that you forgot to even respond to the post. Weird.
I don't love all government. In fact, much of it is shit. But, much of it is good. Necessary. Vital.
Like the EPA. Necessary. Life saving.
Don't you feel that we need the EPA?
Need the EPA for what? All bureaucracies should be dismantled immediately. Any laws we need under any category should be passed by Congress the way our founders meant it to be. Bureaucracies have no constitutional authority to pass laws, create fines or taxes against the people.
I will say I don't mind so much having SMALL bureaucracies to carry out laws once they're passed by the duly-elected legislators. But I'm right there with you on having no patience with people who weren't invested with power by the people through an election creating ANY sort of regulation or restriction on people's lives and activities.
or one could be like the board’s resident mouth breathing liar, BluesFailure, and vote directly for a walking Cheeto who shares his inclination towards sexual predatory violenceVote Dem for higher taxes and more illegals raping and killing Americans.
