toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
Too bad you don't have any examples that aren't total b******* GOP propaganda with no evidence...I'm still waiting . . . . has a single Leftard given just ONE clear example yet of exactly where and when Russia affected and changed votes as per the OP of this thread?
Nah, still didn't think so. . . .
The actual affects aren't quantifiable but logic informs us that it didn't need to be very many whose votes were influenced by Russian efforts.
Just their social media operations alone reached over 126 million people. Trump won the three key electoral states by a margin of only 77k votes.
77k/126 m =.0006%
That is the percentage that needed to be affected to get the desired outcome. Certainly within reason.
The phrase "they reached 126 million people" is meaningless. What does "reached" mean, someone may have seen a single tweet? It doesn't mean anything. Where is the evidence for your claim? Are you including the Wikileaks emails which the Russians weren't even responsible for?
The "math" of the left has about as many holes in it as a screen door on a submarine, showing once and for all the speciousness of their "logic," the paucity of their "education" and their willingness to fudge things as much in their favor as necessary to get a desired outcome rather than look at the actual facts.
Evidence of WHAT, Franc? Evidence that "something" "reaching" 126 million people doesn't prove anything? Show me how to prove a negative! It doesn't take "propaganda" to state the obvious.