- Mar 11, 2015
- 84,744
- 52,485
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #1,181
Then trump should have nominated Obama’s pick Merrick garlandI don’t know what you just said but I bet the new Supreme Court agrees with you. I don’t care what the issues are you win. The American people fucked up when they didn’t show up in 2016 and gave republicans two Supreme Court picks. Whatever you say goes for at least a generation.You say this as 99% of ceos vps and bod’s are white men. How is it them who feels entitled? We may all breath and bleed the same but you don’t hire the same. It’s proven we have these bias’ and many corporations are trying to be more diverse. You can’t even acknowledge a problem we know exists. Ignorant
USA.INC is the majority shareholder in every Fortune 500 corporation and their subsidiaries and since USA.INC was taken into receivership as a successor to contract the 19 enumerated services per their corporate charter constitution via the Act of 1871 by the IMF in 1950 when USA.INC declared bankruptcy once again???You are simply flinging monkey shit through the bars until you understand the root problem.
Are you suggesting the government can stop corporations from diversifying?
I wonder if white conservative men can prove sex or race is why someone got the job, can they sue and take it all the way to the Supreme Court? Is that what you mean?
Kewl...
You think there’s a difference between the parties...
The repubs simply evoked the Biden rule of a president being able to nominate a SCOTUS justice in his last year.....
There is no Biden rule. Plus Biden stated only that they have never picked a justice during a campaign. The claim was that Garland could not be picked during a campaign. But Kavanaugh was.