Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
rump invoking executive privilege when the documents were generated during the Bush 43 administration?If Obama hid the records of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan before they were to be vetted by the senate, what would the Republicans and their fellow travelers do?
Trump admin withholds 100,000-plus pages of Kavanaugh docs - CNNPolitics
We all know what they would do!
Have documents like this ever been asked for with regards to another candidate? How many of them?
Kavenaugh has an extensive case history that should be more than enough to figure out his competence.
Doubt they would have behaved well, but screaming hysterically and destroying decorum? I doubt it.If Obama hid the records of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan before they were to be vetted by the senate, what would the Republicans and their fellow travelers do?
Trump admin withholds 100,000-plus pages of Kavanaugh docs - CNNPolitics
We all know what they would do!
Sorta like the crook in our WH hiding his tax returns except one he releasedIf Obama hid the records of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan before they were to be vetted by the senate, what would the Republicans and their fellow travelers do?
Trump admin withholds 100,000-plus pages of Kavanaugh docs - CNNPolitics
We all know what they would do!
FACTS...If Obama hid the records of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan before they were to be vetted by the senate, what would the Republicans and their fellow travelers do?
Trump admin withholds 100,000-plus pages of Kavanaugh docs - CNNPolitics
We all know what they would do!
If Obama hid the records of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan before they were to be vetted by the senate, what would the Republicans and their fellow travelers do?
Trump admin withholds 100,000-plus pages of Kavanaugh docs - CNNPolitics
We all know what they would do!
Doubt they would have behaved well, but screaming hysterically and destroying decorum? I doubt it.
If the reasoning is legitimately privilege or national security then I’m fine with not releasing them. If they were withheld amoungst other like documents that were released then there is an issue. If they were withhheld because they have potentially political damning information then I have a problem with that. You should too.I’m not going to presume to know what’s actually is happening with these documents but your response is comical. If Trump is withholding docs then that is messed up, doesn’t matter if they were asked for in the past.If Obama hid the records of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan before they were to be vetted by the senate, what would the Republicans and their fellow travelers do?
Trump admin withholds 100,000-plus pages of Kavanaugh docs - CNNPolitics
We all know what they would do!
Have documents like this ever been asked for with regards to another candidate? How many of them?
Kavenaugh has an extensive case history that should be more than enough to figure out his competence.
Can I use your response when you ask for Hillary’s 30k emails? Well they got plenty of others so that should be fine... right?
Hillary's emails were illegally placed on a non-governmental server. From my understanding the documents requested are internal White House counsel documents.
Now if there is a question of privilege here, has any other SC nominee been told or asked to released privileged documentation as part of their process?
How much time was taken up by that silly outburst? How many participants?If Obama hid the records of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan before they were to be vetted by the senate, what would the Republicans and their fellow travelers do?
Trump admin withholds 100,000-plus pages of Kavanaugh docs - CNNPolitics
We all know what they would do!
Doubt they would have behaved well, but screaming hysterically and destroying decorum? I doubt it.
"LOCK HER UP" ring a bell"? How much decorum and restraint is apparent there?
Well said and absolutely true. Didn’t we learn that two wrongs don’t make a right when we were in grade school?bush dumping 42k pages hours before the vote - well looks like both sides are hot and heavy into politics, not right and wrong.I’m not going to presume to know what’s actually is happening with these documents but your response is comical. If Trump is withholding docs then that is messed up, doesn’t matter if they were asked for in the past.If Obama hid the records of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan before they were to be vetted by the senate, what would the Republicans and their fellow travelers do?
Trump admin withholds 100,000-plus pages of Kavanaugh docs - CNNPolitics
We all know what they would do!
Have documents like this ever been asked for with regards to another candidate? How many of them?
Kavenaugh has an extensive case history that should be more than enough to figure out his competence.
Can I use your response when you ask for Hillary’s 30k emails? Well they got plenty of others so that should be fine... right?
we allow our side to do it in a "revenge" fashion, the other side will just do it cause you did. we keep on spinning down a drain of stupid because we want revenge, not justice.
most of the bickering going on is very 4th grade "he did it first" crap and those engaged in it for some reason feel there's a higher calling to push them on. if these people are parents there's no way they let their kids act like this.Well said and absolutely true. Didn’t we learn that two wrongs don’t make a right when we were in grade school?bush dumping 42k pages hours before the vote - well looks like both sides are hot and heavy into politics, not right and wrong.I’m not going to presume to know what’s actually is happening with these documents but your response is comical. If Trump is withholding docs then that is messed up, doesn’t matter if they were asked for in the past.If Obama hid the records of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan before they were to be vetted by the senate, what would the Republicans and their fellow travelers do?
Trump admin withholds 100,000-plus pages of Kavanaugh docs - CNNPolitics
We all know what they would do!
Have documents like this ever been asked for with regards to another candidate? How many of them?
Kavenaugh has an extensive case history that should be more than enough to figure out his competence.
Can I use your response when you ask for Hillary’s 30k emails? Well they got plenty of others so that should be fine... right?
we allow our side to do it in a "revenge" fashion, the other side will just do it cause you did. we keep on spinning down a drain of stupid because we want revenge, not justice.
well the flip side is that the left, even before this potential justice was named, already was against it and even released some literature after he was announced with more or less "insert name here". it doesn't matter who trump would have nominated, the left was going to shit kittens and disrupt anything they can cause it's all they got.If the reasoning is legitimately privilege or national security then I’m fine with not releasing them. If they were withheld amoungst other like documents that were released then there is an issue. If they were withhheld because they have potentially political damning information then I have a problem with that. You should too.I’m not going to presume to know what’s actually is happening with these documents but your response is comical. If Trump is withholding docs then that is messed up, doesn’t matter if they were asked for in the past.If Obama hid the records of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan before they were to be vetted by the senate, what would the Republicans and their fellow travelers do?
Trump admin withholds 100,000-plus pages of Kavanaugh docs - CNNPolitics
We all know what they would do!
Have documents like this ever been asked for with regards to another candidate? How many of them?
Kavenaugh has an extensive case history that should be more than enough to figure out his competence.
Can I use your response when you ask for Hillary’s 30k emails? Well they got plenty of others so that should be fine... right?
Hillary's emails were illegally placed on a non-governmental server. From my understanding the documents requested are internal White House counsel documents.
Now if there is a question of privilege here, has any other SC nominee been told or asked to released privileged documentation as part of their process?
What if Obama did this?
Well said and absolutely true. Didn’t we learn that two wrongs don’t make a right when we were in grade school?bush dumping 42k pages hours before the vote - well looks like both sides are hot and heavy into politics, not right and wrong.I’m not going to presume to know what’s actually is happening with these documents but your response is comical. If Trump is withholding docs then that is messed up, doesn’t matter if they were asked for in the past.If Obama hid the records of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan before they were to be vetted by the senate, what would the Republicans and their fellow travelers do?
Trump admin withholds 100,000-plus pages of Kavanaugh docs - CNNPolitics
We all know what they would do!
Have documents like this ever been asked for with regards to another candidate? How many of them?
Kavenaugh has an extensive case history that should be more than enough to figure out his competence.
Can I use your response when you ask for Hillary’s 30k emails? Well they got plenty of others so that should be fine... right?
we allow our side to do it in a "revenge" fashion, the other side will just do it cause you did. we keep on spinning down a drain of stupid because we want revenge, not justice.
Illegally placed? There was an actual law that prohibited her from using a private server?
So you are saying breaking security rules (which are enacted via law) are perfectly legal?
Something is either legal, or illegal.
Which is it?
If it's illegal there would be a law...cite it.
Here ya go.
3 Federal Laws Hillary May Have Violated By Using Personal Email Accounts for State Business
May have? And that was in 2015? Turned out "may have" was not.
You said the server was illegally placed. The old supposition ("may have violated") you posted doesn't support your claim.
I just cited a few of them. that you don't believe them or want to play word games of illegality vs. Criminality shows all you have is chutzpah as a defense.
i already said she likely meant something else - but if you read back - YOU SAID she NEVER SAID THE WORDS then gave me a snopes article which said she did BUT...oh lord dude - stop being stupid. of course i read it - where do you think i got this quote?so you're going to tell me that's not what she said and give me a snopes article that says she said it as proof.You know that's not what Nancy Pelosi said, right? Sara Palin didn't say she could see Russia from her house and Pelosi did not say you have to pass it to read it.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/pelosi-healthcare-pass-the-bill-to-see-what-is-in-it/
bwahahahahahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahaha
WHAT'S TRUE
Nancy Pelosi did utter the words attributed to her about the passage of the Affordable Care Act.
dats some funny chit right there, son.
You didn't read the link at all...that's what's funny. If you want to stay ignorant, that's on you.
WHAT'S TRUE
Nancy Pelosi did utter the words attributed to her about the passage of the Affordable Care Act.
FROM YOUR OWN DAMN ARTICLE THAT SAYS SHE SAID IT.
now if you want to pretend she meant something else that isn't the same as the claim you made that she never said it.
Did you read farther than that? She did not say they, the legislators, had to pass it to read it. In context she was saying that the American people would find out all that was in it when it was passed, not that the legislators would have to pass it before they could read it. You often try to be an honest broker...try it now.
so - she said 'em. that part is not up for debate.
What if Obama did this?
and that is the core flaw that needs to be addressed. no one should be allowed to send gov e-mail through a private server, then we don't have these "misunderstandings".So you are saying breaking security rules (which are enacted via law) are perfectly legal?
Something is either legal, or illegal.
Which is it?
If it's illegal there would be a law...cite it.
Here ya go.
3 Federal Laws Hillary May Have Violated By Using Personal Email Accounts for State Business
May have? And that was in 2015? Turned out "may have" was not.
You said the server was illegally placed. The old supposition ("may have violated") you posted doesn't support your claim.
I just cited a few of them. that you don't believe them or want to play word games of illegality vs. Criminality shows all you have is chutzpah as a defense.
None of what someone else cited said her server was illegally placed as you claimed. There was nothing illegal in her use or placement of a private server.
yes. she did. now as for what she meant, i know very few who are qualified to know what the hell pelosi means. but if you're trying to tell me the american people had to pass it to see what is in it, then pray tell, when do the american people vote on such measures directly?i already said she likely meant something else - but if you read back - YOU SAID she NEVER SAID THE WORDS then gave me a snopes article which said she did BUT...oh lord dude - stop being stupid. of course i read it - where do you think i got this quote?so you're going to tell me that's not what she said and give me a snopes article that says she said it as proof.
bwahahahahahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahaha
WHAT'S TRUE
Nancy Pelosi did utter the words attributed to her about the passage of the Affordable Care Act.
dats some funny chit right there, son.
You didn't read the link at all...that's what's funny. If you want to stay ignorant, that's on you.
WHAT'S TRUE
Nancy Pelosi did utter the words attributed to her about the passage of the Affordable Care Act.
FROM YOUR OWN DAMN ARTICLE THAT SAYS SHE SAID IT.
now if you want to pretend she meant something else that isn't the same as the claim you made that she never said it.
Did you read farther than that? She did not say they, the legislators, had to pass it to read it. In context she was saying that the American people would find out all that was in it when it was passed, not that the legislators would have to pass it before they could read it. You often try to be an honest broker...try it now.
so - she said 'em. that part is not up for debate.
She never said the words you claimed nor the intent you inferred.
If Obama hid the records of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan before they were to be vetted by the senate, what would the Republicans and their fellow travelers do?
Trump admin withholds 100,000-plus pages of Kavanaugh docs - CNNPolitics
We all know what they would do!
Have documents like this ever been asked for with regards to another candidate? How many of them?
Kavenaugh has an extensive case history that should be more than enough to figure out his competence.
Than why withhold them? What is he and Trump hiding?
That doesn't answer my question.
Don't be a knucklehead; the entire record not only case records cherry picked.
