What if white America just said no...

What if blacks said no....and they didn't come here to be sold into slavery? Oh...right...we didn't give them that right.


Source Wiki

Reverend Peterson has also thanked "God and white people" for slavery—adding that if it weren't for the slave trade, blacks might have never made it to the United States—and described traveling on slave ships as akin to "being on a crowded airplane"

You can't make this stuff up! :D

 
Sure. Like claiming that Trevon Martin was shot while innocently walking home.

INstead of when he was sitting on top of a man beating him.
He was innocently walking home. Zimmerman stalked him to his house, first by car, then parked illegally, and chased on foot. The boy thinking a stalker / rapist / killer was on the phone calling in his gang for help to kill him.. eventually turned and told the guy to stop following him, but Zimmerman kept coming kept stalking his prey. The boy then confronted his stalker. The stalker, Zimmerman, reached for a weapon starting a fight.

Then, Zimmerman, the wimpy coward that he is lost the fight getting a very small bruise or two all the while screaming like a little girl for help. And then when the boy did stop, Zimmerman shot him in the chest like putting a dog out of it's misery. Zimmerman is a coward and a killer.


Nice story.

NOne of it supported by evidence or eyewitnesses accounts.

At least you admit that Zimmerman was losing the fight.

I've had libs try to tell me that Zimmerman shot Martin while standing.

You're still retelling arguments by people in your head?


So, who do you hold responsible for Martin's death, the man that shot him, or Martin for committing the assault that justified the shooting?

I'm just going to focus on the lies you try to slip in.

No one told you Zimmerman shot Martin standing up. Stop lying.

GZ is responsible. You dont disagree. Heres when you make up something else "a liberal" told you.


Goggle Trevon Martin was standing when shot. It's out there. Goofy conspiracy theory, but I've run into libs who believe it.


GZ defended himself. Travon Martin is the one that committed the violent assault that justified his being shot.

Again. A lib excusing black violence and blaming the "white" guy.
 
What if blacks said no....and they didn't come here to be sold into slavery? Oh...right...we didn't give them that right.

The blacks living in America today weren't sold into slavery, and are lucky to be living in America. If they don't like it they are always free to return to the mother land.
Shit, this guy IS Stormfront.

Coming from a Nazi that's funny.
You are the race-baiting right wing progressive fascist that wants to take over America.
 
What if blacks said no....and they didn't come here to be sold into slavery? Oh...right...we didn't give them that right.

The blacks living in America today weren't sold into slavery, and are lucky to be living in America. If they don't like it they are always free to return to the mother land.
Shit, this guy IS Stormfront.

Coming from a Nazi that's funny.
Just because you are still a Hitler Youth doesn't make me a Nazi. Those ungrateful *******, they should be thanking God we brought their ancestors here, as property, in chains.
 
He was innocently walking home. Zimmerman stalked him to his house, first by car, then parked illegally, and chased on foot. The boy thinking a stalker / rapist / killer was on the phone calling in his gang for help to kill him.. eventually turned and told the guy to stop following him, but Zimmerman kept coming kept stalking his prey. The boy then confronted his stalker. The stalker, Zimmerman, reached for a weapon starting a fight.

Then, Zimmerman, the wimpy coward that he is lost the fight getting a very small bruise or two all the while screaming like a little girl for help. And then when the boy did stop, Zimmerman shot him in the chest like putting a dog out of it's misery. Zimmerman is a coward and a killer.


Nice story.

NOne of it supported by evidence or eyewitnesses accounts.

At least you admit that Zimmerman was losing the fight.

I've had libs try to tell me that Zimmerman shot Martin while standing.

You're still retelling arguments by people in your head?


So, who do you hold responsible for Martin's death, the man that shot him, or Martin for committing the assault that justified the shooting?

I'm just going to focus on the lies you try to slip in.

No one told you Zimmerman shot Martin standing up. Stop lying.

GZ is responsible. You dont disagree. Heres when you make up something else "a liberal" told you.


Goggle Trevon Martin was standing when shot. It's out there. Goofy conspiracy theory, but I've run into libs who believe it.


GZ defended himself. Travon Martin is the one that committed the violent assault that justified his being shot.

Again. A lib excusing black violence and blaming the "white" guy.


So your defense is that someone somewhere thinks it so they told you that and you bring it here?

You're right, its not like you can find silly opinions on the internet.

BTW, not one link says that, liar:

GZ shot Trayvon standing up - Google Search
 
No, your silly far right views, Rocko, make me, a mainstreamer, look like a liberal to you.

TM went inside the condo first then came outside to confront the scum. Once TM came back outside, he shed his legal defense. He had no right to get into a confrontation. GZ saw the opportunity and committed legal homicide. He will eventually die the same way.


And more invented reasons to take the responsibility off the black guy and to put in on the "white" guy.
 
We excuse bad behavior? Hmmm...where is that excuse?


Sure. Like claiming that Trevon Martin was shot while innocently walking home.

INstead of when he was sitting on top of a man beating him.
He was innocently walking home. Zimmerman stalked him to his house, first by car, then parked illegally, and chased on foot. The boy thinking a stalker / rapist / killer was on the phone calling in his gang for help to kill him.. eventually turned and told the guy to stop following him, but Zimmerman kept coming kept stalking his prey. The boy then confronted his stalker. The stalker, Zimmerman, reached for a weapon starting a fight.

Then, Zimmerman, the wimpy coward that he is lost the fight getting a very small bruise or two all the while screaming like a little girl for help. And then when the boy did stop, Zimmerman shot him in the chest like putting a dog out of it's misery. Zimmerman is a coward and a killer.


Nice story.

NOne of it supported by evidence or eyewitnesses accounts.

At least you admit that Zimmerman was losing the fight.

I've had libs try to tell me that Zimmerman shot Martin while standing.
Everything I said


Mmm, no.

Following a suspicious persons for a short while is not "Stalking".

You have nothing to support your belief that Zimmerman started the fight and certainly nothing to support you idea he did so by reaching for a weapon.

You have nothing to support your idea that Martin stopped beating Zimmerman before being shot.

You are inventing reasons to excuse Martin's behavior, and to blame the "white" guy here.

As was my point by bringing it up.

THanks for making my point.



What a crock of shit. A grown man with a gun, following an unarmed teenager, especially after dispatch told him he didn't need to follow, was most certainly stalking.
 
Nice story.

NOne of it supported by evidence or eyewitnesses accounts.

At least you admit that Zimmerman was losing the fight.

I've had libs try to tell me that Zimmerman shot Martin while standing.

You're still retelling arguments by people in your head?


So, who do you hold responsible for Martin's death, the man that shot him, or Martin for committing the assault that justified the shooting?

I'm just going to focus on the lies you try to slip in.

No one told you Zimmerman shot Martin standing up. Stop lying.

GZ is responsible. You dont disagree. Heres when you make up something else "a liberal" told you.


Goggle Trevon Martin was standing when shot. It's out there. Goofy conspiracy theory, but I've run into libs who believe it.


GZ defended himself. Travon Martin is the one that committed the violent assault that justified his being shot.

Again. A lib excusing black violence and blaming the "white" guy.


So your defense is that someone somewhere thinks it so they told you that and you bring it here?

You're right, its not like you can find silly opinions on the internet.

BTW, not one link says that, liar:

GZ shot Trayvon standing up - Google Search

I referenced as an example of the extremes libs will go to to excuse black violence and to blame the "white" guy.
 
Lets see what happened when Jesse Lee spoke about the shooting in NC where it was filmed the guy getting shot in the back.

Even Sean Hannity couldn't defend the cop who killed Walter Scott
By Dell Cameron
Apr 10, 2015, 11:50am CT | Last updated Apr 10, 2015, 1:56pm CT
So this is what Bizarro World looks like.

Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday passionately defended Walter Scott, a black man gunned down apparently in cold blood by white North Charleston, S.C., police officer Michael Slager.

“You don’t shoot an innocent person that’s not a threat in the back—that’s murder,” Hannity said.

Opposite Hannity in this debate was Jesse Lee Peterson, an African American conservative who once argued, in defense of President George W. Bush, that black people displaced by Hurricane Katrina were “lazy, immoral and trifling.”



“Right now, Sean, white officers are under attack by angry black folks in this country,” Peterson said. “And when they get stopped by police officers, they're not listening. They are not obeying…the police officer.”



Peterson argued that Scott was not innocent because he had a warrant for his arrest. It appears, however, that said warrant—supposedly due to nonpayment of child support—may not exist. Court records obtained Friday by the Associated Press raised doubts about the warrant, which has nonetheless been heavily publicized by the media.

“We cannot have in this country—look, you talk about the officer is innocent until proven guilty, that tape is overwhelming, incontrovertible evidence that this man was shot innocently in the back," Hannity continued. "He’s not the judge, jury and executioner here. He doesn't get to fire against the guy that’s not a threat to anybody.”

Marc Lamont Hill, a BET News host and CNN commentator, tweeted that Peterson was an "Uncle Ruckus," a reference to a black character on The Boondocks who rebukes his own race.

"This may be the most disgusting conversation I've ever seen," he wrote, linking to the aboveYouTube video.



Civil rights attorney Leo Terrell, who was also a guest on Hannity’s program, stood up and walked off set after Peterson told him to stop “overreacting” to incidents like the Scott shooting.

After Terrell left, Peterson called him "a little coward."

One example. One bad cop. Broad brush meet the liberal agenda.

Notice how the two cops, one white one black, killed by two black criminals, is not being reported by color?



"One bad cop"?

You haven't been watching the news lately.



Everytime a new "bad cop" shows up they reset the counter to 1
 
You're still retelling arguments by people in your head?


So, who do you hold responsible for Martin's death, the man that shot him, or Martin for committing the assault that justified the shooting?

I'm just going to focus on the lies you try to slip in.

No one told you Zimmerman shot Martin standing up. Stop lying.

GZ is responsible. You dont disagree. Heres when you make up something else "a liberal" told you.


Goggle Trevon Martin was standing when shot. It's out there. Goofy conspiracy theory, but I've run into libs who believe it.


GZ defended himself. Travon Martin is the one that committed the violent assault that justified his being shot.

Again. A lib excusing black violence and blaming the "white" guy.


So your defense is that someone somewhere thinks it so they told you that and you bring it here?

You're right, its not like you can find silly opinions on the internet.

BTW, not one link says that, liar:

GZ shot Trayvon standing up - Google Search

I referenced as an example of the extremes libs will go to to excuse black violence and to blame the "white" guy.

By lying about it :2up:
 
Sure. Like claiming that Trevon Martin was shot while innocently walking home.

INstead of when he was sitting on top of a man beating him.
He was innocently walking home. Zimmerman stalked him to his house, first by car, then parked illegally, and chased on foot. The boy thinking a stalker / rapist / killer was on the phone calling in his gang for help to kill him.. eventually turned and told the guy to stop following him, but Zimmerman kept coming kept stalking his prey. The boy then confronted his stalker. The stalker, Zimmerman, reached for a weapon starting a fight.

Then, Zimmerman, the wimpy coward that he is lost the fight getting a very small bruise or two all the while screaming like a little girl for help. And then when the boy did stop, Zimmerman shot him in the chest like putting a dog out of it's misery. Zimmerman is a coward and a killer.


Nice story.

NOne of it supported by evidence or eyewitnesses accounts.

At least you admit that Zimmerman was losing the fight.

I've had libs try to tell me that Zimmerman shot Martin while standing.
Everything I said


Mmm, no.

Following a suspicious persons for a short while is not "Stalking".

You have nothing to support your belief that Zimmerman started the fight and certainly nothing to support you idea he did so by reaching for a weapon.

You have nothing to support your idea that Martin stopped beating Zimmerman before being shot.

You are inventing reasons to excuse Martin's behavior, and to blame the "white" guy here.

As was my point by bringing it up.

THanks for making my point.



What a crock of shit. A grown man with a gun, following an unarmed teenager, especially after dispatch told him he didn't need to follow, was most certainly stalking.


Nope. He was following the stranger in the gated community in order to help vector the police to him.

That is not the legal definition of stalking.

You are inventing reasons to excuse Martin's behavior, and to blame the "white" guy here.

As was my point by bringing it up.

THanks for making my point
 
White liberal America is the problem. They want excuse bad behavior of blacks and blame it on whites.
We excuse bad behavior? Hmmm...where is that excuse?


Sure. Like claiming that Trevon Martin was shot while innocently walking home.

INstead of when he was sitting on top of a man beating him.
He was innocently walking home. Zimmerman stalked him to his house, first by car, then parked illegally, and chased on foot. The boy thinking a stalker / rapist / killer was on the phone calling in his gang for help to kill him.. eventually turned and told the guy to stop following him, but Zimmerman kept coming kept stalking his prey. The boy then confronted his stalker. The stalker, Zimmerman, reached for a weapon starting a fight.

Then, Zimmerman, the wimpy coward that he is lost the fight getting a very small bruise or two all the while screaming like a little girl for help. And then when the boy did stop, Zimmerman shot him in the chest like putting a dog out of it's misery. Zimmerman is a wimp, a coward, and a killer.


The witnesses who said Trayvon screamed for help were not allowed to testify.

Why?
 
So, who do you hold responsible for Martin's death, the man that shot him, or Martin for committing the assault that justified the shooting?

I'm just going to focus on the lies you try to slip in.

No one told you Zimmerman shot Martin standing up. Stop lying.

GZ is responsible. You dont disagree. Heres when you make up something else "a liberal" told you.


Goggle Trevon Martin was standing when shot. It's out there. Goofy conspiracy theory, but I've run into libs who believe it.


GZ defended himself. Travon Martin is the one that committed the violent assault that justified his being shot.

Again. A lib excusing black violence and blaming the "white" guy.


So your defense is that someone somewhere thinks it so they told you that and you bring it here?

You're right, its not like you can find silly opinions on the internet.

BTW, not one link says that, liar:

GZ shot Trayvon standing up - Google Search

I referenced as an example of the extremes libs will go to to excuse black violence and to blame the "white" guy.

By lying about it :2up:


I'm not sure why you are fixated on this so much. I am not holding your personally responsible for this particular example of making excuses.

I am happy to call you on the excuses you are making.
 
We need more people like Peterson and less people like Sharpton, Holder, Obama, Jackson, etc...

Black Reverend Writes “What If White America Just Said No” Essay


Reverend Jesse Lee Peterson, a black man well-known for his criticism of the black community, just dropped an eye-opening truth bomb in an essay that quickly went viral.

“As I watch the racial unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, I can’t help but compare the behavior of blacks in that city to that of spoiled rotten children,” Peterson wrote at the beginning of his powerful op-ed.

Though he criticized the black community for their violent, racially motivated actions after a black criminal was killed by police, his primary point was that if “white America” would stop fearing being labeled as racists and condemn the actions of the blacks who burn down cities, change might actually take place.

He drove that point home using Mo. Gov. Jay Nixon as an example, pointing out how he immediately surrendered to radicals in the black community and tried to sympathize with them, which was awkward and futile, at best.

“Nixon tried to appease the black mob and prematurely called for a ‘vigorous prosecution’ of Officer Darren Wilson,” Peterson wrote, explaining how his efforts backfired, didn’t gain an ounce of respect from the black community and actually increased racial tensions.

Concluding his compelling piece, Peterson made three assertions based on a world in which whites said “no” to being labeled “racist” for calling black cultural failures for what they are — failures.

  1. If whites said “No,” Sharpton and Holder would be out of business.

  2. If whites said “No,” it would give misguided blacks a chance to examine their hearts and repent of their wicked ways.

  3. If whites said “No,” their children would be inspired by their courage.
Black Reverend Writes What If White America Just Said No Essay... And It s Going Viral



You're right, it has gone viral. It's on Stormfront.

What If White America Just Said No - Stormfront

Idiot.

Who gives a fuck if it's on storm front?!?!
There you have it. Apparently not you.
 
This is like saying "you blame rain for being wet" and pretending its not

Is there anything blacks can take responsibility for by themselves, anything at all???

once you answer a question your talking points fall apart.

What is anyone not taking responsibility for?

Let's start with the biggest one - crime.

How are they not taking responsibility?

Well we keep having national discussions on blacks being the victims of police brutality, right? When was the last time we had a national discussion on black crime rates?????????
Last week...and yesterday...and today. Pretty much all the time. Why don't you pay attention?
 
White liberal America is the problem. They want excuse bad behavior of blacks and blame it on whites.
We excuse bad behavior? Hmmm...where is that excuse?


Sure. Like claiming that Trevon Martin was shot while innocently walking home.

INstead of when he was sitting on top of a man beating him.
He was innocently walking home. Zimmerman stalked him to his house, first by car, then parked illegally, and chased on foot. The boy thinking a stalker / rapist / killer was on the phone calling in his gang for help to kill him.. eventually turned and told the guy to stop following him, but Zimmerman kept coming kept stalking his prey. The boy then confronted his stalker. The stalker, Zimmerman, reached for a weapon starting a fight.

Then, Zimmerman, the wimpy coward that he is lost the fight getting a very small bruise or two all the while screaming like a little girl for help. And then when the boy did stop, Zimmerman shot him in the chest like putting a dog out of it's misery. Zimmerman is a coward and a killer.


Nice story.

NOne of it supported by evidence or eyewitnesses accounts.

At least you admit that Zimmerman was losing the fight.

I've had libs try to tell me that Zimmerman shot Martin while standing.
You say NONE of this is based on evidence ROFL put down the pipe:

1) He was innocently walking home. FACT
2) Zimmerman stalked him to his house... FACT
3) First by car.. FACT
4) Then parked illegally... FACT
5) Chased on foot... FACT
6) The boy thinking a stalker / rapist / killer was on the phone calling in his gang for help to kill him.. FACT boy was being stalked... FACT... told his friend on the phone so.. FACT Zimmerman was not selling girl scout cookies... FACT
7) The boy then confronted his stalker. FACT
8) The stalker, Zimmerman, reached for a weapon starting a fight. FACT admitted by Zimmerman that he "reached" for his "phone." FACT... Martin would see that as reaching for "something" like a weapon. FACT
9) Then, Zimmerman, the wimpy (FACT)
10) coward (FACT)
11) lost the fight (FACT)
12) getting a very small bruise or two (FACT)
13) all the while screaming like a little girl for help (FACT).
14) And then when the boy did stop, Zimmerman shot him in the chest (FACT) like putting a dog out of it's misery (FACT).
15) Zimmerman is a coward (FACT)
16) and a killer (FACT).
 
Whitey has said very little else to the *******, for centuries. Can we be free? No. Can we be treated as equals? No. Do you give a good goddamn at all about what you've done to us? No. Carry on.


And how dare them uppity nigras dare to say NO to more injustice and inequality.

Ah, yet another white racist trying to pretend he likes and respects blacks by encouraging criminals in the mistaken belief - fueled by disdain for blacks - that they represent the black community.
 
Whitey has said very little else to the *******, for centuries. Can we be free? No. Can we be treated as equals? No. Do you give a good goddamn at all about what you've done to us? No. Carry on.


And how dare them uppity nigras dare to say NO to more injustice and inequality.

Destroying other people's private property is how you say no to justice?


Well, here we go again.

You

are

lying.

I

did

not

say

that.


:asshole:


.

Actually, you did. Colors and formatting will not shield the truth.


You lying doesn't change what I really wrote.

What you really wrote, Junior, is that you think blacks "say no to injustice" by looting and burning the property of innocent bystanders.
 
I'm just going to focus on the lies you try to slip in.

No one told you Zimmerman shot Martin standing up. Stop lying.

GZ is responsible. You dont disagree. Heres when you make up something else "a liberal" told you.


Goggle Trevon Martin was standing when shot. It's out there. Goofy conspiracy theory, but I've run into libs who believe it.


GZ defended himself. Travon Martin is the one that committed the violent assault that justified his being shot.

Again. A lib excusing black violence and blaming the "white" guy.


So your defense is that someone somewhere thinks it so they told you that and you bring it here?

You're right, its not like you can find silly opinions on the internet.

BTW, not one link says that, liar:

GZ shot Trayvon standing up - Google Search

I referenced as an example of the extremes libs will go to to excuse black violence and to blame the "white" guy.

By lying about it :2up:


I'm not sure why you are fixated on this so much. I am not holding your personally responsible for this particular example of making excuses.

I am happy to call you on the excuses you are making.

Because you are lying about shit and trying to assign it to what other people think.

Of course when you get caught lying, now youre all like "Ok drop it already!"
 

Forum List

Back
Top