Why are black activist agitators showing up in WI to protest the Rittenhouse verdict?

#1 it hasn't been decided yet.

#2 there are no blacks involved in this case.

#3 Rittenhouse has no record of being a white supremacist, as court records show.



The two dead guys left a note saying they identified as Black.
 
What lies?
Your white privilege lies regarding this case of a white guy defending himself from 3 white attackers, Dumbass.

Are you too stupid to follow a simple conversation? Apparently you are.
 
Your white privilege lies regarding this case of a white guy defending himself from 3 white attackers, Dumbass.

Are you too stupid to follow a simple conversation? Apparently you are.
The whole case revolves around the protests regarding the shooting of Jacob Blake.

Your rapid support of an murdering IL teenager shows the racial aspect of the trial.
 
The case is about whether or not an American citizen is allowed to defend himself when attacked by violent rioters attempting to cause injury or death on him. He had every right to do a mag dump on that pedophile rioter who said he would kill him, but Kyle restrained himself to simply neutralizing the threats.

The BLM/ANTIFA/Rioters are committing more of an insurrection than the individuals who visited the Capital Building back in January to take selfies. The anti-American BLM rioters are attempting to intimidate the jury which is a direct attack on our democracy and freedom (what is left of it under the fake ass politicians).
 
The whole case revolves around the protests regarding the shooting of Jacob Blake.

Your rapid support of an murdering IL teenager shows the racial aspect of the trial.
Show us where Jacob Blake is in this trial transcript.\

GO!
 
The whole case revolves around the protests regarding the shooting of Jacob Blake.

Your rapid support of an murdering IL teenager shows the racial aspect of the trial.

You accuse him of rapidly supporting a murder, meanwhile you calling him a murder shows your desire to rapidly accuse someone of murder before their trial is even over. Or is innocent until proven guilty, and due process to American for you and you want to just vote with feelings others tell you to?
 
The case is about whether or not an American citizen is allowed to defend himself when attacked by violent rioters attempting to cause injury or death on him. He had every right to do a mag dump on that pedophile rioter who said he would kill him, but Kyle restrained himself to simply neutralizing the threats.

The BLM/ANTIFA/Rioters are committing more of an insurrection than the individuals who visited the Capital Building back in January to take selfies. The anti-American BLM rioters are attempting to intimidate the jury which is a direct attack on our democracy and freedom (what is left of it under the fake ass politicians).
Like these guys....

Neo-Nazi Recruiters Handed Nine-Year Prison Sentence After Trying To Trigger A Race War
 
Was it supposed to be in the trial?
Dunno.

You claimed the entire trial was based on it, so I'm guessing it should have come up somewhere, right?

Or are you just admitting you are a moron yet again?
 
First, kyle from Antioch pointed a gun at protesters before he was chased. Second, he was attacked after he killed a person and they were trying to get his gun. Third, testimony from kyle himself along with video evidence showed the last guy that he shot never pointed the gun at him.

You would know that if you watched the trial.
So much shit in one post. Hey dimbulb, that moron stated, UNDER OATH, that he pointed the gun at Rittenhouse before he got shot. To sum up your crap....

1637116236825.jpeg
 
Your white privilege lies regarding this case of a white guy defending himself from 3 white attackers, Dumbass.

Are you too stupid to follow a simple conversation? Apparently you are.
your white privledge fantasies make you pathetic.
 

Forum List

Back
Top