Why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently on welfare?

The right wing just likes to pander about tax cuts, so the rich can get richer faster.

The left likes to pander to poor for votes, they don't really care about poor or black, just votes. Power is the hunger that drives the Democrats, without the poor and black, they lose.
the right wing is worse. they don't mind "punishing themselves and others with lucre".

Seems you argue with yourself, why does the left hate the poor blacks, I you gave up arguing this point. You are now to they are worse than we are. Interesting how the defense was really nothing but a facade.
the left is pushing for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage; the right has nothing but repeal.
that doesn't solve the problem as explained many times in here. why are you so dense?
having nothing but repeal, solves even less problems. only the right wing, never gets it.
 
quit your day job and go on welfare so you won't have to pay taxes; don't just whine about it.
Whine is all yours
i am not the one whining about taxes.
Neither am I.
Cool; how about equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will, for unemployment compensation purposes. We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.
I don't know what point you're after here.
Why am I not surprised, by the right wing.

We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.
 
Republicans figured out a long time ago that they could neglect the poor,

and minorities, and still win elections.

That is where they are.


creating good paying jobs for the poor is not neglect, it is respect and caring. Making them slaves to the government is an insult. America voted against slavery several times, the most recent November 2016
The wealthiest have a capital gains preference to help create Jobs Booms, the poor do not. Why blame the poor for a lack of Jobs Booms.
what exactly do the poor have? Please explain in details what they have and why they have it.
nothing but diversion? even women are worth more, in the non-porn sector.

The wealthiest have a capital gains preference to help create Jobs Booms, the poor do not.
I'm far from wealthy, but I have the same capital gains available to me. so do the poor if they knew how to use it.

so again, what is it the poor don't have?
 
i am not the one whining about taxes.
Neither am I.
Cool; how about equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will, for unemployment compensation purposes. We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.

Forget about it. You're not going to get unemployment, so get a job instead.

I don't know what country you're from, but obviously you can't get it through that thick head of yours that unemployment insurance is just that--insurance. In this country, insurance kicks in when something happens to you through no fault of your own.

If you don't get into an auto accident, you can't demand the insurance company pay you as if you did.

If you get life insurance and didn't die, you can't collect the insurance as if you did die.

If your house did not catch fire, you can't go to your insurance company and demand payment as if it did.

Do you get it yet, or do you need pictures?
Where is the Jobs Boom; nothing but slackers getting a capital gains preference but not creating a Jobs Boom?
dude, it's been explained to you and yours so many times we have hair growing on the explanation. Taxes!!!!!!!!!!!!! WTF, open your eyes and read.
This is why I don't take the right wing seriously about anything, much less economics or the law.

Where is the Jobs Boom; nothing but slackers getting a capital gains preference but not creating a Jobs Boom?
 
The left likes to pander to poor for votes, they don't really care about poor or black, just votes. Power is the hunger that drives the Democrats, without the poor and black, they lose.
the right wing is worse. they don't mind "punishing themselves and others with lucre".

Seems you argue with yourself, why does the left hate the poor blacks, I you gave up arguing this point. You are now to they are worse than we are. Interesting how the defense was really nothing but a facade.
the left is pushing for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage; the right has nothing but repeal.
that doesn't solve the problem as explained many times in here. why are you so dense?
having nothing but repeal, solves even less problems. only the right wing, never gets it.
no, an actual plan as the right had in the 90s under clinton showed how it can be done. you all tore it apart. It worked and it pissed you all off and said never again. so far you have succeeded. for eight years obummer did his best to add to the numbers. And make the rich wealthier. and you have the balls to come in here and blame the right. let me laugh at you.....
 
they have many times such as when Clinton and Newt changed welfare to work fare, but then liberals back slide because they are dependent upon buying votes with what is in effect stolen money
Typical of the right wing; get a tax preference for capital gains to help create Jobs Booms, but "pocket the gain" and "blame the poor".

The only ones we see blaming the poor is the Democrats, they are who they blame for Trump being President, they blame the poor. The poor is also the reason we only give handouts and not helping hands, the Democrats don't believe in helping, only handouts.
The democrats are for a higher minimum wage. The right wing only blames the poor for not paying enough taxes.


raising the minimum wage causes job loss and inflation. It hurts the poor and middle classes the most.
probably explained one thousand times on this board.
inflation happens regardless. increasing demand is good for the employment sector.
 
Neither am I.
Cool; how about equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will, for unemployment compensation purposes. We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.

Forget about it. You're not going to get unemployment, so get a job instead.

I don't know what country you're from, but obviously you can't get it through that thick head of yours that unemployment insurance is just that--insurance. In this country, insurance kicks in when something happens to you through no fault of your own.

If you don't get into an auto accident, you can't demand the insurance company pay you as if you did.

If you get life insurance and didn't die, you can't collect the insurance as if you did die.

If your house did not catch fire, you can't go to your insurance company and demand payment as if it did.

Do you get it yet, or do you need pictures?
Where is the Jobs Boom; nothing but slackers getting a capital gains preference but not creating a Jobs Boom?
dude, it's been explained to you and yours so many times we have hair growing on the explanation. Taxes!!!!!!!!!!!!! WTF, open your eyes and read.
This is why I don't take the right wing seriously about anything, much less economics or the law.

Where is the Jobs Boom; nothing but slackers getting a capital gains preference but not creating a Jobs Boom?
already explained to you as I already pointed out. TAXES. stay naive my man.
 
Typical of the right wing; get a tax preference for capital gains to help create Jobs Booms, but "pocket the gain" and "blame the poor".

The only ones we see blaming the poor is the Democrats, they are who they blame for Trump being President, they blame the poor. The poor is also the reason we only give handouts and not helping hands, the Democrats don't believe in helping, only handouts.
The democrats are for a higher minimum wage. The right wing only blames the poor for not paying enough taxes.


raising the minimum wage causes job loss and inflation. It hurts the poor and middle classes the most.
probably explained one thousand times on this board.
inflation happens regardless. increasing demand is good for the employment sector.
you can't throw money at a problem, just like you can't throw food at hunger. doesn't make more food just like it doesn't make new money.
 
dears, laissez-fair capitalism gave us the, Great Depression.

Why do you refuse to answer simple questions I pose?
How long did it last and what was done to end the Depression of 1920?

I know exactly what a right to work state is.
Your statement was an "ALLEGED right to work state". What is an ALLEGED RIGHT TO WORK STATE?

Come one, step up, no guts no glory!
A management failure to learn from historical mistakes:

According to a 1989 analysis by Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz, the recession of 1920–21 was the result of an unnecessary contractionary monetary policy by the Federal Reserve Bank.[13] Paul Krugman agrees that high interest rates due to the Fed's effort to fight inflation caused the problem. This did not cause a deficiency in aggregate demand but in aggregate supply. Once the Fed relaxed its monetary policy, the economy rapidly recovered.[14]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depression_of_1920%E2%80%9321#Interpretations_of_the_1920-1921_recession
 
You have nothing but fallacy.

You arrogantly stated that YOU have an encyclopedic definition of Socialism, not a dictionary definition. I inquired of you:

Have they a different definition? How interesting.

Please, show us the difference or did you just learn what it is, and is not after I challenged you?

How did you become so weak or have you always been that way?

Show us what you've got, show some courage. Simple questions. You should be proud to answer them.
can you cite the dictionary definition?
 
dears, laissez-fair capitalism gave us the, Great Depression.

Why do you refuse to answer simple questions I pose?
How long did it last and what was done to end the Depression of 1920?

I know exactly what a right to work state is.
Your statement was an "ALLEGED right to work state". What is an ALLEGED RIGHT TO WORK STATE?

Come one, step up, no guts no glory!
A management failure to learn from historical mistakes:

According to a 1989 analysis by Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz, the recession of 1920–21 was the result of an unnecessary contractionary monetary policy by the Federal Reserve Bank.[13] Paul Krugman agrees that high interest rates due to the Fed's effort to fight inflation caused the problem. This did not cause a deficiency in aggregate demand but in aggregate supply. Once the Fed relaxed its monetary policy, the economy rapidly recovered.[14]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depression_of_1920%E2%80%9321#Interpretations_of_the_1920-1921_recession
what libturd politicians do to loose all three branches of government.
 
You are still, clueless and Causeless. Why not get a valid argument, instead?

You questioned my knowledge of a right to work state. My response was and you are incapable of an adult answer.

I know exactly what a right to work state is.

Your statement was an "ALLEGED right to work state". What is an ALLEGED RIGHT TO WORK STATE?
look it up dear.
 
Whine is all yours
i am not the one whining about taxes.
Neither am I.
Cool; how about equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will, for unemployment compensation purposes. We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.
I don't know what point you're after here.
Why am I not surprised, by the right wing.

We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.

And the Democrats don't want to do that, they would lose the base of voters. No wonder liberals hate poor blacks.
 
the right wing is worse. they don't mind "punishing themselves and others with lucre".

Seems you argue with yourself, why does the left hate the poor blacks, I you gave up arguing this point. You are now to they are worse than we are. Interesting how the defense was really nothing but a facade.
the left is pushing for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage; the right has nothing but repeal.
that doesn't solve the problem as explained many times in here. why are you so dense?
having nothing but repeal, solves even less problems. only the right wing, never gets it.
no, an actual plan as the right had in the 90s under clinton showed how it can be done. you all tore it apart. It worked and it pissed you all off and said never again. so far you have succeeded. for eight years obummer did his best to add to the numbers. And make the rich wealthier. and you have the balls to come in here and blame the right. let me laugh at you.....
You have nothing but repeal or right wing fantasy. Only You, don't realize it.
 
The only ones we see blaming the poor is the Democrats, they are who they blame for Trump being President, they blame the poor. The poor is also the reason we only give handouts and not helping hands, the Democrats don't believe in helping, only handouts.
The democrats are for a higher minimum wage. The right wing only blames the poor for not paying enough taxes.


raising the minimum wage causes job loss and inflation. It hurts the poor and middle classes the most.
probably explained one thousand times on this board.
inflation happens regardless. increasing demand is good for the employment sector.
you can't throw money at a problem, just like you can't throw food at hunger. doesn't make more food just like it doesn't make new money.
Yes, you can. It is how most problems get solved, under Capitalism.
 
You have nothing but fallacy.

You arrogantly stated that YOU have an encyclopedic definition of Socialism, not a dictionary definition. I inquired of you:

Have they a different definition? How interesting.

Please, show us the difference or did you just learn what it is, and is not after I challenged you?

How did you become so weak or have you always been that way?

Show us what you've got, show some courage. Simple questions. You should be proud to answer them.
can you cite the dictionary definition?

It seems you can't come up with ANY definition, you just keep blabbing nothing, especially since all know the difference between socialism and socialism.
 
Seems you argue with yourself, why does the left hate the poor blacks, I you gave up arguing this point. You are now to they are worse than we are. Interesting how the defense was really nothing but a facade.
the left is pushing for a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage; the right has nothing but repeal.
that doesn't solve the problem as explained many times in here. why are you so dense?
having nothing but repeal, solves even less problems. only the right wing, never gets it.
no, an actual plan as the right had in the 90s under clinton showed how it can be done. you all tore it apart. It worked and it pissed you all off and said never again. so far you have succeeded. for eight years obummer did his best to add to the numbers. And make the rich wealthier. and you have the balls to come in here and blame the right. let me laugh at you.....
You have nothing but repeal or right wing fantasy. Only You, don't realize it.
I realize you live in pretendland. makey uppy shitty land.
 
i am not the one whining about taxes.
Neither am I.
Cool; how about equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will, for unemployment compensation purposes. We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.
I don't know what point you're after here.
Why am I not surprised, by the right wing.

We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.

And the Democrats don't want to do that, they would lose the base of voters. No wonder liberals hate poor blacks.
Just right wing fantasy. Actually having solutions should increase market share.
 
The democrats are for a higher minimum wage. The right wing only blames the poor for not paying enough taxes.


raising the minimum wage causes job loss and inflation. It hurts the poor and middle classes the most.
probably explained one thousand times on this board.
inflation happens regardless. increasing demand is good for the employment sector.
you can't throw money at a problem, just like you can't throw food at hunger. doesn't make more food just like it doesn't make new money.
Yes, you can. It is how most problems get solved, under Capitalism.
no, no you can't and it has been proven over time. It is the reason for the fall of the soviet union, you idiot.
 
raising the minimum wage causes job loss and inflation. It hurts the poor and middle classes the most.
probably explained one thousand times on this board.
inflation happens regardless. increasing demand is good for the employment sector.
you can't throw money at a problem, just like you can't throw food at hunger. doesn't make more food just like it doesn't make new money.
Yes, you can. It is how most problems get solved, under Capitalism.
no, no you can't and it has been proven over time. It is the reason for the fall of the soviet union, you idiot.
Yes, you can. It is how most problems get solved, under Capitalism. Only the right wing, never gets it. The former Soviet Union, was socialist.
 

Forum List

Back
Top