Why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently on welfare?

[Papageorgio]

Neither am I.

Cool; how about equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will, for unemployment compensation purposes. We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.

I don't know what point you're after here.

Why am I not surprised, by the right wing.

We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.

And the Democrats don't want to do that, they would lose the base of voters. No wonder liberals hate poor blacks.

Just right wing fantasy. Actually having solutions should increase market share.

No, the wealth of the blacks would be the downfall of the Democratic Party, now we know why the Democratic Party hates poor blacks.

 

[jc456]

probably explained one thousand times on this board.

inflation happens regardless. increasing demand is good for the employment sector.

you can't throw money at a problem, just like you can't throw food at hunger. doesn't make more food just like it doesn't make new money.

Yes, you can. It is how most problems get solved, under Capitalism.

no, no you can't and it has been proven over time. It is the reason for the fall of the soviet union, you idiot.

Yes, you can. It is how most problems get solved, under Capitalism. Only the right wing, never gets it. The former Soviet Union, was socialist.

exactly, and is why it fails every time. socialism is a failure. so stop trying to push it.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

There are no "unemployment taxes" there is only unemployment insurance REQUIRED by law for employers to have. Unemployment insurance can be provided by the state or private insurance companies. Insurance CLAIMS can be made if one falls under the category of said coverage which is losing a job through no fault of your own.

Why is this so difficult for you to understand?????

Labor doesn't make the law. Legislatures are paid to manufacture legal products with the full faith and credit of public Acts. It is just, lousy management.

There is no reason any unemployment taxes could not be general taxes on firms. It would be a savings over our current regime due to that simplification. We could be lowering our tax burden and improving the efficiency of our economy.

I swear, responding to you is like typing with my computer off. You don't know the difference between insurance and taxes? No, they are not the same. I just explained the entire thing to you, and you act as if you didn't read a word. THERE ARE NO UNEMPLOYMENT TAXES!!! They don't exist outside of your head.

And WTF "legal products" does the legislature make? What products?

it is not a true insurance program. We have State laws that cover insurance, not administrative laws.

WTF do you mean by administrative laws? You can't get a federal extension unless you exhaust your state benefits. All states have to carry unemployment insurance.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

It is not a true insurance program. It is a social safety net called, unemployment compensation insurance. It should be used more effectively.

In any case, administrative law does not preempt a federal doctrine or State law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

EDD should be required to prove a for-Cause employment relationship to deny or disparage at-will employment compensation benefits.

We do have employment at will. You don't want to work, then don't work and don't get paid.

Yes, unemployment is an insurance program. The only unemployment safety net is federal unemployment, and that's only issued by the President during tough times when there are few jobs and people run out of state unemployment.

 

[danielpalos]

Cool; how about equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will, for unemployment compensation purposes. We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.

I don't know what point you're after here.

Why am I not surprised, by the right wing.

We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.

And the Democrats don't want to do that, they would lose the base of voters. No wonder liberals hate poor blacks.

Just right wing fantasy. Actually having solutions should increase market share.

No, the wealth of the blacks would be the downfall of the Democratic Party, now we know why the Democratic Party hates poor blacks.

some solutions that may not work are better than nothing but repeal.

 

[danielpalos]

inflation happens regardless. increasing demand is good for the employment sector.

you can't throw money at a problem, just like you can't throw food at hunger. doesn't make more food just like it doesn't make new money.

Yes, you can. It is how most problems get solved, under Capitalism.

no, no you can't and it has been proven over time. It is the reason for the fall of the soviet union, you idiot.

Yes, you can. It is how most problems get solved, under Capitalism. Only the right wing, never gets it. The former Soviet Union, was socialist.

exactly, and is why it fails every time. socialism is a failure. so stop trying to push it.

dear, we have the best form of socialism in the entire world. The rich can get bailed out and keep their multimillion dollar bonuses while on means tested corporate welfare, and the poor can still have steak and lobster on their EBT cards.

 

[danielpalos]

Labor doesn't make the law. Legislatures are paid to manufacture legal products with the full faith and credit of public Acts. It is just, lousy management.

There is no reason any unemployment taxes could not be general taxes on firms. It would be a savings over our current regime due to that simplification. We could be lowering our tax burden and improving the efficiency of our economy.

I swear, responding to you is like typing with my computer off. You don't know the difference between insurance and taxes? No, they are not the same. I just explained the entire thing to you, and you act as if you didn't read a word. THERE ARE NO UNEMPLOYMENT TAXES!!! They don't exist outside of your head.

And WTF "legal products" does the legislature make? What products?

it is not a true insurance program. We have State laws that cover insurance, not administrative laws.

WTF do you mean by administrative laws? You can't get a federal extension unless you exhaust your state benefits. All states have to carry unemployment insurance.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

It is not a true insurance program. It is a social safety net called, unemployment compensation insurance. It should be used more effectively.

In any case, administrative law does not preempt a federal doctrine or State law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

EDD should be required to prove a for-Cause employment relationship to deny or disparage at-will employment compensation benefits.

We do have employment at will. You don't want to work, then don't work and don't get paid.

Yes, unemployment is an insurance program. The only unemployment safety net is federal unemployment, and that's only issued by the President during tough times when there are few jobs and people run out of state unemployment.

It is about equal protection of the law. Employment is at the will of either party, so is unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

We could be lowering our tax burden and improving the efficiency of our economy.

Paying unemployment benefits to quitters and never workers would end up increasing our tax burden.
The resulting increase in unemployment would decrease GDP and shrink our economy.

Yes, it does, simply Because, Capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy. No amount of right wing fantasy, can change that.

Handing you money for never working is a waste of capital with a negative multiplier.
No amount of lazy, liberal weed smoking can change that.

nothing but fallacy? thanks for making it easy for me.

I'm glad to point out your errors.

Yes, it does, simply Because, Capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy. No amount of right wing fantasy, can change that.

Handing money to layabouts is a waste of capital. Negative multiplier.
No amount of unemployed stoner whining can change that.

 

[Papageorgio]

Neither am I.

Cool; how about equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will, for unemployment compensation purposes. We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.

I don't know what point you're after here.

Why am I not surprised, by the right wing.

We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.

And the Democrats don't want to do that, they would lose the base of voters. No wonder liberals hate poor blacks.

Just right wing fantasy. Actually having solutions should increase market share.

It terminates Democrats market share and you also realize that. That is why you have nothing but a song and dance.

 

[Papageorgio]

I don't know what point you're after here.

Why am I not surprised, by the right wing.

We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.

And the Democrats don't want to do that, they would lose the base of voters. No wonder liberals hate poor blacks.

Just right wing fantasy. Actually having solutions should increase market share.

No, the wealth of the blacks would be the downfall of the Democratic Party, now we know why the Democratic Party hates poor blacks.

some solutions that may not work are better than nothing but repeal.

You have no repeal, you want no repeal, repeal means your power ends. That is why you cry for no repeal, status quo is not your foe.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I swear, responding to you is like typing with my computer off. You don't know the difference between insurance and taxes? No, they are not the same. I just explained the entire thing to you, and you act as if you didn't read a word. THERE ARE NO UNEMPLOYMENT TAXES!!! They don't exist outside of your head.

And WTF "legal products" does the legislature make? What products?

it is not a true insurance program. We have State laws that cover insurance, not administrative laws.

WTF do you mean by administrative laws? You can't get a federal extension unless you exhaust your state benefits. All states have to carry unemployment insurance.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

It is not a true insurance program. It is a social safety net called, unemployment compensation insurance. It should be used more effectively.

In any case, administrative law does not preempt a federal doctrine or State law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

EDD should be required to prove a for-Cause employment relationship to deny or disparage at-will employment compensation benefits.

We do have employment at will. You don't want to work, then don't work and don't get paid.

Yes, unemployment is an insurance program. The only unemployment safety net is federal unemployment, and that's only issued by the President during tough times when there are few jobs and people run out of state unemployment.

It is about equal protection of the law. Employment is at the will of either party, so is unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

It is equal protection. If you get laid off from your job, you can collect unemployment. If I get laid off from my job, I can collect unemployment. Anybody who loses their job through no fault of their own can collect unemployment. Nobody is discriminated against. How can it be more equal than that?

 

[LeftofLeft]

you can't throw money at a problem, just like you can't throw food at hunger. doesn't make more food just like it doesn't make new money.

Yes, you can. It is how most problems get solved, under Capitalism.

no, no you can't and it has been proven over time. It is the reason for the fall of the soviet union, you idiot.

Yes, you can. It is how most problems get solved, under Capitalism. Only the right wing, never gets it. The former Soviet Union, was socialist.

exactly, and is why it fails every time. socialism is a failure. so stop trying to push it.

dear, we have the best form of socialism in the entire world. The rich can get bailed out and keep their multimillion dollar bonuses while on means tested corporate welfare, and the poor can still have steak and lobster on their EBT cards.

....and yet a Middle Class still exists. USA Exceptionalism......no socialist or socialist wannabee could achieve this. Income Inequality????

 

[Markle]

You have nothing but fallacy.

You arrogantly stated that YOU have an encyclopedic definition of Socialism, not a dictionary definition. I inquired of you:

Have they a different definition? How interesting.

Please, show us the difference or did you just learn what it is, and is not after I challenged you?

How did you become so weak or have you always been that way?

Show us what you've got, show some courage. Simple questions. You should be proud to answer them.

can you cite the dictionary definition?

You stated that YOU had an encyclopedic definition superior to the dictionary definition. Yet you cannot produce either nor the difference.

Thank you for conceding that you are a failure.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, it does, simply Because, Capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy. No amount of right wing fantasy, can change that.

Handing you money for never working is a waste of capital with a negative multiplier.
No amount of lazy, liberal weed smoking can change that.

nothing but fallacy? thanks for making it easy for me.

I'm glad to point out your errors.

Yes, it does, simply Because, Capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy. No amount of right wing fantasy, can change that.

Handing money to layabouts is a waste of capital. Negative multiplier.
No amount of unemployed stoner whining can change that.

you are simply clueless and Causeless.

 

[danielpalos]

Cool; how about equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will, for unemployment compensation purposes. We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.

I don't know what point you're after here.

Why am I not surprised, by the right wing.

We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.

And the Democrats don't want to do that, they would lose the base of voters. No wonder liberals hate poor blacks.

Just right wing fantasy. Actually having solutions should increase market share.

It terminates Democrats market share and you also realize that. That is why you have nothing but a song and dance.

nothing but repeal may end republican market share.

 

[danielpalos]

Why am I not surprised, by the right wing.

We could solve simple poverty and improve the efficiency of our economy at the same time.

And the Democrats don't want to do that, they would lose the base of voters. No wonder liberals hate poor blacks.

Just right wing fantasy. Actually having solutions should increase market share.

No, the wealth of the blacks would be the downfall of the Democratic Party, now we know why the Democratic Party hates poor blacks.

some solutions that may not work are better than nothing but repeal.

You have no repeal, you want no repeal, repeal means your power ends. That is why you cry for no repeal, status quo is not your foe.

you wish. the right has no solutions; nothing but repeal. the democrats pushed through healthcare reform.

 

[danielpalos]

it is not a true insurance program. We have State laws that cover insurance, not administrative laws.

WTF do you mean by administrative laws? You can't get a federal extension unless you exhaust your state benefits. All states have to carry unemployment insurance.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

It is not a true insurance program. It is a social safety net called, unemployment compensation insurance. It should be used more effectively.

In any case, administrative law does not preempt a federal doctrine or State law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

EDD should be required to prove a for-Cause employment relationship to deny or disparage at-will employment compensation benefits.

We do have employment at will. You don't want to work, then don't work and don't get paid.

Yes, unemployment is an insurance program. The only unemployment safety net is federal unemployment, and that's only issued by the President during tough times when there are few jobs and people run out of state unemployment.

It is about equal protection of the law. Employment is at the will of either party, so is unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

It is equal protection. If you get laid off from your job, you can collect unemployment. If I get laid off from my job, I can collect unemployment. Anybody who loses their job through no fault of their own can collect unemployment. Nobody is discriminated against. How can it be more equal than that?

Employment is at the will of either party, not just the employer, for unemployment compensation purposes. You have nothing but red herrings, right winger; simply learning how to fish for that, is worthless.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, you can. It is how most problems get solved, under Capitalism.

no, no you can't and it has been proven over time. It is the reason for the fall of the soviet union, you idiot.

Yes, you can. It is how most problems get solved, under Capitalism. Only the right wing, never gets it. The former Soviet Union, was socialist.

exactly, and is why it fails every time. socialism is a failure. so stop trying to push it.

dear, we have the best form of socialism in the entire world. The rich can get bailed out and keep their multimillion dollar bonuses while on means tested corporate welfare, and the poor can still have steak and lobster on their EBT cards.

....and yet a Middle Class still exists. USA Exceptionalism......no socialist or socialist wannabee could achieve this. Income Inequality????

We have a mixed market economy; socialism is like Palmolive, you are soaking in it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Handing you money for never working is a waste of capital with a negative multiplier.
No amount of lazy, liberal weed smoking can change that.

nothing but fallacy? thanks for making it easy for me.

I'm glad to point out your errors.

Yes, it does, simply Because, Capital must circulate to produce a positive multiplier effect on our economy. No amount of right wing fantasy, can change that.

Handing money to layabouts is a waste of capital. Negative multiplier.
No amount of unemployed stoner whining can change that.

you are simply clueless and Causeless.

And yet, can still point out the huge holes in your "ideas".

 

[danielpalos]

You have nothing but fallacy.

You arrogantly stated that YOU have an encyclopedic definition of Socialism, not a dictionary definition. I inquired of you:

Have they a different definition? How interesting.

Please, show us the difference or did you just learn what it is, and is not after I challenged you?

How did you become so weak or have you always been that way?

Show us what you've got, show some courage. Simple questions. You should be proud to answer them.

can you cite the dictionary definition?

You stated that YOU had an encyclopedic definition superior to the dictionary definition. Yet you cannot produce either nor the difference.

Thank you for conceding that you are a failure.

irrelevant; just conjecture on your part without any argument in support. that is just, unsubstantiated opinion, nothing more.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

WTF do you mean by administrative laws? You can't get a federal extension unless you exhaust your state benefits. All states have to carry unemployment insurance.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

It is not a true insurance program. It is a social safety net called, unemployment compensation insurance. It should be used more effectively.

In any case, administrative law does not preempt a federal doctrine or State law regarding the legal concept of employment at will.

EDD should be required to prove a for-Cause employment relationship to deny or disparage at-will employment compensation benefits.

We do have employment at will. You don't want to work, then don't work and don't get paid.

Yes, unemployment is an insurance program. The only unemployment safety net is federal unemployment, and that's only issued by the President during tough times when there are few jobs and people run out of state unemployment.

It is about equal protection of the law. Employment is at the will of either party, so is unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

It is equal protection. If you get laid off from your job, you can collect unemployment. If I get laid off from my job, I can collect unemployment. Anybody who loses their job through no fault of their own can collect unemployment. Nobody is discriminated against. How can it be more equal than that?

Employment is at the will of either party, not just the employer, for unemployment compensation purposes. You have nothing but red herrings, right winger; simply learning how to fish for that, is worthless.

Employment is at the will of either party, not just the employer, for unemployment compensation purposes.

Nope, just for employment purposes.
For unemployment, you don't qualify if you quit or never worked.