Why do democrats hate poor black people and want them permanently on welfare?

NO, it didn't. NEXT.

You are correct....Unemployment rate for blacks actually dropped 8% under Obama
<It went UP 8% under Bush>

chart325final.png


look at your chart, dipshit. Obama was elected in 08, the UE rate went up and stayed up his entire 8 years, then went back to where it started in 08. That's not success, idiot. That's massive failure. Its likely that it started down in 14 because everyone knew that the Kenyan was leaving in two years.

Damn fool, you post a chart that defeats your argument and then you crow about it. That defective liberal gene has finally taken you over the cliff into total idiocy.
Why do conservatives struggle so much interpreting charts?
Obama took office in 2009. 2008 was BUSH
UE went UP 3 percent and continued into 2009
Starting in 2010, President Obama reversed the trend and UE went DOWN 5 percent


are you totally crazy. UE went up after obozo took office, when he left it was back where it was when he started.

We were losing 750,000 jobs a month when Obama took office. Of course they went up.......that was the economy he was given

Obama gave Trump an economy that was adding 200,000 jobs a month


Right, I get it. Obama is responsible for nothing negative. It was either Bush or Trump. I understand your insane logic.

Obama's jobs----------------part time, minimum wage, no benefits. Wow, what a record.
 
When have Republicans ever helped the poor or working class?

Have they ever passed legislation that doesn't help the wealthy the most?


Senate Passes Tax Increases on Wealthy Americans

First step on tax increases by Republicans
.
It was Obama who ran on allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire and preserve them for the middle class

It was Republicans who threatened to default on our debt unless wealthy tax cuts were preserved


bullshit. obozo kept all of the Bush tax cuts in place for everyone who pays taxes. They became the Obama tax cuts.
Once again, your knowledge of the facts is limited

Bush tax cuts were extended for one year and then taxes for those making over $400,000 returned to their former rates


correct, but earlier you said that republicans forced obozo to retain the reduced rates on the top incomes.
 
The long standing policy of democrats is to create a permanent dependent underclass. Is being in power the only thing that matters to democrats?
Oh for god sakes will you Republicans just cut welfare so we can see if the results are what we expect?

You forget you don't need a single democrat vote to pass welfare reform. So what are you waiting for?

My guess is you're all talk.

You won the election. The time for talking shit is over


Look no farther when the republicans got rid of the 99 weekeers on Unemployment.. The Unemployment rate dropped like a rock


.


amazing how people find jobs when the gravy train stops.
 
What have Republicans ever done to help poor neighborhoods?

2f7b8e45-aa5e-4dba-9c15-394b1726b349_zpsxdzmm0gp.jpg
Imagine that
If they are so poor, it would seem easy for Republicans to offer something better

Why don't they?


when the dems control the city it's impossible for republicans to make any changes. Here in New Orleans our stupid mayor and council are more interested in removing historical statues than in doing anything about crime or poverty. But they do have measures in place to raise taxes----------on the poor who have no way to pay them.

I'll be happy to trade you.

We have less than 2/3 of the police enforcement we used to have in Cleveland. Now city Council approved 1.3 million dollars for a dirt bike trail. Why a dirt bike trail? Because the Mayor (Frank Jackson) grandson got busted a few times for riding his dirt bike on the street. Of course the Mayor would look bad telling the cops to look the other way when his grandson speeds down the street on an illegal bike, so the solution is to spend taxpayer money for a bike trail.

I'll bet anybody here this liberal bozo gets reelected because Democrats are stupid. Same goes with the council people that pushed through this idiotic plan.
 
How are they working out for the middle class of Detroit?
How about those middle class Hostess employees?
How are the teachers unions working out for the children of Chicago?

Corrupt thugs must be eliminated.
How has the American worker done since the demise of the unions?

Less pay, no job security, fewer benefits

An insecure worker is just what Republucans want to ensure a low wage workforce


Better to have jobs of any pay than no jobs at all.
That is what employers count on

Take it or leave it



One day.....based on the law of averages....you will actually think about what you write.



  1. While legislative bodies have the power to order wage increases, they have not as of yet found a way to order commensurate increases in worker productivity that make the worker’s output worth the higher wage.
  2. Further, while Congress can legislate the wage at which labor transactions occur, it cannot require that the transaction actually be made, and the worker hired. walter e. williams

Republican legislators destabilized the unions, held down minimum wage, eroded worker protections

Just what their wealthy masters demanded



Really, you dunce???

Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/IllegImmig_10-14-10_430pm.pdf

Wanna give Barack an 'attaboy'?
 
How are they working out for the middle class of Detroit?
How about those middle class Hostess employees?
How are the teachers unions working out for the children of Chicago?

Corrupt thugs must be eliminated.
How has the American worker done since the demise of the unions?

Less pay, no job security, fewer benefits

An insecure worker is just what Republucans want to ensure a low wage workforce


Better to have jobs of any pay than no jobs at all.


Hit the nail on the head, again, Ray!

That's why minimum wage laws contribute to poverty.....

"FDR talked Congress into creating Social Security in 1935 and imposing the nation’s first comprehensive minimum-wage law in 1938.... many economists have a different perspective.
The minimum-wage law prices many of the inexperienced, the young, the unskilled, and the disadvantaged out of the labor market. For example, the minimum-wage provisions passed as part of another act in 1933 threw an estimated 500,000 blacks out of work."
The FEE Store

Liberals are very resistant to the theory of Action/ Reaction.

Most all actions cause a reaction of some kind.

If we decided to meet in person and I put my arm out to shake your hand, it's likely you will return the gesture. That's positive action/ positive reaction. On the other hand, if we met and I pushed you against the wall, it's likely you'll push me right back, negative action/ negative reaction.

Liberals hate this philosophy because they wish to believe that negative actions will not be met with negative reactions. They actually believe that negative actions will cause a positive reaction.

As we have seen in the past, we know their theory is flawed and the action/ reaction theory is much more accurate.
Conservatives earn their chops on "blame the victim"

Liberals look at societies role as helping those who need help


"Conservatives earn their chops on "blame the victim"

But only when the so-called victim deserves the blame.

Liberals pretend that their policies aren't almost always the cause of poverty and helplessness.

From Peter Ferrara, “America’s Ticking Bankruptcy Bomb,” chapter five.

  1. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Such should be the epitaph of Liberalism.
  2. ‘Welfare’ as a wholly owned subsidiary of the government, and its main result is the incentivizing of a disrespect for oneself, and for the entity that provides the welfare. As more folks in a poor neighborhood languish with little or no work, entire local culture begins to change: daily work is no longer the expected social norm. Extended periods of hanging around the neighborhood, neither working nor going to school becoming more and more socially acceptable.
    1. Since productive activity not making any economic sense because of the work disincentives of the welfare plantation, other kinds of activities proliferate: drug and alcohol abuse, crime, recreational sex, illegitimacy, and family breakup are the new social norms, as does the culture of violence.


  1. "The lessons of history … show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit."

    These searing words about Depression-era welfare are from Franklin Roosevelt's 1935 State of the Union Address.


  1. On Dec. 7, 2012, liberal New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof offered an unexpected concession:
    “This is painful for a liberal to admit, but … America’s safety net can sometimes entangle people in a soul-crushing dependency. Our poverty programs do rescue many people, but other times they backfire.”


Liberals: get the heck out of the way, and let everybody succeed!!!!
 
Last edited:
How has the American worker done since the demise of the unions?

Less pay, no job security, fewer benefits

An insecure worker is just what Republucans want to ensure a low wage workforce


Better to have jobs of any pay than no jobs at all.
That is what employers count on

Take it or leave it



One day.....based on the law of averages....you will actually think about what you write.



  1. While legislative bodies have the power to order wage increases, they have not as of yet found a way to order commensurate increases in worker productivity that make the worker’s output worth the higher wage.
  2. Further, while Congress can legislate the wage at which labor transactions occur, it cannot require that the transaction actually be made, and the worker hired. walter e. williams

Republican legislators destabilized the unions, held down minimum wage, eroded worker protections

Just what their wealthy masters demanded



Really, you dunce???

Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/IllegImmig_10-14-10_430pm.pdf

Wanna give Barack an 'attaboy'?


winger has his head so far up obozo's ass that he can't see what is really going on. He is a perfect example of the defective liberal gene and its danger to humanity.
 
What have Republicans ever done to help poor neighborhoods?

2f7b8e45-aa5e-4dba-9c15-394b1726b349_zpsxdzmm0gp.jpg

The top 10 richest are also run by democrats .

This is typical right wing dishonesty. Pretty much all cities lean democratic, so you blame every city problem on the Dems. Even if the city is in the reddest of red states , it's the Dems fault !


Yes, it is. When they are in control, its their fault. That's the way responsibility works. Name one dem run city that is financially sound, has a low crime rate, and a low unemployment rate.
 
What have Republicans ever done to help poor neighborhoods?

2f7b8e45-aa5e-4dba-9c15-394b1726b349_zpsxdzmm0gp.jpg
Imagine that
If they are so poor, it would seem easy for Republicans to offer something better

Why don't they?


when the dems control the city it's impossible for republicans to make any changes. Here in New Orleans our stupid mayor and council are more interested in removing historical statues than in doing anything about crime or poverty. But they do have measures in place to raise taxes----------on the poor who have no way to pay them.
Republicans control the State Houses....that is where the money is
Why haven't they invested in impoverished communities?
 
What have Republicans ever done to help poor neighborhoods?

2f7b8e45-aa5e-4dba-9c15-394b1726b349_zpsxdzmm0gp.jpg

The top 10 richest are also run by democrats .

This is typical right wing dishonesty. Pretty much all cities lean democratic, so you blame every city problem on the Dems. Even if the city is in the reddest of red states , it's the Dems fault !


Yes, it is. When they are in control, its their fault. That's the way responsibility works. Name one dem run city that is financially sound, has a low crime rate, and a low unemployment rate.
New York City
 
What have Republicans ever done to help poor neighborhoods?

2f7b8e45-aa5e-4dba-9c15-394b1726b349_zpsxdzmm0gp.jpg
Imagine that
If they are so poor, it would seem easy for Republicans to offer something better

Why don't they?


when the dems control the city it's impossible for republicans to make any changes. Here in New Orleans our stupid mayor and council are more interested in removing historical statues than in doing anything about crime or poverty. But they do have measures in place to raise taxes----------on the poor who have no way to pay them.
Republicans control the State Houses....that is where the money is
Why haven't they invested in impoverished communities?
Throwing money at something never solves anything
 
What have Republicans ever done to help poor neighborhoods?

2f7b8e45-aa5e-4dba-9c15-394b1726b349_zpsxdzmm0gp.jpg

100 poorest counties:

350px-Lowmhhimap.svg.png


Looks pretty red statey to me

lol
alot of those counties vote progressive

A lot of what you post is comical.
The federal government does not make life better for the individual… Fact

So Medicaid does not make life better for low income Americans?

why not?
 
What have Republicans ever done to help poor neighborhoods?

2f7b8e45-aa5e-4dba-9c15-394b1726b349_zpsxdzmm0gp.jpg
Imagine that
If they are so poor, it would seem easy for Republicans to offer something better

Why don't they?


when the dems control the city it's impossible for republicans to make any changes. Here in New Orleans our stupid mayor and council are more interested in removing historical statues than in doing anything about crime or poverty. But they do have measures in place to raise taxes----------on the poor who have no way to pay them.

City governments have no effect whatsoever on poverty within their boundaries. City policies don't create jobs. Cities governments get the most blame for conditions not of their making, and have fewer resources to deal with the problems. When the steel industry left Pittsburg, whose fault was that? When the auto industry left Detroit, was the local government at fault?

It's a chicken and egg question. Which came first - the poverty, or the democratic government. In every case, it's the poverty. Cities don't become poor because the vote Democrat - they vote Democrat because Republicans do NOTHING for poor people.

That is not to say that poor people want free stuff, what they want is opportunities, just like everyone else, and Republicans don't offer opportunity at all. In fact, Republican policies make it harder and harder for people to work themselves out of poverty.

Conservatives hate "affirmative action" programs which see less qualified students of color gain admittance to Ivy League universities ahead of more qualified white students. They say this is wrong and everyone should be admitted on their merits. Really? They why do they support "legacy" admittance?

Undeserving and less qualifed sons and daughters of graduates of these fine institutions go to the front of the admittance line. Do you think that George W. Bush would have gotten into Harvard or Yale with his C average if his Daddy hadn't been Speaker of the House? If you do, then I have a ski resort in Miami I'd like to sell you.

Liberal cities are America's success story - from the revival of New York, to Los Angeles and Seattle, these are the engines which drive the US economy, with innovation, drive, and left wing policies. Not all are as successful, but compared to the Red States, the Blue Cities are in much, much better shape both economically and socially.
 
What have Republicans ever done to help poor neighborhoods?

2f7b8e45-aa5e-4dba-9c15-394b1726b349_zpsxdzmm0gp.jpg

100 poorest counties:

350px-Lowmhhimap.svg.png


Looks pretty red statey to me

lol
alot of those counties vote progressive

A lot of what you post is comical.
The federal government does not make life better for the individual… Fact

Then let's get rid of the military.
 

Forum List

Back
Top