Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does murdoch control all courtrooms or media?I suppose sorrows controls all respect and media courtrooms around the world, right, brainwashed functional moron. The only major media you have in the world is Rupert Murdoch Fox News The Wall Street journal the New York Post the Sunday times which Fox brings up as if they mean something lol. And internet crazies. Try journalists and reality. Watch the BBC and France 24 and German TV news on PBS and stop being a total f****** moron.
No I saw through the bullshit from TYT a long time agoSo you watch internet crazies? So much better lol idiot.
lol. All you have is fallacy not any form of valid argumentation. Right-wing fantasy is not the same as valid argumentaion.My statement is a valid argument your stqtements are fallacies disproven bvy facts
You are lying.lol. All you have is fallacy not any form of valid argumentation. Right-wing fantasy is not the same as valid argumentaion.
Go ahead and post your alleged proof.You are lying.
I post fact you past fallacies. We have prove that fact
Go ahead and post your alleged proof.
Any for-cause criteria in an At-Will employment State abridge at-will privileges and immunities already established by those laws. It really is that simple and that rational. For-cause employment relationships are based on Cause, unlike at-will employment relationships.
No. That is you assuming that conclusion.So daniel, are you claiming there can be no For Cause Terminations?
No. That is you assuming that conclusion.
Employment is at-will. Legislators have no authority to deny or disparage at-will employment privileges and immunities in an at-will employment State via public policies without due process.
The employer does it not the legislature. It really is that simple. You simply appeal to ignorance and assume your own conclusions. Typical of "right-wingers".Oh, so being fired for cause is ok, but not getting unemployment benefits after you quit your job is not? Funny set of standards you have.
Oh, and there is Due Process with unemployment. They ask you why you left your last job, and they contact your last employer to verify it. If it was through no fault of your own, you get benefits. If you quit or were fired, you don't.
The employer does it not the legislature. It really is that simple. You simply appeal to ignorance and assume your own conclusions. Typical of "right-wingers".
And, it is legal to quit thus since you merely faithfully executed the Law regarding employment at-will. The legislature has no authority to manufacture for-cause criteria in public policies in an at-will employment State.
No, they don't. They have no morals. Our First Amendment applies. Ethics dictate bearing true witness to our own laws not their subjective value of morals.Yes, they do have a reason for making the compensation for those who lost their job through no fault of their own. The entire point of the program is to provide temporary assistance to those who lost their job and are seeking another. You do not qualify for that.
No, they don't. They have no morals. Our First Amendment applies. Ethics dictate bearing true witness to our own laws not their subjective value of morals.
They do not which proves you wrongNo. That is you assuming that conclusion.
Employment is at-will. Legislators have no authority to deny or disparage at-will employment privileges and immunities in an at-will employment State via public policies without due process.
The first amendment does not applyNo, they don't. They have no morals. Our First Amendment applies. Ethics dictate bearing true witness to our own laws not their subjective value of morals.
It could not have happened with any ethics. Only the subjective value of morals can account for that repugnance to express Constitutional law. There is no appeal to ignorance of the at-will employment laws.Nothing in the 1st amendment of the US Constitution applies. A program created and with a singular mission of providing assistance to those who have lost their job through no fault of their own, is just that. People who quit a job or are fired are not what it was designed to assist.
All you need is a valid argument. Otherwise, we know right-wingers are lying because they type on the Internet or their lips are moving.They do not which proves you wrong
Neither do the subjective value of morals. Ethics are required.The first amendment does not apply
It could not have happened with any ethics. Only the subjective value of morals can account for that repugnance to express Constitutional law. There is no appeal to ignorance of the at-will employment laws.
Neither do the subjective value of morals. Ethics are required.
You lack credibility by not having any valid arguments. Not understanding the concepts and refusing to ask questions only indicates bigotry not ethics or morals.More psychobabble.
