Why do poor communities exist in America?

[danielpalos]

You are the one who claimed the 1st Amendment applies.

Yes, your right-wing insistence on a work ethic from the Age of Iron can be considered a form of Religion.

 

[Soupnazi630]

All you need is a valid argument. Otherwise, we know right-wingers are lying because they type on the Internet or their lips are moving.

I have posted valid arguments based on facts.

You have not

That standard makes you a right winger, how does trumps ball sack taste?

 

[Soupnazi630]

Neither do the subjective value of morals. Ethics are required.

I cited no such morals you are unethical and a liar

 

[irosie91]

for the record----"poor communities" exist even in oil rich Saudi Arabia

 

[danielpalos]

I have posted valid arguments based on facts.

You have not

That standard makes you a right winger, how does trumps ball sack taste?

Unfortunately for You, any lying hypocrite can claim the same thing. That is why you need to present your valid argument every time this becomes an issue.

Any for-cause criteria in an At-Will employment State abridge at-will privileges and immunities already established by those laws. It really is that simple and that rational. For-cause employment relationships are based on Cause, unlike at-will employment relationships.

 

[danielpalos]

I cited no such morals you are unethical and a liar

lol. You have no morals or ethics regarding the topic. Your fallacies prove it.

 

[danielpalos]

for the record----"poor communities" exist even in oil rich Saudi Arabia

That is why we must distinguish between the Poor and official poverty.

 

[irosie91]

That is why we must distinguish between the Poor and official poverty.

???? I am not sure what you mean. HOWEVER, I will say this -----the "POVERTY"
threshhold is so HIGH------that both my grandmother and mother GREW UP IN IT----
unaware. And I went thru it for years without uhm---losing an ounce of body weight.
AOC actually imagines that SHE grew up in "poverty"

 

[Soupnazi630]

Unfortunately for You, any lying hypocrite can claim the same thing. That is why you need to present your valid argument every time this becomes an issue.

Any for-cause criteria in an At-Will employment State abridge at-will privileges and immunities already established by those laws. It really is that simple and that rational. For-cause employment relationships are based on Cause, unlike at-will employment relationships.

Yes you are exactly such a lying hypocrite.

This is why you need a valid argument which you have never posted.

It is a fallacy as no laws abridge any such thing.

 

[Soupnazi630]

lol. You have no morals or ethics regarding the topic. Your fallacies prove it.

I post facts not fallacies.

You post fallacies proving you are the liar with no ethics or morals.

 

[danielpalos]

???? I am not sure what you mean. HOWEVER, I will say this -----the "POVERTY"
threshhold is so HIGH------that both my grandmother and mother GREW UP IN IT----
unaware. And I went thru it for years without uhm---losing an ounce of body weight.
AOC actually imagines that SHE grew up in "poverty"

We should have no homeless problem. Only the right-wing believes they "know best" how to apply their Big Government nanny-State socialism on a national basis. Equal protection of the laws is all the Government we need in our market-based economy.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes you are exactly such a lying hypocrite.

This is why you need a valid argument which you have never posted.

It is a fallacy as no laws abridge any such thing.

All you need is a valid argument for rebuttal not any fallacy (of argumentum ad hominem).

Any for-cause criteria in an At-Will employment State abridge at-will privileges and immunities already established by those laws. It really is that simple and that rational. For-cause employment relationships are based on Cause, unlike at-will employment relationships.

 

[danielpalos]

I post facts not fallacies.

You post fallacies proving you are the liar with no ethics or morals.

In right-wing fantasy, you are Always Right.

 

[Soupnazi630]

All you need is a valid argument for rebuttal not any fallacy (of argumentum ad hominem).

Any for-cause criteria in an At-Will employment State abridge at-will privileges and immunities already established by those laws. It really is that simple and that rational. For-cause employment relationships are based on Cause, unlike at-will employment relationships.

All you need is a valid argument to be rebutted in thr first place and you have never posted one.

It is long since proven that nothing is abridged and that is fact. That is a valid argument and it crushed your ignorant claims

 

[Soupnazi630]

In right-wing fantasy, you are Always Right.

You know I am right and you are a self admitted right wing liar.

 

[Soupnazi630]

We should have no homeless problem. Only the right-wing believes they "know best" how to apply their Big Government nanny-State socialism on a national basis. Equal protection of the laws is all the Government we need in our market-based economy.

We have equal protection under the law and there will always be a homeless problem as it is self inflicted by the individual

 

[danielpalos]

All you need is a valid argument to be rebutted in thr first place and you have never posted one.

It is long since proven that nothing is abridged and that is fact. That is a valid argument and it crushed your ignorant claims

Diversion instead of a valid rebuttal? How seriously should we take right-wingers who can't mean what they say when they don't say what they mean regarding any valid arguments.

Any for-cause criteria in an At-Will employment State abridge at-will privileges and immunities already established by those laws. It really is that simple and that rational. For-cause employment relationships are based on Cause, unlike at-will employment relationships.

 

[danielpalos]

We have equal protection under the law and there will always be a homeless problem as it is self inflicted by the individual

No, we don't have equal protection of the Law for Legal purposes regarding employment at-will.

At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Since you don't need Cause to legally quit on an at-will basis in an at-will employment State, Labor as the least wealthy under our form of Capitalism being equally free; there is no basis to deny or disparage that legal privilege and immunity for any other public policy enacted by the Legislature.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Diversion instead of a valid rebuttal? How seriously should we take right-wingers who can't mean what they say when they don't say what they mean regarding any valid arguments.

Any for-cause criteria in an At-Will employment State abridge at-will privileges and immunities already established by those laws. It really is that simple and that rational. For-cause employment relationships are based on Cause, unlike at-will employment relationships.

Nope I have repeatedly stated valiud rebuttals which can only dodge and weave to avoid.

There is no abridgement under the law.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No, we don't have equal protection of the Law for Legal purposes regarding employment at-will.

At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Since you don't need Cause to legally quit on an at-will basis in an at-will employment State, Labor as the least wealthy under our form of Capitalism being equally free; there is no basis to deny or disparage that legal privilege and immunity for any other public policy enacted by the Legislature.

None of which constitutes a violation of equal protection under the law.