Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I completely agree the State should not be handing out cash and prizes to married people. However, since the State DOES hand out cash and prizes to married people by law, then gay and interracial marriages are entitled to the equal protection of those laws.The question is not whether they can marry, the real question is should they get state perks for being married?
So let me ask you, when two people, or more, get married, why should they ask permission from the state? I mean really, who cares what idiots like Pelosi think about virtually anything? And why should they then have to pay for a license to be recognized by the state for their special perks?
Why should married folk have any more rights than people who are not married?
Hmm?
Why are people so insistent that the state be involved and give their approval?
Since the federal government gives all kinds of cash and prizes to married couples by law, then it IS a federal issue.It's a matter for the state to decide. It is not a federal issue and the Supreme Court, mostly that traitor Kennedy, betrayed their oaths of office to appease a bunch of queers. Pathetic. It will be overturned for the horrendous miscarriage of justice it was and returned to the states, over which 30 of them have already amended their constitutions to ban that foul and disgusting abomination.
Seriously?You quoted a Liberal hit piece designed to scare prior to November elections. I personally don't know any Republicans that oppose gay marriage.
You quoted a Liberal hit piece designed to scare prior to November elections. I personally don't know any Republicans that oppose gay marriage.
What's your rant now Tommy, you are looking for Gay Gophers?Why do so many Goppers oppose Gay Marriage ?
That's a tax issue not marriage issue. Have folks forgotten the DOMA ruling?Since the federal government gives all kinds of cash and prizes to married couples by law, then it IS a federal issue.
False godDon’t forget Allah.
“I saw it on the internet so it must be true” kind of argument."it's not raining here, so it's not raining anywhere" kind of argument.
Loads of Republicans oppose gay marriage.
Most Republican legislators in DC oppose gay marriage, for a start.
Seriously?
You must not know any Republicans.
Their argument has always been for legal, property, pension, and survivors rights that are bestowed on all civil unions and domestic partnerships in the county.
Homosexuals are screwed up people. Depression, drug addiction, alcoholism, suicides, high rates among queers.
Life observations and experience.Okay, sure.
That's hardly anything which supports the accusation which was made...
“I saw it on the internet so it must be true” kind of argument.
Would you like me to post the video of Barack Obama opposing gay marriage? The one before he lied to you for votes.
No one has a problem with those rights of civil unions. That is what the domestic partnership is--it is not a marriage.And why would the zealots on the right have a problem with that!?
SCOTUS and same-sex marriage: What could be in store?
Now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade, sending abortion policy back to the states, could the court do thwww.politifact.com
This seems a very unconservative stance. It is more akin to an authoritariaan stance. I understan that 150 gops voted against protecting Gay marriage. The same number voted against rotecting inter racial marriage.
What sort of country would America become if these rights were over turned by your crazy Supreme Court.
We all care what other people do.
The effect is so divisive too. It ended up sidestepping any actual DISCUSSION of the issue, and instantly allowed teh left to frame the issue as one of Identity so any opposition was immediately marginalized as "bigotry".
It worked. At the cost of deeply pissing off, millions of people.
Life observations and experience.
No one has a problem with those rights of civil unions. That is what the domestic partnership is--it is not a marriage.
