Disir
Platinum Member
- Sep 30, 2011
- 28,003
- 9,610
- 910
Not the point. The harm done in that crime is enough to warrant prison time.
I disagree.
theft is not a violent crime and alternative sentencing is acceptable
For whom? Screw alternative sentencing. You got your roll out in policy nationwide. What that policy says is that if you live in poverty or are working class or lower middle class then people can rip you off and there is no justice. Auto theft can bring a house down. I don't need that to be violent.
The only violent car theft is car jacking. If someone steals your car when you are not in it it is not a violent crime.
And how many people have you known that have lost their house because a car got stolen?
Doesn't need to be violent for them to go to prison. I have known enough people to watch that slide. Lost their jobs, lost their homes.
Steal money from a bank? You're going to prison.
There is an income bracket where that vehicle is their bank.
Lost their home because a car was stolen?
Bullshit.
Bank robbery is a federal crime car theft isn't.
Pffttt. Dude, I got nothing to prove to you. It's called living pay check to pay check. For clarification, renting not owning.
Robbery indicates violence. Let's look at embezzlement which falls under both state and federal laws.
I remind you that the people are in a social contract.