Why is antisemitism more pronounced among. Muslims?

what part of Lisa's comment is incorrect?
There is a story in the kharahan indicating
the jews got "transformed" into apes and pigs
and even present day imam-scum like to
allude to that moronic bit during khutbah
jumaat feces flings. Children get to hear
the islamo-dirt
They said the Quran calls Jew's offspring ape and pigs. That is not true. It will be better for you to provide your proof — I can't quote the entire Quran. And then she claimed they needed to be killed, which once again, is nowhere in islamic teachings.

"Say (O Muhammad to the people of the Scripture): ‘Shall I inform you of something worse than that, regarding the recompense from Allaah: those (Jews) who incurred the Curse of Allaah and His Wrath, and those of whom (some) He transformed into monkeys and swines, and those who worshipped Taaghoot (false deities); such are worse in rank (on the Day of Resurrection in the Hell-fire), and far more astray from the Right Path (in the life of this world)’” 5:60

And it isn't just about the children of Israel.

"Ibn Maajah narrated from ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Mas’ood that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Shortly before the Hour begins, people will be transformed into monkeys and pigs, swallowed up in the earth, and pelted with stones.” (Saheeh Ibn Maajah)

"Al-Tirmidhi narrated that Ibn ‘Umar said: “I heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say, ‘Among this ummah those who disbelieve in the divine decree will be swallowed up by the earth, transformed into monkeys and pigs or pelted with stones.” (Saheeh al-Tirmidhi)
 
best of people (3:110), and non-believers, the worst of creatures, (98:6).
Pickthall: Ye are the best community that hath been raised up for mankind. Ye enjoin right conduct and forbid indecency; and ye believe in Allah. And if the People of the Scripture had believed it had been better for them. Some of them are believers; but most of them are evil-livers.
Yusuf Ali: Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein (for aye). They are the worst of creature
you are welcome URANUS-----now you know why muslims like to murder jewish and christian babies---
ALLAH said so----to his bestest friend----the rapist
pig of mecca
 
no, the parents of the religious 1st century itinerant ... nor mary magdalene, was that you referring to her as a prostitute ... jew.
according to the book of Constantine---
Mary was a jewish girl from Nazareth and
Joseph was the local carpenter----they were
"betrothed" In Jewish law ---sex between them
would not "be nice" but in no way would approach
criminal or "adultery". As to Mary Magdalene---
she was a groupie of the gaggle of pharisees which
included the carpenter's son---JESUS---a nice boy--
literate and educated
 
according to the book of Constantine---
Mary was a jewish girl from Nazareth and
Joseph was the local carpenter----they were
"betrothed" In Jewish law ---sex between them
would not "be nice" but in no way would approach
criminal or "adultery". As to Mary Magdalene---
she was a groupie of the gaggle of pharisees which
included the carpenter's son---JESUS---a nice boy--
literate and educated
oh---your issue is the "paterfamilias" thing? ---
how does that relate to crucifixions (a greek and
roman thing but somehow related to "paterfamilias"?)

how is what you wrote related to the c bible than as the same collaboration used for the crucifixion, the 1st century confluence of the main characters referred and the historical conclusion to the heavenly inspired events and the respective religions after the conclusion. their true purpose.
 
how is what you wrote related to the c bible than as the same collaboration used for the crucifixion, the 1st century confluence of the main characters referred and the historical conclusion to the heavenly inspired events and the respective religions after the conclusion. their true purpose.
entirely related----the birth of the roman religion
 
you are welcome URANUS-----now you know why muslims like to murder jewish and christian babies---
ALLAH said so----to his bestest friend----the rapist
pig of mecca
Murdering Jewish babies hasn't exactly been something that is limited to Muslims. The Catholic Church have made it a time honered tradition as well. Pogroms have existed throughout history.

This idea that Muslim are more prone to it flies in the face of millenia of history.
 
Murdering Jewish babies hasn't exactly been something that is limited to Muslims. The Catholic Church have made it a time honered tradition as well. Pogroms have existed throughout history.

This idea that Muslim are more prone to it flies in the face of millenia of history.
not really-----it is about = historically. In fact christians and muslims, OFTEN, in their history
chose to simply confiscate babies. Today
christians seem to have given up the practice of
both murder and confiscation but muslims CLING
to it------"NO CHANGE" is a cornerstone of
"holy shariah"
 
Murdering Jewish babies hasn't exactly been something that is limited to Muslims. The Catholic Church have made it a time honered tradition as well. Pogroms have existed throughout history.

This idea that Muslim are more prone to it flies in the face of millenia of history.
Many of the old testament epics begin with the slaughter of children. The story of king David is about killing, raiding, banditry and extortion. Look at the story of Abigail.
 
Many of the old testament epics begin with the slaughter of children. The story of king David is about killing, raiding, banditry and extortion. Look at the story of Abigail.
I must have missed it-----whom did Abigail kill?
coulc you detail those HIGHWAY MAN stories
of David?-----or mafia like activities? Banditry?
It is true that David is presented as leader of a
military force in the area and aided by
Abigail (a kinda 'maid marian')
 
according to the book of Constantine---
Mary was a jewish girl from Nazareth and
Joseph was the local carpenter----they were
"betrothed" In Jewish law
how is what you wrote related to the c bible than as the same collaboration used for the crucifixion, the 1st century confluence of the main characters
entirely related----the birth of the roman religion

- the roman religion does mimic judaism in their response to the 1st century individuals responsible for the events of the 1st century that led to those events despotic conclusion. their characterization.

in contrast of their heavenly endowment the defendants were recipients of discourse due to their nature and beliefs they then were crucified for, physically and in text -

marry and joseph were never married and never intended to be so, happily living together - the itinerant was not a jew and beheld those beliefs contrary to the religion of antiquity known or not by the nature of their own goodness the same for mary magdalene by her spiritual awareness all three as true heavenly representatives among the festering masses otherwise.

at the heart of the errant desert religions, paterfamilias is the primary downfall for them that most reflects the present tense and the underlying reason the jews in the 1st century chose their own self interests above the heavenly endowments they were unwilling to realize and made certain to not be sustained - by anyone. all three religions to this day.
 
- the roman religion does mimic judaism in their response to the 1st century individuals responsible for the events of the 1st century that led to those events despotic conclusion. their characterization.

in contrast of their heavenly endowment the defendants were recipients of discourse due to their nature and beliefs they then were crucified for, physically and in text -

marry and joseph were never married and never intended to be so, happily living together - the itinerant was not a jew and beheld those beliefs contrary to the religion of antiquity known or not by the nature of their own goodness the same for mary magdalene by her spiritual awareness all three as true heavenly representatives among the festering masses otherwise.

at the heart of the errant desert religions, paterfamilias is the primary downfall for them that most reflects the present tense and the underlying reason the jews in the 1st century chose their own self interests above the heavenly endowments they were unwilling to realize and made certain to not be sustained - by anyone. all three religions to this day.
mushroom omelette for mama day this week?
 
not really-----it is about = historically. In fact christians and muslims, OFTEN, in their history
chose to simply confiscate babies. Today
christians seem to have given up the practice of
both murder and confiscation but muslims CLING
to it------"NO CHANGE" is a cornerstone of
"holy shariah"
suradie "disagreed" For those who do not know---
North Sudan enslaved thousands of christian
THE SHARIAH WAY. ----kill the father and take the kids------It is a principle of islamic law still on the books-----sometimes call the "DHIMMI
ORPHAN LAW"
 
for the record-----the above sophistry is utter bullshit. It is LEGAL in islamic
law to murder a person who REFUSES to convert to islam----the issue of TOLERANT
PRIDE to which sophist muslims resort-----is "EVERYONE GETS A CHANCE"
or the other great boast "ANYONE CAN CONVERT TO ISLAM---NO REQUIRMENTS
OTHER THAN ---MUMBLE THE IDIOT SHAHADA" getting back to the tolerant thing
the real answer is "SOMETIMES" The "very tolerant" SALADIN (as noted by
suradie) did save the life of MAIMONIDES by vetoing his conversion with a
scimitar at his throat. (saladin needed a doctor) Jewish doctors still get to go
go Saudi Arabia ----and are sought after in hospitals in the USA
The article is incorrect.

If something is legal, it cannot be murder by definition.

That's laughable. Can't you make your lies a bit believable? No wait — keep going. It's better this way.

There certainly is death penalty for apostasy, though the issue is highly dramatized by the objectors, taking into account the reality.
 
The article is incorrect.

If something is legal, it cannot be murder by definition.

That's laughable. Can't you make your lies a bit believable? No wait — keep going. It's better this way.

There certainly is death penalty for apostasy, though the issue is highly dramatized by the objectors, taking into account the reality.
to what article do you refer? I did not to a copy and paste job. What are you calling "incorrect" ?
To what "reality" do you refer?
 
I must have missed it-----whom did Abigail kill?
coulc you detail those HIGHWAY MAN stories
of David?-----or mafia like activities? Banditry?
It is true that David is presented as leader of a
military force in the area and aided by
Abigail (a kinda 'maid marian')
Let David Plotz tell the story.

 
Let David Plotz tell the story.


Let David Plotz tell the story.

very unimpressive Suradie-----your handlers are
scraping the bottom of the barrel. Etiquette and
LAW AND CUSTOM actually mandated that Nabal
give hospitality to David and his friends----AND
the could legally eat up a whole fig tree back then
just as Jesus and his friends could LEGALLY pick
wheat berries and eat them on existing
cultivated land------was Jesus MAFIA?
 
very unimpressive Suradie-----your handlers are
scraping the bottom of the barrel. Etiquette and
LAW AND CUSTOM actually mandated that Nabal
give hospitality to David and his friends----AND
the could legally eat up a whole fig tree back then.
Extortion is still extortion.
 
eating on EXISTING CULTIVATED land ---was not
extortion ----it was law and custom.
David was running a protection racket aka a shake down.

 

Forum List

Back
Top