Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know...
I could take in many of these children and create an army with them
Other criminals might have similar ideas.
NO.
We're not ignoring.
It's not happening.
It's all in your sick little xenophobic head.
You know...
I could take in many of these children and create an army with them
Other criminals might have similar ideas.
No duh
Some of the weaker ones could be harvested for organs, sold into slavery, or used as test subjects.
You know...
I could take in many of these children and create an army with them
Other criminals might have similar ideas.
No duh
Some of the weaker ones could be harvested for organs, sold into slavery, or used as test subjects.
Because Republicans are restricting abortion to the point that Americans are flooding the country with babies they can't afford. Bringing a few children from Mexico will have a negligible impact on already severe child poverty.
How is it a lie, ever seen the numbers of children already in poverty in the US? There is no evidence that Mexican kids are the reason for growing child poverty rates in the US, it is just xenophobic tripe. More children are born into poverty due to restrictions on abortions, than due to illegal immigration.Yeah hipeter is a lying sack.
Child poverty here looks like wealth to the kids that are being dumped on us.
What happens to women denied abortions? This is the first scientific study to find out.Because Republicans are restricting abortion to the point that Americans are flooding the country with babies they can't afford. Bringing a few children from Mexico will have a negligible impact on already severe child poverty.
How many abortions have been restricted? I didn't know Roe V Wade had been repealed. I call BS.
But ignore the facts, believe abortions are given out like candy, and pretend women aren't denied their abortion rights.Poverty
The women in the Turnaway Study were in comparable economic positions at the time they sought abortions. 45% were on public assistance and two-thirds had household incomes below the federal poverty level. One of the main reasons women cite for wanting to abort is money, and based on the outcomes for the turnaways, it seems they are right.
Most of the women who were denied an abortion, 86%, were living with their babies a year later. Only 11% had put them up for adoption. Also a year later, they were far more likely to be on public assistance — 76% of the turnaways were on the dole, as opposed to 44% of those who got abortions. 67% percent of the turnaways were below the poverty line (vs. 56% of the women who got abortions), and only 48% had a full time job (vs. 58% of the women who got abortions).
When a woman is denied the abortion she wants, she is statistically more likely to wind up unemployed, on public assistance, and below the poverty line. Another conclusion we could draw is that denying women abortions places more burden on the state because of these new mothers' increased reliance on public assistance programs.
What happens to women denied abortions? This is the first scientific study to find out.Because Republicans are restricting abortion to the point that Americans are flooding the country with babies they can't afford. Bringing a few children from Mexico will have a negligible impact on already severe child poverty.
How many abortions have been restricted? I didn't know Roe V Wade had been repealed. I call BS.
But ignore the facts, believe abortions are given out like candy, and pretend women aren't denied their abortion rights.Poverty
The women in the Turnaway Study were in comparable economic positions at the time they sought abortions. 45% were on public assistance and two-thirds had household incomes below the federal poverty level. One of the main reasons women cite for wanting to abort is money, and based on the outcomes for the turnaways, it seems they are right.
Most of the women who were denied an abortion, 86%, were living with their babies a year later. Only 11% had put them up for adoption. Also a year later, they were far more likely to be on public assistance 76% of the turnaways were on the dole, as opposed to 44% of those who got abortions. 67% percent of the turnaways were below the poverty line (vs. 56% of the women who got abortions), and only 48% had a full time job (vs. 58% of the women who got abortions).
When a woman is denied the abortion she wants, she is statistically more likely to wind up unemployed, on public assistance, and below the poverty line. Another conclusion we could draw is that denying women abortions places more burden on the state because of these new mothers' increased reliance on public assistance programs.
Sure about that, laws [and pending legislation] in many US states prove you wrong:What happens to women denied abortions? This is the first scientific study to find out.How many abortions have been restricted? I didn't know Roe V Wade had been repealed. I call BS.
But ignore the facts, believe abortions are given out like candy, and pretend women aren't denied their abortion rights.Poverty
The women in the Turnaway Study were in comparable economic positions at the time they sought abortions. 45% were on public assistance and two-thirds had household incomes below the federal poverty level. One of the main reasons women cite for wanting to abort is money, and based on the outcomes for the turnaways, it seems they are right.
Most of the women who were denied an abortion, 86%, were living with their babies a year later. Only 11% had put them up for adoption. Also a year later, they were far more likely to be on public assistance — 76% of the turnaways were on the dole, as opposed to 44% of those who got abortions. 67% percent of the turnaways were below the poverty line (vs. 56% of the women who got abortions), and only 48% had a full time job (vs. 58% of the women who got abortions).
When a woman is denied the abortion she wants, she is statistically more likely to wind up unemployed, on public assistance, and below the poverty line. Another conclusion we could draw is that denying women abortions places more burden on the state because of these new mothers' increased reliance on public assistance programs.
women are never "denied the abortion they want".
what the eff are you talking about?
Why Is Everyone Ignoring That Obama Is Flooding The US With Illegal Children????
Well Obama wants to do the reverse, he wants to provide better access to abortion and alleviate child poverty in general. But because the GOP has to be the party of NO on that, child poverty gets worse.Likely because theres nothing to ignore, given the fact the president isnt flooding the US with children, illegal or otherwise.Why Is Everyone Ignoring That Obama Is Flooding The US With Illegal Children????
Perhaps if you used more question marks, that might help.
Well Obama wants to do the reverse, he wants to provide better access to abortion and alleviate child poverty in general. But because the GOP has to be the party of NO on that, child poverty gets worse.Likely because theres nothing to ignore, given the fact the president isnt flooding the US with children, illegal or otherwise.Why Is Everyone Ignoring That Obama Is Flooding The US With Illegal Children????
Perhaps if you used more question marks, that might help.
It is easier for Republicans blame 'Mexicans', 'Muslims', 'Obama', 'Atheism',etc than it is to admit that their elected politicians had a hand in making life so hard and horrible for some kids today.
To be a lie of that sort, it has to be untrue and malicious, haven't posted any 'lies' of that sort in this thread. I have backed my claims up with evidence, without intent to deceive anyone.Well Obama wants to do the reverse, he wants to provide better access to abortion and alleviate child poverty in general. But because the GOP has to be the party of NO on that, child poverty gets worse.Likely because there’s nothing to ‘ignore,’ given the fact the president isn’t ‘flooding’ the US with children, ‘illegal’ or otherwise.
Perhaps if you used more question marks, that might help.
It is easier for Republicans blame 'Mexicans', 'Muslims', 'Obama', 'Atheism',etc than it is to admit that their elected politicians had a hand in making life so hard and horrible for some kids today.
there was less poverty when Republicans ran things
stop being a loser lying to yourself
Obama is a failure
the Democrat Party has failed
record welfare and food stamps; 16 million MORE on food stamps than when Bush was in office
stop being a loser lying to yourself your whole life
grow up