Why Was Mike Pence Not Charged With Possessing Classified Documents?

[Skylar]

Former Trump Vice-President Mike Pence possessed classified documents from January 20, 2021 forward. NB That part of the [BS] charging document of Donald Trump says he possessed them from January 20, 2021, same as Pence possessed them.

And not until after the MAL raid did Pence decide maybe he should search to see if he possessed any classified documents. Meaning Pence possessed them longer than Trump did.

A 100% selective prosecution of Trump because he is a threat to the deep state, whereas Pence is no threat to that same deep state.

DOJ closes Pence classified documents investigation with no charges

The Justice Department's national security division, which looked into the discovery of classified documents at the former vice president's Indiana home, informed his attorney that no charges will be filed.

www.nbcnews.com

Trump wasn't charged with possessing classified docs. Why then would Pence be?

 

[Faun]

You haven't read the indictment have you.

The Qult doesn't read. Tucker, et al., feed their thoughts directly into their hollow heads...

 

[protectionist]

Then Trump should be able to easily beat this.

"Should" is a word that exists in a perfect legal scenario. Far from that, are scenarios where Democrats (juries/judges) are involved, as they see themselves in a war against Republicans, and adhere strictly to the "all is fair in love & war" adage.

Consequently, where Democrats have determinitive power, "should" doesn't exist. All that exists is "Can", and if Democrats can defeat whomever they see as their opponent (Donald Trump in 2024), that's exactly what they are going to do, by any means necessary, including setting up scams, committing perjury, making false, biased judgements, etc,

June 28, 1964 Malcolm X spoke at the founding rally of the Organization of Afro-American Unity in New York. He called for freedom, justice, and equality “by any means necessary.” This has been a cornerstone of left ideology ever since then.

That's exactly what they have BEEN doing (ex. E. Jean Carroll, Alvin Bragg, Russian collusion, etc), and there is no reason to think any change is coming forth.

BAMN - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Skylar]

"Should" is a word that exists in a perfect legal scenario.

It sounds like you're already preparing yourself for the inevitable dissonance between your pseudo-legal gibberish and reality.

It appears your stunning failure with the 'legal brief' files by Texas in 2020 taught you something.

Not much, as you're still apeing NewMax and gatewaypundit. But something.

 

[Faun]

"Should" is a word that exists in a perfect legal scenario. Far from that, are scenarios where Democrats (juries/judges) are involved, as they see themselves in a war against Republicans, and adhere strictly to the "all is fair in love & war" adage.

Consequently, where Democrats have determinitive power, "should" doesn'texist. All that exists is "Can", and if Demcrats can defeat whomever they see as their opponent (Donald Trump in 2024), that's exactly what they are going to do, by any means necessary, including setting up scams, committing perjury, making false, biased judgements, etc,

That's exactly what they have BEEN doing (ex. E. Jean Carroll, Alvin Bragg, Russian collusion, etc), and there is no reason to think any change is coming forth.

Yeah, I know, our justice system is just so harsh on cross dressers like you.

 

[protectionist]

You haven't read the indictment have you.

There isn't an indictment. There is a SCAM JOB. Wanna tell me somethng about it ? go ahead .

 

[Faun]

There isn't an indictment. There is a SCAM JOB. Wanna tell me somethng about it ? go ahead .

 

[protectionist]

It sounds like you're already preparing yourself for the inevitable dissonance between your pseudo-legal gibberish and reality.

It appears your stunning failure with the 'legal brief' files by Texas in 2020 taught you something.

Not much, as you're still apeing NewMax and gatewaypundit. But something.

Jibberish.

 

[protectionist]

That's not "telling" anything, other than maybe your willingness to dodge the offer.

 

[otto105]

Jibberish.

Awww, butthurt.

 

[otto105]

That;s not "telling"anything, other than maybe your willingnes to dodge the offer.

The former 1-term fuckup could have avoided indictment if he had taken the offer to return the documents.

 

[debbiedowner]

Yeah, I know, our justice system is just so harsh on cross dressers like you.

That's why his rent is higher than non cross dressers.

 

[protectionist]

Yeah, I know, our justice system is just so harsh on cross dressers like you.

You're going to be sued for using those words. And every time you repeat them, you solidify the plaintiff claim, more & more. Thanks.

Or maybe you're going to claim that there "is no law" ?

 

[protectionist]

That's why his rent is higher than non cross dressers.

He is being SUED for using those words . Now YOU ARE TOO.

 

[Faun]

That;s not "telling"anything, other than maybe your willingnes to dodge the offer.

That's ok, gramps. I know what that means even though you don't.

 

[protectionist]

The former 1-term fuckup could have avoided indictment if he had taken the offer to return the documents.

All moot without anyone showing/proving that he was aware of any documents being present. Ho hum.

 

[Faun]

You're going to be sued for using those words. And every time you repeat them, you solidify the plaintiff claim, more & more. Thanks.

Or maybe you're going to claim that there "is no law" ?

Why would I say there is no law?? What I'm saying is, you have no case.

 

[protectionist]

That's ok, gramps. I know what that means even though you don't.

I just told you what it means, Dodge boy. Ho hum.

 

[Faun]

I just told you what it means, Dodge boy. Ho hum.

False, gramps. You told me what you think it means. But as always, you were wrong.

 

[debbiedowner]

He is being SUED for using those words . Now YOU ARE TOO.

Oh, you're one of those that sue at the drop of a dime, trying to get money to pay rent, loser.