Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,894
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, Wyoming and ever other small person should be stomped under the heel of the big states. Why not just have the election in NY and CA and get it over with and forget about the pesky little states having even a little say?That is why they have 29 EC votes....yeah Wyoming has more sense.To equate the state of Wyoming with the state of NY makes you a retard. Goddam this thread is full of Trumptards.
Wyoming has 3 EC votes, NY has 29. Sounds to me like NY has 10 times the say in the election then does Wyoming. Why the left has to resort to such easily proven false lies tells me they don't think much of their fellow liberals.
NY has 19.8 million people.
To be proportionate to Wyoming, by population, NY should have about 70.
Yes, he doesnt like that whole weird paradigm where if youre an asshole people call you asshole.Really. However, now you appear paranoid too.So when you say "you people on the right", you don't mean me?I was talking about the reason that Trump was elected, not about you.I voted for Hillary.Time for you scared people on the right to quit being so weak and manipulated.
Oops.r
Wanna try again?
.
Really?
.
So he wah wahs obsessively about PC.
Rinses and repeats. The poor thing
I hate negroes, Mexicans and Muslims......I'm voting for Trump
He understands me
Yes, Wyoming and ever other small person should be stomped under the heel of the big states. Why not just have the election in NY and CA and get it over with and forget about the pesky little states having even a little say?That is why they have 29 EC votes....yeah Wyoming has more sense.
Wyoming has 3 EC votes, NY has 29. Sounds to me like NY has 10 times the say in the election then does Wyoming. Why the left has to resort to such easily proven false lies tells me they don't think much of their fellow liberals.
NY has 19.8 million people.
To be proportionate to Wyoming, by population, NY should have about 70.
So, you think it would be hypocritical of him to push Trade Policy to force manufacturers to manufacture here?good luck with that when his manufacturing is done overseas but we'll pretend he's pro worker.
I have a prob with the gov't forcing manufacturers to do their thing anywhere. We could, however, make the US more biz friendly to attract them.
Are there tears in your beer?Yes, Wyoming and ever other small person should be stomped under the heel of the big states. Why not just have the election in NY and CA and get it over with and forget about the pesky little states having even a little say?That is why they have 29 EC votes.Wyoming has 3 EC votes, NY has 29. Sounds to me like NY has 10 times the say in the election then does Wyoming. Why the left has to resort to such easily proven false lies tells me they don't think much of their fellow liberals.
NY has 19.8 million people.
To be proportionate to Wyoming, by population, NY should have about 70.
One person one vote doesn't stomp on anyone.
Say you live in Laramie Wyoming pop. 30,000, and I live in Poughkeepsie, NY, population 30,000.
Why should your vote for president count for 3 times as much in value as mine?
Make that case.
At what point in this thread did anyone challenge his OP with other than, "But they are RACIST!".
I did. Go back and read my posts and don't come back telling me to link to those posts. You didn't read them or ignored them.
Fair enough.
But how many of the Rust Belt's traditionally dem union blue collar workers/voters were willing to listen to a Billionaire Republican despite him being labeled as a horrible "racist" because they had noticed over the years that THEY THEMSELVES were constantly and falsely accused of being "racist" by the same corrupt media/pop culture?
2012 Exit Polls, OHIO,
Is anyone in household a union member?
22% say YES - Obama wins their vote 60% to 37%
Ohio Presidential Race - 2012 Election Center - Elections & Politics from CNN.com
2016 Exit Polls, OHIO,
union household?
23% say YES - TRUMP wins their vote 54% to 41%
2016 election results: Ohio Exit polls
A 36 point swing in the union vote in Ohio. To Trump. That's how he won. (the swings were similar in the rest of the so-called rust belt)
How does that measure their willingness to listen based on factors like shared false accusations of racism?
What does that even mean? You're desperately trying to avoid admitting that Trump co-opted a liberal position in order to win.
He is of the school that assholes are tired of not being able to say their asshole things because theyre scared to be called asshole, so its refreshing that trumps an asshole.youre mad cuz people see through youI guess I'll put GT down for a solid "no", too.
.
i know the routine dude
youre obsessive, and its kinda gross, and when ppl blow up your skirt about it you dive into your turtle shell and say "see im right every time!! raawr."
Youre paper thin bro. no backbone.
Not to mention the fact that he hasn't provided one gram of evidence to support his 'theory', or whatever it it is.
its toddler-brained kiddy shit, but the faction is out there just like poor widdew mac whose feelings are so apparently hurt
So, you think it would be hypocritical of him to push Trade Policy to force manufacturers to manufacture here?
I think it's admitting that Americans are too lazy to compete on the international market.
"but, but, but,.... Airbus!" KKKorrell will whine, ignoring the huge tax benefits that Boeing gets to set up a plant in JesusLand to have scab workers put together planes.
What a crock of ignorant chicken shit, shit.
Lazy? Really?View attachment 99840
Our productivity rose to the occasion but you payed them nothing and give no benefits probably treat them like shit. They make you millions but you curse them. ...what a piece of dirt you are.
Technology has boosted productivity - not the workers - so the money that propelled that boost has been spent on the technology ... not the workers.
Obviously you don't understand (or don't know) the equation that determines the allocation of EV's.That is why they have 29 EC votes....yeah Wyoming has more sense.To equate the state of Wyoming with the state of NY makes you a retard. Goddam this thread is full of Trumptards.
Wyoming has 3 EC votes, NY has 29. Sounds to me like NY has 10 times the say in the election then does Wyoming. Why the left has to resort to such easily proven false lies tells me they don't think much of their fellow liberals.
NY has 19.8 million people.
To be proportionate to Wyoming, by population, NY should have about 70.
I did. Go back and read my posts and don't come back telling me to link to those posts. You didn't read them or ignored them.
Fair enough.
But how many of the Rust Belt's traditionally dem union blue collar workers/voters were willing to listen to a Billionaire Republican despite him being labeled as a horrible "racist" because they had noticed over the years that THEY THEMSELVES were constantly and falsely accused of being "racist" by the same corrupt media/pop culture?
2012 Exit Polls, OHIO,
Is anyone in household a union member?
22% say YES - Obama wins their vote 60% to 37%
Ohio Presidential Race - 2012 Election Center - Elections & Politics from CNN.com
2016 Exit Polls, OHIO,
union household?
23% say YES - TRUMP wins their vote 54% to 41%
2016 election results: Ohio Exit polls
A 36 point swing in the union vote in Ohio. To Trump. That's how he won. (the swings were similar in the rest of the so-called rust belt)
How does that measure their willingness to listen based on factors like shared false accusations of racism?
What does that even mean? You're desperately trying to avoid admitting that Trump co-opted a liberal position in order to win.
Your numbers show that Trump got more of the union vote than Romney, but it does not say why.
The idea that the Blue Collar White voters were more willing to listen to Trump the Billionaire because they have noticed that they had a common enemy, ie the Media that has nothing but contempt for them both.
Not to mention that some of them had to love seeing someone treat the media like they never had a chance to, all the times the media dismissed them as racist hicks.
The only question is, how many of them loved that.
Oh, you've tried this before, and I answered you. You must have "forgotten".About right. I have yet to have Mac tell me what totally reasonable thing he wants to say that he can't possibly say because of "political correctness".
I did. Go back and read my posts and don't come back telling me to link to those posts. You didn't read them or ignored them.
Fair enough.
But how many of the Rust Belt's traditionally dem union blue collar workers/voters were willing to listen to a Billionaire Republican despite him being labeled as a horrible "racist" because they had noticed over the years that THEY THEMSELVES were constantly and falsely accused of being "racist" by the same corrupt media/pop culture?
2012 Exit Polls, OHIO,
Is anyone in household a union member?
22% say YES - Obama wins their vote 60% to 37%
Ohio Presidential Race - 2012 Election Center - Elections & Politics from CNN.com
2016 Exit Polls, OHIO,
union household?
23% say YES - TRUMP wins their vote 54% to 41%
2016 election results: Ohio Exit polls
A 36 point swing in the union vote in Ohio. To Trump. That's how he won. (the swings were similar in the rest of the so-called rust belt)
How does that measure their willingness to listen based on factors like shared false accusations of racism?
What does that even mean? You're desperately trying to avoid admitting that Trump co-opted a liberal position in order to win.
Your numbers show that Trump got more of the union vote than Romney, but it does not say why.
The idea that the Blue Collar White voters were more willing to listen to Trump the Billionaire because they have noticed that they had a common enemy, ie the Media that has nothing but contempt for them both.
Not to mention that some of them had to love seeing someone treat the media like they never had a chance to, all the times the media dismissed them as racist hicks.
The only question is, how many of them loved that.
Oh, you've tried this before, and I answered you. You must have "forgotten".About right. I have yet to have Mac tell me what totally reasonable thing he wants to say that he can't possibly say because of "political correctness".
I can't think of one. Not one.
Your ignorant question demonstrates how clueless you are on this topic.
.