Will the coup ringleaders ever face justice?

...Impeachment is just an investigation and trial...
Impeachment is a CONGRESSIONAL POWER. The illegal spying by te Biden/Obama Administration had nothing to do with "impeachment", Trump wasn't even an office holder.
...papadopolus bragging to an australian diplomat about russia ties
To get a FISA warrant on a US citizen the corrupt Biden/Obama Administration would have to swear to the Court that they had verified evidence that showed that they were knowingly engaged in clandestine intelligence activities on behalf of a foreign government.

What predicated Biden/Obama spying on the Trump Campaign is what Barr has pledged to get to the bottom of.
... the warrants were signed by fucking judges...
In our system EVERY warrant requires the entity requesting the warrant to swear an oath the information provided is accurate, trustworthy and complete. When you LIE to the Court, the spying that results is illegal. Lies are not suddenly laundered into truth because you tricked a Judge by lying to them and withholding information.
... Republican employees decided they saw probable cause to investigate...
The Party affiliation of the Biden/Obama Administration members that illegally spied on Trump is beside the point. You think a lie is suddenly "truth" if a Republican utters it? How Silly!
... secured warrants from Republican-appointed judges...
Who cares who appointed them? You can no more lie to a Judge selected by Roberts than you can a Judge selected by anyone else.
... Orwellian reframing of legal due process in an attempt to undermine the role of the judicial system in providing the critical oversight necessary to maintaining a free and just democracy....
Lying to the Court doesn't preserve a Free and Just Democracy. They lied because if they had told the truth, they wouldn't have gotten the warrants they wanted to exploit the vast spying capabilities we entrust to our Intelligence Community.
...Carter Page was under investigation since 2013. Why did Trump get involved with him.
Carter Page worked WITH the FBI in 2013. He was never convicted of any crimes, hell, he's never even been indicted, still hasn't! Next to Trump he's probably the cleanest guy in DC. A FISA warrant is renewed every 90 days. His 2013 assistance to the FBI had no bearing on his fitness to work in the Trump Campaign.

The Biden/Obama Administration wanted to spy on Trump, they knew Page and used him as pretext to throw a surveillance blanket over the campaign at a time when they believed Hillary would be elected and that no one would even find out the warrant had even been issued.


And also Zorro, is it not TRUE that---------------->the 1st FISA warrant they tried to obtain was denied! So in actuality, they were attempting to SPY on the Trump campaign earlier.

As far as UNLUCKYDUCKS assertions, 1/2 of them have been proven false! One of the most obvious is his linkage to the discussion had with Alexander Downer, where they BOTH have said that----------->what was claimed to be discussed, NEVER HAPPENED!

Maybe Quack-Quack should also address all of the unmaskings from the protected data-base, and the fact that 3 HIRED CONTRACTORS had access to that data base under the Obama Administration. Was one of the Fusion GPS? We will soon know, and that would explain a whole-helluva-lot! A large amount of the unmaskings were supposedly authorized by the UN Ambassador. She insists it wasn't her, and somebody must have used her name to authorize it!

So what is the point you say?

ANSWER------------->While I can NOT confirm it...……..YET...……...it seems that 95% of these unmaskings, along with the inquiry that followed into these people, WERE PEOPLE WORKING ON THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY CANDIDATES CAMPAIGNS, not just Trumps-) Oh, my! Seems whomever was in control of this, had a plan for whomever won the nomination on the Republican side, now doesn't it! And it probably would have worked, if Admiral Rogers hadn't blown the whistle to the FISA court, which FORCED the cabal to LEGALLY get a FISA warrant, which it could NOT the 1st time around! And so, enter the dossier, and walla, they can now legally spy, even IF the evidence they used, was false!

Problem for them is----------->they had to SWEAR to the court that the evidence was vetted, and found to be true. They LIED!

And how do we know this?

Because Carter Paige is not only walking around, he has a MASSIVE suit against the Feds, which legal experts from both sides of the aisle claim he will WIN, so they will no doubt settle out of court with a gag order to be included.

Anyway, the point is--------------->it was NOT just Trump, it was all/most of the Republican candidates people being unmasked. Trump was just the winner, so it is focused on what happened to him. The Left says worse than Watergate!

Yes it was, and you will soon find out!
Cater Page already lost that suit. And refiled that same suit he already lost.

Chris Wallace sets record straight on Russia probe:
The Trump investigation did not start with the FISA warrant and Carter Page and even the dossier. It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on –– dirt on Hillary Clinton. That’s when the investigation started.
We don't know WHEN the spying started. We do know when some of the FISA spying started and that the Obama/Biden Administration lied to the FISA Court in order to trick them into authorizing spying on the American People.

Barr will get to bottom of all that. He will tell us when this spying started, I understand that you claim they used this dog and pony show with Papa D to kick it off, maybe, we'll see. Thanks to the fact that Trump unexpectedly won the election, we know that they got four FISA warrants on Page, it will be interesting to see if they obtained any others, and frankly if they spied on any other candidates.

For example, as badly as the Democrats rigged the primaries against Bernie, did they also spy on him?

But, don't worry, Bob Barr has committed to getting to the bottom of all of this.
 
Nobody invoked the impeachment power of Congress in this coup attempt. The illegal spying was conducted by the Obama Administration with powers described in Article 2 and impeachment is not one of them. Further, this began well before Trump held elective office.

The entire Trump-Russia collusion gambit, based on the infamous Steele dossier’s pastiche of lies and defamations, was the dirtiest political trick in American history and is in the process of transmogrification into one of the greatest fiascos in the history of American political skullduggery. (One of the most rabid Trump-hating Democratic congressmen, Eric Swallows-well, still professes to believe all of the Steele dossier, as if it were a catechism.)

Though there is an elaborate psychopolitical effort underway to pretend otherwise, investigations already taking place by the inspector general of the Justice Department, a special counsel, and the attorney general of the United States, about to be joined by the Senate Judiciary Committee, will call upon the chief intelligence and law officers of the Obama administration, along with Hillary Clinton and members of her campaign staff, to account for their conduct.

These include lies under oath to congressional committees, lies to federal officials, and misleading the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court. This is a series of dishonest statements and illegal acts that can only, at least provisionally, be seen as a coordinated campaign to influence the results of the presidential election and then to compromise the unwished-for outcome of that election. It will not be long before we hear the still familiar words, in reference to President Obama: “What did the president know and when did he know it?”

Day of Reckoning Is Now Dawning For Democrats
...Impeachment is just an investigation and trial...
Impeachment is a CONGRESSIONAL POWER. The illegal spying by te Biden/Obama Administration had nothing to do with "impeachment", Trump wasn't even an office holder.
...papadopolus bragging to an australian diplomat about russia ties
To get a FISA warrant on a US citizen the corrupt Biden/Obama Administration would have to swear to the Court that they had verified evidence that showed that they were knowingly engaged in clandestine intelligence activities on behalf of a foreign government.

What predicated Biden/Obama spying on the Trump Campaign is what Barr has pledged to get to the bottom of.
... the warrants were signed by fucking judges...
In our system EVERY warrant requires the entity requesting the warrant to swear an oath the information provided is accurate, trustworthy and complete. When you LIE to the Court, the spying that results is illegal. Lies are not suddenly laundered into truth because you tricked a Judge by lying to them and withholding information.
... Republican employees decided they saw probable cause to investigate...
The Party affiliation of the Biden/Obama Administration members that illegally spied on Trump is beside the point. You think a lie is suddenly "truth" if a Republican utters it? How Silly!
... secured warrants from Republican-appointed judges...
Who cares who appointed them? You can no more lie to a Judge selected by Roberts than you can a Judge selected by anyone else.
... Orwellian reframing of legal due process in an attempt to undermine the role of the judicial system in providing the critical oversight necessary to maintaining a free and just democracy....
Lying to the Court doesn't preserve a Free and Just Democracy. They lied because if they had told the truth, they wouldn't have gotten the warrants they wanted to exploit the vast spying capabilities we entrust to our Intelligence Community.
...Carter Page was under investigation since 2013. Why did Trump get involved with him.
Carter Page worked WITH the FBI in 2013. He was never convicted of any crimes, hell, he's never even been indicted, still hasn't! Next to Trump he's probably the cleanest guy in DC. A FISA warrant is renewed every 90 days. His 2013 assistance to the FBI had no bearing on his fitness to work in the Trump Campaign.

The Biden/Obama Administration wanted to spy on Trump, they knew Page and used him as pretext to throw a surveillance blanket over the campaign at a time when they believed Hillary would be elected and that no one would even find out the warrant had even been issued.
...Maybe Quack-Quack should also address all of the unmaskings from the protected data-base, and the fact that 3 HIRED CONTRACTORS had access to that data base under the Obama Administration. Was one of the Fusion GPS? We will soon know, and that would explain a whole-helluva-lot! A large amount of the unmaskings were supposedly authorized by the UN Ambassador. She insists it wasn't her, and somebody must have used her name to authorize it!...

So what is the point you say?

ANSWER------------->While I can NOT confirm it...……..YET...……...it seems that 95% of these unmaskings, along with the inquiry that followed into these people, WERE PEOPLE WORKING ON THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY CANDIDATES CAMPAIGNS, not just Trumps-) Oh, my! Seems whomever was in control of this, had a plan for whomever won the nomination on the Republican side, now doesn't it! And it probably would have worked, if Admiral Rogers hadn't blown the whistle to the FISA court, which FORCED the cabal to LEGALLY get a FISA warrant, which it could NOT the 1st time around! And so, enter the dossier, and walla, they can now legally spy, even IF the evidence they used, was false!

Problem for them is----------->they had to SWEAR to the court that the evidence was vetted, and found to be true. They LIED!
The Unmasking orgy that the Biden/Obama Administration engaged in was truly unprecedented, and you are right about Samantha Powers,a significant portion of it was done under her log in which she could not explain.

Whatever happened to the 'unmaskings' probe?

Every Unmasking by the Biden/Obama Administration was a separate incidence of spying on an American Citizen.

obamabarack_032218getty.jpg


One of the deepest, darkest, most important issues in the whole mess has to do with the massive number of “unmaskings” of U.S. citizens.

Wiretapping foreigners who could be terrorists isn’t as sensitive an issue, since our law doesn’t give them the same protection as U.S. citizens. The problem comes when wiretaps include U.S. citizens in contact with foreign targets. That’s called “incidental” collection.

And it’s not just phone calls. Today’s wiretaps can include everything on the web — emails, bank accounts, photos, messaging, Facebook posts. And “incidental collection” can include anything picked up when a target is watched directly, through a bug, or by secretly activating his computer’s microphone and camera.

U.S. citizens who aren’t accused of crimes are entitled to strong constitutional privacy protections. So, to alleviate worries that citizens’ rights might be violated through “incidental” spying on foreign targets, the intel agencies adopted strict rules. At first, they promised to destroy any “incidental” intelligence they collected. Later, they decided to store it — but promised that the names of the U.S. citizens would be “masked,” or hidden, even internally.

They argued that they needed to store the information on U.S. citizens and might occasionally need to “unmask” or reveal their names. “Unmasking” was supposed to be extraordinarily rare, requiring a high-ranking official’s approval accompanied by a strong legal argument that the citizen’s name is crucial to addressing some national-security threat.

The process was corrupted:

An official who is a bad actor may want to illegally monitor a U.S. citizen — say, a political enemy or a journalist — but knows he could never get wiretap approval from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). So he develops a pretext to wiretap a foreigner or a target in contact with that citizen. He then “incidentally” captures the citizen’s information, too. Later, he builds a case for “unmasking” the U.S. citizen’s name, supposedly for national security or other crucial reasons.

They even have a name for this illegal spying on US Citizens: Reverse Engineering Intel

The U.S. citizens are usually none the wiser. The surveillance isn’t intended to build a criminal case; it’s to collect dirt or political intel or blackmail material. So the corrupt process is never scrutinized in a U.S. court.

In 2016, very real questions were raised about whether reverse engineering of intel was widely deployed in an unethical manner. A red flag waved when we got a sense of how many Americans are “incidentally” surveilled — so many, that near-daily unmasking requests were said to be made in 2016 under the name of a single official: United Nations Ambassador Samantha Power.

Who else was involved? Then-acting Attorney General Sally Yates, national security adviser Susan Rice, and Director of National Intelligence Crapper. Crapper said he requested unmasking of American names “every couple of weeks.” Apparently, it became so common that Crapper told Congress he probably made some requests on his way out the door before Trump’s inauguration, but couldn’t recall the specifics.

Rice initially claimed she knew nothing about the unmasking of surveilled Trump associates. Later, she admitted on MSNBC that she had asked for names of U.S. citizens previously masked in intelligence reports.

Add to all this the report that, during 2016, the Obama administration vastly expanded its searches for information about Americans in the National Security Agency (NSA) database.

  • In 2013, there were 9,500 searches involving 198 Americans.
  • In 2016, that escalated to 30,355 searches of 5,288 Americans.
Tripled!

Whatever happened to the 'unmaskings' probe?

Bob Barr and the Inspector General are going to be VERY BUSY getting to the bottom of all this!
 
Impeachment is a CONGRESSIONAL POWER. The illegal spying by te Biden/Obama Administration had nothing to do with "impeachment", Trump wasn't even an office holder.
To get a FISA warrant on a US citizen the corrupt Biden/Obama Administration would have to swear to the Court that they had verified evidence that showed that they were knowingly engaged in clandestine intelligence activities on behalf of a foreign government.

What predicated Biden/Obama spying on the Trump Campaign is what Barr has pledged to get to the bottom of.
... the warrants were signed by fucking judges...
In our system EVERY warrant requires the entity requesting the warrant to swear an oath the information provided is accurate, trustworthy and complete. When you LIE to the Court, the spying that results is illegal. Lies are not suddenly laundered into truth because you tricked a Judge by lying to them and withholding information.
... Republican employees decided they saw probable cause to investigate...
The Party affiliation of the Biden/Obama Administration members that illegally spied on Trump is beside the point. You think a lie is suddenly "truth" if a Republican utters it? How Silly!
... secured warrants from Republican-appointed judges...
Who cares who appointed them? You can no more lie to a Judge selected by Roberts than you can a Judge selected by anyone else.
... Orwellian reframing of legal due process in an attempt to undermine the role of the judicial system in providing the critical oversight necessary to maintaining a free and just democracy....
Lying to the Court doesn't preserve a Free and Just Democracy. They lied because if they had told the truth, they wouldn't have gotten the warrants they wanted to exploit the vast spying capabilities we entrust to our Intelligence Community.
...Carter Page was under investigation since 2013. Why did Trump get involved with him.
Carter Page worked WITH the FBI in 2013. He was never convicted of any crimes, hell, he's never even been indicted, still hasn't! Next to Trump he's probably the cleanest guy in DC. A FISA warrant is renewed every 90 days. His 2013 assistance to the FBI had no bearing on his fitness to work in the Trump Campaign.

The Biden/Obama Administration wanted to spy on Trump, they knew Page and used him as pretext to throw a surveillance blanket over the campaign at a time when they believed Hillary would be elected and that no one would even find out the warrant had even been issued.
You're believing the president of ten thousand lies...
Did he tell me that if I liked my insurance plan that I could keep my insurance?
Counterintelligence against Russia is justified...
Of course, but they spied on US Citizens and a rival domestic political campaign.
Surveillance of Russian election meddling is justified. ..
Nobody has any issue with them spying on Russians.
...We have the mueller report to prove it. ....
The Mueller Report confirms that Trump and his Campaign didn't engage in a Criminal Conspiracy with the Russians, and far from the "back channels" that we were lied about for 3 years, the Mueller report confirms that after the election the Trump folks had difficulty contacting the Russians as is customary in a Transition because they didn't even have their phone numbers.

Americans and a rival political campaign were illegally spied on by the lying corrupt Obama/Biden Administration and I hope AG Barr gets to the bottom of it.
We dont fully know what Mueller's findings are yet because of redactions and so much has been passed onto other jurisdictions, such as SDNY.
But one source is Trump's reaction to retaliate against the Mueller team indicates that there is something more damaging in that report.
So you are basing your position on what you cannot see and imagine it to support your position? Doesn't that seem a bit circular?
 
...Impeachment is just an investigation and trial...
Impeachment is a CONGRESSIONAL POWER. The illegal spying by te Biden/Obama Administration had nothing to do with "impeachment", Trump wasn't even an office holder.
...papadopolus bragging to an australian diplomat about russia ties
To get a FISA warrant on a US citizen the corrupt Biden/Obama Administration would have to swear to the Court that they had verified evidence that showed that they were knowingly engaged in clandestine intelligence activities on behalf of a foreign government.

What predicated Biden/Obama spying on the Trump Campaign is what Barr has pledged to get to the bottom of.
... the warrants were signed by fucking judges...
In our system EVERY warrant requires the entity requesting the warrant to swear an oath the information provided is accurate, trustworthy and complete. When you LIE to the Court, the spying that results is illegal. Lies are not suddenly laundered into truth because you tricked a Judge by lying to them and withholding information.
... Republican employees decided they saw probable cause to investigate...
The Party affiliation of the Biden/Obama Administration members that illegally spied on Trump is beside the point. You think a lie is suddenly "truth" if a Republican utters it? How Silly!
... secured warrants from Republican-appointed judges...
Who cares who appointed them? You can no more lie to a Judge selected by Roberts than you can a Judge selected by anyone else.
... Orwellian reframing of legal due process in an attempt to undermine the role of the judicial system in providing the critical oversight necessary to maintaining a free and just democracy....
Lying to the Court doesn't preserve a Free and Just Democracy. They lied because if they had told the truth, they wouldn't have gotten the warrants they wanted to exploit the vast spying capabilities we entrust to our Intelligence Community.
...Carter Page was under investigation since 2013. Why did Trump get involved with him.
Carter Page worked WITH the FBI in 2013. He was never convicted of any crimes, hell, he's never even been indicted, still hasn't! Next to Trump he's probably the cleanest guy in DC. A FISA warrant is renewed every 90 days. His 2013 assistance to the FBI had no bearing on his fitness to work in the Trump Campaign.

The Biden/Obama Administration wanted to spy on Trump, they knew Page and used him as pretext to throw a surveillance blanket over the campaign at a time when they believed Hillary would be elected and that no one would even find out the warrant had even been issued.


And also Zorro, is it not TRUE that---------------->the 1st FISA warrant they tried to obtain was denied! So in actuality, they were attempting to SPY on the Trump campaign earlier.

As far as UNLUCKYDUCKS assertions, 1/2 of them have been proven false! One of the most obvious is his linkage to the discussion had with Alexander Downer, where they BOTH have said that----------->what was claimed to be discussed, NEVER HAPPENED!

Maybe Quack-Quack should also address all of the unmaskings from the protected data-base, and the fact that 3 HIRED CONTRACTORS had access to that data base under the Obama Administration. Was one of the Fusion GPS? We will soon know, and that would explain a whole-helluva-lot! A large amount of the unmaskings were supposedly authorized by the UN Ambassador. She insists it wasn't her, and somebody must have used her name to authorize it!

So what is the point you say?

ANSWER------------->While I can NOT confirm it...……..YET...……...it seems that 95% of these unmaskings, along with the inquiry that followed into these people, WERE PEOPLE WORKING ON THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY CANDIDATES CAMPAIGNS, not just Trumps-) Oh, my! Seems whomever was in control of this, had a plan for whomever won the nomination on the Republican side, now doesn't it! And it probably would have worked, if Admiral Rogers hadn't blown the whistle to the FISA court, which FORCED the cabal to LEGALLY get a FISA warrant, which it could NOT the 1st time around! And so, enter the dossier, and walla, they can now legally spy, even IF the evidence they used, was false!

Problem for them is----------->they had to SWEAR to the court that the evidence was vetted, and found to be true. They LIED!

And how do we know this?

Because Carter Paige is not only walking around, he has a MASSIVE suit against the Feds, which legal experts from both sides of the aisle claim he will WIN, so they will no doubt settle out of court with a gag order to be included.

Anyway, the point is--------------->it was NOT just Trump, it was all/most of the Republican candidates people being unmasked. Trump was just the winner, so it is focused on what happened to him. The Left says worse than Watergate!

Yes it was, and you will soon find out!
Cater Page already lost that suit. And refiled that same suit he already lost.

Chris Wallace sets record straight on Russia probe:
The Trump investigation did not start with the FISA warrant and Carter Page and even the dossier. It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on –– dirt on Hillary Clinton. That’s when the investigation started.


Then give us a recent link that shows this! That is all you have to do! Chris Wallace, showing what you said. It will be on YouTube.

If I don't hear back from you, I won't be surprised. But, unlike you, with the modicum of fairness, I will wait 24 hrs. Produce your evidence, or slink away!
 
Impeachment is a CONGRESSIONAL POWER. The illegal spying by te Biden/Obama Administration had nothing to do with "impeachment", Trump wasn't even an office holder.
To get a FISA warrant on a US citizen the corrupt Biden/Obama Administration would have to swear to the Court that they had verified evidence that showed that they were knowingly engaged in clandestine intelligence activities on behalf of a foreign government.

What predicated Biden/Obama spying on the Trump Campaign is what Barr has pledged to get to the bottom of.
... the warrants were signed by fucking judges...
In our system EVERY warrant requires the entity requesting the warrant to swear an oath the information provided is accurate, trustworthy and complete. When you LIE to the Court, the spying that results is illegal. Lies are not suddenly laundered into truth because you tricked a Judge by lying to them and withholding information.
... Republican employees decided they saw probable cause to investigate...
The Party affiliation of the Biden/Obama Administration members that illegally spied on Trump is beside the point. You think a lie is suddenly "truth" if a Republican utters it? How Silly!
... secured warrants from Republican-appointed judges...
Who cares who appointed them? You can no more lie to a Judge selected by Roberts than you can a Judge selected by anyone else.
... Orwellian reframing of legal due process in an attempt to undermine the role of the judicial system in providing the critical oversight necessary to maintaining a free and just democracy....
Lying to the Court doesn't preserve a Free and Just Democracy. They lied because if they had told the truth, they wouldn't have gotten the warrants they wanted to exploit the vast spying capabilities we entrust to our Intelligence Community.
...Carter Page was under investigation since 2013. Why did Trump get involved with him.
Carter Page worked WITH the FBI in 2013. He was never convicted of any crimes, hell, he's never even been indicted, still hasn't! Next to Trump he's probably the cleanest guy in DC. A FISA warrant is renewed every 90 days. His 2013 assistance to the FBI had no bearing on his fitness to work in the Trump Campaign.

The Biden/Obama Administration wanted to spy on Trump, they knew Page and used him as pretext to throw a surveillance blanket over the campaign at a time when they believed Hillary would be elected and that no one would even find out the warrant had even been issued.


And also Zorro, is it not TRUE that---------------->the 1st FISA warrant they tried to obtain was denied! So in actuality, they were attempting to SPY on the Trump campaign earlier.

As far as UNLUCKYDUCKS assertions, 1/2 of them have been proven false! One of the most obvious is his linkage to the discussion had with Alexander Downer, where they BOTH have said that----------->what was claimed to be discussed, NEVER HAPPENED!

Maybe Quack-Quack should also address all of the unmaskings from the protected data-base, and the fact that 3 HIRED CONTRACTORS had access to that data base under the Obama Administration. Was one of the Fusion GPS? We will soon know, and that would explain a whole-helluva-lot! A large amount of the unmaskings were supposedly authorized by the UN Ambassador. She insists it wasn't her, and somebody must have used her name to authorize it!

So what is the point you say?

ANSWER------------->While I can NOT confirm it...……..YET...……...it seems that 95% of these unmaskings, along with the inquiry that followed into these people, WERE PEOPLE WORKING ON THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY CANDIDATES CAMPAIGNS, not just Trumps-) Oh, my! Seems whomever was in control of this, had a plan for whomever won the nomination on the Republican side, now doesn't it! And it probably would have worked, if Admiral Rogers hadn't blown the whistle to the FISA court, which FORCED the cabal to LEGALLY get a FISA warrant, which it could NOT the 1st time around! And so, enter the dossier, and walla, they can now legally spy, even IF the evidence they used, was false!

Problem for them is----------->they had to SWEAR to the court that the evidence was vetted, and found to be true. They LIED!

And how do we know this?

Because Carter Paige is not only walking around, he has a MASSIVE suit against the Feds, which legal experts from both sides of the aisle claim he will WIN, so they will no doubt settle out of court with a gag order to be included.

Anyway, the point is--------------->it was NOT just Trump, it was all/most of the Republican candidates people being unmasked. Trump was just the winner, so it is focused on what happened to him. The Left says worse than Watergate!

Yes it was, and you will soon find out!
Cater Page already lost that suit. And refiled that same suit he already lost.

Chris Wallace sets record straight on Russia probe:
The Trump investigation did not start with the FISA warrant and Carter Page and even the dossier. It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on –– dirt on Hillary Clinton. That’s when the investigation started.


Then give us a recent link that shows this! That is all you have to do! Chris Wallace, showing what you said. It will be on YouTube.

If I don't hear back from you, I won't be surprised. But, unlike you, with the modicum of fairness, I will wait 24 hrs. Produce your evidence, or slink away!
The link I provided was from 3/30/19. Its recent enough, less than a month.
 
... the warrants were signed by fucking judges...
In our system EVERY warrant requires the entity requesting the warrant to swear an oath the information provided is accurate, trustworthy and complete. When you LIE to the Court, the spying that results is illegal. Lies are not suddenly laundered into truth because you tricked a Judge by lying to them and withholding information.
... Republican employees decided they saw probable cause to investigate...
The Party affiliation of the Biden/Obama Administration members that illegally spied on Trump is beside the point. You think a lie is suddenly "truth" if a Republican utters it? How Silly!
... secured warrants from Republican-appointed judges...
Who cares who appointed them? You can no more lie to a Judge selected by Roberts than you can a Judge selected by anyone else.
... Orwellian reframing of legal due process in an attempt to undermine the role of the judicial system in providing the critical oversight necessary to maintaining a free and just democracy....
Lying to the Court doesn't preserve a Free and Just Democracy. They lied because if they had told the truth, they wouldn't have gotten the warrants they wanted to exploit the vast spying capabilities we entrust to our Intelligence Community.
...Carter Page was under investigation since 2013. Why did Trump get involved with him.
Carter Page worked WITH the FBI in 2013. He was never convicted of any crimes, hell, he's never even been indicted, still hasn't! Next to Trump he's probably the cleanest guy in DC. A FISA warrant is renewed every 90 days. His 2013 assistance to the FBI had no bearing on his fitness to work in the Trump Campaign.

The Biden/Obama Administration wanted to spy on Trump, they knew Page and used him as pretext to throw a surveillance blanket over the campaign at a time when they believed Hillary would be elected and that no one would even find out the warrant had even been issued.


And also Zorro, is it not TRUE that---------------->the 1st FISA warrant they tried to obtain was denied! So in actuality, they were attempting to SPY on the Trump campaign earlier.

As far as UNLUCKYDUCKS assertions, 1/2 of them have been proven false! One of the most obvious is his linkage to the discussion had with Alexander Downer, where they BOTH have said that----------->what was claimed to be discussed, NEVER HAPPENED!

Maybe Quack-Quack should also address all of the unmaskings from the protected data-base, and the fact that 3 HIRED CONTRACTORS had access to that data base under the Obama Administration. Was one of the Fusion GPS? We will soon know, and that would explain a whole-helluva-lot! A large amount of the unmaskings were supposedly authorized by the UN Ambassador. She insists it wasn't her, and somebody must have used her name to authorize it!

So what is the point you say?

ANSWER------------->While I can NOT confirm it...……..YET...……...it seems that 95% of these unmaskings, along with the inquiry that followed into these people, WERE PEOPLE WORKING ON THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY CANDIDATES CAMPAIGNS, not just Trumps-) Oh, my! Seems whomever was in control of this, had a plan for whomever won the nomination on the Republican side, now doesn't it! And it probably would have worked, if Admiral Rogers hadn't blown the whistle to the FISA court, which FORCED the cabal to LEGALLY get a FISA warrant, which it could NOT the 1st time around! And so, enter the dossier, and walla, they can now legally spy, even IF the evidence they used, was false!

Problem for them is----------->they had to SWEAR to the court that the evidence was vetted, and found to be true. They LIED!

And how do we know this?

Because Carter Paige is not only walking around, he has a MASSIVE suit against the Feds, which legal experts from both sides of the aisle claim he will WIN, so they will no doubt settle out of court with a gag order to be included.

Anyway, the point is--------------->it was NOT just Trump, it was all/most of the Republican candidates people being unmasked. Trump was just the winner, so it is focused on what happened to him. The Left says worse than Watergate!

Yes it was, and you will soon find out!
Cater Page already lost that suit. And refiled that same suit he already lost.

Chris Wallace sets record straight on Russia probe:
The Trump investigation did not start with the FISA warrant and Carter Page and even the dossier. It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on –– dirt on Hillary Clinton. That’s when the investigation started.


Then give us a recent link that shows this! That is all you have to do! Chris Wallace, showing what you said. It will be on YouTube.

If I don't hear back from you, I won't be surprised. But, unlike you, with the modicum of fairness, I will wait 24 hrs. Produce your evidence, or slink away!
The link I provided was from 3/30/19. Its recent enough, less than a month.

Then I defer to you!
 
Not to perpetuate a conspiracy theory, but people who have information on the Clintons have all met with an untimely death [emoji88].


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
There is no coup.

Only resistance and subversion through legal means.

Trump could have saved himself a ton of trouble if he'd been honest, open and transparent re: Russia, tax returns, etc.

He could have, but he did not.

Why?

Because honesty, openness and transparency are foreign concepts to him.

So far, all that he has shown us is Big Talk and No Action - the guy breaks everything he touches.

Jesus-H-Tap-Dancing-Christ... I wish-to-hell he'd go back to scamming New Yorkers and leave the rest of us alone.
One more delusional idiot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top