Will the Electoral College screw up another election?

[Zincwarrior]

Trump got 7M votes in California. They were effectively disenfranchised. Biden got something like 3.5M votes in Texas. They were essentially disenfranchised.

Nobody can make a logical case for not giving the voters a voice in electing the president.

Frankly the Presidential vote is ideally suited for a national vote.

 

[OKTexas]

Trump got 7M votes in California. They were effectively disenfranchised. Biden got something like 3.5M votes in Texas. They were essentially disenfranchised.

Nobody can make a logical case for not giving the voters a voice in electing the president.

What kind of crap are you smoking? If you have a vote, you're not disenfranchised. It's concept so simple even you commies should be able to understand it.

.

 

[hadit]

No. They are arguing it no longer works because the population is no longer greatly tied to land size. Electorally voters in Rhode Island are far more important than voters in Texas.

When it comes to electing the president, that's how it's supposed to work. The popular vote elects everybody else, just not the president, by design. What's next, getting rid of the Senate because small states have as many Senators as big states?

Can anyone guess WHY democrats are not complaining about the Senate? Look no further than at who controls it.

 

[OKTexas]

Frankly the Presidential vote is ideally suited for a national vote.

See Article 5 USSC and see how far it gets. No way in hell would 3/4ths of the States vote for ratification.

.

 

[candycorn]

Frankly the Presidential vote is ideally suited for a national vote.

If you mean just count the votes and whomever gets more wins, I can’t agree. There would be no reason to ever campaign outside of a major city.

 

[Zincwarrior]

When it comes to electing the president, that's how it's supposed to work. The popular vote elects everybody else, just not the president, by design.

Electoral votes used to be that popular method, when population was equivalent to land size.

What's next, getting rid of the Senate because small states have as many Senators as big states?

Reducing it to a minimum one vote each potentially, but at least with Senate votes its a statewide plebescite.

Can anyone guess WHY democrats are not complaining about the Senate? Look no further than at who controls it.

They do.

 

[hadit]

If you mean just count the votes and whomever gets more wins, I can’t agree. There would be no reason to ever campaign outside of a major city.

We are in agreement.

 

[candycorn]

We are in agreement.

Good that you’re finally learning something.

 

[Rogue AI]

They are examples of what you call "mob rule"

Not really, they simply are not the same as the presidency.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Not really, they simply are not the same as the presidency.

So it is only mob rule when it deals with the POUTS....yeah...that makes a lot of sense....

 

[Rogue AI]

So it is only mob rule when it deals with the POUTS....yeah...that makes a lot of sense....

Learn reading comprehension. I certainly did not say that.

 

[JWBooth]

Since they haven’t the collective intellect to work within the 245 year old operating system, the leftard progs can solve their EC problem very easily by letting Texas secede.

 

[Nostra]

The Electoral College is a curse on American democracy! It must be terminated, which I'll never see in my lifetime - but it must be terminated. Presidential elections should be based on PEOPLE - not ACREAGE.

What do you think?

It's time to abolish the Electoral College​

5 Reasons to Abolish the Electoral College​

Outgrowing the Electoral College​

Why We Should Abolish the Electoral College​

Which election did the electoral college get wrong Lakhota ?