WOW: Judge Nap Drops BOMBSHELL on Fox News - Claims Trump Could Have Been Indicted

[caddo kid]

But Fox News ran this article & as we ALL KNOW, Fox News is Trump's favorite Sesame Street channel that refuses to play 'fake news'

You are wrong again caddo kid ...he has gone after Fox plenty of times. Nice try...try again though.

Trump will see this on his NON 'fake news' Fox News and Trump will get a shriveled ass hole

 

[Justin Richardson]

Trump will see this on his NON 'fake news' Fox News and Trump will get a shriveled ass hole

Well, come on...was that really the best you can come up with?

 

[harmonica]

another hahhahahhahhahaahahha thread
I could've been indicted for killing JFK/RFK/Lincoln/etc

 

[Jitss617]

Mueller report outlines Trump 'crimes,' but no obstruction conclusion because Barr wouldn't permit indictment: Judge Nap

Robert Mueller doesn’t want to testify, but will he succeed in heading off a subpoena?


Special Counsel Robert Mueller outlined several crimes in his report but didn't offer a conclusion on obstruction because his boss was unlikely to permit prosecution.

Judge Andrew Napolitano made those claims Thursday on "Special Report," adding he sees evidence President Trump allegedly broke the law.

"I think the reason Mueller did not come to a conclusion on obstruction of justice is not because the evidence wasn't there - it's there, there are ten crimes outlined," he claimed. "The reason is because he knew that the attorney general would never give him permission to [indict]."


AmeriKKKa is getting very strange. Way to call it Judge Nap.

Saying the president can’t talk about his options is retarted. That’s not obstruction. I know prosecutors can indict a ham sandwich.. but you are messing with the wrong man.

 

[Claudette]

Mueller report outlines Trump 'crimes,' but no obstruction conclusion because Barr wouldn't permit indictment: Judge Nap

Robert Mueller doesn’t want to testify, but will he succeed in heading off a subpoena?


Special Counsel Robert Mueller outlined several crimes in his report but didn't offer a conclusion on obstruction because his boss was unlikely to permit prosecution.

Judge Andrew Napolitano made those claims Thursday on "Special Report," adding he sees evidence President Trump allegedly broke the law.

"I think the reason Mueller did not come to a conclusion on obstruction of justice is not because the evidence wasn't there - it's there, there are ten crimes outlined," he claimed. "The reason is because he knew that the attorney general would never give him permission to [indict]."


AmeriKKKa is getting very strange. Way to call it Judge Nap.

Well he wasn't so Nap appears to be full of shit. Just like you.

 

[caddo kid]

Mueller report outlines Trump 'crimes,' but no obstruction conclusion because Barr wouldn't permit indictment: Judge Nap

Robert Mueller doesn’t want to testify, but will he succeed in heading off a subpoena?


Special Counsel Robert Mueller outlined several crimes in his report but didn't offer a conclusion on obstruction because his boss was unlikely to permit prosecution.

Judge Andrew Napolitano made those claims Thursday on "Special Report," adding he sees evidence President Trump allegedly broke the law.

"I think the reason Mueller did not come to a conclusion on obstruction of justice is not because the evidence wasn't there - it's there, there are ten crimes outlined," he claimed. "The reason is because he knew that the attorney general would never give him permission to [indict]."


AmeriKKKa is getting very strange. Way to call it Judge Nap.

Well he wasn't so Nap appears to be full of shit. Just like you.

Judge Napolitano talks Trump, Mueller statement

 

[caddo kid]

Mueller report outlines Trump 'crimes,' but no obstruction conclusion because Barr wouldn't permit indictment: Judge Nap

Robert Mueller doesn’t want to testify, but will he succeed in heading off a subpoena?


Special Counsel Robert Mueller outlined several crimes in his report but didn't offer a conclusion on obstruction because his boss was unlikely to permit prosecution.

Judge Andrew Napolitano made those claims Thursday on "Special Report," adding he sees evidence President Trump allegedly broke the law.

"I think the reason Mueller did not come to a conclusion on obstruction of justice is not because the evidence wasn't there - it's there, there are ten crimes outlined," he claimed. "The reason is because he knew that the attorney general would never give him permission to [indict]."


AmeriKKKa is getting very strange. Way to call it Judge Nap.

Saying the president can’t talk about his options is retarted. That’s not obstruction. I know prosecutors can indict a ham sandwich.. but you are messing with the wrong man.

obviously you did not read the report; you so stupid, not funny

 

[Deno]

Mueller report outlines Trump 'crimes,' but no obstruction conclusion because Barr wouldn't permit indictment: Judge Nap

Robert Mueller doesn’t want to testify, but will he succeed in heading off a subpoena?


Special Counsel Robert Mueller outlined several crimes in his report but didn't offer a conclusion on obstruction because his boss was unlikely to permit prosecution.

Judge Andrew Napolitano made those claims Thursday on "Special Report," adding he sees evidence President Trump allegedly broke the law.

"I think the reason Mueller did not come to a conclusion on obstruction of justice is not because the evidence wasn't there - it's there, there are ten crimes outlined," he claimed. "The reason is because he knew that the attorney general would never give him permission to [indict]."


AmeriKKKa is getting very strange. Way to call it Judge Nap.

WOW......

You Tards are so STUPID....

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Again, can we all agree that Nap's opinion on whether a president can be indicted is in complete contradiction to Mueller's opinion on same?

If we can all agree on the one, VERY OBVIOUS point, this entire discussion would be so fucking over.



.

 

[Jitss617]

Mueller report outlines Trump 'crimes,' but no obstruction conclusion because Barr wouldn't permit indictment: Judge Nap

Robert Mueller doesn’t want to testify, but will he succeed in heading off a subpoena?


Special Counsel Robert Mueller outlined several crimes in his report but didn't offer a conclusion on obstruction because his boss was unlikely to permit prosecution.

Judge Andrew Napolitano made those claims Thursday on "Special Report," adding he sees evidence President Trump allegedly broke the law.

"I think the reason Mueller did not come to a conclusion on obstruction of justice is not because the evidence wasn't there - it's there, there are ten crimes outlined," he claimed. "The reason is because he knew that the attorney general would never give him permission to [indict]."


AmeriKKKa is getting very strange. Way to call it Judge Nap.

Saying the president can’t talk about his options is retarted. That’s not obstruction. I know prosecutors can indict a ham sandwich.. but you are messing with the wrong man.

obviously you did not read the report; you so stupid, not funny

I did.. did you want to share some evidence?? Maybe present it to BARR.. please share

 

[caddo kid]

Mueller report outlines Trump 'crimes,' but no obstruction conclusion because Barr wouldn't permit indictment: Judge Nap

Robert Mueller doesn’t want to testify, but will he succeed in heading off a subpoena?


Special Counsel Robert Mueller outlined several crimes in his report but didn't offer a conclusion on obstruction because his boss was unlikely to permit prosecution.

Judge Andrew Napolitano made those claims Thursday on "Special Report," adding he sees evidence President Trump allegedly broke the law.

"I think the reason Mueller did not come to a conclusion on obstruction of justice is not because the evidence wasn't there - it's there, there are ten crimes outlined," he claimed. "The reason is because he knew that the attorney general would never give him permission to [indict]."


AmeriKKKa is getting very strange. Way to call it Judge Nap.

Saying the president can’t talk about his options is retarted. That’s not obstruction. I know prosecutors can indict a ham sandwich.. but you are messing with the wrong man.

obviously you did not read the report; you so stupid, not funny

I did.. did you want to share some evidence?? Maybe present it to BARR.. please share

LOFL ............. Barr is a Trump shill ..........

 

[Jitss617]

Mueller report outlines Trump 'crimes,' but no obstruction conclusion because Barr wouldn't permit indictment: Judge Nap

Robert Mueller doesn’t want to testify, but will he succeed in heading off a subpoena?


Special Counsel Robert Mueller outlined several crimes in his report but didn't offer a conclusion on obstruction because his boss was unlikely to permit prosecution.

Judge Andrew Napolitano made those claims Thursday on "Special Report," adding he sees evidence President Trump allegedly broke the law.

"I think the reason Mueller did not come to a conclusion on obstruction of justice is not because the evidence wasn't there - it's there, there are ten crimes outlined," he claimed. "The reason is because he knew that the attorney general would never give him permission to [indict]."


AmeriKKKa is getting very strange. Way to call it Judge Nap.

Saying the president can’t talk about his options is retarted. That’s not obstruction. I know prosecutors can indict a ham sandwich.. but you are messing with the wrong man.

obviously you did not read the report; you so stupid, not funny

I did.. did you want to share some evidence?? Maybe present it to BARR.. please share

LOFL ............. Barr is a Trump shill ..........

Well share here the exact law that was broken and what he did.. it might change our minds

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Mueller report outlines Trump 'crimes,' but no obstruction conclusion because Barr wouldn't permit indictment: Judge Nap

Robert Mueller doesn’t want to testify, but will he succeed in heading off a subpoena?


Special Counsel Robert Mueller outlined several crimes in his report but didn't offer a conclusion on obstruction because his boss was unlikely to permit prosecution.

Judge Andrew Napolitano made those claims Thursday on "Special Report," adding he sees evidence President Trump allegedly broke the law.

"I think the reason Mueller did not come to a conclusion on obstruction of justice is not because the evidence wasn't there - it's there, there are ten crimes outlined," he claimed. "The reason is because he knew that the attorney general would never give him permission to [indict]."


AmeriKKKa is getting very strange. Way to call it Judge Nap.

Saying the president can’t talk about his options is retarted. That’s not obstruction. I know prosecutors can indict a ham sandwich.. but you are messing with the wrong man.

obviously you did not read the report; you so stupid, not funny

I did.. did you want to share some evidence?? Maybe present it to BARR.. please share

LOFL ............. Barr is a Trump shill ..........

Maybe (likely)(okay, he sucks Trumps dong daily)

But, can we all agree that Nap's opinion on whether a sitting president can be indicted is in direct contradiction of the opinion held AND EXPRESSED by Mueller?

Can we do that?



.

 

[caddo kid]

Mueller report outlines Trump 'crimes,' but no obstruction conclusion because Barr wouldn't permit indictment: Judge Nap

Robert Mueller doesn’t want to testify, but will he succeed in heading off a subpoena?


Special Counsel Robert Mueller outlined several crimes in his report but didn't offer a conclusion on obstruction because his boss was unlikely to permit prosecution.

Judge Andrew Napolitano made those claims Thursday on "Special Report," adding he sees evidence President Trump allegedly broke the law.

"I think the reason Mueller did not come to a conclusion on obstruction of justice is not because the evidence wasn't there - it's there, there are ten crimes outlined," he claimed. "The reason is because he knew that the attorney general would never give him permission to [indict]."


AmeriKKKa is getting very strange. Way to call it Judge Nap.

Saying the president can’t talk about his options is retarted. That’s not obstruction. I know prosecutors can indict a ham sandwich.. but you are messing with the wrong man.

obviously you did not read the report; you so stupid, not funny

I did.. did you want to share some evidence?? Maybe present it to BARR.. please share

LOFL ............. Barr is a Trump shill ..........

Maybe (likely)(okay, he sucks Trumps dong daily)

But, can we all agree that Nap's opinion on whether a sitting president can be indicted is in direct contradiction of the opinion held AND EXPRESSED by Mueller?

Can we do that?



.

I thought Judge Nap laid out a pretty impressive argument on the video concerning the timing of the roll out of the current OLC 'opinion' and the prosecution of Clinton in 2000.

It sounded convincing. Did you see it?

 

[Dragonlady]

Sure. The Mule could get an indictment? BFD? No conviction possible on any flimsy charge they pick. Real Lawyers would get to defend DJT.

We watched Trump obstruct Justice daily via twitter and in discussions with the press - threatening Cohen’s family with prosecution, calling cooperating witnesses “rats”, lying and saying “no collusion”, paying off porn stars.

The conviction would be a slam dunk.

 

[22lcidw]

Sure. The Mule could get an indictment? BFD? No conviction possible on any flimsy charge they pick. Real Lawyers would get to defend DJT.

We watched Trump obstruct Justice daily via twitter and in discussions with the press - threatening Cohen’s family with prosecution, calling cooperating witnesses “rats”, lying and saying “no collusion”, paying off porn stars.

The conviction would be a slam dunk.

You are a Socialist/Commie. And nothing else. You represent about 20% of the population where you would elect Charlie Manson. You rarely turn on each other and follow the agendas given by the Pravda editors. Trump has no backing by that base. The rest of the voters have varying views from being Left Democrat to being Right Conservative. Again. Varying views. Its painful because you do not have them on your own. Its a free ride for your politicians unless they are given up as a crumb when they do wrong. For me. I do not listen to people who keep berating Trump. I can listen to a complaint because most normal people have them. But it still does not make it palatable. The Judge is over doing it now. So I don't listen to him anymore. Its simple for you. Everyone on Tv that you see tells you what to think. Even the dramas and comedies and talk shows are involved. Decades of this has infected your human values of right and wrong.

 

[caddo kid]

Sure. The Mule could get an indictment? BFD? No conviction possible on any flimsy charge they pick. Real Lawyers would get to defend DJT.

We watched Trump obstruct Justice daily via twitter and in discussions with the press - threatening Cohen’s family with prosecution, calling cooperating witnesses “rats”, lying and saying “no collusion”, paying off porn stars.

The conviction would be a slam dunk.

You are a Socialist/Commie. And nothing else. You represent about 20% of the population where you would elect Charlie Manson. You rarely turn on each other and follow the agendas given by the Pravda editors. Trump has no backing by that base. The rest of the voters have varying views from being Left Democrat to being Right Conservative. Again. Varying views. Its painful because you do not have them on your own. Its a free ride for your politicians unless they are given up as a crumb when they do wrong. For me. I do not listen to people who keep berating Trump. I can listen to a complaint because most normal people have them. But it still does not make it palatable. The Judge is over doing it now. So I don't listen to him anymore. Its simple for you. Everyone on Tv that you see tells you what to think. Even the dramas and comedies and talk shows are involved. Decades of this has infected your human values of right and wrong.

So, you used to listen to 'the judge' but now that Nap isn't playing the tune you wanna hear (kissing Trump's ass) then you stop listening. LOFL ............

 

[Crixus]

Mueller report outlines Trump 'crimes,' but no obstruction conclusion because Barr wouldn't permit indictment: Judge Nap

Robert Mueller doesn’t want to testify, but will he succeed in heading off a subpoena?


Special Counsel Robert Mueller outlined several crimes in his report but didn't offer a conclusion on obstruction because his boss was unlikely to permit prosecution.

Judge Andrew Napolitano made those claims Thursday on "Special Report," adding he sees evidence President Trump allegedly broke the law.

"I think the reason Mueller did not come to a conclusion on obstruction of justice is not because the evidence wasn't there - it's there, there are ten crimes outlined," he claimed. "The reason is because he knew that the attorney general would never give him permission to [indict]."


AmeriKKKa is getting very strange. Way to call it Judge Nap.

The same Judge “Nap” who asked Trump for a job and was told no? The good judge is wrong allot, and says what he is told to say for any given day. He is a 24/7 news hack like the rest. I don’t understand why just because he is on Foux news that he is some how credible.

 

[caddo kid]

Mueller report outlines Trump 'crimes,' but no obstruction conclusion because Barr wouldn't permit indictment: Judge Nap

Robert Mueller doesn’t want to testify, but will he succeed in heading off a subpoena?


Special Counsel Robert Mueller outlined several crimes in his report but didn't offer a conclusion on obstruction because his boss was unlikely to permit prosecution.

Judge Andrew Napolitano made those claims Thursday on "Special Report," adding he sees evidence President Trump allegedly broke the law.

"I think the reason Mueller did not come to a conclusion on obstruction of justice is not because the evidence wasn't there - it's there, there are ten crimes outlined," he claimed. "The reason is because he knew that the attorney general would never give him permission to [indict]."


AmeriKKKa is getting very strange. Way to call it Judge Nap.

The same Judge “Nap” who asked Trump for a job and was told no? The good judge is wrong allot, and says what he is told to say for any given day. He is a 24/7 news hack like the rest. I don’t understand why just because he is on Foux news that he is some how credible.

Trump claims Fox News is the 'only' source for 'real' news; not 'fake' news.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Benghazi ......... Benghazi ........ Benghazi .......... Benghazi ........ Benghazi ..........Benghazi ........... Benghazi ........ Benghazi........

Russia....... Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......Russia.......