Yeah, conservatives are probably right. We don't need an infrastructure bill...

No it's not. If we purchased it from foreigners it wasn't part of the nation, therefore it's impossible for it to have been infrastructure.

Put your paymaster on, I want to lodge a complaint about the low quality trolls they are hiring.

You do realize that at our founding we were barely above third world standing and deeply in debt
We were hardly in a position for infrastructure investment

But in 1803, Thomas Jefferson made the largest infrastructure investment in our history. The Louisiana Purchase

There was nothing in the Constitution authorizing him to do so.

Maybe he was making it pretty for the 'Statue of Invasion' that French whore who welcomed the whole world into our nation,right? Guess the torch is the closest thing to red light they had.lol, Meantime founders rolling over in their graves.


Crossing the Atlantic​

For its trans-Atlantic voyage aboard the frigate Isère, the Statue was reduced to 350 individual pieces and packed in 214 crates. The ship arrived in New York Harbor on June 17, 1885. While awaiting construction of its pedestal, the Statue remained in pieces on what was then called Bedloe’s Island. The pedestal was completed in April 1886 and finally, on October 28, 1886, President Grover Cleveland oversaw the dedication of the Statue of Liberty in front of thousands of spectators.
The story of the Statue of Liberty and her island has been one of change. For centuries the island was a major source of food for the Lenape native people and later Dutch settlers. In 1807, the U.S.

1643479093023.png
 
The Port and City of New Orleans is a lot of Infrastructure
The Mississippi is a major transportation venue
It wasn't infrastructure when we purchased it, it was foreign territory. You just keep digging yourself in deeper and deeper.

So you won't provide the information to your troll masters? Are you not proud of your work?
 
Democrats only proposed a giant pork bill that had less than 10% of its funds going for real infrastructure funding. Even left wingers say so. Just pointing out the obvious, as many already have.


This bill is a fraud. It does little to actually improve infrastructure, as well as increasing taxes on those who need the money while giving money to the rich elites who are already set for life. And President Biden cares more about the optics of bipartisanship than he does about actually working for the people who need their infrastructure improved significantly.

Absolutely correct, Liam.
 
Why didn’t Pennsylvania Republicans vote for needed Infrastructure funding?

It is obviously needed

There are literally thousands of unsafe bridged in our country
Republicans don’t care

lol as if Democrats do? If they did they would have proposed a real infrastructure bill instead of just another big welfare program for their cronies.
 
Why didn’t Pennsylvania Republicans vote for needed Infrastructure funding?

It is obviously needed

There are literally thousands of unsafe bridged in our country
Republicans don’t care

All the homeless are in democrat cities,along with all the looters burners rioters and killers.
 
Democrats only proposed a giant pork bill that had less than 10% of its funds going for real infrastructure funding. Even left wingers say so. Just pointing out the obvious, as many already have.


This bill is a fraud. It does little to actually improve infrastructure, as well as increasing taxes on those who need the money while giving money to the rich elites who are already set for life. And President Biden cares more about the optics of bipartisanship than he does about actually working for the people who need their infrastructure improved significantly.

Absolutely correct, Liam.
True.
 
" In times of national deviet ,telling the truth is a revolutionary act". Forgot the authur.
 
All the homeless are in democrat cities,along with all the looters burners rioters and killers.
Most major cities are run by Democrats
Appalachia and Mississippi are run by Republicans
 
I do believe that the republicans did want the infrastructure Bill, just not all the pork barrel spending
that went with it. I mean less than 1/2 of the 1.2 trillion went to actual infrastructure projects.
Okay and those are?
 
Democrats only proposed a giant pork bill that had less than 10% of its funds going for real infrastructure funding. Even left wingers say so. Just pointing out the obvious, as many already have.


This bill is a fraud. It does little to actually improve infrastructure, as well as increasing taxes on those who need the money while giving money to the rich elites who are already set for life. And President Biden cares more about the optics of bipartisanship than he does about actually working for the people who need their infrastructure improved significantly.

Absolutely correct, Liam.
No, left wingers don't.

What specifically are you calling pork?
 
Most major cities are run by Democrats
Appalachia and Mississippi are run by Republicans
Not always, now they are just trying to claw their way out of the crapola the dems put them in. Not to speak of the dems cartel support. Remember Fast and Furious? Wasn't that Obombs sending his delivery boy "Holder" to supply money and guns to the Cartels?
 
Yeah surely that bridge would have been repaired within weeks of signing a new bill righhhhhhhtttttttttt. Interstates would get attention first because they are racist.
No, projects will have to be approved and most republics are somewhat racist.
 
Not always, now they are just trying to claw their way out of the crapola the dems put them in. Not to speak of the dems cartel support. Remember Fast and Furious? Wasn't that Obombs sending his delivery boy "Holder" to supply money and guns to the Cartels?
Fuck, more conservaebonics on the internets.
 

Forum List

Back
Top